USPTO Examiner LE MICHAEL - Art Unit 2163

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17252394INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION EXCHANGE SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAMDecember 2020April 2023Abandon2820NoNo
17113421METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING TRENDING SEARCH TERMSDecember 2020January 2025Abandon4960YesNo
17105425METADATA INDEXING FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT USING BOTH DATA RECORDS AND ASSOCIATED METADATA RECORDSNovember 2020May 2024Allow4240NoYes
17094346MAPPING EXPRESSION GENERATORNovember 2020September 2024Allow4740YesNo
17089453Recommendations for Dynamic Time Period Data ComparisonNovember 2020December 2023Abandon3740YesNo
17086797Methods and Systems for Identifying a Level of Similarity Between a Filtering Criterion and a Data Item within a Set of Streamed DocumentsNovember 2020April 2023Abandon3010NoNo
17017140RESUMABLE ORDERED RECURSIVE TRAVERSAL OF AN UNORDERED DIRECTORY TREESeptember 2020May 2024Abandon4440YesNo
16936693BUILDING A DYNAMIC REGULAR EXPRESSION FROM SAMPLED DATAJuly 2020September 2022Allow2610YesNo
16912171QUERY EXECUTION APPARATUS, METHOD, AND SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING DATA, QUERY CONTAINING A COMPOSITE PRIMITIVEJune 2020November 2022Allow2820NoNo
16896895ACCURACY METRIC FOR REGULAR EXPRESSIONJune 2020August 2022Allow2710NoNo
16845949METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND MEDIA FOR RESOLVING DATABASE QUERIES USING ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS USING MATRIX-MATRIX MULTIPLICATIONApril 2020April 2022Allow2410NoNo
16835637DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING ATTRIBUTE INFORMATIONMarch 2020March 2024Abandon4750NoNo
16834891SHARD HASHING FOR DATABASE OBJECTS WITHIN A DISTRIBUTED DATABASEMarch 2020June 2025Allow6090YesNo
16817304Graphical User Interfaces for Assessment of Digital TransformationMarch 2020January 2023Abandon3420YesNo
16787318METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR CACHELINE CONSCIOUS EXTENDIBLE HASHINGFebruary 2020April 2025Abandon6060NoNo
16782426RELIABLY MAINTAINING STRICT CONSISTENCY IN CLUSTER WIDE STATE OF OPENED FILES IN A DISTRIBUTED FILE SYSTEM CLUSTER EXPOSING A GLOBAL NAMESPACEFebruary 2020October 2023Allow4430NoNo
16775139METHOD, DEVICE, AND PRODUCT FOR MANAGING A PLURALITY OF USERS MATCHING A SEARCH KEYWORD OF APPLICATION SYSTEM BASED ON HIERARCHICAL RELATIONS AMONG THE PLURALITY OF USERSJanuary 2020August 2023Allow4240NoNo
16723313ASSET MANAGEMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEDecember 2019June 2022Abandon2940YesNo
16708191VIDEO CONTENT OPTIMIZATION SYSTEMDecember 2019January 2022Abandon2510NoNo
16584454EMAIL ENABLED UPDATES OF DATABASE TIME RECORDSSeptember 2019June 2024Abandon5640YesNo
16570757GATHERING DATA OF A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM BASED ON DEFINED SAMPLING INTERVALS THAT HAVE BEEN RESPECTIVELY INITIATED BY SUCH SYSTEM TO MINIMIZE CONTENTION OF SYSTEM RESOURCESSeptember 2019January 2024Abandon5240YesNo
16569000AUTOMATIC ARTIST AND CONTENT BREAKOUT PREDICTIONSeptember 2019September 2024Abandon6070YesNo
16554233USING A DIALOG SYSTEM FOR LEARNING AND INFERRING JUDGMENT REASONING KNOWLEDGEAugust 2019May 2025Abandon6060NoNo
16551734INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS CAPABLE OF EXTRACTING KEY-VALUE IN TABLE WITHOUT HAVING TO DEFINE ALL KEYS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM THEREFORAugust 2019April 2023Abandon4420NoNo
16510108METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MAPPING DATA ITEMS TO SPARSE DISTRIBUTED REPRESENTATIONSJuly 2019August 2024Allow6060NoNo
16507136DETERMINING CAUSES OF EVENTS IN DATAJuly 2019March 2022Allow3340YesNo
16454993METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND MEDIA FOR RESOLVING DATABASE QUERIES USING ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS USING MATRIX-MATRIX MULTIPLICATIONJune 2019February 2020Allow810NoNo
16451688METHOD AND SYSTEM TO EXTRACT DOMAIN CONCEPTS TO CREATE DOMAIN DICTIONARIES AND ONTOLOGIESJune 2019January 2023Allow4230NoNo
16449596Facilitating Streaming Media Access Via A Media-Item DatabaseJune 2019June 2022Allow3520NoNo
16406885DETERMINING USER INTERACTIONS WITH NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSOR (NPL) ITEMS IN DOCUMENTS TO DETERMINE PRIORITIES TO PRESENT NPL ITEMS IN DOCUMENTS TO REVIEWMay 2019June 2023Allow5050YesYes
16389877DETERMINING MISSING CONTENT IN A DATABASE CONTAINING A PLURALITY OF KNOWN EMBEDDED SENTENCES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO CONTENTApril 2019February 2023Abandon4640YesNo
16361578User interface for displaying and monitoring user interaction with synthesized contentMarch 2019June 2025Abandon6090YesNo
16358630PLATFORM FOR IMPLEMENTING A PERSONALIZED LEARNING SYSTEMMarch 2019February 2025Abandon6060NoNo
16275811ASSET MANAGEMENT METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEFebruary 2019June 2022Abandon4030YesNo
16274116Realtime Data Stream Cluster Summarization and Labeling SystemFebruary 2019November 2020Allow2110YesNo
16233342METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL USING A CACHING TECHNIQUE WITH PROBE-LIMITED OPEN-ADDRESS HASHINGDecember 2018April 2022Allow4020YesNo
16223602DENSITY-BASED COMPUTATION FOR INFORMATION DISCOVERY IN KNOWLEDGE GRAPHSDecember 2018December 2022Allow4830YesNo
16223697RESTORING A DIRECTORY TO A STATE PRIOR TO A PAST SYNCHRONIZATION EVENTDecember 2018November 2024Allow6070YesNo
16157831DETERMINING CAUSES OF EVENTS IN DATAOctober 2018March 2022Allow4240NoNo
16157866BLOCKCHAIN DATA TRANSFORMATIONOctober 2018May 2022Abandon4320YesNo
16136093Incremental Rendering of Responses from Transport LayerSeptember 2018July 2023Abandon5850YesNo
16123981PROCESSING A DATABASE QUERY USING A SHARED METADATA STORESeptember 2018July 2021Allow3540NoNo
16113670COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED DETERMINATION METHODAugust 2018August 2022Abandon4840YesYes
16046212DETECTING SERVER PAGES WITHIN BACKUPSJuly 2018November 2024Abandon6070NoNo
16004883SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF A PLATFORM FOR CANDIDATE IDENTIFICATIONJune 2018January 2020Abandon2010NoNo
15978540APPARATUSES, METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AN EVENTUAL EVENT CALENDARING PLATFORMMay 2018April 2022Abandon4760YesNo
15968817COGNITIVE DATA SHARINGMay 2018September 2021Allow4120YesNo
15895584ASSIGNING STORAGE RESPONSIBILITY IN A DISTRIBUTED DATA STORAGE SYSTEM WITH REPLICATIONFebruary 2018April 2021Allow3820YesNo
15865674MANAGING OBJECT IDENTIFIERS BASED ON USER GROUPSJanuary 2018June 2018Allow610YesNo
15865721MANAGING OBJECT IDENTIFIERS BASED ON USER GROUPSJanuary 2018June 2018Allow610YesNo
15834139COGNITIVE HUMAN INTERACTION AND BEHAVIOR ADVISORDecember 2017November 2023Abandon6080NoNo
15832840MODEL-DRIVEN PROFILING JOB GENERATOR FOR DATA SOURCESDecember 2017January 2021Allow3760NoNo
15811124USING PERSISTENT MEMORY TO ENABLE RESTARTABILITY OF BULK LOAD TRANSACTIONS IN CLOUD DATABASESNovember 2017June 2022Allow5530YesNo
15811090Funnel Locking For Sleepable Read-Copy UpdateNovember 2017March 2021Allow4020YesNo
15811225DETERMINING USER INTERACTIONS WITH NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSOR (NPL) ITEMS IN DOCUMENTS TO DETERMINE PRIORITIES TO PRESENT NPL ITEMS IN DOCUMENTS TO REVIEWNovember 2017June 2023Allow6050YesYes
15811152SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT SEARCH AND RECOMMENDATIONNovember 2017February 2020Abandon2710NoNo
15811150RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROVIDING SYSTEM, CLIENT-SIDE DEVICE, INFORMATION PROVIDING METHOD, INFORMATION PROVIDING PROGRAM, AND CLIENT-SIDE PROGRAMNovember 2017October 2020Abandon3510NoNo
15677750TRANSACTIONAL AND BATCH-UPDATED DATA STORE SEARCHAugust 2017August 2021Allow4840YesNo
15677737SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF BOUNDED SCANS ON MULTI-COLUMN KEYS OF A DATABASEAugust 2017October 2022Abandon6060YesNo
15539686INFORMATION ITEM RETRIEVALJune 2017November 2018Abandon1740YesNo
15607128SUGGESTED CONTENT GENERATIONMay 2017January 2024Abandon6070YesNo
15486096Maximizing Content Item Information on a Search Engine Results PageApril 2017December 2019Allow3230YesNo
15473450EXPLOITING OBJECT TAGS TO PRODUCE A WORK ORDER ACROSS BACKUP ENGINES FOR A BACKUP JOBMarch 2017September 2022Allow6050YesNo
15473283SHARING INTERMEDIATE DATA IN MAP-REDUCEMarch 2017April 2021Allow4920YesNo
15473321EXTERNAL FALLBACK SYSTEM FOR LOCAL COMPUTING SYSTEMSMarch 2017March 2022Abandon6060YesNo
15472255INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEMarch 2017November 2020Abandon4320YesNo
15437796SPATIAL DATA ANALYZER SUPPORTFebruary 2017August 2021Allow5450NoNo
15437675AUTO-ADJUSTING DATA LOG RECORD TIMESTAMPSFebruary 2017October 2020Allow4320YesNo
15393794TARGETING OF DIGITAL CONTENT TO GEOGRAPHIC REGIONSDecember 2016September 2017Allow810NoNo
15530187Realtime data stream cluster summarization and labeling systemDecember 2016September 2018Allow2210NoNo
15316046APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DATA COMPRESSION UTILIZING MATCHES BETWEEN DATA BLOCKS AND ELEMENTS IN ONE OR MORE DATABASESDecember 2016December 2021Abandon6060YesNo
15312035Data Management Method and TerminalNovember 2016December 2019Abandon3710NoNo
15337836Assigning Storage Responsibility in a Distributed Data Storage System with ReplicationOctober 2016October 2021Abandon6070YesNo
15303234DATA SYSTEM FOR MANAGING SYNCHRONIZED DATA PROTECTION OPERATIONS AT NODES OF THE DATA SYSTEM, SOURCE NODE AND DESTINATION NODE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR USE IN SUCH DATA SYSTEMOctober 2016February 2021Allow5230YesNo
15279983RECOVERY PROCESSING FOR PERSISTENT FILE DATA CACHE TO REDUCE DATA LOSSSeptember 2016December 2020Allow5130NoNo
15266337SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPATIALLY-INDEXING AGRICULTURAL CONTENTSeptember 2016September 2022Allow6060YesNo
15266160UNCERTAINTY-AWARE SELECTION OF QUERY EXECUTION PLANSeptember 2016March 2021Allow5440YesNo
15241194METHOD FOR UPDATING A DATABASEAugust 2016July 2020Abandon4760NoNo
15239302MANAGING OBJECT IDENTIFIERS BASED ON USER GROUPSAugust 2016May 2017Allow910NoNo
15228004MODEL-DRIVEN PROFILING JOB GENERATOR FOR DATA SOURCESAugust 2016January 2021Allow5460NoNo
15228058METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ANSWERING QUERIES BASED ON PARTIAL AGGREGATIONS OF A CONTINUOUS DATA STREAMAugust 2016February 2022Abandon6060YesNo
15228113APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANAGING GRAPH DATAAugust 2016August 2019Abandon3620NoNo
15228006DATA VALUE SUFFIX BIT LEVEL COMPRESSIONAugust 2016June 2021Abandon5840NoNo
15227957System For Managing Relational Databases Using XML ObjectsAugust 2016September 2020Allow4930YesNo
15227899SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EFFICIENT REPURPOSING OF CONNECTIONS IN A MULTI-TENANT DATABASE ENVIRONMENTAugust 2016May 2021Allow5740NoNo
15219851Methods and Systems for Identifying a Level of Similarity Between a Filtering Criterion and a Data Item within a Set of Streamed DocumentsJuly 2016August 2020Allow4930YesNo
15219759INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMJuly 2016September 2020Abandon5040NoNo
15216412AUTOMATIC ARTIST AND CONTENT BREAKOUT PREDICTIONJuly 2016June 2019Allow3520NoNo
15216688DATA SYNCHRONIZATION METHOD AND DEVICE WITHOUT REDUNDANT REPLICATIONJuly 2016July 2019Abandon3620NoNo
15181050SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF A PLATFORM FOR CANDIDATE IDENTIFICATIONJune 2016November 2018Abandon2910NoNo
15181120NAVIGATING AN ELECTRONIC ITEM DATABASE VIA USER INTENTIONJune 2016April 2021Abandon5850YesNo
15159570DIRECTING CONTENT TO USERS OF A COMPUTER SYSTEM BASED ON PREVIOUSLY ACCESSSED CONTENTMay 2016October 2018Abandon2910NoNo
15158833ENABLING SESSION-BASED PERMISSION SETSMay 2016October 2022Abandon6080YesNo
15075881Unified Time-Indexed Catalogue for Multiple Archived SnapshotsMarch 2016October 2021Allow6050YesNo
15075936SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISTRIBUTED STORAGE OF DATA ACROSS MULTIPLE HASH TABLESMarch 2016September 2021Allow6060YesNo
15076034BACKUP AND RECOVERY FOR END-USER COMPUTING IN VIRTUAL DESKTOP ENVIRONMENTSMarch 2016February 2020Allow4730NoNo
14937701DATA PROCESSING FRAMEWORK FOR DATA CLEANSINGNovember 2015February 2024Abandon6070YesNo
14829885ADAPTIVE BANDWIDTH MANAGEMENT OF A REPLICATION PROCESSAugust 2015June 2021Allow6050YesNo
14829760METHOD FOR PROVIDING MAIL SEARCH RESULT INCLUDING AT LEAST ONE MAIL CARD, AND MAIL SERVICE SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING SAMEAugust 2015June 2020Allow5840YesNo
14829901IMPROVED INTERFACES AND PROCESSES FOR RECORDS MANAGEMENT IN A COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT BY APPLYING RETENTION RULES TO TRACK ELECTRONIC RECORDS AGAINST APPROPRIATE RETENTION SCHEDULESAugust 2015May 2022Abandon6080YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner LE, MICHAEL.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
36
Examiner Affirmed
24
(66.7%)
Examiner Reversed
12
(33.3%)
Reversal Percentile
51.7%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 33.3% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
67
Allowed After Appeal Filing
18
(26.9%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
49
(73.1%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
40.1%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 26.9% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner LE, MICHAEL - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner LE, MICHAEL works in Art Unit 2163 and has examined 404 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 52.7%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner LE, MICHAEL's allowance rate of 52.7% places them in the 16% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by LE, MICHAEL receive 3.78 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 95% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LE, MICHAEL is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +26.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LE, MICHAEL. This interview benefit is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 14.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 14.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 18% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 28.6% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 44.6% of appeals filed. This is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 37.9% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 55.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.5% of allowed cases (in the 82% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.