USPTO Examiner BHUYAN MOHAMMAD SOLAIMAN - Art Unit 2168

Examiner Information

Name: BHUYAN, MOHAMMAD SOLAIMAN
Art Unit: 2168
Total Cases: 1
Last Active: December 2024

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19014552Method for using chunks of change log data for comparing a source and a target database which are actively being kept in synchronization with each otherJanuary 2025October 2025Allow900NoNo
19005664Sequential Consistency Across a Distributed Cloud Computing NetworkDecember 2024January 2026Allow1310YesNo
18990055SYSTEM FOR TRANSFORMING DATA INTO TABLE FORMATDecember 2024November 2025Allow1010YesNo
18945371Auto Computation of Counters and Last-N features across High Cardinality Dimensions in Distributed SystemsNovember 2024March 2026Allow1600NoNo
18801881Editing Data Within A Data Visualization ToolAugust 2024January 2026Allow1710YesNo
18704289Data Transaction Management With Database On Edge DeviceApril 2024March 2026Abandon2210NoNo
18618038INFORMATION RECOMMENDATION METHOD, APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUMMarch 2024January 2026Allow2120YesNo
18427236SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRIORITIZING A PLURALITY OF PREDEFINED RULES FOR AN EXPERT SYSTEMJanuary 2024January 2026Allow2410YesNo
18508532MERKLE-ENHANCED TRAINING DATA AUDIT PROCESSNovember 2023January 2026Allow2630YesNo
18270686COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK TOPOLOGY FOR MINIMIZING LATENCY IN A MANY-TO-ONE ENVIRONMENTJune 2023December 2025Allow3020NoNo
15817908DELETION OF BLOCKS IN A BLOCKCHAINNovember 2017April 2020Allow2910YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner BHUYAN, MOHAMMAD SOLAIMAN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BHUYAN, MOHAMMAD SOLAIMAN works in Art Unit 2168 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 29 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BHUYAN, MOHAMMAD SOLAIMAN's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 95% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BHUYAN, MOHAMMAD SOLAIMAN receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BHUYAN, MOHAMMAD SOLAIMAN is 29 months. This places the examiner in the 63% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.