USPTO Examiner LEE TING ZHOU - Art Unit 2173

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17138687Devices, Methods, and User Interfaces for Processing Touch EventsDecember 2020April 2023Allow2710YesNo
17018883METHOD FOR DISPLAYING INPUT METHOD INTERFACE OF IMPROVED ACCURACY OF INPUT, DEVICE, AND TERMINALSeptember 2020October 2022Allow2610NoNo
16997588CLOCK FACES FOR AN ELECTRONIC DEVICEAugust 2020September 2021Allow1320YesNo
16865893METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENTMay 2020February 2023Allow3310YesNo
16781905AUTO-SCROLL ON IN-CONTEXT MODULESFebruary 2020September 2022Allow3110YesNo
16693707Input Commands via Visual CuesNovember 2019April 2023Allow4110YesNo
16686695DYNAMIC CREDIT REPORT OBFUSCATIONNovember 2019September 2022Allow3400YesNo
16667318ACTIVATING A CAMERA FUNCTION WITHIN A CONTENT MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONOctober 2019June 2022Allow3210YesNo
16585399CLOCK FACES FOR AN ELECTRONIC DEVICESeptember 2019July 2020Allow1010YesNo
16578841PROCESSING ACTIONABLE NOTIFICATIONSSeptember 2019January 2022Allow2800YesNo
16460294APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING HAPTIC FEEDBACK TO INPUT UNITJuly 2019April 2022Allow3410NoNo
16425388SHARING A FILE WITH A SINGLE CONTACTMay 2019March 2022Allow3410YesNo
16416882Video Segments For a Video Related To a TaskMay 2019February 2022Allow3300YesNo
16417413SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING USER DEFINED VIRTUAL SPACEMay 2019October 2022Allow4120NoNo
16394008MANAGING CONTENT DISPLAYED ON A TOUCH SCREEN ENABLED DEVICEApril 2019May 2022Allow3620YesNo
16380000TECHNIQUES TO CONFIGURE THE NETWORK DISTRIBUTION OF MEDIA COMPOSITIONS FOR RECEPTIONApril 2019February 2022Allow3410YesNo
16278756CHARACTER INPUT DEVICE, CHARACTER INPUT METHOD, AND CHARACTER INPUT PROGRAMFebruary 2019March 2021Abandon2520NoNo
16257335INTERACTIVE PERSONALIZED GRAPHICAL FEEDBACK OVERLAYJanuary 2019December 2021Allow3520YesNo
16166389DYNAMIC CREDIT REPORT OBFUSCATIONOctober 2018August 2019Allow1000YesNo
16162319SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIA FOR MANAGING COLLABORATION ON A VIRTUAL WORK OF ARTOctober 2018October 2021Allow3620YesNo
16155499METHOD FOR EDITING DISPLAY INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOFOctober 2018April 2021Abandon3040YesNo
16155442ENHANCED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE SYSTEMOctober 2018November 2020Abandon2610NoNo
16152791SCREEN CONTROL METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOFOctober 2018November 2020Allow2520NoNo
16147523REMOTE USER INTERFACESeptember 2018August 2022Allow4650YesNo
16144396VIDEO MESSAGINGSeptember 2018April 2021Allow3020YesNo
15990723Input Device Enhanced InterfaceMay 2018June 2020Allow2510YesNo
15775631MOBILE TERMINAL AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFORMay 2018February 2021Allow3320NoNo
15916809Input Commands via Visual CuesMarch 2018July 2019Allow1610YesNo
15826258Displaying Information Related to Content Playing on a DeviceNovember 2017January 2020Allow2500YesNo
15817670USING DECOY ICONS TO PREVENT UNWANTED USER ACCESS TO APPLICATIONS ON A USER COMPUTING DEVICENovember 2017November 2019Allow2400YesNo
15801301ACTIVATING A CAMERA FUNCTION WITHIN A CONTENT MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONNovember 2017August 2019Allow2110YesNo
15799452USER INTERFACE METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND USER INTERFACE PROGRAM MEDIUMOctober 2017August 2021Allow4530NoNo
15676799AUTO-SCROLL ON IN-CONTEXT MODULESAugust 2017September 2019Allow2510YesNo
15639676MANAGING ELECTRONIC SLIDE DECKSJune 2017February 2020Allow3110NoNo
15635005OPTION EMPHASIZATION FOR CALL-TO-ACTION INTERFACESJune 2017October 2019Allow2710YesNo
15619225NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND TERMINAL DEVICEJune 2017September 2020Allow3920NoNo
15589541SMART CONTROLS FOR USER INTERFACE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATIONMay 2017October 2019Allow2910NoNo
15396288SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DIGITAL TELEVISION OPERATION AND CONTROL - CONNECTION INTERFACEDecember 2016September 2019Abandon3210NoNo
15280928METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENTSeptember 2016February 2020Allow4020YesNo
15218314CROWDSOURCING DESCRIPTOR SELECTIONJuly 2016October 2019Allow3920YesNo
15090006CONFIGURATION USER INTERFACE FOR A HOME AUTOMATION SYSTEMApril 2016August 2020Allow5340YesNo
15057610DEVICE, METHOD, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE FOR CONFIGURING AND IMPLEMENTING RESTRICTED INTERACTIONS FOR APPLICATIONSMarch 2016November 2018Allow3300YesNo
15055000Video Segments For a Video Related To a TaskFebruary 2016January 2019Allow3400YesNo
14995602METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DISPLAYING RESPONSEJanuary 2016October 2020Allow5740YesNo
14981816IDENTIFYING IMAGE COMMENTS FROM SIMILAR IMAGESDecember 2015March 2020Allow5130YesNo
14949765SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING USER DEFINED VIRTUAL SPACENovember 2015March 2019Allow4010YesNo
14943807TECHNIQUES TO CONFIGURE THE NETWORK DISTRIBUTION OF MEDIA COMPOSITIONS FOR RECEPTIONNovember 2015February 2019Allow3910YesNo
14925295BLOOD PURIFICATION DEVICE FEEDBACK METHODOctober 2015October 2019Abandon4920NoNo
14921673METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WORD PREDICTION SELECTIONOctober 2015December 2019Allow5040YesNo
14880839SHARING A FILE WITH A SINGLE CONTACTOctober 2015January 2019Allow4010YesNo
14880758SECURITY SYSTEM WITH GRAPHICAL ALARM NOTIFICATIONOctober 2015June 2019Allow4420YesNo
14875270AUTOMATIC INCREASING OF CAPACITY OF A VIRTUAL SPACE IN A VIRTUAL WORLDOctober 2015December 2018Allow3810NoNo
14778736USABILITY-CHECK-RESULT OUTPUT METHOD, DEVICE, AND PROGRAMSeptember 2015October 2018Abandon3710NoNo
14766312TERMINAL AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SAMEAugust 2015February 2018Allow3000YesNo
14766177MANAGING DEVICE, MANAGEMENT METHOD, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND PROGRAMAugust 2015September 2018Allow3710YesNo
14807199ENHANCED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE SYSTEMJuly 2015July 2018Allow3510YesNo
14805083ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DISPLAYING INTERFACE ACCORDING TO DETECTED TOUCH OPERATIONJuly 2015April 2018Abandon3310NoNo
14805403REMOTE USER INTERFACEJuly 2015July 2018Allow3610YesNo
14804787Using Audio Input and Output to Interact with Text-Based Interactive ContentJuly 2015May 2019Allow4630YesNo
14804150SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF VISUALIZING MULTIMEDIA CONTENTJuly 2015April 2019Allow4530YesNo
14793654Systems, Methods, and Computer-Readable Media for Managing Collaboration on a Virtual Work of ArtJuly 2015May 2018Allow3410YesNo
14741271VIDEO MESSAGINGJune 2015March 2018Abandon3320NoNo
14624505METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DISPLAYING INTERFACEFebruary 2015November 2015Allow900YesNo
14614708SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING THREE-DIMENSIONAL GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACEFebruary 2015March 2017Allow2500YesNo
14590065ELECTRONIC DEVICEJanuary 2015January 2018Allow3710NoNo
14579637MOBILE PLATFORM FUNCTIONALITIES EMPLOYING PROXIMAL VARIANTS AND ADVANCED PERSONALIZATION METHODS TO CONTROL DYNAMIC ICON DISPLAY ON A MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICE DISPLAY SCREENDecember 2014January 2018Abandon3710NoNo
14579710SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RECOMMENDING FOLLOW UP CONTENTDecember 2014January 2019Allow4930YesNo
14566149SELECTION DEVICEDecember 2014November 2017Abandon3510NoNo
14403685ELECTRONIC DEVICENovember 2014April 2017Allow2910YesNo
14548001CONFIGURATION INTERFACE FOR A PROGRAMMABLE MULTIMEDIA CONTROLLERNovember 2014December 2015Allow1320YesNo
14526573MANAGING CONTENT DISPLAYED ON A TOUCH SCREEN ENABLED DEVICEOctober 2014December 2018Allow5030YesNo
14527547SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTION OF TWO PARAMETERS VIA UI ELEMENTOctober 2014July 2018Allow4520YesNo
14395963MOBILE TERMINAL-BASED PHOTOGRAPH DELETION METHOD AND MOBILE TERMINALOctober 2014March 2018Allow4120NoNo
14520210ACTIVATING A CAMERA FUNCTION WITHIN A CONTENT MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONOctober 2014July 2017Allow3310YesNo
14503142System and Method for Displaying a Timeline Associated With a Plurality of ApplicationsSeptember 2014February 2016Allow1700YesNo
14493192Input Device Enhanced InterfaceSeptember 2014January 2018Allow4020YesNo
14481519PERSONAL LINEAR CHANNELSeptember 2014October 2019Abandon6060NoNo
14481854REGISTERING AND DISPLAYING VISUAL ATTENTION METADATA IN A WEB VIDEO CONFERENCING AND SEMINAR SYSTEMSeptember 2014March 2019Allow5450YesNo
14481512SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HOME AUTOMATION MONITORINGSeptember 2014November 2020Allow6080YesNo
14481586AUTO-SCROLL ON IN-CONTEXT MODULESSeptember 2014March 2017Allow3010YesNo
14481527Desktop Control in Online ConferencingSeptember 2014October 2017Abandon3820NoNo
14481821DIGITAL PERSONAL ASSISTANT REMOTE INVOCATIONSeptember 2014September 2019Abandon6050YesNo
14329704DEVICE, METHOD, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE FOR CONFIGURING RESTRICTED INTERACTION WITH A USER INTERFACEJuly 2014March 2017Allow3210YesNo
14312591INTERACTIVE PERSONALIZED GRAPHICAL FEEDBACK OVERLAYJune 2014October 2018Allow5230YesNo
14312384REMOTE CONTROL AND MODIFICATION OF LIVE PRESENTATIONJune 2014May 2018Allow4730YesNo
14311218Displaying Information Related to Content Playing on a DeviceJune 2014July 2017Allow3720YesNo
14311204Displaying Information Related to Spoken Dialogue in Content Playing on a DeviceJune 2014December 2017Allow4130YesNo
14297084METHOD FOR SCALE ADJUSTMENT OF TOUCH-BASED MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENTJune 2014October 2016Allow2800YesNo
14226703SELECTIVELY ADJUSTING DISPLAY PARAMETER OF AREAS WITHIN USER INTERFACEMarch 2014April 2017Allow3620YesNo
14226257SCREEN CONTROL METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOFMarch 2014April 2018Allow4940YesNo
14226607ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TRIGGERING EVENTS OF THE ELECTRONIC DEVICEMarch 2014November 2016Abandon3210NoNo
14204528INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUMMarch 2014December 2016Allow3320YesNo
14204912CENTRALIZED ADMINISTRATION TOOL FOR OPERATING WITH EXISTING HOST SYSTEM HAVING NON-CENTRALIZED ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONSMarch 2014October 2016Abandon3210NoNo
14193618METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PLAYING MEDIA SYNCHRONOUSLYFebruary 2014January 2017Allow3520YesNo
14193629APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING HAPTIC FEEDBACK TO INPUT UNITFebruary 2014March 2019Allow6060YesNo
14183395Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Configuring and Implementing Restricted Interactions for ApplicationsFebruary 2014November 2015Allow2100NoNo
14165360SOCIAL NETWORK SERVICE QUEUING USING SALIENCEJanuary 2014August 2017Abandon4220NoYes
14165278PROCESSING ACTIONABLE NOTIFICATIONSJanuary 2014June 2019Allow6070YesNo
14164767HANDEDNESS FOR HAND-HELD DEVICESJanuary 2014May 2019Allow6070YesNo
14154634IMAGE DISPLAY SYSTEM RELATED-INFORMATION-ACCESS TABSJanuary 2014August 2016Allow3120YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LEE, TING ZHOU.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
11
Examiner Affirmed
9
(81.8%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(18.2%)
Reversal Percentile
30.4%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 18.2% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
20
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(15.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
17
(85.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
18.9%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 15.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner LEE, TING ZHOU - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner LEE, TING ZHOU works in Art Unit 2173 and has examined 308 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 65.6%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner LEE, TING ZHOU's allowance rate of 65.6% places them in the 28% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by LEE, TING ZHOU receive 2.13 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 53% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LEE, TING ZHOU is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 24% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +56.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LEE, TING ZHOU. This interview benefit is in the 95% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 24.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 40% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 21.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 25.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 42.1% of appeals filed. This is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 37.5% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 25.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 11.0% of allowed cases (in the 95% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 1.0% of allowed cases (in the 63% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.