Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17058782 | INTEGRATED DESIGN TOOL FOR FIRE SAFETY SYSTEMS | November 2020 | September 2024 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17058664 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PREDICTING THERMAL LOAD OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEM | November 2020 | September 2024 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17047095 | RECONSTRUCTING AN OBJECT | October 2020 | May 2024 | Abandon | 43 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17038590 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF REPORTING STRETCHING FAILURE IN STAMPING DIE DEVELOPMENT | September 2020 | March 2023 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17026276 | VIRTUAL TOOL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOMOTOR SKILLS AND COMPARING PSYCHOMOTOR SKILL PERFORMANCE | September 2020 | August 2022 | Abandon | 23 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17025154 | POWER GRID REACTIVE VOLTAGE CONTROL MODEL TRAINING METHOD AND SYSTEM | September 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17026001 | REVERSE ROTATION CONDITION ESTIMATING APPARATUS, REVERSE ROTATION CONDITION ESTIMATING METHOD AND INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE | September 2020 | July 2024 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17014839 | SYNTHETIC CORROSION LOGS THROUGH SUBSURFACE SPATIAL MODELING | September 2020 | April 2024 | Abandon | 43 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16911423 | APPARATUS, SIMULATION SYSTEM, METHOD AND PROGRAM | June 2020 | August 2024 | Abandon | 50 | 5 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16896757 | Model Featuring N-Porosity | June 2020 | March 2023 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16756953 | Method and device for operating an actuator regulation system, computer program and machine-readable storage medium | April 2020 | May 2022 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16843695 | Method and Computer Device for Selecting a Measurement Sequence for a Coordinate Measuring Machine | April 2020 | July 2024 | Abandon | 52 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16833513 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DESIGNING MOLD STRUCTURE OF HIGH STRENGTH STEEL | March 2020 | October 2023 | Abandon | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16780139 | PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT OF WELLS BASED ON DETERMINED ALLOCATED WELL PRODUCTION RATES | February 2020 | January 2024 | Abandon | 47 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16632634 | A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A SURFACE | January 2020 | August 2024 | Abandon | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16730568 | BOUNDARY-FREE PERIODIC MESHING METHOD | December 2019 | January 2024 | Allow | 49 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16711785 | IOT-BASED SYSTEM FOR MEASUREMENT OF CONTAMINATION DISTRIBUTION OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER THROUGH REAL-TIME MONITORING OF CONTAMINATION DEGREE OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER WELL FOR CONTROL OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER PURIFICATION DEVICE AND PREDICTION OF PURIFICATION PERIOD BASED ON MEASUREMENT RESULT | December 2019 | December 2023 | Allow | 48 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16702837 | REAL-TIME RESERVOIR SURVEILLANCE-MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | December 2019 | August 2024 | Abandon | 57 | 4 | 1 | No | Yes |
| 16700128 | Systems, Methods, and Apparatus for Simulation of Complex Subsurface Fracture Geometries Using Unstructured Grids | December 2019 | September 2023 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16688028 | ADAPTIVE PENALTY TERM DETERMINATIONS IN APPLICATIONS OF QUANTUM COMPUTING TO ELECTRONIC DESIGN AUTOMATION PROCESSES | November 2019 | October 2024 | Abandon | 59 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16591397 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF STRUCTURING RATIONALES FOR COLLABORATIVE FORECASTING | October 2019 | May 2023 | Abandon | 43 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16584788 | ALIGNER DAMAGE PREDICTION AT WEAK SPOTS WITH SIMULATION | September 2019 | September 2022 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16575898 | MEASURING FRACTURE-HIT ARRIVAL TIME IN WELLBORE OPERATIONS | September 2019 | September 2023 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16572600 | PREDICTION METHOD FOR SHALE OIL AND GAS SWEET SPOT REGION, COMPUTER DEVICE AND COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2019 | May 2023 | Abandon | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16484773 | SIMULATION RESULTS EVALUATION DEVICE AND METHOD | August 2019 | October 2022 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16476612 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LIGHTWEIGHT PRECISE 3D VISUAL FORMAT | July 2019 | January 2024 | Abandon | 55 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16447038 | System and Method for Predicting Fluid Behavior in an Unconventional Shale Play | June 2019 | March 2022 | Abandon | 32 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 16436732 | TRACKING HARDWARE EVENTS WITHIN A PROCESS ON AN INSTRUCTION-LEVEL SIMULATOR | June 2019 | September 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16402928 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATION OF MULTISCALE SIMULATIONS | May 2019 | September 2023 | Abandon | 53 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16344462 | AUTOMATED MUTUAL IMPROVEMENT OF OILFIELD MODELS | April 2019 | March 2023 | Abandon | 47 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16389086 | STREAMLINED FRAMEWORK FOR IDENTIFYING AND IMPLEMENTING FIELD DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES | April 2019 | December 2023 | Abandon | 56 | 4 | 1 | No | No |
| 16340448 | Real-Time Model for Diverter Drop Decision using DAS and Step Down Analysis | April 2019 | April 2023 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16373349 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GROWTH-BASED DESIGN | April 2019 | April 2023 | Abandon | 48 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16365217 | AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION OF FORWARD DEPOSITIONAL MODELS | March 2019 | November 2023 | Abandon | 56 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16362797 | METHOD AND PROGRAM FOR CALCULATING STIFFNESS COEFFICIENT OF BRIDGE BY USING AMBIENT VIBRATION TEST DATA | March 2019 | October 2022 | Abandon | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16335280 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SUPERVISION OF LOCAL ANALYTICS | March 2019 | May 2022 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 16276198 | SITE-SPECIFIC ANOMALY DETECTION | February 2019 | June 2023 | Abandon | 52 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16253595 | ANALYZING SECONDARY ENERGY SOURCES IN SEISMIC WHILE DRILLING | January 2019 | October 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16318139 | POWER SYSTEM AGGREGATION DEVICE AND METHOD, AND POWER SYSTEM STABILIZATION DEVICE | January 2019 | September 2022 | Abandon | 44 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16244563 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREVENTING FAILURES OF A PRODUCT IN A VIRTUAL TESTING ENVIRONMENT | January 2019 | February 2022 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16242721 | System and Method for Evaluating Quality Involving Data Nodes | January 2019 | March 2023 | Abandon | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16228804 | Degradation modeling and lifetime prediction method considering effective shocks | December 2018 | March 2022 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16226501 | SIMULATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | December 2018 | January 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16224103 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR HAZARD ABATEMENT USING NORMALIZED EFFECT ANALYSIS | December 2018 | January 2023 | Abandon | 49 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16308752 | A METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OPTIMIZING A MODELLING OF FLOWS WITHIN A RESERVOIR FOR OPTIMIZATION OF OIL/GAS PRODUCTION | December 2018 | August 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16191528 | Method and System for Modeling in a Subsurface Region | November 2018 | April 2022 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16182999 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ARRANGING WIND TURBINES BASED ON RAPID ACCESSMENT FLUID MODEL AND WAKE MODEL | November 2018 | November 2022 | Abandon | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16178192 | VISUALIZATION OF MACHINE STRUCTURE DAMAGE FROM MACHINE SENSOR DATA USING MACHINE LEARNING | November 2018 | April 2023 | Abandon | 54 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16178048 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TIME-TO-EVENT PROCESS ANALYSIS | November 2018 | September 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 16173343 | Growth-Based Design System | October 2018 | April 2023 | Abandon | 54 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16091481 | TOPOLOGICALLY CORRECT HORIZONS FOR COMPLEX FAULT NETWORK | October 2018 | October 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16091021 | METHOD FOR SIMULATING THE THERMO-FLUID DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF MULTIPHASE FLUIDS IN A HYDROCARBONS PRODUCTION AND TRANSPORT SYSTEM | October 2018 | March 2023 | Abandon | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16126391 | DESIGN-INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | September 2018 | October 2021 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16126876 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING SPREAD OF DISASTER USING SCENARIO | September 2018 | September 2022 | Abandon | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16081528 | MULTI-PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION OF OILFIELD OPERATIONS | August 2018 | November 2023 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16110170 | METHOD, SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM FOR PROVIDING PREDICTION ABOUT BREEDING | August 2018 | January 2022 | Abandon | 41 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16105411 | Printed Circuit Board Thermal Conductivity Determination | August 2018 | January 2022 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16101302 | DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEX AGRICULTURAL SIMULATION MODELS FROM LIMITED DATASETS | August 2018 | April 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 16076809 | ESTIMATOR, ESTIMATION METHOD, PROGRAM AND STORAGE MEDIUM WHERE PROGRAM STORED FOR MODEL PARAMETER ESTIMATION AND MODEL PARAMETER ESTIMATION SYSTEM | August 2018 | February 2022 | Abandon | 42 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16056966 | SERVER FOR CONFIGURING AND INTEGRATING OBJECTS FROM EXTERNAL LIBRARY INTO USER'S BUILDING INFORMATION MODEL AND DETERMINING COMPLIANCE WITH PREDETERMINED STANDARDS | August 2018 | October 2021 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16051078 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BENCHMARKING AI HARDWARE USING SYNTHETIC AI MODEL | July 2018 | March 2022 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16071005 | STRUCTURAL DESIGN METHOD OF PRODUCT | July 2018 | September 2021 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 16070236 | SIMULATION APPARATUS | July 2018 | October 2021 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16069426 | NON-CONTACT METHOD OF CHARACTERIZING ISOSTATIC STRENGTH OF CELLULAR CERAMIC ARTICLES | July 2018 | September 2023 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16026132 | EMULATING CLIENT BEHAVIOR IN A WIRELESS NETWORK | July 2018 | September 2022 | Abandon | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16015667 | METHOD FOR GENERATING AND SELECTING A MISTUNING PATTERN OF A BLADED WHEEL OF A TURBOMACHINE | June 2018 | October 2021 | Abandon | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16012821 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, RECORDING MEDIUM RECORDING MAGNETIC BODY SIMULATION PROGRAM, AND MAGNETIC BODY SIMULATION METHOD | June 2018 | February 2022 | Abandon | 44 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16012128 | U-SPLINES: SPLINES OVER UNSTRUCTURED MESHES | June 2018 | October 2022 | Abandon | 52 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16012407 | MONTE CARLO SIMULATION MONITORING AND OPTIMIZATION | June 2018 | September 2021 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15986103 | PROCESS ANALYSIS APPARATUS, PROCESS ANALYSIS METHOD, AND PROCESS ANALYSIS PROGRAM | May 2018 | July 2022 | Abandon | 50 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15774542 | PROCESS FOR CALCULATING AN ANGULAR SPACING BETWEEN THE BLADES OF AN AXIAL FAN | May 2018 | October 2021 | Abandon | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15973420 | COMPUTER VISION THROUGH SIMULATED HARDWARE OPTIMIZATION | May 2018 | March 2023 | Abandon | 58 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15971040 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR OPTIMIZING AND MONITORING GROUNDWATER AND SOLAR ENERGY USAGE | May 2018 | October 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 0 | No | No |
| 15773383 | METHOD FOR MEASURING THE FLATNESS OF A METAL PRODUCT AND ASSOCIATED DEVICE | May 2018 | September 2021 | Allow | 41 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15900735 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR INFERRING PARAMETERS OF A MODEL OF A MEASUREMENT STRUCTURE FOR A PATTERNING PROCESS | February 2018 | October 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15891524 | Predictive Voltage Stability of a Power System Post-Contingency | February 2018 | January 2022 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15887040 | PLASMA SIMULATION WITH NON-LINEAR OPTICS | February 2018 | March 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 14856294 | USING EMULATED INPUT/OUTPUT DEVICES IN VIRTUAL MACHINE MIGRATION | September 2015 | January 2023 | Abandon | 60 | 10 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner GIRI, PURSOTTAM.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner GIRI, PURSOTTAM works in Art Unit 2147 and has examined 78 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 12.8%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.
Examiner GIRI, PURSOTTAM's allowance rate of 12.8% places them in the 2% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by GIRI, PURSOTTAM receive 3.55 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 92% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by GIRI, PURSOTTAM is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +14.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by GIRI, PURSOTTAM. This interview benefit is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 4.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 44.4% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 100.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 40.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.