Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18957773 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING A MODIFIED GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE USING AN OPTIMIZATION PROTOCOL | November 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18778317 | METHOD, APPARATUS, TERMINAL DEVICE AND MEDIUM FOR OBJECT PROCESSING | July 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18432752 | USER INTERFACE DISPLAY METHOD AND APPARATUS THEREFOR | February 2024 | August 2024 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18430806 | Finger Orientation Touch Detection | February 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18456442 | USER INTERFACES FOR MESSAGES | August 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18451610 | SCREEN RECORDING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | August 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18362785 | ACTIVE AGREEMENT COMPONENTS | July 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18357907 | APPLICATION DATA DISPLAYED THROUGH A SELECTABLE APPLICATION ICON | July 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18347374 | ENCODING/DECODING USER INTERFACE INTERACTIONS | July 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18216741 | AUTOMATED CONTENT CREATION AND CONTENT SERVICES FOR COLLABORATION PLATFORMS | June 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18341221 | INTERACTIVE FORM EDITOR WITH CONCURRENT AUTOMATIC CREATION OF SCHEMA FILES | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 24 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18340701 | GAZE-INITIATED COMMUNICATIONS | June 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18336692 | MANAGEMENT OF USER INTERFACE ELEMENTS BASED ON HISTORICAL CONFIGURATION DATA | June 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18204888 | USER INTERFACES FOR MANAGING ACCESSORIES | June 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18326723 | ARRANGING WORKBOOK ELEMENTS USING A DYNAMIC GRID LAYOUT | May 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18319939 | USER INTERFACES FOR CONTENT APPLICATIONS | May 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18311713 | MODIFYING DIGITAL IMAGES USING COMBINATIONS OF DIRECT INTERACTIONS WITH THE DIGITAL IMAGES AND CONTEXT-INFORMING SPEECH INPUT | May 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18296246 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DECOUPLING USER INPUT USING CONTEXT | April 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18116654 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR DISPLAYING PLURALITY OF APPLICATION EXECUTION SCREENS, AND METHOD RELATED THERETO | March 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 18 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18150001 | AUTOMATED IMAGE PROCESSING AND INSIGHT PRESENTATION | January 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18091725 | COMPUTER PROGRAM, METHOD, AND SERVER DEVICE | December 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18090270 | Electronic Devices with Translating Flexible Displays and Corresponding Methods for Managing Display Position as a Function Content Presentation | December 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17962485 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INTERFACE CONTROL WITH PROMPT AND FEEDBACK | October 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17937777 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ALTERNATE CHANNEL COMMUNICATION INITIATED THROUGH A COMMON MESSAGE THREAD | October 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17883877 | INTERACTION INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | August 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 26 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17884310 | USER GUIDANCE FROM GAZE INFORMATION DURING A COMMUNICATION SESSION WHILE VIEWING A WEBPAGE | August 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17869402 | MULTI-CRITERIA OPTION COMPARISON TOOL | July 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17756818 | REPEAT SECTION IN CHECKLIST BUILDER AND METHOD OF USING | June 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17729808 | GESTURE-BASED KEYBOARD TEXT ENTRY | April 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17718749 | SURGICAL PLANNING GUIDANCE AND LEARNING | April 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17602260 | METHOD, DEVICE, TERMINAL EQUIPMENT AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FOR SYNCHRONOUS DISPLAY OF VIDEO INFORMATION | October 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17405444 | COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | August 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17360806 | Web-Based Data Upload and Visualization Platform Enabling Creation of Code-Free Exploration of MS-Based Omics Data | June 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17180812 | AIR eCommerce | February 2021 | October 2023 | Abandon | 31 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17156642 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM | January 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16522031 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CREATING COMBINED MEDIA AND USER-DEFINED AUDIO SELECTION | July 2019 | July 2020 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16155633 | TIME-BASED METADATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR DIGITAL MEDIA | October 2018 | September 2024 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16132348 | GENERATING COMPONENT PAGES TO RENDER IN A CONFIGURATION PAGE IN A GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE TO CONFIGURE A COMPUTING RESOURCE | September 2018 | November 2019 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16033797 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DISPLAYING CONTENTS | July 2018 | May 2020 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16033621 | COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS | July 2018 | September 2019 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16033807 | DISPLAY CONTROL DEVICE AND DISPLAY CONTROL METHOD | July 2018 | September 2019 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15241017 | SELECTING APPLICATION THAT CAN HANDLE DATA CONTENT | August 2016 | October 2019 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14925853 | GENERATING COMPONENT PAGES TO RENDER IN A CONFIGURATION PAGE IN A GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE TO CONFIGURE A COMPUTING RESOURCE | October 2015 | July 2018 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14769319 | ENGINEERING TOOL PROVIDING HUMAN INTERFACE AMONG PLURALITY OF HUMAN INTERFACES ACCORDING TO USER SKILL LEVEL | August 2015 | December 2016 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14495671 | TAGGED BROWSING HISTORY INTERFACE | September 2014 | May 2017 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14469729 | ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DURING INTERACTIVE COMPUTER USE | August 2014 | July 2017 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13462532 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HYPERLINK LIST NAVIGATION | May 2012 | August 2018 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13051942 | CARD STACK NAVIGATION | March 2011 | May 2017 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12410617 | CONTROL DEVICE FOR A MEDICAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM WITH AN INTEGRATED WEB BROWSER THAT AUTOMATICALLY SUPPLEMENTS QUERIES | March 2009 | February 2012 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12348363 | MANAGEMENT OF VIRTUAL DISCUSSION THREADS IN A SYNCHRONOUS CONFERENCING SYSTEM | January 2009 | December 2011 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11951002 | RETURNING PASSED OBJECTS IN A SURFACE BASED COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT USING A VIRTUAL BUNGEE | December 2007 | November 2011 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BELOUSOV, ANDREY.
With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner BELOUSOV, ANDREY works in Art Unit 2172 and has examined 47 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 91.5%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 24 months.
Examiner BELOUSOV, ANDREY's allowance rate of 91.5% places them in the 75% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by BELOUSOV, ANDREY receive 2.19 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 74% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BELOUSOV, ANDREY is 24 months. This places the examiner in the 70% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +18.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BELOUSOV, ANDREY. This interview benefit is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 33.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 21.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 20.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.