Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18604075 | GUIDED PERSONAL IDENTITY BASED ACTIONS | March 2024 | April 2025 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18590472 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DOMAIN AWARE DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION AND INFORMATION EXTRACTION FROM CONSUMER DOCUMENTS | February 2024 | November 2024 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18414095 | GENERATING ENCODED TEXT BASED ON SPOKEN UTTERANCES USING MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS AND METHODS | January 2024 | November 2024 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18525543 | OBJECT TIME SERIES SYSTEM | November 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18492230 | Stage-Specific Pipeline View Using Prediction Engine | October 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18237704 | Adaptive Data Platforms | August 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18221354 | Devices, Methods, and Graphical User Interfaces for Touch Input Processing | July 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18348191 | CREATING USER INTERFACE USING MACHINE LEARNING | July 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18205867 | MULTI-SEGMENT TEXT SEARCH USING MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR TEXT SIMILARITY | June 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18186472 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROMPTING LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL TO PROCESS INPUTS FROM MULTIPLE USER ELEMENTS | March 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18164661 | CORPUS QUALITY PROCESSING FOR A SPECIFIED TASK | February 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18153583 | CONTROLLABLE READING GUIDES AND NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION | January 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18069839 | INTERACTION METHOD OF MULTIMEDIA SEGMENTATION, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 20 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18057932 | OPTIMIZED ANALYSIS AND ACCESS TO INTERACTIVE CONTENT | November 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18046446 | CREATING USER INTERFACE USING MACHINE LEARNING | October 2022 | May 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17938572 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TEXT SUMMARIZATION | October 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 24 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17798683 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, SERVER DEVICE, AND PROGRAM | August 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17879151 | ACCELERATED FORM COMPLETION WITH EMAIL ADDRESS ANALYTICS | August 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 27 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17875083 | METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR NAVIGATING APPLICATION SCREEN | July 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17862509 | AUTOMATING TEXT AND GRAPHICS COVERAGE ANALYSIS OF A WEBSITE PAGE | July 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 27 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17758196 | DOCUMENT DISPLAY ASSISTANCE SYSTEM, DOCUMENT DISPLAY ASSISTANCE METHOD, AND PROGRAM FOR EXECUTING SAID METHOD | June 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17711873 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTEXTUAL HIGHLIGHTING OF A DOCUMENT | April 2022 | July 2024 | Allow | 27 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17601720 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VALIDATING TABULAR SUMMARY REPORTS | October 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17408311 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED PROCESSING OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS WITH MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | August 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17331077 | Active Hidden Stressor Identification and Notification | May 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17243684 | System and Method for Identification of Replacement Parts Using Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning | April 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17285630 | SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING AND MANAGING A PROCESS WITHIN AN ENVIRONMENT USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES AND RELATIVE METHOD | April 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 46 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17214448 | TECHNIQUES FOR GENERATING A TRAINING DATA SET FOR A MACHINE-LEARNING MODEL | March 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 46 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17185447 | SCHEDULING METHOD AND DEVICE FOR BATCH PROCESSING MACHINE | February 2021 | June 2025 | Abandon | 52 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17169267 | DESIGN INTERFACE OBJECT MANIPULATION BASED ON AGGREGATED PROPERTY VALUES | February 2021 | May 2024 | Allow | 39 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17131577 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAINING DEEP-LEARNING CLASSIFIERS | December 2020 | December 2024 | Abandon | 48 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17101754 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF AN INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM | November 2020 | January 2025 | Allow | 50 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17098508 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17085779 | DEVICE, METHOD, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE FOR ANNOTATING TEXT | October 2020 | July 2024 | Allow | 44 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17050265 | NEURAL NETWORK LEARNING APPARATUS, NEURAL NETWORK LEARNING METHOD AND PROGRAM | October 2020 | August 2024 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17070332 | OBJECTIVE-EFFECTUATORS IN SYNTHESIZED REALITY SETTINGS | October 2020 | April 2025 | Allow | 54 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17008569 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTILINGUAL SENTENCE EMBEDDINGS | August 2020 | April 2025 | Allow | 56 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16946586 | Random Action Replay for Reinforcement Learning | June 2020 | April 2025 | Allow | 58 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16688084 | MATHEMATICAL FUNCTION DEFINED NATURAL LANGUAGE ANNOTATION | November 2019 | November 2024 | Allow | 60 | 7 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16550197 | CUSTOMIZED CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT PLATFORM METHOD AND DEVICES | August 2019 | March 2020 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16505666 | INVOICE CLASSIFICATION AND APPROVAL SYSTEM | July 2019 | February 2025 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16137908 | TREE-TYPE HOMEPAGE SYSTEM AND HOMEPAGE MANAGEMENT METHOD | September 2018 | July 2020 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16129032 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACTIVE LEARNING TO DETECT PERSONALLY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION | September 2018 | August 2024 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16003643 | GENERATING CUSTOM APPLICATION LINKS | June 2018 | April 2020 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15981344 | Method and System for Semantically Generating and Digitally Publishing Articles | May 2018 | April 2020 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15979499 | CONTEXTUAL DETERMINATION OF EMOTION ICONS | May 2018 | March 2019 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15979513 | CONTEXTUAL DETERMINATION OF EMOTION ICONS | May 2018 | March 2019 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15956042 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING FRACTAL MAP FOR WEB DISCOVERY AND NAVIGATION | April 2018 | December 2019 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15802103 | DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DISPLAY APPARATUS | November 2017 | February 2020 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15666618 | CONTEXTUAL DETERMINATION OF EMOTION ICONS | August 2017 | February 2018 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15401846 | SYSTEM, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR RESUME REARRANGEMENT | January 2017 | January 2020 | Allow | 36 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 15396849 | EXPORTING DATA TO WEB-BASED APPLICATIONS | January 2017 | March 2018 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15365623 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRELOADING CONTENT | November 2016 | October 2019 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15243276 | SMARTER ELECTRONIC READER | August 2016 | March 2017 | Allow | 6 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15138320 | CONTEXTUAL DETERMINATION OF EMOTION ICONS | April 2016 | September 2018 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15060919 | SMARTER ELECTRONIC READER | March 2016 | July 2016 | Allow | 4 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14955724 | PLUGIN TOOL FOR COLLECTING USER GENERATED DOCUMENT SEGMENTATION FEEDBACK | December 2015 | November 2017 | Allow | 24 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14742873 | FONT PERSONALIZATION | June 2015 | July 2019 | Allow | 49 | 6 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14735698 | CASCADING MENUS FOR REMOTE POPPING | June 2015 | May 2019 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 1 | No | Yes |
| 14690579 | SMARTER ELECTRONIC READER | April 2015 | August 2018 | Allow | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14584401 | NATIVE ADVERTISEMENT SMART INJECTION | December 2014 | June 2017 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14229392 | ASYNCHRONOUS LOADING OF SCRIPTS IN WEB PAGES | March 2014 | June 2017 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14043761 | WEBPAGE PARTIAL RENDERING ENGINE | October 2013 | January 2017 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13922402 | PARTIAL DATA REPORT GENERATION WITH DATA COSTING NOTIFICATION | June 2013 | December 2015 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13649342 | Real Time Term Suggestion Using Text Analytics | October 2012 | May 2016 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13648908 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING COMMANDS | October 2012 | October 2016 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13558731 | Substitute Uniform Resource Locator (URL) Generation | July 2012 | April 2015 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13547932 | CLIPBOARD FOR PROCESSING RECEIVED DATA CONTENT | July 2012 | April 2015 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13539231 | STRUCTURED DOCUMENT CUSTOMIZABLE COMPARISON SYSTEMS AND METHODS | June 2012 | July 2016 | Allow | 49 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13524106 | DYNAMIC PRESENTATION OF A RESULTS SET BY A FORM-BASED SOFTWARE APPLICATION | June 2012 | November 2017 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 13404730 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANAGING LONG-TERM PLAN BY AN E-CALENDAR | February 2012 | February 2016 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13403170 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR REPRESENTING DIGITAL DOCUMENTS FOR SEARCH APPLICATIONS | February 2012 | December 2015 | Allow | 46 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13399345 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SORTING ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS | February 2012 | September 2013 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13323996 | RESOURCE GUIDE GENERATOR FOR RESOURCE PAGES | December 2011 | December 2013 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13228352 | COMPARING TEXT PAGES USING IMAGE FEATURES BASED ON WORD POSITIONS | September 2011 | December 2011 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13148512 | ANNOTATING E-BOOKS / E-MAGAZINES WITH APPLICATION RESULTS AND FUNCTION CALLS | August 2011 | November 2013 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13187789 | APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTING A MEDIA ENHANCEMENT | July 2011 | December 2013 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13185773 | Apparatus, System and Method for Selecting a Media Enhancement | July 2011 | March 2014 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13184664 | APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SELECTING A MEDIA ENHANCEMENT | July 2011 | September 2013 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12916140 | CONCURRENT EDITING OF A DOCUMENT BY MULTIPLE CLIENTS | October 2010 | May 2013 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12901954 | REPORT FORMAT SETTING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND DEFECT REVIEW SYSTEM | October 2010 | August 2012 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12897701 | METHOD OF GENERATING A GRAPHICAL RESUME | October 2010 | December 2013 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12833229 | SYSTEM AND METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STREAM PROCESSING APPLICATIONS UTILIZING SPREADSHEET INTERFACE | July 2010 | March 2014 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 12682722 | ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION SYSTEM AND EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION METHOD | April 2010 | November 2014 | Allow | 55 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 12757910 | INCLUDING HYPERLINKS IN A DOCUMENT | April 2010 | May 2012 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12612612 | ASYNCHRONOUS LOADING OF SCRIPTS IN WEB PAGES | November 2009 | December 2013 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12340323 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXPORTING DATA TO WEB-BASED APPLICATIONS | December 2008 | September 2016 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 12263335 | ZOOMING OPERATIONS AND MAGNIFICATION FOR GROUPS OF IMAGES | October 2008 | September 2011 | Allow | 34 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12252418 | IDENTIFYING AND USING TEXTUAL WIDGETS | October 2008 | May 2013 | Allow | 55 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12238787 | METHOD FOR OBTAINING ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND ACCESSIBILITY INFORMATION DEVICE | September 2008 | October 2011 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12232209 | AUDIO DATA DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A PHOTO SLIDESHOW WHICH AUTOMATICALLY SELECTS MUSIC | September 2008 | May 2012 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11909952 | PRESENTING A RECOMMENDATION BASED ON USER PREFERENCE | September 2008 | March 2014 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 12164845 | STRUCTURED DOCUMENT CUSTOMIZABLE COMPARISON SYSTEMS AND METHODS | June 2008 | April 2012 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12165552 | ANALYSIS OF DATABASE PERFORMANCE REPORTS FOR GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION OF SUMMARY RESULTS | June 2008 | January 2012 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MCINTOSH, ANDREW T.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner MCINTOSH, ANDREW T works in Art Unit 2144 and has examined 91 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 95.6%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.
Examiner MCINTOSH, ANDREW T's allowance rate of 95.6% places them in the 87% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by MCINTOSH, ANDREW T receive 2.40 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 82% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MCINTOSH, ANDREW T is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 31% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +4.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MCINTOSH, ANDREW T. This interview benefit is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.3% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 43.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 9% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.