Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19244778 | RELIABLE OUTPUTS FROM LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS FOR MULTI-LABEL CLASSIFICATION TASKS | June 2025 | August 2025 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18585465 | BUILT-IN ANALYTICS FOR DATABASE MANAGEMENT | February 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 24 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18526692 | DATA DISPLAY METHOD, DEVICE, COMPUTER APPARATUS AND SYSTEM | December 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18513483 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC PROFILE SEGMENTATION USING SMALL TEXT VARIATIONS | November 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18319322 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IDENTIFYING SUSTAINED CHANGES IN TIME SERIES DATA USING CONFIGURABLE CHANGE PARAMETER VALUES | May 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18301537 | VARIABLE DENSITY-BASED CLUSTERING ON DATA STREAMS | April 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18134592 | SEMANTIC SEARCH AND RULE METHODS FOR A DISTRIBUTED DATA SYSTEM | April 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18019736 | Source Scoring for Entity Representation Systems | February 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17806767 | NATIVE METADATA GENERATION WITHIN A STREAM-ORIENTED SYSTEM | June 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 17742161 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRONIC DATA RECORD SYNCHRONIZATION | May 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 41 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17639164 | Centralized Knowledge Repository and Data Mining System | February 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 44 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17484808 | GENERATING AND VISUALIZING A DATA STRUCTURE OF A MANAGEMENT MODEL OF AN APPLICATION SERVER | September 2021 | February 2026 | Abandon | 53 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17342986 | FILTERED DATA LAKE FOR ENTERPRISE SECURITY | June 2021 | August 2025 | Allow | 50 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17170095 | AUTOMATIC DOCUMENT SOURCE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS | February 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 56 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner CURRAN, J MITCHELL works in Art Unit 2169 and has examined 3 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 66.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 53 months.
Examiner CURRAN, J MITCHELL's allowance rate of 66.7% places them in the 28% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by CURRAN, J MITCHELL receive 5.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 99% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CURRAN, J MITCHELL is 53 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.