Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19175928 | CONSTRUCTING A SEARCH INDEX BASED ON AN AUTOMATICALLY-SELECTED SET OF DOCUMENT PROPERTIES | April 2025 | February 2026 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18961840 | DETERMINING FAMILY CONNECTIONS OF INDIVIDUALS IN A DATABASE | November 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18959476 | TECHNIQUES FOR ASYNCHRONOUSLY PUSHING METADATA IN BULK | November 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18938008 | MISUSE INDEX FOR EXPLAINABLE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS | November 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18916173 | EFFICIENT AND SCALABLE DATA PROCESSING AND MODELING | October 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18903434 | FILE SYSTEMS WITH GLOBAL AND LOCAL NAMING | October 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18889724 | CONCURRENT WRITE OPERATIONS FOR USE WITH MULTI-THREADED FILE LOGGING | September 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18886008 | QUERY-BASED TIME-SERIES DATA DISPLAY AND PROCESSING SYSTEM | September 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18830297 | PROCESS MANAGEMENT METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | September 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18792117 | System and Method for Image Generation Using Neuroscience-Inspired Prompt Strategy | August 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18765267 | AI MODEL OPTIMIZATION METHOD AND APPARATUS | July 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18629508 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SYSTEM EXTENSIBILITY | April 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18427802 | RECORDS RETENTION MANAGEMENT | January 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18531262 | SUMMARY GENERATION FOR A DISTRIBUTED GRAPH DATABASE | December 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18206607 | ORGANIZATION AND ANALYSIS OF HIGH-SCALE LOW-SIGNAL DATA | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18187339 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEMOCRATIZING SENSITIVE DATA | March 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17549796 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPUTING REGION CENTERS BY POINT CLUSTERING | December 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16197010 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND ARBITRATING AMONG MULTIPLE MARKET-DATA FEEDS | November 2018 | March 2021 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16131101 | METHOD FOR MIGRATING DATA RECORDS FROM A SOURCE DATABASE TO A TARGET DATABASE | September 2018 | August 2020 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16000227 | OBJECT DELETION IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS | June 2018 | October 2020 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15950924 | APPLICATION-AWARE AND REMOTE SINGLE INSTANCE DATA MANAGEMENT | April 2018 | September 2020 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15766653 | METHOD, DEVICE AND ARRANGEMENT FOR MEASUREMENT OF APP USAGE BASED ON VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS | April 2018 | August 2020 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15827697 | BUFFER SIZE OPTIMIZATION IN A HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE | November 2017 | July 2020 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15690997 | GENERATING DEVICE, GENERATING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM | August 2017 | December 2020 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15592179 | METHOD FOR RELIABLE AND EFFICIENT FILESYSTEM METADATA CONVERSION | May 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15230108 | COMMAND LINE INTERPRETER FOR ACCESSING A DATA OBJECT STORED IN A DISTRIBUTED STORAGE NETWORK | August 2016 | August 2017 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15068944 | DATA REPLICATION ACROSS SERVERS | March 2016 | August 2016 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14338504 | COMMAND LINE INTERPRETER FOR ACCESSING A DATA OBJECT STORED IN A DISTRIBUTED STORAGE NETWORK | July 2014 | March 2016 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14218846 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING SPONSORED INFORMATION ON ELECTRONIC DEVICES | March 2014 | November 2016 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14092726 | SINGLE SCHEMA-BASED RIS/PACS INTEGRATION | November 2013 | April 2017 | Allow | 41 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 13971368 | Method for Reliable and Efficient Filesystem Metadata Conversion | August 2013 | March 2017 | Allow | 42 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13793178 | COMPUTER SYSTEM AND ITS DATA CONTROL METHOD | March 2013 | March 2015 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13587377 | PREDICATE PUSHDOWN WITH LATE MATERIALIZATION IN DATABASE QUERY PROCESSING | August 2012 | June 2014 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13586715 | PROMOTION AND DEMOTION OF POSTS IN SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICES | August 2012 | May 2016 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13363581 | CONVERTER, SERVER SYSTEM, CONVERSION METHOD AND PROGRAM | February 2012 | September 2013 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13363208 | METHOD FOR RELIABLE AND EFFICIENT FILESYSTEM METADATA CONVERSION | January 2012 | August 2013 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13332340 | User Behavior-Driven Background Cache Refreshing | December 2011 | August 2014 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13324513 | EVENT MINING IN SOCIAL NETWORKS | December 2011 | July 2014 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13220666 | Indexing Quoted Text in Messages in Conversations to Support Advanced Conversation-Based Searching | August 2011 | August 2013 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13105924 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MAINTAINING PROFILES OF INFORMATION CHANNELS | May 2011 | December 2011 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12842975 | CONVERTING TWO-TIER RESOURCE MAPPING TO ONE-TIER RESOURCE MAPPING | July 2010 | November 2012 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12842434 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING A UNIFORM RESOURCE LOCATOR | July 2010 | February 2014 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 12839209 | COMMAND LINE INTERPRETER FOR ACCESSING A DATA OBJECT STORED IN A DISTRIBUTED STORAGE NETWORK | July 2010 | June 2014 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12724292 | DE-DUPLICATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR APPLICATION-SPECIFIC DATA | March 2010 | February 2013 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12527409 | COMPUTER SYSTEM AND ITS DATA CONTROL METHOD | August 2009 | November 2012 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12512908 | IDENTIFYING QUERY ASPECTS | July 2009 | January 2013 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12511747 | SYSTEM, METHODS AND APPLICATIONS FOR STRUCTURED DOCUMENT INDEXING | July 2009 | June 2013 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 12497495 | METHOD FOR RELIABLE AND EFFICIENT FILESYSTEM METADATA CONVERSION | July 2009 | January 2012 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12423483 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE STORAGE OF REDUNDANT ELECTRONIC FILES TO INCREASE STORAGE RELIABILITY AND SPACE EFFICIENCY | April 2009 | January 2013 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12403443 | CONVERTER, SERVER SYSTEM, CONVERSION METHOD AND PROGRAM | March 2009 | November 2011 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12348406 | STORAGE SYSTEM FOR MANAGING A LOG OF ACCESS | January 2009 | March 2012 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12342538 | METHOD OF SEARCHING ADDRESS BOOK AND PORTABLE COMMUNICATION DEVICE USING THE SAME | December 2008 | February 2016 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | No | No |
| 12331344 | SYMBOLIC PROGRAM ANALYSIS USING TERM REWRITING AND GENERALIZATION | December 2008 | October 2011 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12327214 | HYBRID PUSH/PULL EXECUTION OF CONTINUOUS SQL QUERIES | December 2008 | August 2012 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12267314 | Network File Association | November 2008 | August 2013 | Allow | 57 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12205107 | PERFORMING LARGE SCALE STRUCTURED SEARCH ALLOWING PARTIAL SCHEMA CHANGES WITHOUT SYSTEM DOWNTIME | September 2008 | July 2012 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12145347 | APPLICATION-AWARE AND REMOTE SINGLE INSTANCE DATA MANAGEMENT | June 2008 | April 2015 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12112407 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC CONFIGURATION OF NETWORKED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ASSETS FOR A BACKUP, RECOVERY AND ARCHIVING APPLICATION | April 2008 | July 2013 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12025077 | MODELING AND IMPLEMENTING COMPLEX DATA ACCESS OPERATIONS BASED ON LOWER LEVEL TRADITIONAL OPERATIONS | February 2008 | January 2011 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11970728 | METHODS AND APPARATUS PROVIDING AN EXTENSIBLE MANAGEABLE ENTITY MODEL FOR A NETWORK | January 2008 | March 2011 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11954648 | QUERY BASED RULE OPTIMIZATION THROUGH RULE COMBINATION | December 2007 | March 2011 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11926337 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR LOCATING DATA IN LARGE DATASETS | October 2007 | February 2011 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11864290 | INTEGRATED SEARCH ENGINE DEVICES THAT SUPPORT MULTI-WAY SEARCH TREES HAVING MULTI-COLUMN NODES | September 2007 | July 2010 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11843961 | AUDITING OF CURATION INFORMATION | August 2007 | June 2012 | Allow | 58 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11826006 | PHOTO RECOMMENDATION METHOD USING MOOD OF MUSIC AND SYSTEM THEREOF | July 2007 | February 2012 | Allow | 55 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11825161 | Method and system for providing sponsored information on electronic devices | July 2007 | December 2013 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11798516 | REMOTE MAILBOX MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD | May 2007 | January 2013 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11564915 | EFFICIENT MULTIFACETED SEARCH IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS | November 2006 | September 2008 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 11564756 | AGENT FOR IDENTIFYING DOMAINS WITH CONTENT ARRANGED FOR DISPLAY BY A MOBILE DEVICE | November 2006 | July 2011 | Allow | 56 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11563485 | ENTERPRISE PLANNING AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROVIDING DOUBLE DISPATCH RETRIEVAL OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL DATA | November 2006 | October 2010 | Allow | 46 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11489243 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CREATING A CONCEPT-OBJECT DATABASE | July 2006 | November 2009 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11487595 | Generating and distributing a malware countermeasure | July 2006 | October 2014 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11447145 | PREDICTING APPARATUS, PREDICTING METHOD, AND COMPUTER PRODUCT | June 2006 | September 2009 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11447533 | TECHNIQUES FOR MANAGING MEDIA CONTENT | June 2006 | June 2016 | Allow | 60 | 10 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11446104 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ROLE BASED ANALYSIS AND ACCESS CONTROL | June 2006 | December 2010 | Allow | 55 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11413808 | DYNAMIC DATA NAVIGATION | April 2006 | February 2014 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11413534 | Systems and methods for file maintenance | April 2006 | June 2013 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11303990 | Compact floating point delta encoding for complex data | December 2005 | February 2010 | Abandon | 50 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11303167 | XML SPECIFICATION FOR ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE (EDI) | December 2005 | October 2009 | Allow | 46 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11303621 | DATA ANALYSIS TOOL FOR ANALYZING DATA STORED IN MUTIPLE TEXT FILES | December 2005 | May 2009 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11304036 | USER ACCESS TO ITEM INFORMATION | December 2005 | March 2012 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11144977 | System having an apparatus that uses a resource on an external device | June 2005 | October 2014 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11135876 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PEER-TO-PEER GRID BASED AUTONOMIC AND PROBABILISTIC ON-DEMAND BACKUP AND RESTORE | May 2005 | April 2009 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11124749 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR APPROXIMATE PROJECTION OF XML DOCUMENTS | May 2005 | October 2008 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 10958746 | APPLICATION FAILURE DIAGNOSIS | October 2004 | August 2010 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner UDDIN, MOHAMMED R.
With a 16.7% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 40.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner UDDIN, MOHAMMED R works in Art Unit 2161 and has examined 69 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 98.6%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 40 months.
Examiner UDDIN, MOHAMMED R's allowance rate of 98.6% places them in the 92% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by UDDIN, MOHAMMED R receive 2.55 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 75% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by UDDIN, MOHAMMED R is 40 months. This places the examiner in the 23% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +5.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by UDDIN, MOHAMMED R. This interview benefit is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 31.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 18.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 80.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 71.4% of appeals filed. This is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 13.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 13.0% of allowed cases (in the 96% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.