USPTO Examiner MRABI HASSAN - Art Unit 2144

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17117169SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING TRANSFERABLE, MODULAR WEB PAGESDecember 2020August 2022Allow2010NoNo
17111364SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EFFICIENT PARALLEL EXECUTION OF PHYSICAL SIMULATIONSDecember 2020September 2023Allow3400NoNo
17101258SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ONLINE CONSTRAINT OPTIMIZATION IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKSNovember 2020December 2023Allow3700NoNo
16953664FORMULASNovember 2020April 2022Allow1700YesNo
17099574System and Method of Exchanging Information Through a Wireless Brain-Computer InterfaceNovember 2020December 2023Allow3700NoNo
17086019DISPLAYING CUSTOMIZED ELECTRONIC MESSAGING GRAPHICSOctober 2020March 2022Allow1700YesNo
17082965DISPLAYING CUSTOMIZED ELECTRONIC MESSAGING GRAPHICSOctober 2020February 2022Allow1500YesNo
17079466Advanced Digital Content ProcessingOctober 2020June 2022Abandon1910NoNo
17072141SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING CONTENT TO USERS BASED ON INTERACTIONS BY SIMILAR OTHER USERSOctober 2020February 2022Allow1600YesNo
17039172Augmented Natural Language Generation PlatformSeptember 2020April 2022Allow1910YesNo
17038800METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REGULATORY DOCUMENTATION CAPTURESeptember 2020July 2021Allow1010NoNo
17039766ENHANCED INFORMATION EXTRACTION FROM WEB PAGESSeptember 2020June 2021Allow900NoNo
17037037METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR BUILDING COMPREHENSIVE GENOME SCALE METABOLIC MODELSeptember 2020September 2023Allow3500NoNo
17027518Analysis SystemSeptember 2020July 2021Allow1000YesNo
17017716SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLOUD COMPUTINGSeptember 2020March 2022Abandon1810NoNo
17016772SEAT HAPTIC SYSTEM AND METHOD OF EQUALIZING HAPTIC OUTPUTSeptember 2020September 2021Allow1310NoNo
16979690A METHOD AND AN APPARATUS FOR DISPLAYING INFORMATION FLOW, A STORAGE, AN ELECTRONIC DEVICESeptember 2020February 2022Allow1710NoNo
17015151SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXTENDED DYNAMIC LAYOUTSeptember 2020May 2022Allow2020YesNo
16940135SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT INTERACTION WITH EXTERNAL RESOURCESJuly 2020December 2021Allow1710YesNo
16927718SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR APPLYING LAYOUT TO DOCUMENTSJuly 2020December 2021Allow1730YesNo
16926512CONTENT-BASED TACTILE OUTPUTSJuly 2020May 2022Allow2210YesNo
16924284ENHANCED SECTION DETECTION USING A COMBINATION OF OBJECT DETECTION WITH HEURISTICSJuly 2020August 2021Allow1320YesNo
16919370SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DOCUMENT TRANSLATION IN A FORMAT AGNOSTIC DOCUMENT VIEWERJuly 2020September 2021Allow1410YesNo
16920222SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING FLOATING BUTTON INTERFACES ON A WEB BROWSERJuly 2020June 2021Allow1110NoNo
16917575Template for Creating Content ItemJune 2020May 2022Allow2230YesNo
16913904System and Method for Identifying a UserJune 2020June 2021Allow1200YesNo
16913910DETERMINING INTENT OF A RECOMMENDATION ON A MOBILE APPLICATIONJune 2020March 2021Allow910YesNo
16906802RECONSTRUCTING MIXED REALITY CONTEXTUALLY DERIVED ACTIONSJune 2020June 2022Allow2400NoNo
16904712SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODIFYING FAST-FORWARD SPEEDS BASED ON THE USER'S REACTION TIME WHEN DETECTING POINTS OF INTEREST IN CONTENTJune 2020January 2021Allow710YesNo
16899090METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPROVED ANALYSIS OF LEGAL DOCUMENTSJune 2020January 2021Allow700YesNo
16890236PAGE UPDATING METHOD AND DISPLAY DEVICEJune 2020September 2021Allow1620YesNo
16857295AGNOSTIC CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT WITH AGENT HUB AND BROWSER OVERLAYApril 2020March 2022Allow2320NoNo
16847557SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MEDIA FOR MANAGING AND SHARING DIGITAL CONTENT AND SERVICESApril 2020August 2020Allow500YesNo
16839322Artificial Intelligence Process Automation for Enterprise Business CommunicationApril 2020December 2022Abandon3210NoNo
16813318TECHNIQUES FOR VIEW CAPTURE AND STORAGE FOR MOBILE APPLICATIONSMarch 2020November 2020Allow910YesNo
16791632CREATION OF COMPONENT TEMPLATES BASED ON SEMANTICALLY SIMILAR CONTENTFebruary 2020September 2021Allow1910YesNo
16789764STYLE SHEET AUTOMATIONFebruary 2020December 2021Abandon2220NoNo
16786140HAPTIC FEEDBACK SYSTEMFebruary 2020September 2020Allow800YesNo
16774639SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING CONTENT TO USERS BASED ON INTERACTIONS BY SIMILAR OTHER USERSJanuary 2020July 2020Allow600YesNo
16747730DESKTOP ERROR REPAIR TOOLJanuary 2020August 2020Allow710NoNo
16740561OPTIMIZING WEB PAGES BY MINIMIZING THE AMOUNT OF REDUNDANT INFORMATIONJanuary 2020September 2021Allow2030YesNo
16740062SCROLLING FOR MULTI-PLATFORMSJanuary 2020March 2021Allow1400YesNo
16732876COMPARING SCHEMA DEFINITIONS USING SAMPLINGJanuary 2020March 2021Allow1410YesNo
16721092METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROCESSING HYPERLINK OBJECTDecember 2019February 2021Allow1430YesNo
16686620METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING THEMENovember 2019November 2021Allow2420YesNo
16681945CRF-BASED SPAN PREDICTION FOR FINE MACHINE LEARNING COMPREHENSIONNovember 2019September 2022Allow3510YesNo
16665303SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING TRANSFERABLE, MODULAR WEB PAGESOctober 2019October 2020Allow1120YesNo
16656337Artificial Intelligence Driven Inference Engine to Separate Replicable from Non-Replicable Scientific StudiesOctober 2019June 2021Abandon2010NoNo
16595819STATISTICS CHART ROW MODE DRILL DOWNOctober 2019July 2021Allow2210YesNo
16587729COLLABORATIVE IN-LINE CONTENT ITEM ANNOTATIONSSeptember 2019May 2021Allow2010YesNo
16568000FORMULASSeptember 2019August 2020Allow1100YesNo
16561507Method, Apparatus, and Terminal for Processing Notification InformationSeptember 2019June 2021Allow2230YesNo
16555437SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING PERSONALIZED CONTENTAugust 2019April 2022Allow3210YesNo
16549902SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REAL TIME DIGITIZATION OF HAND WRITTEN INPUT DATAAugust 2019April 2021Allow1910NoNo
16540951SYNCHRONIZATION AND TAGGING OF IMAGE AND TEXT DATAAugust 2019April 2021Allow2010YesNo
16532458PASSING FUNCTIONAL SPREADSHEET DATA BY REFERENCEAugust 2019October 2020Allow1410YesNo
16513423PASSING SYSTEM WITH AN INTERACTIVE USER INTERFACEJuly 2019March 2021Abandon2000YesNo
16477553INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAMJuly 2019March 2021Allow2010YesNo
16506543AUTOMATED PATENT PREPARATIONJuly 2019August 2021Abandon2610NoNo
16453356AUTOMATED DOCUMENT ANALYSIS COMPRISING A USER INTERFACE BASED ON CONTENT TYPESJune 2019September 2020Allow1510NoNo
16452394DYNAMICALLY UPDATED DATA SHEETS USING ROW LINKSJune 2019April 2021Allow2110NoNo
16449006SYSTEM AND METHODOLOGIES FOR COLLABORATION UTILIZING AN UNDERLYING COMMON DISPLAY PRESENTATIONJune 2019March 2021Allow2110YesNo
16445143Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Providing Handwriting Support in Document EditingJune 2019March 2021Abandon2120YesNo
16442335TARGET DOCUMENT TEMPLATE GENERATIONJune 2019September 2021Allow2720YesNo
16430125TECHNIQUES FOR TEXT RENDERING USING FONT PATCHINGJune 2019June 2021Allow2420YesNo
16417429SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING USER-MANAGED ONLINE PAGES (MAPpages) LINKED TO LOCATIONS ON AN INTERACTIVE DIGITAL MAPMay 2019April 2020Allow1100YesNo
16412862DIGITAL WORK GENERATING DEVICE, METHOD AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMMay 2019October 2021Allow2910YesNo
16397550DETERMINING INTENT OF A RECOMMENDATION ON A MOBILE APPLICATIONApril 2019March 2020Allow1100YesNo
16344524INTERNET BROWSINGApril 2019March 2021Allow2310YesNo
16375487COLLABORATIVE ELECTRONIC WHITEBOARD PUBLICATION PROCESSApril 2019March 2020Allow1100YesNo
16366049SYMMETRIC TEXT REPLACEMENTMarch 2019September 2020Allow1810YesNo
16365439PERSONALIZED MEETING SUMMARIESMarch 2019September 2020Allow1810YesNo
16361140System and Method for Tracking Interactions in an EmailMarch 2019January 2021Allow2210YesNo
16352823ANALYSIS SYSTEMMarch 2019August 2020Allow1710YesNo
16286365GENERATION OF DIGITAL CONTENT NAVIGATION DATAFebruary 2019November 2020Allow2110YesNo
16284983INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMFebruary 2019May 2020Allow1500YesNo
16270798COLLECTING TRAINING DATA FROM TeX FILESFebruary 2019June 2020Allow1610NoNo
16247973DISTRIBUTING CONTENT VIA CONTENT PUBLISHING PLATFORMSJanuary 2019November 2019Allow1000YesNo
16317030METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SERVER FOR RENDERING A CELL PAGE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMJanuary 2019December 2020Abandon2420NoNo
16242814LAYERED CONTENT SELECTIONJanuary 2019December 2019Allow1100YesNo
16235770METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROCESSING HYPERLINK OBJECTDecember 2018February 2021Allow2530YesNo
16222354METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING AND SUBMITTING A PETITIONDecember 2018April 2021Abandon2820YesNo
16195956SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXTENDED DYNAMIC LAYOUTNovember 2018February 2020Allow1500YesNo
16188156SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISPLAYING CONTEXTUAL REVISION HISTORY IN AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTNovember 2018August 2020Allow2120YesNo
16181039SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MEDIA FOR CONTENT MANAGEMENT AND SHARINGNovember 2018December 2019Allow1400NoNo
16147993METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR SOLVING SINGLE AND MULTIPLE INTEGRAL EQUATIONS USING SPREADSHEET SOFTWAREOctober 2018January 2020Allow1600YesNo
16144950CONTENT-BASED TACTILE OUTPUTSSeptember 2018March 2020Allow1820YesNo
16086281INTERACTION RECOMMENDATION ENGINESeptember 2018June 2022Allow4520YesNo
16131571Mobile Application with Dating QuestionnaireSeptember 2018June 2020Abandon2210NoNo
16131774METHOD FOR ENABLING INTERACTION USING FINGERPRINT ON DISPLAY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOFSeptember 2018October 2020Allow2620YesNo
16131865SEAT HAPTIC SYSTEM AND METHOD OF EQUALIZING HAPTIC OUTPUTSeptember 2018June 2020Allow2110YesNo
16128079DISPLAYING CUSTOMIZED ELECTRONIC MESSAGING GRAPHICSSeptember 2018April 2020Allow1910YesNo
16121904SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING CONTENT TO USERS BASED ON INTERACTIONS BY SIMILAR OTHER USERSSeptember 2018November 2019Allow1400YesNo
16069071EFFICIENTLY AUGMENTING IMAGES WITH RELATED CONTENTJuly 2018September 2021Allow3810YesNo
15993436PAGE LOADING METHOD AND SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMMay 2018February 2019Allow810NoNo
15961777APPLICATION PAGE QUICK ACCESSApril 2018March 2020Allow2230YesNo
15755030ONLINE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERSONALISING A GREETING CARD OR STATIONERY WITH HANDWRITING AND DOODLES USING A COMPUTERFebruary 2018February 2021Allow3520YesNo
15860324DETERMINING INTENT OF A RECOMMENDATION ON A MOBILE APPLICATIONJanuary 2018February 2019Allow1310NoNo
15858757SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODIFYING FAST-FORWARD SPEEDS BASED ON THE USER'S REACTION TIME WHEN DETECTING POINTS OF INTEREST IN CONTENTDecember 2017March 2020Allow2720YesNo
15840899NETWORK-BASED CONTENT RENDERINGDecember 2017September 2020Allow3330YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MRABI, HASSAN.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
10
Examiner Affirmed
7
(70.0%)
Examiner Reversed
3
(30.0%)
Reversal Percentile
47.4%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 30.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
20
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(15.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
17
(85.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
18.8%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 15.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner MRABI, HASSAN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MRABI, HASSAN works in Art Unit 2144 and has examined 273 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 74.7%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MRABI, HASSAN's allowance rate of 74.7% places them in the 41% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MRABI, HASSAN receive 1.93 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 43% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MRABI, HASSAN is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 70% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +37.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MRABI, HASSAN. This interview benefit is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 31.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 67% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 7.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 20.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 52.4% of appeals filed. This is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 18.2% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 58.8% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.