Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18622362 | CUSTOMIZING USER INTERFACES BASED ON USER FUNCTION COMPLETION | March 2024 | October 2024 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18483898 | TRIMMING VIDEO WITHIN A MESSAGING SYSTEM | October 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18228188 | MOBILE WORKFORCE WORKFLOW AUTOMATION DATA STRUCTURE | July 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18360227 | PAGE-BASED INTERACTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18222052 | PRINTING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD OF CONTROLLING PRINTING APPARATUS, METHOD OF CONTROLLING INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, PRINTING SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18211167 | CREATION OF REMINDERS USING ACTIVITY STATE OF AN APPLICATION | June 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18201804 | INTEGRATED BACKEND AND DYNAMIC INTERFACE SYSTEM FOR HANDLING MULTIPLE TRANSACTION CHANNELS ACROSS DIFFERENT DEVICES | May 2023 | April 2024 | Allow | 11 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18199327 | COORDINATION OF MESSAGE THREAD GROUPINGS ACROSS DEVICES OF A COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | May 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18198683 | METHOD FOR ACTIVATING A MOBILE DEVICE IN A NETWORK, AND ASSOCIATED DISPLAY DEVICE AND SYSTEM | May 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18130151 | CONTEXTUAL USER INTERFACE COMPONENT | April 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18127629 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERSONALIZING A USER INTERFACE OF A FUME HOOD MONITOR BASED ON THE IDENTIFY OF A DETECTED USER | March 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18125578 | Systems, Methods, and Media for Automatically Optimizing Maintenance | March 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18182994 | DATA PROCESSING DEVICE AND DATA PROCESSING METHOD FOR CHANGING SPLIT-SCREEN REGION SIZE | March 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18024912 | CARD INFORMATION DISPLAY METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE | March 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18117811 | PRESENTING ENTITY ACTIVITIES | March 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18145113 | Method for Browsing Application Folder and Electronic Device | December 2022 | May 2024 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18071574 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RULE-BASED COMPOSITION OF USER INTERFACES | November 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 18053176 | MODIFYING A DOCUMENT CONTENT SECTION OF A DOCUMENT OBJECT OF A GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE (GUI) | November 2022 | December 2023 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18048046 | UI CONTROL GENERATION AND TRIGGER METHODS, AND TERMINAL | October 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17792342 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | July 2022 | April 2024 | Abandon | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17811442 | Method for pointer-based user interaction in a CAE/CAD system | July 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17845981 | Voice-Based Virtual Area Navigation | June 2022 | June 2024 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17829309 | AUTOMATION OF PERMISSION CONTROLS FOR GROUP MESSAGES | May 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17726692 | VEHICLE, ADVICE PROVIDING APPARATUS AND METHOD | April 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17725330 | CURSOR TEXT REPRESENTATION OF USER IN A COLLABORATIVE PLATFORM | April 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 23 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17767964 | Personality-Based Intelligent Personal Assistant System | April 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17711397 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | April 2022 | August 2024 | Abandon | 28 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17708380 | GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE FOR NOTIFICATION ARRANGEMENT IN A NETWORKED COMPUTER SYSTEM | March 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 29 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17651253 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMIC USER INTERFACE EXPERIENCES | February 2022 | December 2023 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17586489 | TARGETING FUNCTIONALITY FOR INTEGRATING AN RPA BOT WITH AN APPLICATION | January 2022 | February 2024 | Allow | 24 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17523924 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM | November 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17494805 | ONLINE COLLABORATION PLATFORM | October 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 41 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17379174 | SLIDING IMAGE CONTAINER SWITCHING DISPLAY METHOD, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2021 | February 2024 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17375617 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING CREATION, VERIFICATION, AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL RESOURCES | July 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17226824 | REPOSITORY FOR QUICK RETRIEVAL OF OBJECT(S) OF A COMMUNICATION PLATFORM | April 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 39 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17204303 | Remote View Playback Tool | March 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 49 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17192430 | Continuous Improvement Tool | March 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 49 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17182052 | Automated Video-preroll Method and Device | February 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17167841 | CONTROLLED SHARING OF CONTENT DURING A COLLABORATION SESSION | February 2021 | November 2024 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17254705 | STABLE GRAPH LAYOUT DETERMINATION | December 2020 | February 2024 | Allow | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17051002 | VISUALIZATION OF BIOMEDICAL PREDICTIONS | October 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17070760 | SIDEBAR SEARCH PANE | October 2020 | April 2025 | Abandon | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17016351 | PAGE SWITCHING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2020 | August 2024 | Allow | 47 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16796578 | COMPUTER MESSAGING ANALYTICS SYSTEMS AND METHODS | February 2020 | July 2024 | Allow | 53 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16335979 | CREATING DEFAULT LAYOUT CONSTRAINTS FOR GRAPHICAL INTERFACES | March 2019 | May 2024 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15709074 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GEO-FENCED DYNAMIC DISSEMINATION | September 2017 | May 2019 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14531934 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES AND METHODS FOR A CALCULATOR USER INTERFACE | November 2014 | March 2019 | Allow | 52 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14080369 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING CUSTOMIZED VIEWING AND CONTROL OF FIELD DEVICES THROUGH CUSTOM GROUPS AND ACTIONS IN A PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM | November 2013 | March 2017 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14080443 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UNLOCKING MOBILE TERMINAL | November 2013 | October 2016 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13965612 | SETTING BREAKPOINTS IN A CODE DEBUGGER USED WITH A GUI OBJECT | August 2013 | October 2015 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13940464 | AUDIO PROCESSING DEVICE, AUDIO PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | July 2013 | July 2015 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner PARCHER, DANIEL W.
With a 75.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 60.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner PARCHER, DANIEL W works in Art Unit 2174 and has examined 50 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 84.0%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 26 months.
Examiner PARCHER, DANIEL W's allowance rate of 84.0% places them in the 53% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by PARCHER, DANIEL W receive 2.92 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 94% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PARCHER, DANIEL W is 26 months. This places the examiner in the 60% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +40.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PARCHER, DANIEL W. This interview benefit is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 28.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 11.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 33.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.