USPTO Examiner ARJOMANDI NOOSHA - Art Unit 2166

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19037324Artificial Intelligence Agent Creation In A Database SystemJanuary 2025January 2026Allow1200NoNo
18946571GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION INTERFACENovember 2024December 2025Allow1310NoNo
18928136SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING BLOCKCHAIN TRANSACTIONSOctober 2024November 2025Allow1210NoNo
18917469System And Method For Representing Busyness Using Content Specific To A PlaceOctober 2024February 2026Abandon1610NoNo
18885322MODEL ML REGISTRY AND MODEL SERVINGSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
18818060SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO GENERATE RECORDS WITHIN A COLLABORATION ENVIRONMENTAugust 2024October 2025Allow1310YesNo
18809197SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR LIVE DATA MIGRATIONAugust 2024November 2025Allow1510YesNo
18740986METHODS FOR MANAGING A DIGITAL ECOSYSTEM FOR REAL ESTATE PROPERTY DATA AND DEVICES THEREOFJune 2024January 2026Allow1910NoNo
18659799RETRIEVAL-AUGMENTED GENERATION (RAG) SYSTEM OPTIMIZATIONMay 2024October 2025Allow1710YesNo
18649400WEB TRANSFORMERSApril 2024October 2025Allow1810YesNo
18609754LIST SEARCHMarch 2024November 2025Allow2010NoNo
18516602SYSTEM AND METHOD CONFIGURED TO MANAGE INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) DEVICES USING DIGITAL TWINS AND BLOCKCHAINSNovember 2023October 2025Allow2220NoNo
18500936SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGED DATA TRANSFERNovember 2023December 2025Allow2510NoNo
18384158EVENT PROCESSING METHOD AND SYSTEMOctober 2023November 2025Allow2510NoNo
18039853COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED ENGINEERING MATERIALS MECHANICAL PROPERTY BASED SEARCH METHODJune 2023September 2025Allow2700NoNo
18147572METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DEVICE PROBE POINT DATA OBJECT DETERMINATIONS AND VALIDATIONSDecember 2022November 2025Allow3420NoNo
18049479METHOD FOR TRAINING AIRCRAFT CONTROL AGENTOctober 2022December 2025Allow3810YesNo
17958555GRAPH NEURAL NETWORKS FOR PARTICLE ACCELERATOR FACILITIESOctober 2022July 2025Allow3300NoNo
17864697DEVICE AND METHOD USING MACHINE LEARNING MODEL SHARED BY PLURALITY OF APPLICATIONSJuly 2022November 2025Allow4010YesNo
17664896Dynamic Multi-tenant Data Platform for Machine Learning Modeling and VisualizationMay 2022March 2026Allow4510YesNo
16696598REFERRING EXPRESSION GENERATIONNovember 2019July 2020Allow810YesNo
16245907SOCIAL PLATFORM PROMOTION SYSTEM AND METHODJanuary 2019August 2020Allow1930YesNo
16203792DETECTING EVENTS FROM FEATURES DERIVED FROM MULTIPLE INGESTED SIGNALSNovember 2018March 2019Allow300NoNo
16006240INTERACTIVE WEATHER ADVISORY SYSTEMJune 2018April 2021Allow3410NoNo
15977952SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING CONCEPTS RELATED TO A TARGET CONCEPTMay 2018April 2021Allow3520YesNo
15946861METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MANAGING COMPUTING DEVICES WITH SPECIFICATION MIGRATIONApril 2018February 2021Allow3420NoNo
15842113ITERATIVE WIDENING SEARCH FOR DESIGNING CHEMICAL COMPOUNDSDecember 2017September 2020Allow3310NoNo
15725959CAPTURING AND MANAGING KNOWLEDGE FROM SOCIAL NETWORKING INTERACTIONSOctober 2017April 2020Allow3110NoNo
15726214Generate A Knowledge Graph Using A Search IndexOctober 2017May 2020Allow3110YesNo
15671074Time-Box Constrained Searching in a Distributed Search SystemAugust 2017June 2019Allow2300NoNo
15624552METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR REAL-TIME UPDATING OF ENCODED SEARCH INDEXESJune 2017November 2019Allow2900NoNo
15446432CAPTURING AND MANAGING KNOWLEDGE FROM SOCIAL NETWORKING INTERACTIONSMarch 2017August 2018Allow1710NoNo
15503935METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CONTENT DELIVERY VIA BROWSER CACHE EXTENSIONFebruary 2017March 2019Allow2510NoNo
15404065Interactive Weather Advisory SystemJanuary 2017April 2017Allow300NoNo
15376111MINING OF USER EVENT DATA TO IDENTIFY USERS WITH COMMON INTERESTSDecember 2016June 2017Allow610NoNo
15349033METHOD FOR ESTIMATING FORMAT OF LOG MESSAGE AND COMPUTER AND COMPUTER PROGRAM THEREFORNovember 2016August 2017Allow900NoNo
15050302Presentation of Search Results to Mobile Devices Based on Television Viewing HistoryFebruary 2016June 2017Allow1610NoNo
14970358FAST SEARCH IN A MUSIC SHARING ENVIRONMENTDecember 2015June 2017Allow1810NoNo
14939722IDENTIFYING ENTITIES BASED ON INTERACTIVITY MODELSNovember 2015May 2017Allow1800NoNo
14861193Identifying Unchecked Criteria in Unstructured and Semi-Structured DataSeptember 2015August 2016Allow1110NoNo
14849472MINING OF USER EVENT DATA TO IDENTIFY USERS WITH COMMON INTERESTSSeptember 2015August 2016Allow1110NoNo
14824039CREATING AND DISCOVERING LEARNING CONTENT IN A SOCIAL LEARNING SYSTEMAugust 2015May 2017Allow2110NoNo
14801586INTERACTIVE ADVISORY SYSTEMJuly 2015September 2016Allow1510NoNo
14801555INTERACTIVE WEATHER ADVISORY SYSTEMJuly 2015October 2016Allow1510NoNo
14746696METHODS OF AND SYSTEMS FOR SEARCHING BY INCORPORATING USER-ENTERED INFORMATIONJune 2015January 2016Allow700NoNo
14744723APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SEARCH AND RETRIEVAL OF DOCUMENTSJune 2015October 2015Allow400NoNo
14559661USER COMMENTARY SYSTEMS AND METHODSDecember 2014September 2015Allow900NoNo
14552017APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SEARCH AND RETRIEVAL OF DOCUMENTSNovember 2014March 2015Allow400NoNo
14543566MINING OF USER EVENT DATA TO IDENTIFY USERS WITH COMMON INTERESTSNovember 2014June 2015Allow710NoNo
14536040SELF-LEARNING SEMANTIC SEARCH ENGINENovember 2014August 2015Allow1010NoNo
14496256METHOD AND APPARATUS OF GENERATING UPDATE PARAMETERS AND DISPLAYING CORRELATED KEYWORDSSeptember 2014June 2015Allow910NoNo
14463247SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIRECTING ACCESS TO PRODUCTS AND SERVICESAugust 2014January 2015Allow500NoNo
14331372VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT SPANNING DESKTOP AND CLOUDJuly 2014October 2014Allow300NoNo
14322599INTERACTIVE ADVISORY SYSTEMJuly 2014April 2015Allow1010NoNo
14267266Content DistributionMay 2014January 2016Allow2000NoNo
14242700SEQUENTIAL CHAIN REGISTRYApril 2014February 2015Allow1110NoNo
14231700Presentation of Search Results to Mobile Devices Based on Television Viewing HistoryMarch 2014April 2015Allow1210NoNo
14223632Classifying Documents Using Multiple ClassifiersMarch 2014April 2015Allow1300NoNo
14173168CAPTURING AND MANAGING KNOWLEDGE FROM SOCIAL NETWORKING INTERACTIONSFebruary 2014January 2017Allow3520NoNo
14172196PREVENTION OF CIRCULAR EVENT PUBLICATION IN PUBLISH/SUBSCRIBE MODEL USING PATH VECTORFebruary 2014July 2016Allow2930YesNo
14156103INTERACTIVE ADVISORY SYSTEMJanuary 2014December 2014Allow1110NoNo
14156027INTERACTIVE ADVISORY SYSTEMJanuary 2014December 2014Allow1110NoNo
14136314IDENTIFYING UNCHECKED CRITERIA IN UNSTRUCTURED AND SEMI-STRUCTURED DATADecember 2013April 2016Allow2810NoNo
14064877DYNAMIC CONTENT ASSEMBLY ON EDGE-OF NETWORK SERVERS IN A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORKOctober 2013October 2014Allow1210NoNo
14047868MINING OF USER EVENT DATA TO IDENTIFY USERS WITH COMMON INTERESTSOctober 2013July 2014Allow1010NoNo
13930523MINIMIZATION OF SURPRISAL CONTEXT DATA THROUGH APPLICATION OF CUSTOMIZED SURPRISAL CONTEXT FILTERSJune 2013February 2015Allow1900NoNo
13910005Search Systems and Computer-Implemented Search MethodsJune 2013August 2015Allow2610NoNo
13856428Method and Apparatus for Optimizing the Evaluation of Semantic Web QueriesApril 2013January 2015Allow2100NoNo
13548047MINING OF USER EVENT DATA TO IDENTIFY USERS WITH COMMON INTERESTJuly 2012May 2013Allow1010YesNo
13290859MINING OF USER EVENT DATA TO IDENTIFY USERS WITH COMMON INTERESTSNovember 2011March 2012Allow410NoNo
13218288SEQUENTIAL CHAIN REGISTRYAugust 2011February 2014Allow3020YesNo
13218319SEQUENTIAL CHAIN REGISTRY FOR EVENT AWARENESSAugust 2011August 2014Allow3530YesNo
13099296DATA STRUCTURE VERSIONING FOR DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODSMay 2011February 2012Allow910NoNo
13035074METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING MEDIA-EXCHANGEABLE MULTIMEDIA DATA AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RECONSTRUCTING MEDIA-EXCHANGEABLE MULTIMEDIA DATAFebruary 2011September 2011Allow710NoNo
13021690COLLABORATION PORTAL - COPO - A SCALEABLE METHOD, SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING COMPUTER-ACCESSIBLE BENEFITS TO COMMUNITIES OF USERSFebruary 2011July 2012Allow1700NoNo
12885227TAXONOMY MAPPINGSeptember 2010May 2012Allow2010NoNo
12825715DYNAMIC CONTENT ASSEMBLY ON EDGE-OF-NETWORK SERVERS IN A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORKJune 2010December 2011Allow1800NoNo
12649429ENHANCING SOFT FILE SYSTEM LINKSDecember 2009March 2012Allow2710YesNo
12613604APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SEARCH AND RETRIEVAL OF DOCUMENTSNovember 2009October 2014Allow5970YesNo
12435066ON-DEMAND SERVICE RECONCILIATION, AUDIT, AND ALERTMay 2009December 2010Allow2010NoNo
12346230VERIFICATION OF DATA CATEGORIZATIONDecember 2008August 2012Allow4320YesNo
12335127INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAMDecember 2008October 2011Allow3410NoNo
12333742MANAGEMENT OF MULTIMEDIA CONTENTDecember 2008September 2012Allow4520YesNo
12266364Virtual Environment Spanning Desktop and CloudNovember 2008May 2014Allow6030YesNo
12245276SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY MANAGING DATA CENTRIC SEARCHESOctober 2008March 2013Allow5420NoNo
12192629AUTONOMIC INDEX CREATION, MODIFICATION AND DELETIONAugust 2008July 2013Allow5950NoYes
12172123JUST-IN-TIME PUBLISHING SYSTEM AND PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR A PUBLISH/SUBSCRIBE MESSAGING SYSTEM USING A SUBSCRIBE-EVENT MODELJuly 2008October 2010Allow2700YesNo
12131078EFFICIENT UPDATE METHODS FOR LARGE VOLUME DATA UPDATES IN DATA WAREHOUSESMay 2008November 2012Allow5430NoNo
12113203COLLABORATION PORTAL (COPO) A SCALEABLE METHOD, SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING COMPUTER-ACCESSIBLE BENEFITS TO COMMUNITIES OF USERSApril 2008September 2010Allow2900YesNo
12111428ENHANCED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSURING INTEGRITY OF DEDUPLICATED DATAApril 2008April 2013Allow5930NoNo
12021588PERSONALIZED AD DELIVERY WHEN ADS FATIGUEJanuary 2008August 2010Allow3010NoNo
11963423SYNDICATING HUMORDecember 2007December 2012Allow5940YesYes
11959182METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR QUANTIFYING THE QUALITY OF SEARCH RESULTS BASED ON COHESIONDecember 2007February 2010Allow2600YesNo
11863902DECENTRALIZED RECORD EXPIRYSeptember 2007May 2010Allow3210YesNo
11840703APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR ENSURING QUERY EXECUTION PLAN STABILITY IN A DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMAugust 2007August 2009Allow6000NoNo
11837961SKILLS DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHODAugust 2007June 2013Allow6060YesYes
11804570SYSTEM, METHOD, AND PROGRAM FOR SHARING PHOTOS VIA THE INTERNETMay 2007February 2010Allow3310YesNo
11672421METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING AND REFINING THE QUALITY OF WEB SERVICES DEFINITIONSFebruary 2007April 2010Allow3820YesNo
11364539File sharingFebruary 2006March 2013Allow6020NoYes
11237229SEMANTIC VISUAL SEARCH ENGINESeptember 2005August 2010Allow5860YesYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner ARJOMANDI, NOOSHA.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
2
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
4.7%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
8
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(37.5%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
5
(62.5%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
61.5%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 37.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner ARJOMANDI, NOOSHA - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner ARJOMANDI, NOOSHA works in Art Unit 2166 and has examined 92 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 98.9%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 26 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner ARJOMANDI, NOOSHA's allowance rate of 98.9% places them in the 92% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by ARJOMANDI, NOOSHA receive 1.63 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 32% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ARJOMANDI, NOOSHA is 26 months. This places the examiner in the 75% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -3.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ARJOMANDI, NOOSHA. This interview benefit is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 37.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 46.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 80.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 80.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 14.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 17.4% of allowed cases (in the 97% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.