USPTO Examiner JAMI HARES - Art Unit 2164

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18866060MIDDLEWARE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING READING AND WRITING OF SCIENTIFIC DATA FILESNovember 2024August 2025Allow900NoNo
18933586PICTURE STORAGE METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND TERMINAL DEVICEOctober 2024September 2025Allow1100NoNo
18755593AUTOMATIC VECTOR INDEX GENERATION WITH MACHINE-LEARNED LARGE LANGUAGE MODELJune 2024October 2025Allow1610NoNo
18749372QUERY PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR SLOT-BASED EXECUTION OF QUERIESJune 2024October 2025Allow1610YesNo
18740491BUCKET SEARCH METRIC BASED REBALANCING ACROSS PEERSJune 2024September 2025Allow1510YesNo
18735971OPERATION METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR GENERATING AND USING FILENAME METADATA INCLUDING ENCRYPTED CASE INSENSITIVE FILENAMEJune 2024August 2025Allow1410YesNo
18731764DATA RECONCILIATION SYSTEMJune 2024January 2026Allow1920NoNo
18638392EXPLORABLE VISUAL ANALYTICS SYSTEM HAVING REDUCED LATENCYApril 2024October 2025Allow1820YesNo
18633486REMOVING BIASES WITHIN A DISTRIBUTED MODELApril 2024March 2026Allow2320YesNo
18236919Semantic-based Data BinningAugust 2023September 2025Allow2520YesNo
18449212GLOBAL QUERY OPTIMIZATIONAugust 2023January 2026Allow2920YesNo
18358558PROGRAM RECOVERYJuly 2023July 2025Allow2410NoNo
18259279NEAREST NEIGHBOR TRAJECTORY QUERY METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMJune 2023February 2026Abandon3140NoNo
18134999AUTOMATICALLY BUILDING BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE MODELSApril 2023January 2026Allow3320YesNo
18021050DOCUMENT RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON CONTEXT-AWARE EMBEDDINGSFebruary 2023February 2026Allow3630YesNo
17092849MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE WITH ELECTRONIC NOSENovember 2020July 2025Allow5780YesNo
16860098OPTIMIZATION OF DATABASE QUERIES FOR DATABASE SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENTSApril 2020July 2025Abandon6060NoYes
16789989SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING POTENTIAL FRAUD BETWEEN A PROBE BIOMETRIC AND A DATASET OF BIOMETRICSFebruary 2020March 2026Abandon6030YesYes
16407263PARTITIONED BLOOM FILTER MERGE FOR MASSIVELY PARALLEL PROCESSING CLUSTERED DATA MANAGEMENTMay 2019February 2021Allow2110YesNo
16202043AUTOMATIC CONTEXT ADAPTIVE ENTERPRISE SEARCH AND RESULT GENERATION ON BEHALF OF A USERNovember 2018November 2020Allow2410NoNo
16175968SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SPATIAL CLUSTERING USING MULTIPLE-RESOLUTION GRIDSOctober 2018March 2021Allow2830YesNo
16018240SEARCH EXPLORATION USING DRAG AND DROPJune 2018February 2021Allow3120YesNo
15910129FILTERING DOCUMENT SEARCH RESULTS USING CONTEXTUAL METADATAMarch 2018September 2018Allow710YesNo
15814286CATEGORIZED SOCIAL OPINIONS AS ANSWERS TO QUESTIONSNovember 2017August 2020Allow3320YesNo
15691591SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SEQUENCING DATABASE-BASED CONTENT RECOMMENDATIONAugust 2017April 2020Allow3120NoNo
15691610SMALLER PROXIMATE SEARCH INDEXAugust 2017June 2019Allow2100NoNo
15691563SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED HYBRID SEQUENCING DATABASE GENERATIONAugust 2017May 2020Allow3220YesNo
15610287Keyword Search Queries on Online Social NetworksMay 2017January 2020Allow3110NoNo
15582922CATEGORIZED SOCIAL OPINIONS AS ANSWERS TO QUESTIONSMay 2017September 2019Allow2810NoNo
15490348SEARCHING AND DISPLAYING RELATED CONTENT TO A POST IN AN ACTIVITY STREAMApril 2017September 2019Allow2800YesNo
15416937GENERATION OF END-USER SESSIONS FROM END-USER EVENTS IDENTIFIED FROM COMPUTER SYSTEM LOGSJanuary 2017May 2019Allow2810YesNo
15410857ETL TOOL INTERFACE FOR REMOTE MAINFRAMESJanuary 2017August 2017Allow700NoNo
15410263ETL TOOL INTERFACE FOR REMOTE MAINFRAMESJanuary 2017August 2017Allow700NoNo
15381147INDEX MASKING BASED ON INSERT CONTENTION RATIODecember 2016August 2017Allow800YesNo
15380018INDEX MASKING BASED ON INSERT CONTENTION RATIODecember 2016August 2017Allow800YesNo
15344786ETL TOOL INTERFACE FOR REMOTE MAINFRAMESNovember 2016August 2019Allow3320YesNo
15268621ADAPTIVE CONTENT GENERATION AND DISSEMINATION SYSTEM (ACGDS)September 2016January 2020Allow4020NoNo
15263659File Creation with Location Limitation Capability in Storage Cluster EnviornmentsSeptember 2016April 2017Allow1510YesNo
15190361MEASURING AND DISPLAYING FACETS IN CONTEXT-BASED CONFORMED DIMENSIONAL DATA GRAVITY WELLSJune 2016July 2018Allow2400YesNo
15187141DATA LINEAGE IN AN INTELLIGENT DATA INTEGRATION SYSTEMJune 2016January 2019Abandon3130YesNo
15098417ETL TOOL INTERFACE FOR REMOTE MAINFRAMESApril 2016November 2016Allow700NoNo
15066543INDEX MASKING BASED ON INSERT CONTENTION RATIOMarch 2016November 2016Allow910YesNo
14795408SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING AN EFFICIENT DATA COMPRESSION SCHEME TO URL PARAMETERSJuly 2015March 2017Allow2000YesNo
14698854SEMANTIC MERGE OF ARGUMENTSApril 2015August 2019Allow5140YesYes
14697741GENERATION OF SYNTHETIC CONTEXT FRAMEWORKS FOR DIMENSIONALLY CONSTRAINED HIERARCHICAL SYNTHETIC CONTEXT-BASED OBJECTSApril 2015November 2016Allow1900YesNo
14697682GENERATION OF SYNTHETIC CONTEXT FRAMEWORKS FOR DIMENSIONALLY CONSTRAINED HIERARCHICAL SYNTHETIC CONTEXT-BASED OBJECTSApril 2015November 2016Allow1900YesNo
14695247MEASURING AND DISPLAYING FACETS IN CONTEXT-BASED CONFORMED DIMENSIONAL DATA GRAVITY WELLSApril 2015May 2016Allow1300YesNo
14644133PROXY CACHE AGGREGATORMarch 2015August 2016Allow1710NoNo
14554403INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM FOR EXTRACTING CO-OCCURRENCE CHARACTER STRINGSNovember 2014August 2016Allow2110NoNo
14397852DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION AND INSPECTION SYSTEM, DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION AND INSPECTION METHOD, AND DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION AND INSPECTION PROGRAMOctober 2014November 2016Allow2510NoNo
14471557SEARCHING AND DISPLAYING RELATED CONTENT TO A POST IN AN ACTIVITY STREAMAugust 2014March 2017Allow3110NoNo
14471100ANALYSIS OF USER'S DATA TO RECOMMEND CONNECTIONSAugust 2014October 2017Allow3830YesNo
14471847NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM THAT STORES DOCUMENT EVALUATION PROGRAM THAT EVALUATES CONSISTENCY IN DOCUMENTAugust 2014May 2017Allow3320NoNo
14470607Keyword Search Queries on Online Social NetworksAugust 2014April 2017Allow3220YesNo
14470583Blending by Query Classification on Online Social NetworksAugust 2014May 2017Allow3220YesNo
14470560SHARING CONTENT WITH PERMISSION CONTROL USING NEAR FIELD COMMUNICATIONAugust 2014February 2017Allow3010NoNo
14459195AUTOMATIC LAYOUT DERIVATION AND IMPLEMENTATIONAugust 2014November 2016Allow2720YesNo
14451866PARTITIONING ONLINE DATABASESAugust 2014February 2016Allow1910NoNo
14311543ETL TOOL INTERFACE FOR REMOTE MAINFRAMESJune 2014September 2016Allow2610YesNo
14311721RECONCILING QUERY RESULTS ASSOCIATED WITH MULTIPLE INDICESJune 2014March 2017Allow3320YesNo
14309781TECHNIQUES FOR FOCUSED CRAWLINGJune 2014May 2018Allow4640YesNo
14214455Unidirectional Lookalike Campaigns in a Messaging PlatformMarch 2014January 2016Allow2200NoNo
14213941Scalable Analysis Platform For Semi-Structured DataMarch 2014November 2016Allow3220NoNo
14214125Method of Gesture-Based Definition of an Object within an ImageMarch 2014March 2016Allow2410NoNo
14063383QUERY-BASED USER GROUPS IN SOCIAL NETWORKSOctober 2013May 2014Allow610YesNo
14006233SYSTEM, APPARATUS, AND METHOD FOR EXECUTING A QUERY INCLUDING BOOLEAN AND CONDITIONAL EXPRESSIONSSeptember 2013August 2015Allow2310YesNo
13910302DATA LINEAGE IN AN INTELLIGENT DATA INTEGRATION SYSTEMJune 2013February 2016Allow3210YesNo
13896128PROVIDING KNOWLEDGE CONTENT TO USERSMay 2013November 2013Allow600NoNo
13890051SYSTEM FOR GENERATING BEHAVIOR-BASED ASSOCIATIONS FOR MULTIPLE DOMAIN-SPECIFIC APPLICATIONSMay 2013May 2014Allow1210YesNo
13845590COMPUTER PRODUCT, VERIFICATION SUPPORT METHOD, AND VERIFICATION SUPPORT APPARATUSMarch 2013January 2017Allow4640NoNo
13755814DISPLAYING RECOMMENDED ENTITIES IN A RELEVANCE MAPJanuary 2013June 2015Allow2920NoNo
13756051MEASURING AND DISPLAYING FACETS IN CONTEXT-BASED CONFORMED DIMENSIONAL DATA GRAVITY WELLSJanuary 2013February 2015Allow2500YesNo
13755492CALCULATING A CONTENT SUBSETJanuary 2013December 2014Allow2310YesNo
13755692SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR APPLYING AN EFFICIENT DATA COMPRESSION SCHEME TO URL PARAMETERSJanuary 2013March 2015Allow2510NoNo
13755784DYNAMICALLY DETERMINING JOIN ORDERJanuary 2013June 2015Allow2810YesNo
13755695SUPPORTING FLEXIBLE TYPES IN A DATABASEJanuary 2013February 2015Allow2410YesNo
13755987GENERATION OF SYNTHETIC CONTEXT FRAMEWORKS FOR DIMENSIONALLY CONSTRAINED HIERARCHICAL SYNTHETIC CONTEXT-BASED OBJECTSJanuary 2013February 2015Allow2410NoNo
13805398DEVICE, SYSTEM, METHOD AND PROGRAM FOR DATA INTEGRATION PROCESSDecember 2012December 2014Allow2410YesNo
13715889BACKOFF-BASED SCHEDULING OF STORAGE OBJECT DELETIONSDecember 2012February 2015Allow2620YesNo
13715867CONDITIONAL STORAGE OBJECT DELETIONDecember 2012December 2014Allow2410NoNo
13715241ADAPTIVE DATA STRIPING AND REPLICATION ACROSS MULTIPLE STORAGE CLOUDS FOR HIGH AVAILABILITY AND PERFORMANCEDecember 2012January 2016Allow3740YesNo
13659704WEB SEARCH WITH VISITED WEB PAGE SEARCH RESULT RESTRICTIONSOctober 2012November 2013Allow1320YesNo
13618282STAR AND SNOWFLAKE SCHEMAS IN EXTRACT, TRANSFORM, LOAD PROCESSESSeptember 2012December 2015Allow3920YesNo
13584380ADAPTIVE HYBRID REASONING DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMAugust 2012March 2013Allow710YesNo
13538566MULTIPLEX CLASSIFICATION FOR TABULAR DATA COMPRESSIONJune 2012September 2013Allow1420YesNo
13531865METHOD OF SEARCHING FOR PERSONAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (PIM) INFORMATION AND HANDHELD ELECTRONIC DEVICE EMPLOYING THE SAMEJune 2012March 2013Allow910NoNo
13469346INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAMMay 2012October 2014Allow2920YesNo
13442237APPARATUS, METHOD AND MEDIUM FOR TRANSMISSION AND/OR RECEPTION OF DIGITAL CONTENT BASED ON TIME OR LOCATION INFORMATIONApril 2012August 2013Allow1620YesNo
13499673A Method and an Apparatus for Maintaining a Database Containing Information on Frequency Spectrum UsageMarch 2012May 2014Allow2510YesNo
13430897INPUT/OUTPUT EFFICIENCY FOR ONLINE ANALYSIS PROCESSING IN A RELATIONAL DATABASEMarch 2012December 2013Allow2110YesNo
13431621RETRIEVAL OF SEARCHABLE AND NON-SEARCHABLE ATTRIBUTESMarch 2012November 2012Allow700YesNo
13430495Method for Locating Web Elements Comprising of Fuzzy Matching on Attributes and Relative Location/Position of ElementMarch 2012October 2013Allow1910NoNo
13411441METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROBABILISTICALLY QUANTIFYING AND VISUALIZING RELEVANCE BETWEEN TWO OR MORE CITATIONALLY OR CONTEXTUALLY RELATED DATA OBJECTSMarch 2012March 2013Allow1310YesNo
13408413FRAMEWORK FOR WEB SERVICES EXPOSING LINE OF BUSINESS APPLICATIONSFebruary 2012October 2012Allow810YesNo
13361500Linguistic Assistance Systems And MethodsJanuary 2012January 2013Allow1110YesNo
13359182METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING DATA ACCESS VIA MULTI-USER VIEWSJanuary 2012August 2016Allow5520YesYes
13314606Using an ID Domain to Improve SearchingDecember 2011May 2013Allow1710YesNo
13292234STAR AND SNOWFLAKE SCHEMAS IN EXTRACT, TRANSFORM, LOAD PROCESSESNovember 2011December 2015Allow4920YesNo
13175365MIXED INITIATIVE SEMANTIC SEARCHJuly 2011March 2012Allow810YesNo
13165557PARTITIONING ONLINE DATABASESJune 2011April 2014Allow3410YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner JAMI, HARES.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
7
Examiner Affirmed
6
(85.7%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(14.3%)
Reversal Percentile
25.9%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 14.3% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
13
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(23.1%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
10
(76.9%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
31.0%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 23.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner JAMI, HARES - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner JAMI, HARES works in Art Unit 2164 and has examined 172 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 97.1%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner JAMI, HARES's allowance rate of 97.1% places them in the 88% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by JAMI, HARES receive 2.24 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 62% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by JAMI, HARES is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 46% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -0.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by JAMI, HARES. This interview benefit is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 24.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 58.8% of appeals filed. This is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 30.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 41.2% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 19.8% of allowed cases (in the 98% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.4% of allowed cases (in the 70% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.