USPTO Examiner MCINTOSH ANDREW T - Art Unit 2144

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18608836NATIVE INTEGRATION OF ARBITRARY DATA SOURCESMarch 2024December 2025Allow2110NoNo
18604075GUIDED PERSONAL IDENTITY BASED ACTIONSMarch 2024April 2025Allow1320YesNo
18590472SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DOMAIN AWARE DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION AND INFORMATION EXTRACTION FROM CONSUMER DOCUMENTSFebruary 2024November 2024Allow810NoNo
18414095GENERATING ENCODED TEXT BASED ON SPOKEN UTTERANCES USING MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS AND METHODSJanuary 2024November 2024Allow1010NoNo
18525543OBJECT TIME SERIES SYSTEMNovember 2023October 2024Allow1110NoNo
18492230Stage-Specific Pipeline View Using Prediction EngineOctober 2023March 2025Allow1720YesNo
18241645AUTOMATIC FITTING AND/OR PROPOSAL OF PREDICTIVE MODELS TO DATA ENTRIES OF A SPREADSHEET FILE REPRESENTATIVE OF A LARGER DATASETSeptember 2023November 2025Abandon2710NoNo
18237704Adaptive Data PlatformsAugust 2023December 2024Allow1620YesNo
18353083SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR THE GENERATION AND EDITING OF TEXT CONTENT IN WEBSITE BUILDING SYSTEMSJuly 2023October 2025Allow2710NoNo
18352145TOKENIZATION OF TEXT DATA TO FACILITATE AUTOMATED DISCOVERY OF SPEECH DISFLUENCIESJuly 2023February 2026Allow3120YesNo
18221354Devices, Methods, and Graphical User Interfaces for Touch Input ProcessingJuly 2023August 2024Allow1310NoNo
18348191CREATING USER INTERFACE USING MACHINE LEARNINGJuly 2023May 2025Allow2310NoNo
18335031SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A KNOWLEDGE-BASED FORM CREATION PLATFORMJune 2023June 2025Allow2430YesNo
18205867MULTI-SEGMENT TEXT SEARCH USING MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR TEXT SIMILARITYJune 2023October 2024Allow1620NoNo
18133969USER-GUIDED VISUAL CONTENT GENERATIONApril 2023October 2025Abandon3010NoNo
18186472METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROMPTING LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL TO PROCESS INPUTS FROM MULTIPLE USER ELEMENTSMarch 2023April 2025Allow2510NoNo
18119123INTELLIGENT FORM FILLINGMarch 2023February 2026Allow3520YesNo
18169793GENERATIVE COLLABORATIVE PUBLISHING SYSTEMFebruary 2023January 2026Allow3520YesNo
18164661CORPUS QUALITY PROCESSING FOR A SPECIFIED TASKFebruary 2023January 2025Allow2310YesNo
18153583CONTROLLABLE READING GUIDES AND NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATIONJanuary 2023September 2024Allow2020YesNo
18069839INTERACTION METHOD OF MULTIMEDIA SEGMENTATION, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUMDecember 2022August 2024Allow2040YesNo
18057932OPTIMIZED ANALYSIS AND ACCESS TO INTERACTIVE CONTENTNovember 2022January 2025Allow2611NoNo
18046446CREATING USER INTERFACE USING MACHINE LEARNINGOctober 2022May 2024Allow1920YesNo
17938572SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TEXT SUMMARIZATIONOctober 2022October 2024Allow2430YesNo
17959402TEXT CLASSIFICATION MODEL TRAINING METHOD, TEXT CLASSIFICATION METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTOctober 2022March 2026Allow4110YesNo
17800355METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUS FOR PROBABILISTIC REASONINGAugust 2022February 2026Abandon4210NoNo
17798683INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, SERVER DEVICE, AND PROGRAMAugust 2022February 2025Abandon3040NoNo
17879151ACCELERATED FORM COMPLETION WITH EMAIL ADDRESS ANALYTICSAugust 2022October 2024Allow2740NoNo
17875083METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR NAVIGATING APPLICATION SCREENJuly 2022August 2024Allow2530NoNo
17867958MACHINE LEARNING CLASSIFIER BASED ON CATEGORY MODELINGJuly 2022December 2025Allow4110NoNo
17867680TRAINING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FAULT RECOGNITION MODEL, FAULT RECOGNITION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEJuly 2022December 2025Allow4110NoNo
17862509AUTOMATING TEXT AND GRAPHICS COVERAGE ANALYSIS OF A WEBSITE PAGEJuly 2022October 2024Allow2750YesNo
17758196DOCUMENT DISPLAY ASSISTANCE SYSTEM, DOCUMENT DISPLAY ASSISTANCE METHOD, AND PROGRAM FOR EXECUTING SAID METHODJune 2022July 2024Allow2410YesNo
17807039PREDICTING THE NEED FOR XAI IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMSJune 2022March 2026Allow4520YesNo
17663365TRAINING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ENGINE TO IDENTIFY COMMONALITIES AMONG NODES TO PREDICT ACTIONSMay 2022July 2025Allow3810NoNo
17661328TRAINING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ENGINE TO IDENTIFY COMMONALITIES AMONG NODES TO PREDICT ACTIONSApril 2022July 2025Allow3810NoNo
17731590METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ESTIMATING CAUSAL EFFECTS FROM KNOWLEDGE GRAPHSApril 2022July 2025Allow3910NoNo
17660036Action Space Reduction for Planning DomainsApril 2022March 2026Allow4720YesNo
17711873SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTEXTUAL HIGHLIGHTING OF A DOCUMENTApril 2022July 2024Allow2740NoNo
17702803METHOD FOR PREDICTING COAL QUALITY OF COAL MILL BASED ON NEURAL NETWORKMarch 2022November 2025Allow4410NoNo
17588057CONSTRAINED DESIGNED AND GUIDED LATENT FEATURE SPACE CONTRIBUTIONS TO MACHINE LEARNING MODELSJanuary 2022July 2025Allow4210NoNo
17601720SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VALIDATING TABULAR SUMMARY REPORTSOctober 2021August 2024Allow3410NoNo
17460584HETEROGENEOUS ARCHITECTURE FOR DEPTHWISE-SEPERABLE CONVOLUTION BASED NEURAL NETWORK COMPUTATION ACCELERATIONAugust 2021July 2025Allow4720YesNo
17408311SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED PROCESSING OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS WITH MACHINE LEARNING MODELSAugust 2021January 2025Allow4110YesNo
17331077Active Hidden Stressor Identification and NotificationMay 2021December 2024Allow4310NoNo
17245541DEPLOYING PARALLELIZABLE DEEP LEARNING MODELS BY ADAPTING TO THE COMPUTING DEVICESApril 2021December 2025Allow5530NoNo
17243684System and Method for Identification of Replacement Parts Using Artificial Intelligence/Machine LearningApril 2021May 2025Allow4920NoNo
17285630SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING AND MANAGING A PROCESS WITHIN AN ENVIRONMENT USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES AND RELATIVE METHODApril 2021February 2025Abandon4610NoNo
17214448TECHNIQUES FOR GENERATING A TRAINING DATA SET FOR A MACHINE-LEARNING MODELMarch 2021January 2025Allow4610YesNo
17185447SCHEDULING METHOD AND DEVICE FOR BATCH PROCESSING MACHINEFebruary 2021June 2025Abandon5220NoNo
17169267DESIGN INTERFACE OBJECT MANIPULATION BASED ON AGGREGATED PROPERTY VALUESFebruary 2021May 2024Allow3950NoNo
17131577SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRAINING DEEP-LEARNING CLASSIFIERSDecember 2020December 2024Abandon4810YesNo
17109870INFERENCE APPARATUS, TRAINING APPARATUS, AND INFERENCE METHODDecember 2020February 2026Allow6041YesNo
17101754SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF AN INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEMNovember 2020January 2025Allow5030YesNo
17098508INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMNovember 2020September 2024Allow4620NoNo
17085779DEVICE, METHOD, AND GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE FOR ANNOTATING TEXTOctober 2020July 2024Allow4440YesNo
17050265NEURAL NETWORK LEARNING APPARATUS, NEURAL NETWORK LEARNING METHOD AND PROGRAMOctober 2020August 2024Allow4620YesNo
17070332OBJECTIVE-EFFECTUATORS IN SYNTHESIZED REALITY SETTINGSOctober 2020April 2025Allow5430YesNo
17008569SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTILINGUAL SENTENCE EMBEDDINGSAugust 2020April 2025Allow5650YesNo
16959302ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ASSISTED RECOGNITION METHOD AND DEVICEJune 2020November 2025Allow6051YesNo
16946586Random Action Replay for Reinforcement LearningJune 2020April 2025Allow5840YesNo
16688084MATHEMATICAL FUNCTION DEFINED NATURAL LANGUAGE ANNOTATIONNovember 2019November 2024Allow6070YesNo
16550197CUSTOMIZED CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT PLATFORM METHOD AND DEVICESAugust 2019March 2020Allow710YesNo
16505666INVOICE CLASSIFICATION AND APPROVAL SYSTEMJuly 2019February 2025Allow6040YesNo
16137908TREE-TYPE HOMEPAGE SYSTEM AND HOMEPAGE MANAGEMENT METHODSeptember 2018July 2020Allow2210NoNo
16129032SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ACTIVE LEARNING TO DETECT PERSONALLY IDENTIFYING INFORMATIONSeptember 2018August 2024Allow6090YesNo
16003643GENERATING CUSTOM APPLICATION LINKSJune 2018April 2020Allow2320YesNo
15981344Method and System for Semantically Generating and Digitally Publishing ArticlesMay 2018April 2020Allow2310NoNo
15979499CONTEXTUAL DETERMINATION OF EMOTION ICONSMay 2018March 2019Allow1020NoNo
15979513CONTEXTUAL DETERMINATION OF EMOTION ICONSMay 2018March 2019Allow1020NoNo
15956042SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING FRACTAL MAP FOR WEB DISCOVERY AND NAVIGATIONApril 2018December 2019Allow2010NoNo
15802103DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING DISPLAY APPARATUSNovember 2017February 2020Allow2720NoNo
15666618CONTEXTUAL DETERMINATION OF EMOTION ICONSAugust 2017February 2018Allow610NoNo
15415693Method and System to Display Content from a PDF Document on a Small ScreenJanuary 2017November 2025Allow6091YesYes
15401846SYSTEM, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR RESUME REARRANGEMENTJanuary 2017January 2020Allow3650NoNo
15396849EXPORTING DATA TO WEB-BASED APPLICATIONSJanuary 2017March 2018Allow1500NoNo
15365623SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRELOADING CONTENTNovember 2016October 2019Allow3540YesNo
15243276SMARTER ELECTRONIC READERAugust 2016March 2017Allow600NoNo
15138320CONTEXTUAL DETERMINATION OF EMOTION ICONSApril 2016September 2018Allow2830YesNo
15060919SMARTER ELECTRONIC READERMarch 2016July 2016Allow420YesNo
14955724PLUGIN TOOL FOR COLLECTING USER GENERATED DOCUMENT SEGMENTATION FEEDBACKDecember 2015November 2017Allow2430NoNo
14742873FONT PERSONALIZATIONJune 2015July 2019Allow4961YesNo
14735698CASCADING MENUS FOR REMOTE POPPINGJune 2015May 2019Allow4821NoYes
14690579SMARTER ELECTRONIC READERApril 2015August 2018Allow4040YesNo
14584401NATIVE ADVERTISEMENT SMART INJECTIONDecember 2014June 2017Allow3010YesNo
14229392ASYNCHRONOUS LOADING OF SCRIPTS IN WEB PAGESMarch 2014June 2017Allow3910NoNo
14043761WEBPAGE PARTIAL RENDERING ENGINEOctober 2013January 2017Allow4021YesNo
13922402PARTIAL DATA REPORT GENERATION WITH DATA COSTING NOTIFICATIONJune 2013December 2015Allow3020YesNo
13649342Real Time Term Suggestion Using Text AnalyticsOctober 2012May 2016Allow4340YesNo
13648908METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING COMMANDSOctober 2012October 2016Allow4830YesNo
13558731Substitute Uniform Resource Locator (URL) GenerationJuly 2012April 2015Allow3210NoNo
13547932CLIPBOARD FOR PROCESSING RECEIVED DATA CONTENTJuly 2012April 2015Allow3320YesNo
13539231STRUCTURED DOCUMENT CUSTOMIZABLE COMPARISON SYSTEMS AND METHODSJune 2012July 2016Allow4930YesNo
13524106DYNAMIC PRESENTATION OF A RESULTS SET BY A FORM-BASED SOFTWARE APPLICATIONJune 2012November 2017Allow6060NoNo
13404730APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANAGING LONG-TERM PLAN BY AN E-CALENDARFebruary 2012February 2016Allow4731YesNo
13403170METHOD AND DEVICE FOR REPRESENTING DIGITAL DOCUMENTS FOR SEARCH APPLICATIONSFebruary 2012December 2015Allow4630NoNo
13399345SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SORTING ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTSFebruary 2012September 2013Allow1910YesNo
13323996RESOURCE GUIDE GENERATOR FOR RESOURCE PAGESDecember 2011December 2013Allow2410NoNo
13228352COMPARING TEXT PAGES USING IMAGE FEATURES BASED ON WORD POSITIONSSeptember 2011December 2011Allow300NoNo
13148512ANNOTATING E-BOOKS / E-MAGAZINES WITH APPLICATION RESULTS AND FUNCTION CALLSAugust 2011November 2013Allow2720NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MCINTOSH, ANDREW T.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
1
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
71.8%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(33.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(66.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
51.6%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner MCINTOSH, ANDREW T - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MCINTOSH, ANDREW T works in Art Unit 2144 and has examined 77 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 96.1%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MCINTOSH, ANDREW T's allowance rate of 96.1% places them in the 86% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MCINTOSH, ANDREW T receive 2.56 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 75% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MCINTOSH, ANDREW T is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 21% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +2.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MCINTOSH, ANDREW T. This interview benefit is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 39.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 60.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 13.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.