USPTO Examiner JUNG SEUNG WOON - Art Unit 2144

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17121271SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR HYBRID IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIVE AND WEB COMPONENTSDecember 2020July 2022Allow1920YesNo
17114723INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUSDecember 2020May 2024Abandon4140YesNo
17103038Disentanglement of Chat UtterancesNovember 2020July 2022Allow1910YesNo
17076406SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODIFYING WEBPAGES WITH DELIVERY DATE ESTIMATIONOctober 2020August 2021Allow1010NoNo
17071737AUTOMATING MAPPING BETWEEN CONTENT SCHEMA AND RENDERED PAGESOctober 2020March 2023Allow2920YesNo
17060103SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OBTAINING DOCUMENTS FROM A COMPOSITE FILEOctober 2020May 2022Allow2010NoNo
17018233SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DOCUMENT EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESISSeptember 2020January 2024Allow4010NoNo
17005429USER CONFIGURABLE ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS BROWSERAugust 2020November 2021Allow1500YesNo
16939283DETECTING AND PROCESSING SECTIONS SPANNING PROCESSED DOCUMENT PARTITIONSJuly 2020April 2022Allow2110NoNo
16914899ANOMALY CLASSIFICATION WITH ATTENDANT WORD ENRICHMENTJune 2020March 2024Allow4540YesNo
16907661METHOD FOR MANAGING AND SELECTIVELY ARRANGING SETS OF MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS AND PAGES WITHIN DOCUMENTSJune 2020January 2022Allow1920YesNo
16892293INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAMJune 2020July 2023Allow3710YesNo
16877215SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR STACKING MARGINAL ANNOTATIONSMay 2020March 2022Allow2220YesNo
15931129SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC TABLE DISPLAYMay 2020April 2022Abandon2320YesNo
16838570Systems and Methods for Generating Logical Documents for a Document Evaluation SystemApril 2020September 2021Allow1710YesNo
16652656ASSOCIATING BROWSER WITH APPLICATIONMarch 2020November 2021Allow2020NoNo
16642937UI Enabling Mapping Engine System and Process Interconnecting Spreadsheets and Database-Driven ApplicationsMarch 2020March 2022Allow2510YesNo
16797914CORRECTING ERRORS IN COPIED TEXTFebruary 2020September 2022Allow3140YesYes
16793524INTELLIGENT DOCUMENT SYSTEMFebruary 2020July 2023Allow4140YesYes
16781800NOVEL USER CONFIGURABLE ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS BROWSERFebruary 2020November 2021Allow2100YesNo
16631786METHOD FOR E-NOTE MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC BOOKS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEJanuary 2020October 2021Allow2140YesNo
16704823PAGE STREAM SEGMENTATIONDecember 2019April 2022Abandon2830YesNo
16691656EDITING ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTSNovember 2019February 2021Allow1520YesNo
16686873Method and Apparatus for Accessing Proprietary Resources on a Co-Browse SessionNovember 2019January 2022Allow2620YesNo
16678772CONTENT ALIGNMENTNovember 2019August 2022Allow3320YesNo
16655426SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR DEVELOPING A TOOL FOR AUTOMATED DATA CAPTUREOctober 2019November 2021Abandon2510NoNo
16605805INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE USING RECOGNITION DIFFICULTY SCORE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODOctober 2019February 2022Allow2830YesNo
16601702AUGMENTED REALITY AUDIO MIXINGOctober 2019October 2021Abandon2420YesNo
16653581SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODIFYING WEBPAGES WITH DELIVERY DATE ESTIMATIONOctober 2019August 2020Allow1100YesNo
16597318Heading Identification and Classification for a Digital DocumentOctober 2019January 2021Allow1500YesNo
16566529CONTENT EVALUATION BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING AND ENGAGEMENT METRICSSeptember 2019October 2023Allow4930YesNo
16552471ANALYZING DOCUMENTS USING MACHINE LEARNINGAugust 2019September 2022Allow3710YesNo
16447437Image Annotation Using Aggregated Page Information From Active and Inactive IndicesJune 2019May 2023Abandon4640YesNo
16434988PAGE STREAM SEGMENTATIONJune 2019September 2019Allow300YesNo
16426432DYNAMIC MANAGEMENT OF CONTENT IN AN ELECTRONIC PRESENTATIONMay 2019November 2022Allow4230YesYes
16413910GENERATING RICH DIGITAL DOCUMENTS FROM LIMITED INSTRUCTIONAL DATAMay 2019June 2021Allow2510YesNo
16395801HYBRID WEB PUBLISHING SYSTEMApril 2019April 2021Allow2320YesNo
16378854DISPLAY SYSTEM FOR SMART PRODUCTSApril 2019December 2020Allow2110YesNo
16355151GENERATING A MEETING REVIEW DOCUMENT THAT INCLUDES LINKS TO THE ONE OR MORE DOCUMENTS REVIEWEDMarch 2019September 2022Allow4250YesNo
16289174SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING AN EMAIL CLIENT INTERFACE WITH AN INTEGRATED TABULAR DATA MANAGEMENT INTERFACEFebruary 2019November 2020Abandon2120NoNo
16251932Computer-Implemented Environment for Creating, Sharing, and Storing Documents in a Modular FormatJanuary 2019May 2021Allow2820YesNo
16248583SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING A COMMUNICATION PROGRAM INTERFACE WITH AN INTEGRATED TABULAR DATA MANAGEMENT INTERFACEJanuary 2019May 2020Allow1610YesNo
16314148METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ANALYZING DATA FLOW, DEVICE, AND MEDIUMDecember 2018July 2022Abandon4320NoNo
16231250DYNAMIC RENDERING OF ITEMS IN SPACE-CONSTRAINED CONTAINER IN USER INTERFACEDecember 2018June 2021Allow3030YesNo
16215367INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMDecember 2018March 2022Abandon3940NoNo
16197789ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DATA INPUT INTO INPUT FIELDNovember 2018December 2021Allow3731YesNo
16154057Dynamic Linguistic Assessment and MeasurementOctober 2018April 2022Allow4220YesNo
16139697LINK CORRECTIONS BY COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF WEB RESOURCESSeptember 2018December 2020Allow2610YesNo
16135591CORRECTING ERRORS IN COPIED TEXTSeptember 2018November 2019Allow1410YesNo
16133775PROVIDING SEMANTIC BASED DOCUMENT EDITORSeptember 2018June 2021Allow3340YesNo
16132781ARTIFICIAL CONVERSATIONAL ENTITY METHODS AND SYSTEMSSeptember 2018March 2021Abandon3020NoNo
16132627PROVIDING ONE OR MORE NEW VIRTUAL KEYS IN A VIRTUAL KEYBOARD THAT EACH CORRESPOND TO A PREDICTED SET OF CHARACTERSSeptember 2018November 2020Abandon2610NoNo
16085632INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODSeptember 2018September 2021Allow3640YesNo
16132307PROVIDING OPTIMIZED DISPLAYS ON USER INTERFACES BASED ON USER GENERATED LISTS OF ITEMSSeptember 2018October 2022Abandon4960YesNo
16105429POPULATING DATA FIELDS IN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTSAugust 2018March 2021Allow3130YesNo
16104134INFORMATION INPUT METHOD, INFORMATION INPUT APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION INPUT SYSTEMAugust 2018March 2021Allow3120YesNo
16056256SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR STACKING MARGINAL ANNOTATIONSAugust 2018January 2020Allow1710YesNo
16050933METHOD FOR MANAGING AND SELECTIVELY ARRANGING SETS OF MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS AND PAGES WITHIN DOCUMENTSJuly 2018March 2020Allow2010YesNo
16036636HISTOGRAM SLIDER FOR QUICK NAVIGATION OF A TIME-BASED LISTJuly 2018March 2020Allow2020YesNo
16026666Contextual Graphical User Interface FormsJuly 2018March 2023Abandon5630YesYes
16025585DISPLAYING PAGEJuly 2018June 2021Abandon3640YesNo
16024492IMAGE QUALITY OPTIMIZATION DURING REMOTE ISOLATED SESSIONSJune 2018November 2020Allow2930YesNo
16015273Systems, Devices, and/or Methods for Managing MessagesJune 2018February 2023Abandon5650NoYes
16010793HANDWRITING INPUT DEVICE AND INFORMATION INPUT METHODJune 2018April 2022Allow4650YesNo
15967300SIMULTANEOUS LIVE VIDEO AMONGST MULTIPLE USERS FOR DISCOVERY AND SHARING OF INFORMATIONApril 2018September 2020Abandon2920NoNo
15960460SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SHARING TRIMMED VERSIONS OF DIGITAL MEDIA ITEMSApril 2018March 2022Allow4760YesNo
15958963ASPECT ORIENTED CONTROL SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC TOPOLOGY OF UTILITY DEVICESApril 2018April 2021Abandon3630YesNo
15943153AUGMENTED REALITY AUDIO MIXINGApril 2018September 2019Allow1720YesNo
15912483Document Editor with Research Citation Insertion ToolMarch 2018July 2020Allow2940YesNo
15860462COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS SYSTEMS AND ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE FOR AUTOMATED CONSTRUCTION OF COMPUTER-GENERATED USER INTERFACEJanuary 2018January 2021Allow3620YesNo
15810510BOOK VERSION MAPPINGNovember 2017November 2019Allow2420NoNo
15807431GENERATING PRESENTATION SLIDES WITH DISTILLED CONTENTNovember 2017June 2022Allow5570YesNo
15806494DIGITAL FORM OPTIMIZATIONNovember 2017September 2019Allow2210YesNo
15572383ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFORNovember 2017March 2021Abandon4150YesNo
15802460SPREADSHEET COMMENT NAVIGATIONNovember 2017March 2019Allow1610YesNo
15720068METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DISPLAYING HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACESeptember 2017January 2020Abandon2720NoNo
15561319METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PAGE DIFFERENCE PRESENTATIONSeptember 2017January 2020Allow2720YesNo
15703118PRESENTATION SYSTEM, RECEIVER DEVICE, METHODS THEREOF, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM THEREOFSeptember 2017January 2023Abandon6060YesNo
15692598METHODS AND APPARATUS TO GENERATE USER INTERFACE VIRTUAL RESOURCE PROVISIONING REQUEST FORMSAugust 2017April 2022Abandon5560YesNo
15673662WEB PAGE DISPLAY METHOD, TERMINAL, AND STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2017April 2020Allow3240YesNo
15596436IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD FOR CREATING A PDF FILE INCLUDING STROKE DATA IN A TEXT FORMATMay 2017August 2019Allow2730YesNo
15595073COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING A FEATURE-BASED SEARCH AND DISPLAYING AN INTERACTIVE DYNAMICALLY UPDATABLE, MULTIDIMENSIONAL USER INTERFACE THEREFROMMay 2017March 2020Abandon3420NoNo
15588963GENERATING RICH DIGITAL DOCUMENTS FROM LIMITED INSTRUCTIONAL DATAMay 2017March 2019Allow2340YesNo
15589194DATA ACQUISITION METHOD, DATA ACQUISITION DEVICE, AND RECORDING MEDIUMMay 2017March 2020Abandon3440NoNo
15498142OPTIMIZING ONLINE CONTENT RENDERINGApril 2017June 2019Allow2620YesNo
15495904Systems And Methods For Generating And Configuring Content Of Elevator Destination Dispatch KiosksApril 2017January 2019Allow2110NoNo
15444317ASSISTING INPUT FROM A KEYBOARDFebruary 2017April 2019Allow2620YesNo
15441219TECHNIQUES FOR MIXED-INITIATIVE VISUALIZATION OF DATAFebruary 2017January 2023Allow60100YesYes
15417340CONVERTING ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS HAVING VISIBLE OBJECTSJanuary 2017March 2019Allow2530YesNo
15254794MEDIA CONTENT PRESENTATION BY CATEGORIZING AND FORMATTING MEDIA TYPESSeptember 2016April 2019Abandon3220YesNo
15250472HYBRID WEB PUBLISHING SYSTEMAugust 2016January 2019Allow2820YesNo
15242279SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING AN EMAIL CLIENT INTERFACE WITH AN INTEGRATED TABULAR DATA MANAGEMENT INTERFACEAugust 2016September 2018Allow2530YesNo
15222842SLICER ELEMENTS FOR FILTERING TABULAR DATAJuly 2016February 2019Allow3020YesNo
15220550IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM IN WHICH A TEXT ELEMENT AND AN IMAGE ELEMENT ARE ARRANGED BASED ON LAYOUTS IN A WEBPAGEJuly 2016February 2020Allow4340YesNo
15213598NOTE RECOGNITION FOR OVERLAPPING PHYSICAL NOTESJuly 2016January 2019Allow3020YesNo
15176409Method and System for Visualizing DocumentsJune 2016January 2020Allow4340YesNo
15161645DISPLAY SYSTEM FOR SMART PRODUCTSMay 2016February 2019Allow3320YesNo
15161979METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SENDING MESSAGEMay 2016June 2019Abandon3620YesNo
15160789METHOD FOR PROCESSING INPUTS BETWEEN DEVICES AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOFMay 2016March 2019Allow3420YesNo
15147693Extension of Text on a PathMay 2016March 2019Allow3420YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner JUNG, SEUNG WOON.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
10
Examiner Affirmed
6
(60.0%)
Examiner Reversed
4
(40.0%)
Reversal Percentile
61.7%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 40.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
24
Allowed After Appeal Filing
12
(50.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
12
(50.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
77.9%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner JUNG, SEUNG WOON - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner JUNG, SEUNG WOON works in Art Unit 2144 and has examined 209 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 65.1%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 36 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner JUNG, SEUNG WOON's allowance rate of 65.1% places them in the 27% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by JUNG, SEUNG WOON receive 2.86 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 80% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by JUNG, SEUNG WOON is 36 months. This places the examiner in the 35% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +55.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by JUNG, SEUNG WOON. This interview benefit is in the 95% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 21.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 27% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 22.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 16.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 61.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 39% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 71.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 1.0% of allowed cases (in the 66% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.