USPTO Examiner BHARGAVA ANIL K - Art Unit 2173

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17125744USER INTERFACES FOR RETRIEVING CONTEXTUALLY RELEVANT MEDIA CONTENTDecember 2020October 2021Allow1000NoNo
17103734Interaction Engine for Creating a Realistic Experience in Virtual Reality/Augmented Reality EnvironmentsNovember 2020September 2021Allow1000YesNo
17093219SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC ORCHESTRATION AND SCHEDULING OF TASK PROCESSINGNovember 2020January 2023Allow6010YesNo
16949360CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION IN CHATOctober 2020January 2022Allow1510NoNo
17076694USER INTERFACES FOR MANAGING SECURE OPERATIONSOctober 2020March 2023Allow2810YesNo
17073981INTUITIVE GUI FOR CREATING AND MANAGING HOSTS AND VIRTUAL MACHINESOctober 2020May 2022Allow1910YesNo
17069637INTELLIGENTLY SENSING DIGITAL USER CONTEXT TO GENERATE RECOMMENDATIONS ACROSS CLIENT DEVICE APPLICATIONSOctober 2020June 2022Allow2000NoNo
17064565Customizing Immersive Media Content with Embedded Discoverable ElementsOctober 2020September 2021Allow1200YesNo
17038050Method And Apparatus For Autonomous Services CompositionSeptember 2020September 2021Allow1100YesNo
17035456SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REMOTE HUDDLE COLLABORATIONSeptember 2020October 2021Allow1300YesNo
17007469APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DISPLAYING NOTIFICATION IN ELECTRONIC DEVICEAugust 2020November 2021Allow1420NoNo
17002027Managing Touch Inputs based on Device MovementAugust 2020May 2022Abandon2110NoNo
16997081CENTRALIZED APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE MONITORING TOOLAugust 2020March 2022Allow1810YesNo
16995209GRAPHICAL QUERY BUILDER FOR MULTI-MODAL SEARCHAugust 2020August 2021Allow1210NoNo
16991940FILE MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, FILE MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND FILE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMAugust 2020July 2022Allow2310YesNo
16966756ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR EXECUTING RECOMMENDED APPLICATION AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOFJuly 2020July 2022Allow2430NoNo
16931976SYSTEM AND USER INTERFACES FOR RAPID ANALYSIS OF VIEWERSHIP INFORMATIONJuly 2020May 2021Allow1010YesNo
16961165IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHODJuly 2020December 2021Allow1810NoNo
16910843SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC ALLOCATION OF NAVIGATION TOOLS BASED ON LEARNED USER INTERACTIONJune 2020December 2023Allow4240YesNo
16899932Integrated Mobile DeviceJune 2020February 2023Abandon3210NoNo
16899778ASSOCIATING EXECUTABLE ACTIONS WITH WORK STEPS IN WORK PLANS GENERATED WHEN CREATING WORK ORDERSJune 2020August 2021Allow1400NoNo
16894199OPINION AGGREGATION SYSTEMJune 2020August 2022Allow2610YesNo
16882442TWO-PART MESSAGING WITH SPECIFIED DELAYMay 2020June 2022Allow2500YesNo
16880058GENERATING WORK PLANS WHICH INCLUDE WORK STEPS WHEN CREATING NEW WORK ORDERSMay 2020August 2021Allow1500NoNo
16877449All-in-One Machine and Method and Computer Memory Medium for Realizing Quick Touch in All Channels ThereofMay 2020June 2022Allow2510YesNo
16822900SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXPEDITED ACCESS TO APPLICATIONSMarch 2020May 2022Allow2610NoNo
16812573AGENT CONSOLE FOR FACILITATING CHAT INTERACTIONS WITH CUSTOMERSMarch 2020May 2022Allow2600YesNo
16796645SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUGMENTED REALITY GUIDANCEFebruary 2020January 2023Allow3510YesNo
16794082PERSISTENT MEDIA PLAYBACKFebruary 2020July 2021Allow1710NoNo
16721629DYNAMIC ANOMALY REPORTINGDecember 2019April 2022Allow2810YesNo
16715422SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO AVOID COLLISIONS IN ESTABLISHING REAL-TIME COMMUNICATION CONNECTIONSDecember 2019November 2021Allow2320NoNo
16670420PROVIDING COLOR MANIPULATION TOOLS DYNAMICALLY CUSTOMIZED BASED ON IMAGE CONTENTOctober 2019January 2022Allow2700YesNo
16500309MENU DISPLAY METHOD, MENU DISPLAY DEVICE, AND MENU DISPLAY PROGRAMOctober 2019April 2022Allow3110YesNo
16496709A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING USER ACCOUNTS THROUGH WHICH USERS ARE ABLE TO OPERATE COMPUTING DEVICESSeptember 2019October 2022Allow3720YesNo
16510968WEB PAGE VIEW CUSTOMIZATIONJuly 2019September 2021Allow2640YesNo
16506583MECHANISM TO PROVIDE VISUAL FEEDBACK REGARDING COMPUTING SYSTEM COMMAND GESTURESJuly 2019February 2022Allow3130YesNo
16475961BIOLOGICAL SYSTEM INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOFJuly 2019December 2021Allow2920YesNo
16454675INTERACTIVE DIMENSIONAL HIERARCHY DEVELOPMENTJune 2019April 2022Allow3420YesNo
16432203CONTEXTUAL MODELING USING APPLICATION METADATAJune 2019June 2022Allow3630NoNo
16426636MAINTAINING ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS SESSION CONTINUITY DURING SESSION INACTIVITYMay 2019February 2022Allow3310YesNo
16423576MEDICAL IMAGE PROVIDING APPARATUS AND MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD OF THE SAMEMay 2019June 2021Allow2510NoNo
16395621IRRIGATION SYSTEM MAP INTEGRATIONApril 2019July 2021Allow2730YesNo
16354436METHOD, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING HOME DEVICEMarch 2019July 2022Abandon4070YesNo
16323124INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODFebruary 2019October 2021Allow3230NoNo
16264516INTERFACE FOR DATA VISUALIZATIONS ON A WEARABLE DEVICEJanuary 2019May 2022Allow6040YesNo
16134270METHOD AND SYSTEM OF INTELLIGENT NUMERIC CATEGORIZATION OF NOISY DATASeptember 2018July 2021Allow3430YesNo
15995119Distributed Computing System with a Synthetic Data as a Service Feedback Loop EngineMay 2018November 2021Allow4210YesNo
15941815AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF TRAINING DATA FOR SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNINGMarch 2018November 2021Allow4310YesNo
15367594INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODDecember 2016August 2021Allow5780YesNo
14920182NUMERICAL CONTROL SYSTEM FOR MACHINE TOOLOctober 2015September 2021Allow6040YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner BHARGAVA, ANIL K - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BHARGAVA, ANIL K works in Art Unit 2173 and has examined 50 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 94.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 26 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BHARGAVA, ANIL K's allowance rate of 94.0% places them in the 82% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BHARGAVA, ANIL K receive 1.62 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 29% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BHARGAVA, ANIL K is 26 months. This places the examiner in the 74% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +8.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BHARGAVA, ANIL K. This interview benefit is in the 40% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 30.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 21.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 133.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.