Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18585668 | Academic Editing Engine(s) For Attribution And Revision Of Scholarly Authoring | February 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18538338 | IDENTIFYING OCCLUDED AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTS FOR AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS | December 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18471056 | 3D PAINTING ON AN EYEWEAR DEVICE | September 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18130081 | DASHBOARD WITH RELATIONSHIP GRAPHING | April 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18097718 | DRONE-ASSISTED VEHICLE EMERGENCY RESPONSE SYSTEM | January 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18014528 | METHOD AND CONTROLLER FOR CONTROLLING A MOTOR VEHICLE | January 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18092129 | ISSUE TRACKING SYSTEM HAVING A VIRTUAL MEETING SYSTEM FOR FACILITATING A VIRTUAL MEETING IN A THREE-DIMENSIONAL VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT | December 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18084982 | VEHICLE LIGHTING CONTROL DEVICE | December 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18007597 | DYNAMIC LIFT-OFF CONTROL DEVICE, AND CRANE | December 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17958177 | METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR HAND GESTURE-BASED CONTROL OF SELECTION FOCUS | September 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17862381 | CURSOR CONTROL METHOD AND CURSOR CONTROL DEVICE WHICH CAN IMPROVE CURSOR MOVEMENT RANGE AND ACCURACY | July 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17858995 | OPERATIONAL SYSTEM, OPERATIONAL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17734620 | LANE EDGE EXTRACTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AUTONOMOUS DRIVING SYSTEM, VEHICLE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | May 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17763638 | METHOD FOR GENERATING DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF AREA AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOF | March 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17656029 | Dynamic Change of Map Origin | March 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17700038 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UPDATING A MAP ACCORDING TO FEATURE LOCATIONS | March 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17689460 | Proactive Actions Based on Audio and Body Movement | March 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17584281 | USER INTERFACES FOR INDICATING AND/OR CONTROLLING CONTENT ITEM PLAYBACK FORMATS | January 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 50 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17549708 | OVERLAYING AN IMAGE OF A CONFERENCE CALL PARTICIPANT WITH A SHARED DOCUMENT | December 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17518421 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANNOTATION OF ANATOMICAL TREE STRUCTURES IN 3D IMAGES | November 2021 | August 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17492530 | CONTEXT-BASED USER STATUS INDICATOR SELECTION | October 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17398583 | INTERNET OF THINGS CONFIGURATION USING EYE-BASED CONTROLS | August 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 50 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17334433 | SMALL-SCREEN WINDOW DISPLAY METHOD, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | May 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 47 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16731965 | DECISION INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM AND METHOD | December 2019 | May 2025 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16568022 | INTERACTION STRENGTH USING VIRTUAL OBJECTS FOR MACHINE CONTROL | September 2019 | January 2026 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15395796 | MACRO/MICRO CONTROL USER INTERFACE ELEMENT | December 2016 | March 2020 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14518952 | MOBILE TERMINAL AND CONTROLLING METHOD THEREOF | October 2014 | September 2019 | Allow | 59 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14465901 | GROUPWARE MANAGEMENT | August 2014 | November 2019 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner AYAD, MARIA S works in Art Unit 2172 and has examined 10 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 60.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 50 months.
Examiner AYAD, MARIA S's allowance rate of 60.0% places them in the 20% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by AYAD, MARIA S receive 5.20 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 100% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by AYAD, MARIA S is 50 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -50.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by AYAD, MARIA S. This interview benefit is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 10.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 16.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 18% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 33.3% of allowed cases (in the 96% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.