Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18758221 | Generating And Presenting Search Filter Recommendations | June 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18652738 | MEDIA TRIGGERED VIRTUAL REPOSITORY WITH TEMPORAL DATA RECOGNITION AND MATCHING ENGINE | May 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18582831 | SURFACING AUGMENTED REALITY OBJECTS | February 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18543633 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MANAGING PROJECTS | December 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18512444 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SNAPSHOT MANAGEMENT | November 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18486032 | TEMPORAL REASONING | October 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18478283 | Snapshot Difference Namespace of a File System | September 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18243916 | STORAGE SYSTEM AND DATA BACKUP PROCESSING METHOD IN STORAGE SYSTEM | September 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18241040 | User-Configurable Autotagging Policies | August 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18448058 | SYSTEM AND TECHNIQUES FOR ENRICHING LOG RECORDS WITH FIELDS FROM OTHER LOG RECORDS IN STRUCTURED FORMAT | August 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18217943 | TRIGGER EXECUTION FOR TRIGGERS HAVING MULTIPLE INSERT OPERATIONS | July 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18342582 | DISTRIBUTED LEDGER BASED MACHINE-LEARNING MODEL MANAGEMENT | June 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18203874 | Multi-Cluster Database Deployment | May 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18326227 | Smart Search UI | May 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18321771 | FORENSIC CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION STORYBOARD | May 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18305367 | DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF AUTOMATICALLY INITIATING PROCESS | April 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18304545 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURE DATABASE SCHEMA MIGRATION | April 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18124907 | DATA REPOSITORY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM | March 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18112304 | GROUP RECOMMENDATION FOR USER-GENERATED CONTENT | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18145621 | AUTOMATED CATEGORIZATION OF GROUPS IN A SOCIAL NETWORK | December 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18065803 | THEME DETECTION WITHIN A CORPUS OF INFORMATION | December 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18062408 | APPARATUS, METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR DATABASE QUERY | December 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17241217 | CROSS-PROVIDER TOPIC CONFLATION | April 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16107914 | SYSTEMS FOR LEARNING AND USING ONE OR MORE SUB-POPULATION FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH INDIVIDUALS OF ONE OR MORE SUB-POPULATIONS OF A GROSS POPULATION AND RELATED METHODS THEREFOR | August 2018 | March 2020 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15709058 | MEDIA FILE SHARING, CORRELATION OF METADATA RELATED TO SHARED MEDIA FILES AND ASSEMBLING SHARED MEDIA FILE COLLECTIONS | September 2017 | January 2020 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15345827 | Method and System for Self-Organizing an Online Community of News Content Readers and Authors | November 2016 | December 2019 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15345810 | Method and System for Assigning Privileges in an Online Community of News Content Readers and Authors | November 2016 | February 2020 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14044268 | SMART DISTRIBUTED TRANSACTIONS AND MULTIPLY DISTRIBUTED TABLES | October 2013 | April 2014 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14044260 | REDISTRIBUTION REDUCTION IN EPRDBMS | October 2013 | April 2014 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13956762 | ANALYTIC SOLUTION INTEGRATION | August 2013 | May 2015 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13874616 | ANALYTIC SOLUTION INTEGRATION | May 2013 | May 2015 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13874270 | WEB ACCELERATION BASED ON HINTS DERIVED FROM CROWD SOURCING | April 2013 | November 2015 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13791472 | SUMMARIZING A STREAM OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL, AXIS-ALIGNED RECTANGLES | March 2013 | May 2015 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13744676 | DATABASE QUERY USING A USER-DEFINED FUNCTION | January 2013 | September 2015 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13744538 | AUTOMATICALLY GRANTING ACCESS TO CONTENT IN A MICROBLOG | January 2013 | May 2015 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13744825 | Low Priority, Multi-Pass, Server File Discovery and Management | January 2013 | July 2015 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13730203 | INTERACTION-BASED MANAGEMENT OF CONTACT ENTRIES | December 2012 | February 2015 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13673851 | RELATIVE PERFORMANCE PREDICTION OF A REPLACEMENT DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (DBMS) | November 2012 | April 2015 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13645657 | MONITORING STORED PROCEDURE EXECUTION | October 2012 | November 2014 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13619674 | MULTI-NODE REPLICATION SYSTEMS, DEVICES AND METHODS | September 2012 | May 2015 | Allow | 32 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 13425434 | COMPUTING DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND METHOD FOR OUTPUTING DIMENSION DATA USING THE COMPUTING DEVICE | March 2012 | November 2013 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13425435 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BACKING UP TEST DATA | March 2012 | July 2013 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13417406 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UPDATING INITIALIZATION PARAMETERS FOR APPLICATION SOFTWARE FROM WITHIN A SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT | March 2012 | November 2012 | Allow | 8 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13183133 | LOSSLESS TRANSFORMATION OF XBRL INSTANCE TO XML DATA MODEL INSTANCE | July 2011 | August 2013 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13183331 | EXPERTISE IDENTIFICATION USING INTERACTION METRICS | July 2011 | September 2013 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13072729 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TWO-WAY DATA FILTERING | March 2011 | March 2013 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13011260 | ASSET ADVISORY INTELLIGENCE ENGINE FOR MANAGING REUSABLE SOFTWARE ASSETS | January 2011 | August 2012 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12696849 | TECHNIQUES FOR GENERICALLY ACCESSING DATA | January 2010 | March 2013 | Allow | 37 | 4 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 12618299 | DOCUMENT SIMILARITY SCORING AND RANKING METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | November 2009 | September 2010 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12548437 | SYSTEM, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR STORING TRANSIENT STATE INFORMATION | August 2009 | February 2011 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12406201 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTEGRATING PERSONAL INFORMATION SEARCH AND INTERACTION ON WEB/DESKTOP APPLICATIONS | March 2009 | September 2011 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 12339354 | SEARCHING FOR A BUSINESS NAME IN A DATABASE | December 2008 | September 2011 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12260215 | COMPARISON OF DOCUMENTS BASED ON SIMILARITY MEASURES | October 2008 | May 2012 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12248663 | INTEGRATED ENTITY AND INTEGRATED OPERATIONS OF PERSONALIZED DATA RESOURCE ACROSS THE WORLD WIDE WEB FOR ONLINE AND OFFLINE INTERACTIONS | October 2008 | July 2011 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12186997 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND/OR METHODS FOR DETERMINING DATASET ESTIMATORS | August 2008 | November 2011 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12187053 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING TAGS | August 2008 | December 2012 | Allow | 52 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12187301 | REPRESENTATION OF SYSTEM CLOCK CHANGES IN TIME BASED FILE SYSTEMS | August 2008 | September 2011 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12187260 | DOCUMENT CREATION, LINKING, AND MAINTENANCE SYSTEM | August 2008 | November 2010 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12171510 | METHOD OF CHANGING THE PAGE SIZE OF A DB2 TABLE SPACE WHILE KEEPING THE OBJECT AVAILABLE | July 2008 | June 2012 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12136139 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF IDENTIFYING AND TRACKING SOFTWARE PATTERN SOFTWARE RECIPES | June 2008 | March 2013 | Allow | 57 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12096706 | CONTENT EDIT APPARATUS AND CONTENT VERIFICATION APPARATUS | June 2008 | December 2010 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12096167 | SYSTEM FOR INTEGRATED UTILIZATION OF DATA TO IDENTIFY, CHARACTERIZE, AND SUPPORT SUCCESSFUL FARM AND LAND USE OPERATIONS | June 2008 | March 2011 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12132108 | MEMBERSHIP CHECKING OF DIGITAL TEXT | June 2008 | July 2011 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 12095980 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROCESSING RELEVANT DATA FOR SORTING POSTAL ITEMS | June 2008 | June 2011 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12105984 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR UPDATING INITIALIZATION PARAMETERS FOR APPLICATION SOFTWARE FROM WITHIN A SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT | April 2008 | November 2012 | Allow | 55 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12050750 | SECURITY SYSTEM FOR SYNCHRONIZATION OF DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICE DATA | March 2008 | January 2011 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12044983 | PREDICTIVE ALGORITHM FOR LOAD BALANCING DATA TRANSFERS ACROSS COMPONENTS | March 2008 | April 2011 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12040587 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SEPARATING FILE SYSTEM METADATA FROM OTHER METADATA IN VIRTUAL MACHINE IMAGE FORMAT | February 2008 | April 2011 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12034705 | SECURITY SYSTEM FOR SYNCHRONIZATION OF DESKTOP AND MOBILE DEVICE DATA | February 2008 | January 2011 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12031750 | METHOD AND APPARATUS TO FACILITATE THE CREATING AND ALTERING OF INDEX OBJECTS ON TABLES | February 2008 | March 2011 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12000077 | DOCUMENT PROCESSOR AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | December 2007 | September 2010 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11900525 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SELECTING PERSONALIZED SEARCH ENGINES FOR ACCESSING INFORMATION | September 2007 | February 2014 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11775658 | INFORMATION RECEIVING SYSTEM, INFORMATION RECEIVING METHOD, INFORMATION PROVIDING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROVIDING METHOD, INFORMATION PROVIDING METHOD PROVIDING MEDIUM, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD PRO | July 2007 | March 2011 | Allow | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11775381 | FILE SYSTEM MOUNTING IN A CLUSTERED FILE SYSTEM | July 2007 | September 2010 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11775176 | GUARANTEEING HYPERTEXT LINK INTEGRITY | July 2007 | July 2011 | Allow | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11775052 | NATURAL LANGUAGE BASED LOCATION QUERY SYSTEM, KEYWORD BASED LOCATION QUERY SYSTEM AND A NATURAL LANGUAGE AND KEYWORD BASED LOCATION QUERY SYSTEM | July 2007 | December 2010 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11504076 | METHOD FOR CHANGING CONFIGURATION OF SERVERS IN A SHARED-NOTHING DATABASE SYSTEM | August 2006 | December 2010 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11422105 | DYNAMIC OPITIMIZED DATASTORE GENERATION AND MODIFICATION FOR PROCESS MODELS | June 2006 | April 2010 | Allow | 46 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11422055 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF INTELLIGENT DEVICE DISCOVERY | June 2006 | May 2010 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11349235 | DOCUMENT SIMILARITY SCORING AND RANKING METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | February 2006 | October 2009 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11342833 | COMPUTER SYSTEM AND METHOD OF REPRODUCING DATA FOR THE SYSTEM | January 2006 | July 2009 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 10711826 | METHOD OF CHANGING THE PAGE SIZE OF A DB2 TABLE SPACE WHILE KEEPING THE OBJECT AVAILABLE | October 2004 | June 2008 | Allow | 45 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10711808 | TRANSIENT RANGE VERSIONING BASED ON REDIRECTION | October 2004 | October 2011 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 10855724 | BI-DIRECTIONAL DATA MAPPING TOOL | May 2004 | June 2010 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 10855677 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING A DATABASE QUERY BY A PROXY SERVER | May 2004 | September 2010 | Allow | 60 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 10786674 | SYSTEM-WIDE SELECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT | February 2004 | August 2007 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 10734681 | TROUBLE TICKET ASSIGNMENT | December 2003 | January 2008 | Allow | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10731535 | METHOD AND APPARATUS TO MAP ASSOCIATIONS WITH BITSETS | December 2003 | June 2007 | Abandon | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10730192 | PACKAGE RESOLUTION MECHANISM FOR DATABASE SYSTEMS | December 2003 | October 2010 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 10717407 | METHODS TO INTEGRATE USER-DEFINED OPERATIONS INTO A DATABASE | November 2003 | June 2008 | Allow | 55 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 10638988 | DATA STORAGE SYSTEM | August 2003 | December 2007 | Allow | 52 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MORRISON, JAY A.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 16.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner MORRISON, JAY A works in Art Unit 2151 and has examined 88 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 98.9%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.
Examiner MORRISON, JAY A's allowance rate of 98.9% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MORRISON, JAY A receive 2.19 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 74% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MORRISON, JAY A is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 31% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a -1.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MORRISON, JAY A. This interview benefit is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 37.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 24.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 33.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 11.4% of allowed cases (in the 97% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.