USPTO Examiner SANDIFER MATTHEW D - Art Unit 2151

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19232245CIRCUIT FOR EFFICIENTLY PERFORMING OPERATIONS ON INPUT DATA TO COMPUTE AN INTERPRETABLE AND DIFFERENTIABLE FUNCTIONJune 2025December 2025Allow710YesNo
19201747HIGH PRECISION ANALOG OPTICAL COMPUTING METHOD AND SYSTEM BASED ON BIT SLICEMay 2025October 2025Allow510YesNo
19097839METHODS FOR DESIGNING HIGH FREEDOM PARAMETERIZED FREQUENCY-MODULATED CODED WAVEFORMApril 2025September 2025Allow510NoNo
19046863AEROELECTROMAGNETIC DATA INVERSION METHOD AND SYSTEM BASED ON APPROXIMATE JACOBIAN MATRIXFebruary 2025February 2026Abandon1220NoNo
19011658METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LIGHTWEIGHTING OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL USING DEQUANTIZATIONJanuary 2025August 2025Allow700YesNo
18754719BIT MATRIX MULTIPLICATIONJune 2024October 2025Allow1620YesNo
18739768METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPLIED BIT HANDLING IN FLOATING POINT MULTIPLICATIONJune 2024July 2025Allow1310NoNo
18602936Combinatorial Logic Circuits With FeedbackMarch 2024August 2025Allow1820YesNo
18587519SYSTEMS AND METHODS EMPLOYING UNIQUE DEVICE FOR GENERATING RANDOM SIGNALS AND METERING AND ADDRESSING, E.G., UNUSUAL DEVIATIONS IN SAID RANDOM SIGNALSFebruary 2024June 2025Allow1610NoNo
18444249LOW LATENCY MATRIX MULTIPLY UNITFebruary 2024November 2025Allow2100YesNo
17939654SYSTOLIC PARALLEL GALOIS HASH COMPUTING DEVICESeptember 2022December 2025Allow3940YesNo
17799977SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEAugust 2022February 2026Allow4200YesNo
17847817ACCELERATION OF 1X1 CONVOLUTIONS IN CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKSJune 2022January 2026Allow4200YesNo
17840908APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING ACCUMULATION OPERATIONSJune 2022October 2025Allow4000NoNo
17703744MULTIPLICATION AND ACCUMULATION(MAC) OPERATOR AND PROCESSING-IN-MEMORY (PIM) DEVICE INCLUDING THE MAC OPERATORMarch 2022January 2026Allow4610NoNo
17761116CHARGE-DOMAIN IN-MEMORY COMPUTING CIRCUITMarch 2022November 2025Allow4401NoNo
17686409COMPUTING DEVICE, COMPUTING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF WARP ACCUMULATIONMarch 2022October 2025Allow4300NoNo
17680436DYNAMIC ALGORITHM SELECTIONFebruary 2022February 2026Allow4710YesNo
17674134APPARATUS AND METHOD WITH IN-MEMORY COMPUTINGFebruary 2022March 2026Allow4900YesNo
17576898MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR COMPUTING-IN-MEMORY (CIM)January 2022August 2025Allow4301NoNo
17625392SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING PRODUCT-SUM OPERATION CIRCUIT AND MEMORY DEVICE, ELECTRONIC COMPONENT, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEJanuary 2022January 2026Allow4900NoNo
17551876SGCNAX: A SCALABLE GRAPH CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK ACCELERATOR WITH WORKLOAD BALANCINGDecember 2021August 2025Allow4401YesNo
17546523APPARATUS AND METHOD WITH MULTIPLY-ACCUMULATE OPERATIONDecember 2021January 2026Allow5000YesNo
17542833APPARATUS AND METHOD WITH MULTIPLY-ACCUMULATE OPERATIONDecember 2021January 2026Allow5000YesNo
17542016PIPELINED PROCESSING OF POLYNOMIAL COMPUTATIONDecember 2021February 2026Allow5000NoNo
17500568SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SINGLE CHIP QUANTUM RANDOM NUMBER GENERATIONOctober 2021August 2025Allow4610NoNo
17490037DECOMPOSING MATRICES FOR PROCESSING AT A PROCESSOR-IN-MEMORYSeptember 2021October 2025Allow4820YesNo
17489734CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK OPERATIONSSeptember 2021January 2026Allow5210YesNo
17485342LEARNING STATIC BOUND MANAGEMENT PARAMETERS FOR ANALOG RESISTIVE PROCESSING UNIT SYSTEMSeptember 2021January 2026Allow5110NoNo
17480925CONVOLUTIONAL COMPUTATION DEVICESeptember 2021January 2026Allow5220YesNo
17465462SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANALYZING STABILITY USING METAL RESISTANCE VARIATIONSSeptember 2021September 2025Allow4911YesNo
17391718FOLDING COLUMN ADDER ARCHITECTURE FOR DIGITAL COMPUTE IN MEMORYAugust 2021September 2025Allow5010NoNo
17225915MULTIPLICATION AND ACCUMULATION (MAC) OPERATOR AND PROCESSING-IN-MEMORY (PIM) DEVICE INCLUDING THE MAC OPERATORApril 2021September 2025Allow5311YesNo
17138733TECHNIQUES TO PERFORM OPERATIONS WITH MATRIX MULTIPLY ACCUMULATE (MMA) CIRCUITRYDecember 2020July 2025Allow5520YesNo
17044799DATA PREDICTION DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAMOctober 2020November 2025Abandon6040YesNo
16798300Apparatus and Method of Fast Floating-Point Adder Tree for Neural NetworksFebruary 2020May 2021Allow1500NoNo
16553510LINEAR FEEDBACK SHIFT REGISTER WITH NEAR-MAXIMAL LENGTH SEQUENCESAugust 2019December 2020Allow1500YesNo
16511085SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SUPPORTING ALTERNATE NUMBER FORMAT FOR EFFICIENT MULTIPLICATIONJuly 2019December 2020Allow1800NoNo
16333987DYNAMICAL SWITCHING BETWEEN EPT AND SHADOW PAGE TABLES FOR RUNTIME PROCESSOR VERIFICATIONMarch 2019February 2021Allow2300NoNo
16253062SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERSJanuary 2019March 2020Allow1400YesNo
16242780Decentralized Random Number GeneratorJanuary 2019June 2020Allow1700YesNo
16208990Assessing Distances Between Pairs Of Histograms Based On Relaxed Flow ConstraintsDecember 2018February 2021Allow2610YesNo
16163596METHOD FOR EQUIVALENT HIGH SAMPLING RATE FIR FILTERING BASED ON FPGAOctober 2018February 2021Allow2810NoNo
16118592ADAPTIVE SORT ACCELERATOR SHARING FIRST LEVEL PROCESSOR CACHEAugust 2018January 2020Allow1710NoNo
16045688METASTABLE TRUE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR REALIZED ON FPGAJuly 2018September 2019Allow1400YesNo
16042207REPRODUCIBLE STOCHASTIC ROUNDING FOR OUT OF ORDER PROCESSORSJuly 2018October 2018Allow210NoNo
16070169METHOD, APPARATUS AND RECORDING MEDIUM FOR PROCESSING DIVISION CALCULATIONJuly 2018May 2020Allow2210YesNo
16017049HARDWARE ACCELERATED LINEAR SYSTEM SOLVERJune 2018March 2020Allow2010YesNo
16015789ARITHMETIC PROCESSING DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD FOR ARITHMETIC PROCESSING DEVICEJune 2018April 2020Allow2120YesNo
15878453ARITHMETIC OPERATION UNIT AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING ARITHMETIC OPERATION UNITJanuary 2018June 2019Allow1610YesNo
15842422MATRIX MULTIPLICATION ON A SYSTOLIC ARRAYDecember 2017November 2018Allow1130YesNo
15821171REPRODUCIBLE STOCHASTIC ROUNDING FOR OUT OF ORDER PROCESSORSNovember 2017May 2018Allow610YesNo
15782881ARITHMETIC PROCESSING DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD OF THE ARITHMETIC PROCESSING DEVICEOctober 2017March 2020Allow2910YesNo
15650619Signal Processing Method and ApparatusJuly 2017July 2020Allow3620YesNo
15515391ELECTRONIC CALCULATING DEVICE FOR PERFORMING OBFUSCATED ARITHMETICMarch 2017July 2019Allow2810YesNo
15514468DIGITAL PROCESSING OF AUDIO SIGNALS UTILIZING COSINE FUNCTIONSMarch 2017September 2019Allow2910YesNo
15459737CONVOLUTION OPERATION DEVICE AND METHODMarch 2017November 2018Allow2010NoNo
15314614PEAK FREQUENCY DETECTION DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAMNovember 2016October 2017Allow1010YesNo
15227149DETERMINING UNSIGNED NORMALIZED INTEGER REPRESENTATIONS OF A NUMBER IN DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMSAugust 2016December 2018Allow2810NoNo
15213884SIMPLIFYING CLAUSES FOR MAX-SATJuly 2016January 2019Allow3030YesNo
15074346FLOATING POINT EXECUTION UNIT FOR CALCULATING PACKED SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCESMarch 2016September 2016Allow510NoNo
15074378FLOATING POINT EXECUTION UNIT FOR CALCULATING PACKED SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCESMarch 2016September 2016Allow510NoNo
14987034PARTIAL STOCHASTIC ROUNDING THAT INCLUDES STICKY AND GUARD BITSJanuary 2016November 2017Allow2310YesNo
14641578SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEMarch 2015December 2016Allow2100NoNo
14554389SOLUTION METHOD AND SOLUTION APPARATUS FOR UNDERDETERMINED SYSTEM OF LINEAR EQUATIONSNovember 2014January 2017Allow2610NoNo
14403812LOW LATENCY AND LOW COMPLEXITY PHASE SHIFT NETWORKNovember 2014January 2017Allow2610YesNo
14551110CUBIC ROOT OF A GALOIS FIELD ELEMENTNovember 2014June 2017Allow3120NoNo
14397717GENERATING AND PARTITIONING POLYNOMIALSOctober 2014February 2017Allow2810YesNo
14448906PICOENGINE HAVING A HASH GENERATOR WITH REMAINDER INPUT S-BOX NONLINEARIZINGJuly 2014May 2017Allow3300YesNo
14299789COMPRESSION OF INTEGER DATA USING A COMMON DIVISORJune 2014February 2016Allow2010YesNo
14283918PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING A STAGE OF A FAST FOURIER TRANSFORMMay 2014March 2017Allow3400YesNo
14272879Generating a SignalMay 2014May 2017Allow3610NoNo
14219534RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION USING PULSED PROGRAMMING PARAMETERSMarch 2014August 2016Allow2900YesNo
14167253ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL PROCESSES AND METHODS OF USING THE SAMEJanuary 2014January 2017Allow3610YesNo
14143770COMPRESSION OF INTEGER DATA USING A COMMON DIVISORDecember 2013January 2016Allow2510YesNo
13663970OPERAND-OPTIMIZED ASYNCHRONOUS FLOATING-POINT UNITS AND METHOD OF USE THEREOFOctober 2012August 2016Allow4621YesNo
13408388FULLY DIGITAL CHAOTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION-BASED SYSTEMS AND METHODSFebruary 2012August 2016Allow5420YesNo
12127064DESIGN STRUCTURE FOR A BOOTH DECODERMay 2008May 2010Allow2310YesNo
11844402HALF WIDTH COUNTING LEADING ZERO CIRCUITAugust 2007March 2011Allow4300YesNo
11636242HIGH SPEED LOW POWER FIXED-POINT MULTIPLIER AND METHOD THEREOFDecember 2006November 2010Allow4810YesNo
11589932ARITHMETIC PROGRAM CONVERSION APPARATUS, ARITHMETIC PROGRAM CONVERSION PROGRAM AND ARITHMETIC PROGRAM CONVERSION METHODOctober 2006January 2011Allow5110YesNo
11426652BOOTH DECODER APPARATUS AND METHODJune 2006May 2010Allow4610YesNo
11341256COMMON SHIFT-AMOUNT CALCULATION FOR BINARY AND HEX FLOATING POINTJanuary 2006December 2009Allow4710YesNo
11213790ARITHMETIC UNIT OF ARBITRARY PRECISION, OPERATION METHOD FOR PROCESSING DATA OF ARBITRARY PRECISION AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENTAugust 2005July 2010Allow5930YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner SANDIFER, MATTHEW D - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SANDIFER, MATTHEW D works in Art Unit 2151 and has examined 63 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 98.4%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 29 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SANDIFER, MATTHEW D's allowance rate of 98.4% places them in the 91% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SANDIFER, MATTHEW D receive 1.02 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 10% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SANDIFER, MATTHEW D is 29 months. This places the examiner in the 63% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -2.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SANDIFER, MATTHEW D. This interview benefit is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 47.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 50.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 11.1% of allowed cases (in the 94% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 3.2% of allowed cases (in the 75% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.