Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19009718 | SPLINE CURVE INTERPOLATION METHOD AND SYSTEM BASED ON ARC LENGTH PREDICTION AND ITERATIVE TUNING | January 2025 | January 2026 | Abandon | 13 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18949783 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF TRANSPOSED MATRIX-VECTOR MULTIPLICATION | November 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18489640 | Floating-point Division Circuitry with Subnormal Support | October 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17620562 | CONVERTER FOR CONVERTING DATA TYPE, CHIP, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND METHOD THEREFOR | June 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 50 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17785510 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | June 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 41 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17825911 | REINFORCEMENT LEARNING DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF | May 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17824712 | SIGNAL PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR GENERATING A PLURALITY OF OUTPUT SAMPLES USING COMBINER LOGIC BASED ON A HIEARCHICHAL TREE STRUCTURE | May 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17741481 | CORDIC COMPUTATION OF SIN/COS USING COMBINED APPROACH IN ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY | May 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 42 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17727313 | APPROXIMATE MAXIMAL CLIQUE ENUMERATION FOR DYNAMIC GRAPHS | April 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17719419 | Data Processing Device Having A Logic Circuit for Calculating a Modified Cross Sum | April 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17717823 | HARDWARE ACCELERATED MINOR EMBEDDING FOR QUANTUM ANNEALING | April 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17762740 | APPROXIMATE FUNCTION CALCULATION APPARATUS, METHOD AND PROGRAM | March 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17700122 | RAM TRUE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR | March 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17682271 | IMPORTANCE CALCULATION APPARATUS, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | February 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 48 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17637030 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, NONVOLATILE STORAGE APPARATUS, MULTIPLY-ACCUMULATE OPERATION APPARATUS, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | February 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17670284 | Binary Optimization Using Shallow Boson Sampling | February 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17583411 | IMPLEMENTING DILATED CONVOLUTION IN HARDWARE | January 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17583054 | Binary Optimization with Boson Sampling | January 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17563836 | ADDER CELL AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT INCLUDING THE SAME | December 2021 | November 2025 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17553726 | BANDWIDTH-AWARE FLEXIBLE-SCHEDULING MACHINE LEARNING ACCELERATOR | December 2021 | January 2026 | Abandon | 49 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17596734 | MIXED-SIGNAL ACCELERATION OF DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS | December 2021 | February 2026 | Allow | 50 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17643615 | ARITHMETIC DEVICE AND METHOD | December 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17519850 | ARITHMETIC APPARATUS, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | November 2021 | February 2026 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17441801 | RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION CIRCUIT | September 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17367517 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR MATRIX AND VECTOR STORAGE AND OPERATIONS | July 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17348034 | RANKING FINITE REGULAR EXPRESSION FORMATS USING STATE MACHINES | June 2021 | November 2025 | Abandon | 53 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17338381 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OPTICAL MATRIX CALCULATION | June 2021 | August 2025 | Allow | 50 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17335858 | PARALLEL PROCESSING OF A SOFTMAX OPERATION BY DIVIDING AN INPUT VECTOR INTO A PLURALITY OF FRAGMENTS | June 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17320453 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING POWER CONSUMPTION IN COMPUTE CIRCUITS | May 2021 | February 2026 | Abandon | 57 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17207912 | DETERMINING TRIANGLES IN GRAPH DATA STRUCTURES USING CROSSPOINT ARRAY | March 2021 | November 2025 | Abandon | 56 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16982153 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING RANDOM BIT STRING IN AN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT | September 2020 | February 2026 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17013583 | COMPRESSION USING ENTROPY REDUCTION BASED ON PSEUDO RANDOM NUMBERS | September 2020 | November 2020 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16926342 | APERIODIC PSEUDO-RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR BASED ON A LINEAR CONGRUENTIAL GENERATOR | July 2020 | January 2021 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16926376 | APERIODIC PSEUDO-RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR USING BIG PSEUDO-RANDOM NUMBERS | July 2020 | February 2021 | Allow | 7 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16903335 | HARDWARE ACCELERATION MACHINE LEARNING AND IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM WITH ADD AND SHIFT OPERATIONS | June 2020 | March 2026 | Abandon | 60 | 10 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16267531 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | February 2019 | March 2021 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16257106 | ON-CHIP HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR | January 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner WAJE, CARLO C works in Art Unit 2151 and has examined 20 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 75.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 50 months.
Examiner WAJE, CARLO C's allowance rate of 75.0% places them in the 40% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by WAJE, CARLO C receive 2.70 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 79% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WAJE, CARLO C is 50 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +5.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WAJE, CARLO C. This interview benefit is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 21.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 25% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 28.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 40% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.