Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16793926 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ATTRIBUTING A SCROLL EVENT IN AN INFINITE SCROLL GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE | February 2020 | November 2024 | Allow | 57 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16001629 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECONCILING USER INTERACTIONS | June 2018 | December 2024 | Allow | 60 | 11 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12888007 | Electronic Device, Content Reproduction Method, and Program Therefor | September 2010 | June 2014 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 12510019 | Graphical User Interface Having Sound Effects For Operating Control Elements and Dragging Objects | July 2009 | January 2014 | Allow | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12127341 | USER MANUAL SUPPORTING METHOD AND APPARATUS USING ERROR PATTERN ANALYSIS | May 2008 | February 2012 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12127164 | EXPLICIT USE OF USER CONTEXT OBJECTS IN A VIRTUAL UNIVERSE | May 2008 | March 2014 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12013207 | INTERACTIVE VIDEO TOUR SYSTEM EDITOR | January 2008 | September 2011 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12013095 | FINGERPRINT LOCATION INDICATOR | January 2008 | February 2016 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11775097 | DRAGGABLE MECHANISM FOR IDENTIFYING AND COMMUNICATING THE STATE OF AN APPLICATION | July 2007 | August 2011 | Abandon | 50 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11774108 | Method, Apparatus and Computer Program Product for Providing Presentation of a Media Collection | July 2007 | July 2011 | Abandon | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11774110 | INTELLIGENT MUSIC TRACK SELECTION IN A NETWORKED ENVIRONMENT | July 2007 | January 2011 | Abandon | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11769170 | DISPLAY OF HIERARCHICAL DATA WITH NON-NUMERIC MEASURES | June 2007 | February 2011 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11716782 | Method and device for fast access to application in mobile communication terminal | March 2007 | March 2010 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11681427 | MULTIFUNCTION APPARATUS, SERVER, AND SERVER SYSTEM | March 2007 | November 2008 | Abandon | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11669501 | GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE USING PERCEPTION-ACTION ICONS AND A METHOD THEREOF | January 2007 | January 2011 | Abandon | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10560991 | Virtual desktop | December 2006 | December 2009 | Abandon | 48 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11379647 | INTEGRATED EXPERIENCE OF VOGUE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SHARED INTEGRATED ONLINE SOCIAL INTERACTION | April 2006 | December 2010 | Allow | 56 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11379389 | METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUPPLEMENTING STATIC CONTENTS | April 2006 | December 2009 | Abandon | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11374921 | Information processing apparatus and image display program product | March 2006 | October 2009 | Abandon | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11015088 | Flexible and extensible combination user interfaces | December 2004 | March 2010 | Abandon | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10949235 | Calendar channel | September 2004 | November 2009 | Abandon | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10945537 | RESPONSIVE USER INTERFACE TO MANAGE A NON-RESPONSIVE APPLICATION | September 2004 | August 2009 | Allow | 59 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10897176 | BROWSER BACK AND FORTH NAVIGATION | July 2004 | February 2009 | Allow | 54 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 10885157 | Problem solving support apparatus and program | July 2004 | June 2008 | Abandon | 47 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10765742 | Systems and methods for interfacing with computer devices | January 2004 | June 2009 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10757291 | METHOD, SYSTEM, SOFTWARE, AND SIGNAL FOR AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF MACRO COMMANDS | January 2004 | May 2008 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10730957 | Personalized desktop workspace icon organizer | December 2003 | March 2010 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10730647 | ELECTRONIC COMMERCE GUI FOR DISPLAYING TRADING PARTNERS | December 2003 | October 2010 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10663688 | MULTIFUNCATION APPARATUS HAVING AT LEAST A COPYING FUNCTION, SERVER, SERVER, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING MULTIFUNCTION APPARATUS. | September 2003 | January 2012 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 10664293 | Method and arrangement of user-modified variables in a presentation list | September 2003 | July 2009 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 10663590 | METHOD OF BALANCING DISPLAY PANEL COLOUR USE USING A SCREEN SAVER | September 2003 | November 2008 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 10663640 | Enhancements for manipulating two-dimensional windows within a three-dimensional display model | September 2003 | August 2009 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 10406188 | Synchronized processing of views and drawing tools in a multiple document interface application | April 2003 | July 2007 | Abandon | 51 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10406335 | Twice click method for processing data | April 2003 | February 2007 | Abandon | 47 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10406378 | Program creation by combining web services using graphic user interface controls | April 2003 | February 2008 | Abandon | 58 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 10340336 | Activity record maintenance and display tool | January 2003 | September 2005 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10335763 | Method and system to display, modify or substitute the contents of self-describing objects | January 2003 | July 2010 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 10335773 | Software tool for providing a demonstration screen | January 2003 | February 2007 | Abandon | 49 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10335591 | STREAMING ALGORITHM THAT POPULATES USER INFORMATION FROM DATABASE BASED ON SCROLLING ACTIVITY | December 2002 | April 2008 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10301179 | Portable terminal unit | November 2002 | July 2006 | Abandon | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10182591 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, MENU DISPLAYING METHOD AND PROGRAM STORING MEDIUM | October 2002 | January 2009 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 10283135 | Method and apparatus for assisting the reading of a document | October 2002 | March 2007 | Abandon | 52 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10282684 | System and method for designing storage area networks | October 2002 | August 2006 | Abandon | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10282581 | System and method for providing network access to devices using numeric input | October 2002 | August 2006 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 10232699 | Method and apparatus for controlling an electronic device via a menu displayed on a display screen of the electronic device | September 2002 | June 2009 | Abandon | 60 | 7 | 0 | No | No |
| 10232400 | Display system and display method that renders construction view of an object, and recording media thereof | September 2002 | December 2006 | Abandon | 51 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10201653 | Method for creating configurable and customizable web user interfaces | July 2002 | February 2009 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 09991416 | On-screen display area enabling media convergence useful for viewers and audio/visual programmers | November 2001 | March 2005 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09992773 | Enhanced user interface for a remote terminal | November 2001 | August 2006 | Abandon | 58 | 3 | 1 | No | No |
| 10045241 | Method of connecting people for social interaction | November 2001 | September 2005 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 09986378 | DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT UTILIZING A FILING APPLIANCE | November 2001 | May 2006 | Allow | 55 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 09942754 | Modifying only selected icons on an interactive display screen crowed with icons by rendering the non-selected icons unmodifiable | August 2001 | March 2005 | Abandon | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09942744 | METHOD, SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR ELECTRONIC MESSAGING MAIL LIST MANAGEMENT | August 2001 | February 2005 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 09942376 | System and method for managing graphical components | August 2001 | December 2004 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09870373 | METHOD OF GRAPHICALLY INDICATING PATIENT INFORMATION | May 2001 | March 2006 | Allow | 58 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 09855361 | Method and system for scaling a graphical user interface (GUI) widget based on selection pointer proximity | May 2001 | May 2004 | Abandon | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09855365 | Method and system for graphical user interface (GUI) widget having user-selectable mass | May 2001 | December 2004 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 09855099 | Computer assisted text input system | May 2001 | August 2006 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 09854577 | Method and apparatus for indexing, searching and displaying data | May 2001 | March 2005 | Abandon | 46 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 09853650 | GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE HAVING SOUND EFFECTS FOR OPERATING CONTROL ELEMENTS AND DRAGGING OBJECTS | May 2001 | March 2009 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 09854426 | Analysis mechanism for genetic data | May 2001 | December 2004 | Abandon | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 09854037 | Picture stack | May 2001 | April 2006 | Abandon | 59 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 09849653 | Editing system, editing method, clip management device, and clip management method | May 2001 | March 2010 | Abandon | 60 | 11 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 09849832 | EDITING SYSTEM, EDITING METHOD, CLIP MANAGEMENT DEVICE, AND CLIP MANAGEMENT METHOD | May 2001 | December 2006 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MUHEBBULLAH, SAJEDA.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 18.8% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner MUHEBBULLAH, SAJEDA works in Art Unit 2174 and has examined 64 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 29.7%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 52 months.
Examiner MUHEBBULLAH, SAJEDA's allowance rate of 29.7% places them in the 5% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MUHEBBULLAH, SAJEDA receive 3.22 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 88% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MUHEBBULLAH, SAJEDA is 52 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +40.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MUHEBBULLAH, SAJEDA. This interview benefit is in the 87% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 12.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 14.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 55% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 48% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 83.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 6.2% of allowed cases (in the 89% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.