Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19039370 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AGENTS FOR USER INTERFACE AUTOMATION TO APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE AUTOMATION AND VICE VERSA | January 2025 | May 2025 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18957737 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A COMMAND QUEUE AS A FUNCTION OF SENSOR DATA OF A TRANSPORTATION DEVICE | November 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18954074 | SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING CHECKLISTS TO A PILOT | November 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18623229 | DIGITAL MODEL BASED PLANT OPERATION AND OPTIMIZATION | April 2024 | November 2024 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18622895 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MAINTAINING AN EVENT LISTING USING VOICE CONTROL | March 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18609364 | Systems and Methods for Communicating Notifications and Textual Data Associated with Applications | March 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18441454 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CROSS DOMAIN SERVICE COMPONENT INTERACTION | February 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18428927 | MECHANISM TO PROVIDE VISUAL FEEDBACK REGARDING COMPUTING SYSTEM COMMAND GESTURES | January 2024 | June 2025 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18420598 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION | January 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18538359 | PROVIDING RELEVANT DATA ITEMS BASED ON CONTEXT | December 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18526089 | USER-SPECIFIC MEDIA PLAYLISTS | December 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18511339 | TABLE DATA DISPLAY METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18507429 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DISPLAYING NOTIFICATION IN ELECTRONIC DEVICE | November 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18448416 | VIDEO CONFERENCE APPARATUS, VIDEO CONFERENCE METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM USING A SPATIAL VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENT | August 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18365056 | INPUT METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | August 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18348859 | POSITION MARKING METHOD, APPARATUS, AND DEVICE IN VIRTUAL SCENE, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT | July 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18342391 | FUEL DISPENSER REMOTE CONTENT PROVISION | June 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18339275 | EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF DOCUMENT CHANGES | June 2023 | April 2025 | Abandon | 22 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18140349 | IRRIGATION SYSTEM MAP INTEGRATION | April 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18250451 | SMART INTERACTIVE BOARD, DISPLAY METHOD THEREFOR, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | April 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18300243 | DISPLAY OF A PLURALITY OF FILES FROM MULTIPLE DEVICES | April 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18162873 | CUSTOMIZED ELECTRICAL VEHICLE RANGE ESTIMATION SYSTEM BASED ON LOCATION AND DRIVER | February 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18077158 | PROVIDING A UI INPUT GENERATION INTERFACE FOR DRAFTING TEXT DESCRIPTIONS USED BY AN AI IMAGE GENERATION MODEL | December 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 24 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18000147 | CLOUD-OFFLOADED GNSS POSITIONING METHOD | November 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17978109 | ROUTE DISPLAY METHOD AND RELATED APPARATUS | October 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17962112 | Highlighting Icons for Search Results | October 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17910942 | MAP GENERATION METHOD AND MAP GENERATION DEVICE | September 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17908534 | MANAGEMENT DEVICE, MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM | September 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17823811 | INTELLIGENTLY GENERATING CLIENT DEVICE APPLICATION RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON DYNAMIC DIGITAL USER CONTEXT STATES | August 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17891952 | MAP ANNOTATION MODIFICATION USING SPARSE POSE GRAPH NODE UPDATES | August 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17890573 | DETERMINING VEHICLE TURN DIFFICULTY USING OVERHEAD IMAGES | August 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17818140 | DYNAMIC ANOMALY REPORTING | August 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17880538 | AUTOMATIC PREDICTION OF VISITATIONS TO SPECIFIED POINTS OF INTEREST | August 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17877625 | VEHICULAR POSITIONING METHOD AND SYSTEM | July 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17869561 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING MAP MATCHED LOCATIONS ON A CLIENT DEVICE | July 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17864580 | METHOD FOR CONTROL ASSISTANCE OF A VEHICLE | July 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17811136 | REMOTE DRIVING SERVER, REMOTE DRIVING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17689819 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REMOTE HUDDLE COLLABORATION | March 2022 | December 2023 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17689015 | INTERFACE SCREENS FOR USE WITH STRAIGHT THROUGH PROCESSING ("STP") | March 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17606576 | DISPLAY RENDERING METHOD AND SYSTEM | October 2021 | June 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17449107 | DYNAMIC TYPEAHEAD SUGGESTIONS FOR A TEXT INPUT | September 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17363297 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTERIOR DESIGN SYSTEM | June 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 45 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14944061 | ADAPTIVE, AUTOMATICALLY-RECONFIGURABLE, VEHICLE INSTRUMENT DISPLAY | November 2015 | June 2016 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14682460 | DYNAMIC CHARACTER BIOGRAPHIES | April 2015 | March 2017 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14391918 | Method for Operating an Automatic Cleaning Machine | October 2014 | December 2016 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14456703 | INITIATION OF ACTIONS BY A PORTABLE COMPUTING DEVICE FROM A LOCKED STATE | August 2014 | February 2017 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14337271 | Dynamic Array Presentation and Multiple Selection of Digitally Stored Objects and Corresponding Link Tokens for Simultaneous Presentation | July 2014 | April 2015 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13151961 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | June 2011 | January 2015 | Allow | 44 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12828248 | WORKSPACE CREATION AND MANAGEMENT FOR A COMPUTING DESKTOP | June 2010 | April 2016 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 12522821 | PORTABLE COMMUNICATION TERMINAL, BROWSING METHOD, AND BROWSING PROGRAM | July 2009 | December 2014 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12428975 | SETTING USER-PREFERENCE INFORMATION ON THE CONFERENCE BRIDGE | April 2009 | May 2014 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12361725 | MOBILE TERMINAL AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | January 2009 | January 2013 | Allow | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12326526 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM | December 2008 | August 2013 | Allow | 56 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 12324780 | HIERARCHICAL TAG BASED BROWSING OF MEDIA COLLECTIONS | November 2008 | June 2013 | Allow | 54 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12212266 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD OF INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2008 | March 2012 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12081627 | Systems and methods for field data collection | April 2008 | January 2014 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12017016 | VIRTUAL WORLD INTEGRATION WITH A COLLABORATIVE APPLICATION | January 2008 | February 2016 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BHARGAVA, ANIL K.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner BHARGAVA, ANIL K works in Art Unit 2172 and has examined 48 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 95.8%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.
Examiner BHARGAVA, ANIL K's allowance rate of 95.8% places them in the 88% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by BHARGAVA, ANIL K receive 1.98 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 64% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BHARGAVA, ANIL K is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 55% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +8.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BHARGAVA, ANIL K. This interview benefit is in the 42% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 38.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 26.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 33.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.