Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18160477 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONSOLIDATION AND AUTOMATED DISTRIBUTION OF INFORMATION | July 2024 | February 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18609996 | TEMPORARILY HIDING USER INTERFACE ELEMENTS | March 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18396053 | PROMPT METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON DOCUMENT SHARING, DEVICE, AND MEDIUM | December 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 17 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18479618 | IMAGE PATTERN MATCHING TO ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATIONS | October 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18240342 | USER INTERFACE FOR MANAGING RETARGETING OF DASHBOARD CONTENT | August 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18214559 | Controllable Diffusion Model based Image Gallery Recommendation Service | June 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18210453 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERACTING WITH COMPUTING DEVICE | June 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18322581 | VISUAL ASSIST CHATBOT FOR IMPROVED ACCESSIBILITY OF CONTENT BY A VISUALLY IMPAIRED USER | May 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18303180 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING DISPLAY MAGNIFICATION FUNCTION, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE OPERATION METHOD | April 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18295938 | Method and System for Displaying a Cursor on a Trading Screen | April 2023 | July 2024 | Abandon | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18123350 | REDIRECTING APPLICATIONS BETWEEN REMOTE DESKTOPS | March 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18110523 | DYNAMIC MODIFICATIONS OF DISPLAYED PAGES TO INTRODUCE NEW WIDGETS | February 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18100539 | Updating Available Features Based on Server Compatibility | January 2023 | December 2023 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18092299 | INTELLIGENT KNOWLEDGE GRAPH TO FACILITATE USER INPUT INTO GUI FORMS | December 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17991943 | METHOD FOR GENERATING MULTIMEDIA DATA ASSOCIATED WITH A SYSTEM FOR PRACTICING SPORTS | November 2022 | October 2024 | Abandon | 22 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17977993 | WINDOW ARRANGEMENT METHOD AND WINDOW ARRANGEMENT SYSTEM | October 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17916259 | SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING INTERACTIVE PARTICIPATION-TYPE DRAWING MAKING SERVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME | September 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17820657 | JOINT EMBEDDING CONTENT NEURAL NETWORKS | August 2022 | May 2024 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17867588 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ADJUSTING PERSPECTIVE OF DIRECTION INDICATOR, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | July 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17855235 | WINDOW ARRANGEMENTS USING TABBED USER INTERFACE ELEMENTS | June 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17752986 | APPLICATION SHARING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | May 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17674092 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTERACTIVE EXPERIENCES AND CONTROLLERS THEREFOR | February 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17671020 | METHOD FOR CONNECTING MOBILE TERMINAL AND EXTERNAL DISPLAY AND APPARATUS IMPLEMENTING THE SAME | February 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 37 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17634519 | PROVIDING ASSISTIVE USER INTERFACES USING EXECUTION BLOCKS | February 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17550095 | SCREEN CAPTURE HINT AND AUTOMATED SCREEN CAPTURE | December 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 40 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17548141 | GENERATING ARTWORK TUTORIALS | December 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17546630 | TECHNIQUES FOR MANAGING DISPLAY USAGE | December 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17530279 | SCROLL-BASED AUTOMATIC FIELD COMPLETION | November 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17496273 | DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT FOR GENERATION OF AUTOMATED CONTROL PATHWAYS | October 2021 | May 2024 | Allow | 31 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17493274 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERFACE DISPLAY SCREEN MANIPULATION | October 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 42 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17365170 | User Interface with Configurable Specification of Related Data Sources | July 2021 | August 2024 | Abandon | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17361034 | PAGE GUIDING METHODS, APPARATUSES, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES | June 2021 | May 2024 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17303984 | USER INTERFACE ACCESSIBILITY NAVIGATION GUIDE | June 2021 | August 2024 | Abandon | 38 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 17341121 | USER INTERFACES FOR CALIBRATIONS AND/OR SYNCHRONIZATIONS | June 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 46 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17336878 | TEMPORARILY HIDING USER INTERFACE ELEMENTS | June 2021 | December 2023 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17336346 | RECORDING CONVERSATION OF USER FOR IDENTIFYING CONTEXTUAL KEYWORDS OR KEY PHRASES FOR IDENTIFYING USER RELEVANT CONTENTS OR MEDIA OR POSTS | June 2021 | December 2023 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17322375 | HEART-LUNG MACHINE WITH SIMPLIFIED SETUP BASED ON ROLE-PROFILE MAPPING | May 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17238942 | USER INTERFACE WITH METADATA CONTENT ELEMENTS FOR VIDEO NAVIGATION | April 2021 | June 2024 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17239257 | TECHNIQUES FOR MANIPULATING COMPUTER-GENERATED OBJECTS | April 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17101223 | Reverse Seamless Integration Between Local and Remote Computing Environments | November 2020 | March 2024 | Abandon | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17015944 | INTERACTIVE PRESENTATION CONTROLS | September 2020 | June 2024 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16902939 | TECHNIQUES FOR TRANSFERRING DATA WITHIN AND BETWEEN COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS | June 2020 | August 2024 | Abandon | 50 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16903101 | AUDIO ASSOCIATIONS FOR INTERACTIVE MEDIA EVENT TRIGGERING | June 2020 | July 2024 | Allow | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16836255 | REPLY BACK MECHANISM WITHIN A MESSAGING SYSTEM | March 2020 | June 2024 | Allow | 51 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15857599 | FRAMEWORK OF PROACTIVE AND/OR REACTIVE STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING LABELING CONSISTENCY AND EFFICIENCY | December 2017 | May 2024 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14899922 | NON-INTERFERING MULTI-APPLICATION DISPLAY METHOD AND AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOF | December 2015 | June 2019 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14925272 | COMPUTING DEVICE HAVING USER-INPUT ACCESSORY | October 2015 | November 2024 | Allow | 60 | 10 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 14842410 | VIDEO-BASED INTERACTIVE VIEWING ALONG A PATH IN MEDICAL IMAGING | September 2015 | October 2018 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14099690 | MOBILE TERMINAL AND CORRESPONDING METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DIVIDED ITEMS IN LIST | December 2013 | June 2016 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13843270 | REVERSE BRAND SORTING TOOLS FOR INTEREST-GRAPH DRIVEN PERSONALIZATION | March 2013 | December 2017 | Allow | 57 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13606401 | PROVIDING CONTENT ITEM MANIPULATION ACTIONS ON AN UPLOAD WEB PAGE OF THE CONTENT ITEM | September 2012 | August 2016 | Allow | 47 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13358275 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME | January 2012 | February 2014 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL.
With a 66.7% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 80.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL works in Art Unit 2171 and has examined 51 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 74.5%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.
Examiner CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL's allowance rate of 74.5% places them in the 31% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 95% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 31% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +39.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL. This interview benefit is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 3.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 51% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 62.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 20.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 54.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.