Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18783227 | XR DEVICE-BASED TOOL FOR CROSS-PLATFORM CONTENT CREATION AND DISPLAY | July 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18524816 | COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM FOR USER-DIRECTED CUSTOMIZATION AND USER INTERFACE TRANSFORMATION | November 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18228597 | METHODS AND USER INTERFACES FOR SHARING AUDIO | July 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 25 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18347443 | CUSTOMER EFFORT EVALUATION IN A CONTACT CENTER SYSTEM | July 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18303386 | Human Interactions with Mid-Air Haptic Systems | April 2023 | May 2024 | Abandon | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18127535 | Devices, Methods, and Graphical User Interfaces for Providing and Interacting with Notifications | March 2023 | January 2025 | Abandon | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18117116 | DIGITAL HABIT TRAINER SYSTEM | March 2023 | November 2024 | Abandon | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18021247 | CONTROLLING A 2D SCREEN INTERFACE APPLICATION IN A MIXED REALITY APPLICATION | February 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 32 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18165403 | MICROSCOPE PARAMETER CONTROLLER, MICROSCOPE ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING MICROSCOPE PARAMETERS | February 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18045370 | System and Method for Displaying Message History when Composing a Message | October 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17938602 | Interface Component for a Flow Therapy Device | October 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17843085 | USER INTERFACE EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT REPRESENTATIONS OF BANKING FUNCTIONS | June 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 41 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17804277 | COMPUTING SYSTEM THAT APPLIES EDITS MODEL FROM PUBLISHED VIDEO TO SECOND VIDEO | May 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17762001 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATING ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17641455 | METHOD, SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR MANAGING MODEL UPDATES | March 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 47 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17680826 | Systems And Methods For Visualizing Sporting Equipment | February 2022 | March 2026 | Abandon | 49 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17673231 | DYNAMIC VIRTUAL BACKGROUND IMAGE SELECTION FOR A VIDEO COLLABORATION SESSION | February 2022 | January 2025 | Abandon | 35 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17592904 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING PROCESSABLE DATA FOR MACHINE LEARNING APPLICATIONS | February 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17625578 | Method for operating an electronic device in order to browse through photos | January 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17564151 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING INTERACTIVE WHITE BOARD | December 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17523595 | COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM STORING MODEL GENERATION PROGRAM, METHOD OF GENERATING MODEL, AND MODEL GENERATION APPARATUS | November 2021 | August 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17498005 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOLECULAR PROPERTY PREDICTION USING HYPERGRAPH MESSAGE PASSING NEURAL NETWORK (HMPNN) | October 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17487818 | CONTROL METHOD AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR PASTING AN OBJECT IN A PHOTO ALBUM | September 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17485956 | EVALUATING THE RELEVANCE OF POTENTIAL INPUT SIGNALS TO AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK | September 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17406827 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESENTING MESSAGES TO FLIGHT CREW | August 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17378199 | Deep Learning in a Virtual Reality Environment | July 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17323489 | PROACTIVE ALERT AGGREGATION AND CORRELATION MANAGEMENT WITH AUTOMATED SUMMARIZATION | May 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 56 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17323823 | OPERATIONAL FORECASTING SYSTEM BASED ON ANOMALOUS BEHAVIORS IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS | May 2021 | March 2026 | Allow | 58 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17302268 | TEXT AUGMENTATION OF A MINORITY CLASS IN A TEXT CLASSIFICATION PROBLEM | April 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17238567 | CLASSIFYING DATA FROM DE-IDENTIFIED CONTENT | April 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17279315 | PROCESSING APPARATUS, PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 48 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17279439 | HYBRID MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR CODE CLASSIFICATION | March 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17277520 | DECISION LIST LEARNING DEVICE, DECISION LIST LEARNING METHOD, AND DECISION LIST LEARNING PROGRAM | March 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 52 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17169783 | Systems and Methods for Object Management | February 2021 | November 2024 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17169882 | Digital Image Editing using a Depth-Aware System | February 2021 | March 2025 | Allow | 49 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17152361 | NOTIFYING A USER OF EVENTS IN A COMPUTING DEVICE | January 2021 | October 2025 | Abandon | 56 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17258613 | MACHINE INTELLIGENCE FOR RESEARCH AND ANALYTICS (MIRA) SYSTEM AND METHOD | January 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 53 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17109072 | MODEL TRAINING METHOD, MEDIA INFORMATION SYNTHESIS METHOD, AND RELATED APPARATUSES | December 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 49 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17075517 | TEXT EDITING IN REMOTE DOCUMENTS ON MOBILE DEVICES | October 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 47 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17041336 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR KEEPING STATISTICAL INFERENCE ACCURACY WITH 8-BIT WINOGRAD CONVOLUTION | September 2020 | June 2025 | Allow | 56 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16964150 | CURSOR LOCATION ON A NAVIGATIONAL MAP | July 2020 | March 2025 | Abandon | 55 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16731907 | System and Method of a Customer Management System | December 2019 | March 2025 | Allow | 60 | 12 | 0 | No | No |
| 16520792 | METHOD, SYSTEM AND COMPUTER DEVICE FOR CONVERTING NEURAL NETWORK INFORMATION | July 2019 | April 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16142868 | Automatic Digital Asset Sharing Suggestions | September 2018 | May 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14056078 | SINGLE PAGE MULTI-TIER CATALOG BROWSER | October 2013 | February 2016 | Allow | 28 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12984117 | SINGLE PAGE MULTI-TIER CATALOG BROWSER | January 2011 | July 2013 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12761137 | MOBILE TERMINAL AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING APPLICATIONS OF THE SAME | April 2010 | February 2016 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 1 | No | No |
| 12555392 | OPERATIONS DASHBOARD | September 2009 | January 2016 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12334850 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO VISUALIZE ACTIVITIES THROUGH THE USE OF AVATARS | December 2008 | February 2015 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11480727 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR INTERACTIVE MAP-BASED ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL VIDEO CONTENT | July 2006 | September 2013 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11475884 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PRINTING FILE USING TOOLBAR BUTTON | June 2006 | May 2012 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11068690 | APPARATUS FOR DISPLAYING FORMATION OF NETWORK | February 2005 | December 2011 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WONG, WILLIAM.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner WONG, WILLIAM works in Art Unit 2144 and has examined 33 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 60.6%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 49 months.
Examiner WONG, WILLIAM's allowance rate of 60.6% places them in the 21% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by WONG, WILLIAM receive 3.73 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 96% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WONG, WILLIAM is 49 months. This places the examiner in the 6% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +43.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WONG, WILLIAM. This interview benefit is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 15.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 2.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 0.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.