Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18435607 | Method for Displaying Different Application Shortcuts on Different Screens | February 2024 | December 2024 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18454715 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEDIA CONTENT COMMUNICATION | August 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18315163 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PARKING SPACE SELECTION AND NAVIGATION BASED ON WEIGHTED PARAMETER COMPARISON | May 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18143331 | MEDIA CONTENT ITEM GENERATION FOR A CONTENT SHARING PLATFORM | May 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 19 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18140756 | DEVICE NAVIGATIONAL MAPS FOR CONNECTED DEVICES | April 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18178382 | SYSTEM FOR SUPERIMPOSED COMMUNICATION BY OBJECT ORIENTED RESOURCE MANIPULATION ON A DATA NETWORK | March 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18178453 | NOTIFICATION OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM AND SYSTEM MANAGEMENT SERVER | March 2023 | January 2025 | Abandon | 23 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18174913 | Adaptive User Interface for Marine Electronic Device Usability | February 2023 | May 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18090179 | APPARATUSES, COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR IMPROVED SELECTION AND PROVISION OF OPERATIONAL SUPPORT DATA OBJECTS | December 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18067956 | HAND-MOVEMENT BASED INTERACTION WITH AUGMENTED REALITY OBJECTS | December 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18074661 | MENU FOR SELECTING A CAMERA SHOOTING MODE AMONG CAMERA SHOOTING MODES | December 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 17992435 | PAGE SWITCHING METHOD AND APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | November 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17986867 | PERSISTENT DISPLAY OF PRIORITIZED PARTICIPANTS WITH SHARED CONTENT OF COMMUNICATION SESSIONS | November 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17972429 | DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIRTUAL SCENE, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | October 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17953979 | CONFIGURING BROADCAST MEDIA QUALITY WITHIN A VIRTUAL CONFERENCING SYSTEM | September 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 23 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17943411 | LIVE DEMONSTRATION ASSISTANCE PROVIDING MORE RELIABLE OUTPUT | September 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17883549 | MESSAGING FOR EVENT LIVE-STREAM | August 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 26 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17812147 | CARD-BASED INFORMATION MANAGEMENT METHOD AND SYSTEM | July 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17860968 | System and Method for Learning User Preferences | July 2022 | March 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17806871 | LOCALIZATION FOR AUTONOMOUS MOVEMENT USING VEHICLE SENSORS | June 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17744298 | APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING MOBILE APPLICATION USER ENGAGEMENT | May 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17706606 | REMOTE GESTURE CONTROL, INPUT MONITOR, SYSTEMS INCLUDING THE SAME, AND ASSOCIATED METHODS | March 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17701890 | Selecting and Sharing Content | March 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 36 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17762772 | Operation Method and Electronic Device for Displaying Content of an Application in an Accessible Window | March 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 39 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17679647 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NAVIGATING CONTENT | February 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 35 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17673888 | CONDITIONAL REGION-BASED COSTING IN CONTRACTION HIERARCHIES | February 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17648673 | ROAD NETWORK MAPPING USING VEHICLE TELEMETRY DATA | January 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17571277 | OPTIMIZED WEATHER AND THREAT DEPICTION BASED ON AIRCRAFT FLIGHT PLAN | January 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17454155 | Method and System for Supplementing and Providing Enhancements to Target Software Data Entries | November 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 34 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17497169 | Shared Ride Hail Service Platform Gaming Experience | October 2021 | December 2024 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17403342 | WIRELESS HANDHELD AUDIO CAPTURE DEVICE AND MULTI-VOCALIST METHOD FOR AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA APPLICATION | August 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17401348 | Hands-Free Crowd Sourced Indoor Navigation System and Method for Guiding Blind and Visually Impaired Persons | August 2021 | November 2024 | Abandon | 39 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17331169 | System and Method for Displaying and Analyzing Interface Variants for Concurrent Analysis by a User | May 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17207536 | USER REACTION PREDICTION METHOD AND APPARATUS | March 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 44 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16705073 | REMOTELY CONTROLLING THE OUTPUT OF CONTENT ON A DEVICE | December 2019 | February 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15971922 | METHOD FOR CREATING A MENU STRUCTURE ON A MEASURING TRANSDUCER, AND MEASURING TRANSDUCER | May 2018 | December 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13871362 | PRESENTING DATA TO ELECTRONIC MEETING PARTICIPANTS | April 2013 | October 2015 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13476831 | System And Method For Decorating A Hotel Room | May 2012 | July 2015 | Allow | 38 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13466293 | PRESENTING DATA TO ELECTRONIC MEETING PARTICIPANTS | May 2012 | May 2015 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R works in Art Unit 2151 and has examined 38 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 63.2%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.
Examiner BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R's allowance rate of 63.2% places them in the 16% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R receive 3.21 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 97% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 23% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +55.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BLAUFELD, JUSTIN R. This interview benefit is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 16.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 8.3% of allowed cases (in the 86% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.