Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18644802 | PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE, METHOD, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE FOR DISPLAYING A VERTICAL BAR WITH SCROLLABLE CONTENT | April 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18614349 | REAL-TIME COMMUNICATION INTERFACE WITH HAPTIC AND AUDIO FEEDBACK RESPONSE | March 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18590258 | METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING MESSAGE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOF | February 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18531214 | VIDEO DISPLAY METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 18 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18508048 | VIRTUAL WORKSPACE VIEWPORT FOLLOWING IN COLLABORATION SYSTEMS | November 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18462745 | MIXING PARTICIPANT AUDIO FROM MULTIPLE ROOMS WITHIN A VIRTUAL CONFERENCING SYSTEM | September 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18202770 | COLLABORATION SYSTEM INCLUDING A SPATIAL EVENT MAP | May 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18323297 | APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESENTING CONTENT REVIEWS IN A VIRTUAL WORLD | May 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18320836 | USER INTERFACES FOR TIME PERIOD-BASED CURATED PLAYLISTS | May 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18182667 | Generating a Customized Social-Driven Playlist | March 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18175097 | MUSIC RECOMMENDATION METHOD AND APPARATUS | February 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18157730 | PEER MANAGED AUTOMATED DUAL SCREEN SHARING BASED ON ASSOCIATING SEMANTIC INPUTS AND VIEWED VISUAL CONTENT | January 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18013907 | MEETING ASSISTANCE SYSTEM | December 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 32 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18013710 | TACTILE PRESENTATION DEVICE, TACTILE PRESENTATION SYSTEM, CONTROL DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM | December 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18068328 | THREE-DIMENSIONAL INTERFACE CONTROL METHOD AND TERMINAL | December 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18061203 | SYSTEMS, APPARATUS, AND METHODS FOR GESTURE-BASED AUGMENTED REALITY, EXTENDED REALITY | December 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18060628 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TWO-STEP HIERARCHICAL MODEL OPTIMIZATION | December 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17997904 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING HANDWRITING PROBLEMS | November 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17918945 | GROUPED CONVOLUTION PROCESSING DEFINITION CHANGING DEVICE, GROUPED CONVOLUTION PROCESSING DEFINITION CHANGING METHOD, AND GROUPED CONVOLUTION PROCESSING DEFINITION CHANGING PROGRAM | October 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17952155 | TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR MULTI-MODAL ENTITY MATCHING IN ELECTRONIC RECORDS | September 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17913227 | DISPLAYING USER INTERFACE USING USER INTERFACE DEFINITION FILE | September 2022 | December 2024 | Abandon | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17932999 | DEVICES, METHODS, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES FOR PRESENTING VIRTUAL OBJECTS IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS | September 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17932278 | MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TRAINING SYSTEM AND METHOD | September 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17910270 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD FOR REDUCSING STORAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR WEIGHT PARAMETER VALUES OF LEARNED DATA SETS | September 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17909086 | METHODS PROVIDING VIDEO CONFERENCING WITH ADJUSTED/MODIFIED VIDEO AND RELATED VIDEO CONFERENCING NODES | September 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 32 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17893026 | PERFORMING VISUAL RELATIONAL REASONING | August 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17872395 | COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ELECTRONICALLY GENERATING A DYNAMICALLY VISUALIZED HIERARCHICAL REPRESENTATION OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION | July 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17439962 | METHOD FOR GENERATING A COMPOSITION FOR DYES, PAINTS, PRINTING INKS, GRIND RESINS, PIGMENT CONCENTRATES OR OTHER COATING SUBSTANCES | May 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17700865 | VIDEO ACTIVATION BASED UPON DETECTION OF USER ACTION | March 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17699547 | OPTIMIZING CASCADE OF CLASSIFIERS SCHEMA USING GENETIC SEARCH | March 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17698937 | SIGNAL DATA SIGNATURE CLASSIFIERS TRAINED WITH SIGNAL DATA SIGNATURE LIBRARIES AND A MACHINE LEARNING DERIVED STRATEGIC BLUEPRINT | March 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17761049 | LEARNING APPARATUS, ESTIMATION APPARATUS, LEARNING METHOD, ESTIMATION METHOD AND PROGRAM | March 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17687329 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING DATA PREDICTION | March 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17636549 | Light Field Display System for Consumer Devices | February 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17674762 | REAL-TIME PREDICTION METHOD FOR ENGINE EMISSION | February 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17671399 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED SCRIBES BASED ON KNOWLEDGE GRAPHS OF CLINICAL INFORMATION HAVING WEIGHTED CONNECTIONS | February 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 37 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17574433 | ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS GENERATED BY LOW DISCREPANCY SEQUENCES | January 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17566069 | Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Managing Content Items and Associated Metadata | December 2021 | March 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17623177 | MEASURING QUANTUM STATE PURITY | December 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17549704 | HAPTIC CONTROLLER | December 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17480282 | Method and Apparatus for Performing Convolution Neural Network Operations | September 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17437017 | MODEL LEARNING APPARATUS, LABEL ESTIMATION APPARATUS, METHOD AND PROGRAM THEREOF | September 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17368060 | DETERMINING DATA SUITABILITY FOR TRAINING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | July 2021 | July 2025 | Allow | 48 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17362385 | FEATURE GENERATION OPTIMIZATION | June 2021 | November 2025 | Allow | 52 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17362728 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ENABLED PREFERENCE LEARNING | June 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17360526 | NETWORK OPERATOR PROCESSING METHOD, APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | June 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17355406 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TRANSFER LEARNING OF DEEP LEARNING MODEL BASED ON DOCUMENT SIMILARITY LEARNING | June 2021 | July 2025 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17416697 | NEURON AND NEUROMORPHIC SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME | June 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17349251 | TRANSFER LEARNING WITH BASIS SCALING AND PRUNING | June 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17339898 | COMPATIBLE NEURAL NETWORKS | June 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 38 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17334663 | RECOMMENDATION METHOD, COMPUTING DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | May 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 48 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17306507 | System and Method for Detecting Handwriting Problems | May 2021 | January 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17236640 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS CONFIGURED TO SPECIFY RESOURCES FOR HYPERDIMENSIONAL COMPUTING IMPLEMENTED IN PROGRAMMABLE DEVICES USING A PARAMETERIZED TEMPLATE FOR HYPERDIMENSIONAL COMPUTING | April 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17236450 | COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISTILLED DEEP PREDICTION FOR PERSONALIZED STREAM RANKING | April 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17119523 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING LEARNING FROM DEMONSTRATIONS, PARTICULARLY IMITATION LEARNING | December 2020 | November 2024 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17080588 | FEATURE ENGINEERING ORCHESTRATION METHOD AND APPARATUS | October 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 53 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17079894 | Learning Expert System | October 2020 | August 2024 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17015243 | MACHINE LEARNING WITH MULTIPLE CONSTRAINTS | September 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16855980 | COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED ACCESSIBILITY SYSTEMS AND METHODS | April 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 53 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16744537 | Applied Artificial Intelligence Technology for Adaptively Classifying Sentences Based on the Concepts They Express to Improve Natural Language Understanding | January 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 59 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16668524 | EFFICIENT CRAWLING USING PATH SCHEDULING, AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF | October 2019 | September 2024 | Allow | 59 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15258708 | MOVING AN OBJECT DISPLAYED ON A DISPLAY SCREEN | September 2016 | April 2017 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13931960 | VOICE OUTPUT DEVICE, INFORMATION INPUT DEVICE, FILE SELECTION DEVICE, TELEPHONE SET, AND PROGRAM AND RECORDING MEDIUM OF THE SAME | June 2013 | February 2016 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13769094 | KEY SELECTION OF A GRAPHICAL KEYBOARD BASED ON USER INPUT POSTURE | February 2013 | August 2015 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner TSAI, JAMES T.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner TSAI, JAMES T works in Art Unit 2147 and has examined 28 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 82.1%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 46 months.
Examiner TSAI, JAMES T's allowance rate of 82.1% places them in the 54% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by TSAI, JAMES T receive 2.36 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 67% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by TSAI, JAMES T is 46 months. This places the examiner in the 11% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +66.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by TSAI, JAMES T. This interview benefit is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 28.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 30.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 100.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.