Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19110827 | GENERATION AND USE OF SEARCHABLE GRAPH DATA STRUCTURE BASED ON ONTOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE | March 2025 | November 2025 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 19025912 | STORAGE CONSTRAINED SYNCHRONIZATION OF SHARED CONTENT ITEMS | January 2025 | October 2025 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18872839 | CLASSIFICATION DEVICE, CLASSIFICATION METHOD, AND CLASSIFICATION PROGRAM | December 2024 | February 2026 | Abandon | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18954624 | CONFLICT-FREE PARALLEL RADIX SORTING DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD | November 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18946762 | Deduplication in Retrieval-Access Generation Ingestion Versioning | November 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18939754 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PARSING LOG FILES USING CLASSIFICATION AND A PLURALITY OF NEURAL NETWORKS | November 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18934811 | INCENTIVIZED ELECTRONIC PLATFORM | November 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18920737 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING DATA ANALYTICS ON SENSITIVE DATA IN REMOTE NETWORK ENVIRONMENTS WITHOUT EXPOSING CONTENT OF THE SENSITIVE DATA | October 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18886712 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERFORMANT DATA MATCHING | September 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18824878 | GENERATING AUTOMATICALLY ENTITY PROFILE DATA TO RELATE TO PERSONA CLASSIFICATION DATA TO CUSTOMIZE INTEGRATION DATA INTO COMPATIBLE DISTRIBUTED DATA SOURCES AT VARIOUS NETWORKED COMPUTING DEVICES | September 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18824877 | AUTOMATING GENERATION OF PERSONA CLASSIFICATION DATA TO CUSTOMIZE INTEGRATION DATA INTO COMPATIBLE DISTRIBUTED DATA SOURCES AT VARIOUS NETWORKED COMPUTING DEVICES | September 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18808150 | STORAGE CONSTRAINED SYNCHRONIZATION OF SHARED CONTENT ITEMS | August 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18835224 | Image Search Method and Related Apparatus | August 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18760895 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LARGE FILE UPLOAD, CONFIGURABLE WITH USER WORKFLOWS | July 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18757288 | DRAWING SEARCH DEVICE, DRAWING DATABASE CONSTRUCTION DEVICE, DRAWING SEARCH SYSTEM, DRAWING SEARCH METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | June 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18746516 | QUERY EXECUTION SYSTEM WITH PLAN REUSE | June 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18648104 | LOAD-BALANCING DATA PROTECTION TRAFFIC | April 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18633606 | DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM STORING DATA PROCESSING PROGRAM, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING OUTPUT MATTER | April 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18616662 | Cross-Grid Replication Within A Distributed Storage System | March 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18594998 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A FILTERED DATA SET | March 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18590863 | AGGREGATING DATA TO FORM GENERALIZED PROFILES BASED ON ARCHIVED EVENT DATA AND COMPATIBLE DISTRIBUTED DATA FILES WITH WHICH TO INTEGRATE DATA ACROSS MULTIPLE DATA STREAMS | February 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18416991 | COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME | January 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18472769 | CONTEXTUAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DATA VISUALIZATIONS | September 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18240519 | IMAGE SEARCH APPARATUS, IMAGE SEARCH METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM | August 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18314646 | Visual Citations for Information Provided in Response to Multimodal Queries | May 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18178613 | DATA LOADING BASED ON WORKLOAD PREDICTIONS FOR IMPROVED PERFORMANCE OF CLOUD-BASED SYSTEMS | March 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 36 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18175525 | AUTOMATED ENRICHMENT OF ENTITY DESCRIPTIONS IN UNSTRUCTURED TEXT | February 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17988193 | MACHINE LEARNING-INFUSED ANALYSIS ENGINE | November 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17812230 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF ASSIGNING A CLASSIFICATION TO A STATE OR CONDITION OF AN EVALUATION TARGET | July 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17603322 | IMAGE SEARCH DEVICE, COMPONENT MOUNTING SYSTEM, AND IMAGE SEARCH METHOD | October 2021 | January 2026 | Abandon | 51 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 14854131 | PROBLEM MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE | September 2015 | June 2016 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14605993 | DISTRIBUTING WEB APPLICATIONS ACROSS A PRE-EXISTING WEB | January 2015 | April 2016 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14564047 | System And Method For Classifying Documents Via Propagation | December 2014 | September 2016 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14543933 | METHOD, SYSTEM, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR TRANSFERRING DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES | November 2014 | June 2015 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14313000 | PROVIDING A VISUAL AND CONVERSATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN SUPPORT OF RECOMMENDATIONS | June 2014 | October 2016 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14227974 | TECHNIQUE FOR FACTORING UNCERTAINTY INTO COST-BASED QUERY OPTIMIZATION | March 2014 | October 2015 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14141164 | Method for Recommending Applications for Deletion | December 2013 | May 2016 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14039025 | ARCHIVAL MANAGEMENT OF DATABASE LOGS | September 2013 | January 2016 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13837241 | PROBLEM MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE | March 2013 | June 2015 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13681352 | METHOD OF MANAGING PROGRAM FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE | November 2012 | May 2015 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13680860 | REPORT GENERATION APPARATUS, REPORT GENERATION SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | November 2012 | July 2015 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13650054 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SIMPLIFYING DATA RESTORATION USING RESOURCE TYPES | October 2012 | January 2015 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13650005 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMPRESSING DATABASE OBJECTS | October 2012 | February 2015 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13550161 | Methods and Systems For Using Distributed Allocation Tables | July 2012 | May 2014 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13545657 | Distributed Storage Method and System | July 2012 | March 2014 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13488728 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING A MULTIDIMENSIONAL STRING QUERY | June 2012 | November 2015 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13433717 | IDENTIFYING UNIVERSAL RESOURCE LOCATOR REWRITING RULES | March 2012 | October 2013 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13114255 | ANALYSIS-PROGRAM STORING RECORDING MEDIUM, ANALYZING APPARATUS, AND ANALYTIC METHOD | May 2011 | June 2014 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13113581 | POSITION INVARIANT COMPRESSION OF FILES WITHIN A MULTI-LEVEL COMPRESSION SCHEME | May 2011 | October 2014 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13112652 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRESENTING EVENTS | May 2011 | January 2013 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13107699 | Interactively Entering Data Into the Database | May 2011 | January 2016 | Allow | 56 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13099887 | IDENTIFYING UNIVERSAL RESOURCE LOCATOR REWRITING RULES | May 2011 | March 2013 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13088570 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PERSONAL INFORMATION EXTRACTION AND MODELING WITH FULLY GENERALIZED EXTRACTION CONTEXTS | April 2011 | June 2015 | Allow | 50 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13025355 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPARING UNIVERSITIES BASED ON THEIR UNIVERSITY MODEL GRAPHS | February 2011 | June 2013 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13021278 | IMPLICIT HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING | February 2011 | September 2012 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13021618 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROPAGATING CLASSIFICATION DECISIONS | February 2011 | June 2012 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13012326 | TRANSACTIONAL SERVICE PIPELINE | January 2011 | October 2013 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13008705 | CRITICAL PARAMETER/REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND ENVIRONMENT | January 2011 | August 2012 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 13008776 | CRITICAL PARAMETER/REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND ENVIRONMENT | January 2011 | December 2011 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 12903302 | DESCRIBING A PARADIGMATIC MEMBER OF A TASK DIRECTED COMMUNITY IN A COMPLEX HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENT BASED ON NON-LINEAR ATTRIBUTES | October 2010 | June 2016 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 12556523 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, PROGRAM AND STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2009 | March 2013 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12509149 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ERASING AND WRITING DESKTOP MANAGEMENT INTERFACE DATA UNDER A LINUX SYSTEM | July 2009 | July 2011 | Allow | 24 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12421688 | INDEXING INFORMATION ABOUT ENTITIES WITH RESPECT TO HIERARCHIES | April 2009 | February 2013 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12355742 | MOOD BASED MUSIC RECOMMENDATION METHOD AND SYSTEM | January 2009 | June 2012 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 11967588 | PARSING INFORMATION IN DATA RECORDS AND IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES | December 2007 | October 2011 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11927699 | SYSTEMS AND APPARATUSES FOR SEAMLESS INTEGRATION OF USER, CONTEXTUAL, AND SOCIALLY AWARE SEARCH UTILIZING LAYERED APPROACH | October 2007 | September 2010 | Allow | 34 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11694618 | CUSTODIAN BASED CONTENT IDENTIFICATION | March 2007 | April 2012 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11694462 | RANKING METHOD USING HYPERLINKS IN BLOGS | March 2007 | October 2012 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11691923 | METHOD FOR PROVIDING THE APPEARANCE OF A SINGLE DATA REPOSITORY FOR QUERIES INITIATED IN A SYSTEM INCORPORATING DISTRIBUTED MEMBER SERVER GROUPS | March 2007 | November 2010 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11607260 | RECURSIVE FILE BACKUP | December 2006 | May 2010 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11606799 | COLLABORATIVE WORKSPACE CONTEXT INFORMATION FILTERING | November 2006 | June 2010 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 11559859 | DISTRIBUTING WEB APPLICATIONS ACROSS A PRE-EXISTING WEB | November 2006 | January 2012 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10570822 | METHOD OF CONSTRUCTING PREFERRED VIEWS OF HIERARCHICAL DATA | October 2006 | November 2009 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 11526409 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONCEPT-BASED VISUAL PRESENTATION OF SEARCH RESULTS | September 2006 | July 2010 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11523361 | METHOD FOR ASSIGNING QUALITY SCORES TO DOCUMENTS IN A LINKED DATABASE | September 2006 | November 2009 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11522223 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMPARING ATTRIBUTES SUCH AS PERSONAL NAMES | September 2006 | August 2009 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10588322 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND METHOD FOR RETAINING SECURITY | August 2006 | April 2009 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11435610 | CONTENT REPRODUCTION APPARATUS AND CONTENT REPRODUCTION METHOD | May 2006 | October 2009 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11358331 | METHOD, SYSTEM, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR TRANSFERRING DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES | February 2006 | July 2014 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11315458 | DOCUMENT ALIGNMENT SYSTEMS FOR LEGACY DOCUMENT CONVERSIONS | December 2005 | October 2010 | Allow | 58 | 5 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11265851 | DATABASE CACHE SYSTEM | November 2005 | August 2009 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 11229342 | NETWORK-BASED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACCESSING AND PROCESSING EMAILS AND OTHER ELECTRONIC LEGAL DOCUMENTS THAT MAY INCLUDE DUPLICATE INFORMATION | September 2005 | February 2010 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11190690 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR CONSTRUCTING PERSONALIZED CONTEXT-SENSITIVE PORTAL PAGES OR VIEWS BY ANALYZING PATTERNS OF USERS' INFORMATION ACCESS ACTIVITIES | July 2005 | November 2010 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11001260 | CRITICAL PARAMETER/REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND ENVIRONMENT | December 2004 | October 2010 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 2 | No | No |
| 10943284 | IN-PLACE SPLITTING AND MERGING OF FILES | September 2004 | October 2010 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 10941584 | Method, system, apparatus, program code and means for determining a redundancy of information | September 2004 | January 2013 | Allow | 60 | 10 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10941310 | USER-LOCALIZABLE HIERARCHICAL LISTS | September 2004 | June 2009 | Allow | 57 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 10941742 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH LEGAL, COMPLIANCE AND REGULATORY RISK | September 2004 | February 2013 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10468636 | Controlling the creation of process instances in workflow management systems | December 2003 | December 2013 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner RUIZ, ANGELICA.
With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 27.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner RUIZ, ANGELICA works in Art Unit 2154 and has examined 60 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 95.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.
Examiner RUIZ, ANGELICA's allowance rate of 95.0% places them in the 84% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by RUIZ, ANGELICA receive 2.63 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 77% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RUIZ, ANGELICA is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 21% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +1.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RUIZ, ANGELICA. This interview benefit is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 26.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 30.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 80.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 69.2% of appeals filed. This is in the 55% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 33.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 42.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 6.7% of allowed cases (in the 89% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.