USPTO Examiner MCGHEE TRACEY M - Art Unit 2154

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17108374SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CAPTURING DATA SCHEMA FOR DATABASES DURING DATA INSERTIONDecember 2020March 2023Allow2820NoNo
17106851SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESENTING IMAGE CLASSIFICATION RESULTSNovember 2020June 2023Allow3110YesNo
17073436MASKING SENSITIVE INFORMATION IN A DOCUMENTOctober 2020May 2024Allow4330YesYes
17067481COMPUTERIZED METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DATA CLONINGOctober 2020July 2023Allow3320NoNo
17027696MANAGING VERSIONS OF OBJECTS RESULTING FROM APPENDING DATA FOR SPACE EFFICIENCYSeptember 2020October 2023Allow3630YesNo
16906232AUTOMATED PROCESSING OF UNSTRUCTURED TEXT DATA IN PAIRED DATA FIELDS OF A DOCUMENTJune 2020December 2023Allow4230NoYes
16849873Generating Reports from Unstructured DataApril 2020April 2023Allow3630YesNo
16843218ELECTRONIC MEDIA RETRIEVALApril 2020February 2023Allow3500YesNo
16839131QUERY EXPANSION IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMSApril 2020October 2023Allow4311NoNo
16829450INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAMMarch 2020September 2023Abandon4220NoNo
16812121METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CLASSIFYING SAMPLESMarch 2020October 2022Abandon3240NoNo
16780636DEMAND BASED FILE REPLICATIONFebruary 2020November 2022Abandon3310YesNo
16669864METHOD FOR ORGANISING CONTENTOctober 2019October 2022Abandon3620NoNo
16534375SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESENTING IMAGE CLASSIFICATION RESULTSAugust 2019August 2020Allow1320NoNo
16409284CONTAINER-BASED VIRTUALIZATION FOR TESTING DATABASE SYSTEMMay 2019October 2023Allow5330YesNo
16364168MEASURING AND INCREASING THE QUALITY OF USER-PROVIDED INFORMATIONMarch 2019September 2021Abandon3040YesNo
16280252DATA EXTRACTION USING A DISTRIBUTED INDEXING ARCHITECTURE FOR DATABASESFebruary 2019September 2022Allow4320NoNo
16280591EFFICIENT GRAPH QUERY EXECUTION ENGINE SUPPORTING GRAPHS WITH MULTIPLE VERTEX AND EDGE TYPESFebruary 2019January 2024Abandon5940YesNo
16281060SYSTEM THAT CUSTOMIZES A RE-RANKER BASED UPON END USER INPUTFebruary 2019October 2023Abandon5620NoYes
16279920Data Replication Using Probabilistic Replication FiltersFebruary 2019May 2022Allow3930YesYes
16278585Intent Signaling with CollaboratorsFebruary 2019September 2023Abandon5560YesNo
16252159DIRECTING PLACEMENT OF DATA IN CLOUD STORAGE NODESJanuary 2019March 2022Allow3820NoNo
16251390ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND SEARCH KEYWORD PROCESSING METHOD THEREOFJanuary 2019September 2022Allow4430NoNo
16251760BUCKETIZING DATA INTO BUCKETS FOR PROCESSING BY CODE MODULESJanuary 2019April 2022Abandon3920NoYes
16251464SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISCOVERING SYNERGISTIC COMPANIESJanuary 2019March 2023Abandon5060YesNo
16180146INTELLIGENT DIAGNOSIS AND RESOLUTION OF DOCUMENT PROCESSING FAILURESNovember 2018May 2022Allow4230NoNo
16180880DISTRIBUTED DATA DEDUPLICATION REFERENCE COUNTINGNovember 2018July 2022Allow4430YesNo
16179843SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING AN INTELLIGENT CROSS-DOMAIN SEARCHNovember 2018March 2021Abandon2810NoNo
16179562Object Mining and Recognition SystemNovember 2018August 2022Allow4630YesNo
16179220INSTANT REPLAY OF A FILE TO A CLOUD TIER ON A DEDUPLICATION FILE SYSTEMNovember 2018July 2022Allow4430NoNo
16145010ENSURING INTEGRITY OF RECORDS IN A NOT ONLY STRUCTURED QUERY LANGUAGE DATABASESeptember 2018October 2022Allow4850YesNo
16145093PARTIAL MIGRATION OF APPLICATIONS ACROSS DATABASE SYSTEMSSeptember 2018April 2023Allow5560YesNo
16144974VOICE CONVERSATIONAL SEARCH CONSTRAINT MANAGEMENTSeptember 2018September 2023Allow6050YesNo
16117752Timeline of Events in Search Based SystemAugust 2018April 2022Abandon4440YesNo
16117478SMART SEARCH AND HELP SYSTEMAugust 2018July 2022Abandon4720NoYes
16106536SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING RESILIENCE WITHIN AN AUGMENTED MEDIA INTELLIGENCE ECOSYSTEMAugust 2018May 2022Abandon4540YesNo
16051677TAGGING DOCUMENTS TO DISPLAY WITH CONTEXT SENSITIVITY FOR IMPROVED USER EXPERIENCEAugust 2018July 2023Allow5960YesYes
16052364CROSS-APPLICATION INGESTION AND RESTRUCTURING OF CONTENTAugust 2018February 2023Allow5550YesNo
16052461Active Change Detection For Geospatial Entities Using Trend AnalysisAugust 2018December 2020Allow2810NoNo
16060022APPLICATION-AWARE DATABASE BACKUPSJune 2018February 2022Abandon4430NoNo
15848491COST BASED FUNCTION OPTIMIZATION FOR COUPLED SYSTEMSDecember 2017September 2022Allow5720NoYes
15847551METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING AN ACTION TO BE TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO A USER QUERY AS A FUNCTION OF PRE-QUERY CONTEXT INFORMATIONDecember 2017April 2022Allow5240YesYes
15843582STRUCTURED DATA CORRELATION FROM INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE BASESDecember 2017July 2021Allow4340YesNo
15844032FEED OPTIMIZATIONDecember 2017September 2022Allow5750NoYes
15843934FILE RECOVERY USING ANTI-VIRUS ENGINE AND BACKUP PROVIDERDecember 2017July 2021Allow4330YesNo
15844110SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLIENT-SIDE DATA ANALYSISDecember 2017September 2022Allow5740YesNo
15844209SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DATA STORAGE AND RETRIEVALDecember 2017October 2020Abandon3410NoNo
15844072ENRICHING A KNOWLEDGE GRAPHDecember 2017March 2021Abandon3920NoNo
15844061SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMMENT RANKING USING NEURAL EMBEDDINGSDecember 2017April 2021Abandon4020NoNo
15844100DETERMINING CONNECTION SUGGESTIONSDecember 2017May 2021Abandon4120NoNo
15631250Techniques and Architectures for Native Data Field Lifecycle ManagementJune 2017November 2021Allow5330NoNo
15630360HIGH PERFORMANCE DICTIONARY FOR MANAGED ENVIRONMENTJune 2017September 2022Allow6050YesNo
15630489VISUALIZATION-ORIENTED TIME SERIES DATA AGGREGATIONJune 2017January 2022Allow5440NoYes
15630907SERVER SYSTEM AND READING METHODJune 2017September 2021Abandon5140NoNo
15583617System And Method For Interactive Discovery Of Inter-Data Set RelationshipsMay 2017December 2023Allow6070YesYes
15583624Selection Query Language Methods And SystemsMay 2017December 2021Allow5640YesYes
15583606METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ELECTRONIC GENERATION OF NARRATIVESMay 2017September 2023Allow6060YesYes
15583836BROWSER BASED, PLUGGABLE, WORKFLOW DRIVEN BIG DATA PIPELINES AND ANALYTICS SYSTEMMay 2017September 2020Abandon4120NoNo
15476704SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RESOURCE RECONCILIATION IN AN ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMMarch 2017June 2020Allow3840NoYes
15243258RANKING INFORMATION PROVIDERSAugust 2016September 2019Abandon3710NoNo
15243608DEMAND BASED FILE REPLICATIONAugust 2016March 2020Abandon4320NoNo
15243530SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CATEGORIZING WEBPAGE BOOKMARKSAugust 2016May 2019Abandon3310NoNo
15242941COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM, EVENT FILTERING APPARATUS, AND EVENT FILTERING METHODAugust 2016August 2020Abandon4830NoNo
15243598ADJUSTING FEATURE WEIGHTS FOR RANKING ENTITY BASED SEARCH RESULTSAugust 2016May 2020Abandon4520NoNo
15243719EFFICIENT MEANS FOR IDENTIFYING COMMON SUBSEQUENCES USING A TIER SETAugust 2016September 2019Abandon3710NoNo
15242915SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RECOMMENDING CONTENT ITEMSAugust 2016July 2022Abandon6060YesNo
15243131SYSTEM AND METHOD TO AUTOMATE VALIDATING MEDIA REDIRECTION IN TESTING PROCESSAugust 2016February 2022Allow6060NoNo
15242896Method and Apparatus for Information Presentation Based on Service ObjectAugust 2016October 2021Abandon6050NoNo
15159901ENTAILMENT KNOWLEDGE BASE IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMSMay 2016March 2023Allow6080YesNo
15143579Graphically Selectable Filter Parameters for Field Data in a Set of Machine DataApril 2016April 2022Abandon6080YesNo
15044165Browser Search Result Option to Facilitate Human SpideringFebruary 2016June 2021Allow6040NoYes
14986759ENTAILMENT KNOWLEDGE BASE IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMSJanuary 2016October 2022Allow6070YesNo
14986792COMPUTER METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR FLAT NAVIGATIONJanuary 2016November 2022Allow6060YesYes
14987649TECHNIQUES FOR PERFORMING DATA RECONCILIATION IN DISTRIBUTED DATA STORE SYSTEMSJanuary 2016June 2023Allow6070NoYes
14987056DATABASE INDEX FOR CONSTRUCTING LARGE SCALE DATA LEVEL OF DETAILSJanuary 2016December 2019Abandon4820NoNo
14987543RECIPROCAL DATA FILE PUBLISHING AND MATCHING SYSTEMJanuary 2016March 2019Abandon3910NoNo
14986815AUTHORIZED DATA SOURCE VALIDATION OF EVIDENCE TOOLJanuary 2016May 2020Abandon5230NoNo
14986634Time-Differential User Interface for Datacenter ManagementJanuary 2016March 2023Allow6090NoNo
14960480GENERATING MESSAGES USING KEYWORDSDecember 2015January 2022Abandon6060YesNo
14960557Data Replication Based on Compression Ratio HistoryDecember 2015January 2022Allow6050YesYes
14960361METHOD OF MANIPULATING VOCABULARY DEPENDING ON THE AUDIENCEDecember 2015January 2023Abandon6080YesNo
14960181CONTENT RELEVANCE IN A SOCIAL NETWORKING SYSTEM BY SIMULATING FEED RANKING MODELSDecember 2015August 2021Abandon6050YesYes
14960043DISTRIBUTED DATABASE DRIVER MIDDLEWAREDecember 2015August 2020Allow5640YesNo
14960168AUTONOMIC FUSION CHANGES BASED OFF DATA RATESDecember 2015February 2019Abandon3930NoNo
14959722OPTIMAL INDEX SELECTION IN POLYNOMIAL TIMEDecember 2015May 2021Allow6020NoYes
14867083QUERYING A QUESTION AND ANSWER SYSTEMSeptember 2015March 2020Abandon5420YesNo
14753475SCHEMA MANAGEMENT FOR JOURNAL-BASED STORAGE SYSTEMSJune 2015October 2022Allow6080YesNo
14753421LOGGING FILE SYSTEM METADATA CHANGES USING A SINGLE LOG HOLD PER CACHED BLOCK OF METADATAJune 2015November 2020Allow6050NoNo
14753495COMPACT SNAPSHOTS OF JOURNAL-BASED STORAGE SYSTEMSJune 2015August 2020Allow6040NoNo
14753505CONSISTENCY MANAGEMENT USING QUERY RESTRICTIONS IN JOURNAL-BASED STORAGE SYSTEMSJune 2015September 2022Allow6080YesNo
14753484STORAGE SYSTEM JOURNAL ENTRY REDACTIONJune 2015August 2020Allow6040NoNo
14726334DIGITAL ASSET AND DESIGN COMPONENT TRACKING IN A COLLABORATIVE ENVIRONMENTMay 2015February 2024Allow6080YesYes
14718998AUTOMATED COMPATIBILITY MATCHING SYSTEM FOR DOGS AND DOG OWNERSMay 2015April 2018Abandon3410NoNo
14435042DEVICE FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION, AND METHOD AND PROGRAM FOR MANAGING CHRONOLOGICAL INFORMATIONApril 2015January 2020Abandon5750NoNo
14434666METHOD FOR ORGANISING CONTENTApril 2015November 2019Abandon5540NoNo
14434151INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICEApril 2015December 2018Abandon4420NoNo
14433448System and Method for Providing Content in Real-TimeApril 2015October 2017Abandon3110NoNo
14431629Data Collector and Associated Method, Computer Program and Computer Program ProductMarch 2015September 2019Abandon5440NoNo
14644371METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR APPLICATION LOADINGMarch 2015May 2022Allow6080YesYes
14636948DYNAMIC NODES FOR MANAGING ORGANIZATION STRUCTUREMarch 2015February 2020Allow5940NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MCGHEE, TRACEY M.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
8
Examiner Affirmed
4
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
4
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
71.8%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
43
Allowed After Appeal Filing
25
(58.1%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
18
(41.9%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
87.6%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 58.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner MCGHEE, TRACEY M - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MCGHEE, TRACEY M works in Art Unit 2154 and has examined 176 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 48.3%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 54 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MCGHEE, TRACEY M's allowance rate of 48.3% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MCGHEE, TRACEY M receive 4.15 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 97% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MCGHEE, TRACEY M is 54 months. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +34.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MCGHEE, TRACEY M. This interview benefit is in the 82% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 11.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 13.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 87.5% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 67% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 80.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 37.5% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 71.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.