Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18931554 | ASSOCIATING USER-PROVIDED CONTENT ITEMS TO INTEREST NODES | October 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18907672 | Context-Based Dictionaries for Multimedia Audiobook Systems Including Linguistic Dictionary Entries | October 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18444336 | DATABASE REPLICATION FOR REAL-TIME DATA EXTRACTION | February 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18465051 | COMBINING STRUCTURED QUERY LANGUAGE (SQL) QUERIES | September 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18301490 | COMPATIBILITY CHECKER FOR LISTING AUTO FULFILLMENT | April 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18134447 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRAINING RETRIEVAL MODEL, RETRIEVAL METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE AND MEDIUM | April 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18295744 | DIGITAL CONTENT MANAGEMENT IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS | April 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 34 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18113197 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR STREAMING DATA PIPELINES | February 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18153495 | PREDICTING OUTAGE CONDITIONS AND HANDLING ARCHIVING | January 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18069605 | Refined Search with Machine Learning | December 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 32 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18073123 | ADAPTIVE AGGREGATION AND COMPRESSION OF METADATA | December 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17823060 | DYNAMICALLY SUBSTITUTING A MODIFIED QUERY BASED ON PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS | August 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17856339 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SCALABLE DATABASE HOSTING DATA OF MULTIPLE DATABASE TENANTS | July 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17806770 | DYNAMIC FILESYSTEM GENERATION BASED ON CONTENT METADATA | June 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17734026 | MATERIALIZED VIEW GENERATION AND PROVISION BASED ON QUERIES HAVING A SEMANTICALLY EQUIVALENT OR CONTAINMENT RELATIONSHIP | April 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17548520 | CLASSIFYING AND ORGANIZING DIGITAL CONTENT ITEMS AUTOMATICALLY UTILIZING CONTENT ITEM CLASSIFICATION MODELS | December 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 45 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17612197 | SOUND SIGNAL SEARCH APPARATUS, SOUND SIGNAL SEARCH METHOD, DATA SEARCH APPARATUS, DATA SEARCH METHOD, AND PROGRAM | November 2021 | February 2026 | Abandon | 51 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17364842 | UNIVERSAL DATA LANGUAGE TRANSLATOR | June 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16580637 | STATEFUL CONTAINER MIGRATION | September 2019 | July 2021 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15955681 | DATABASE TRANSACTION LOG WRITING AND INTEGRITY CHECKING | April 2018 | May 2021 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15908596 | BOT NETWORKS | February 2018 | January 2021 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15823275 | ONTOLOGY REFINEMENT BASED ON QUERY INPUTS | November 2017 | June 2020 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15822391 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY PROVIDING ALTERNATIVE POINTS OF VIEW FOR MULTIMEDIA CONTENT | November 2017 | October 2020 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner SHARPLESS, SAMUEL works in Art Unit 2165 and has examined 8 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 87.5%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 37 months.
Examiner SHARPLESS, SAMUEL's allowance rate of 87.5% places them in the 67% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by SHARPLESS, SAMUEL receive 3.12 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 89% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SHARPLESS, SAMUEL is 37 months. This places the examiner in the 32% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +100.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SHARPLESS, SAMUEL. This interview benefit is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 38% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 25.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 34% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.