USPTO Examiner NABI REZA U - Art Unit 2142

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18957784SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF AN EXECUTION SEQUENCE WITHIN A GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACENovember 2024January 2025Allow200YesNo
18677665Devices, Methods, and Graphical User Interfaces for Providing Haptic FeedbackMay 2024January 2025Allow800NoNo
18609698AUGMENTED REALITY BEAUTY PRODUCT TUTORIALSMarch 2024October 2024Allow700YesNo
18599919COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS CONFIGURED FOR EFFICIENT ENTITY RESOLUTION FOR DATABASE MERGING AND RECONCILIATIONMarch 2024April 2025Allow1410NoNo
18432228INTELLIGENT MANIPULATION OF DYNAMIC DECLARATIVE INTERFACESFebruary 2024February 2025Allow1210YesNo
18407048CONFIGURABLE DEPLOYMENT OF DATA SCIENCE MODELSJanuary 2024August 2024Allow700YesNo
18402242A METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING PRODUCT SIMILARITY IN DIGITAL DOMAINSJanuary 2024August 2024Allow800YesNo
18497890SPECIAL LOCK MODE USER INTERFACEOctober 2023August 2024Allow1000YesNo
18485950TRAINING TEXT SUMMARIZATION NEURAL NETWORKS WITH AN EXTRACTED SEGMENTS PREDICTION OBJECTIVEOctober 2023September 2024Allow1110NoNo
18264253INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAMAugust 2023May 2025Allow2100YesNo
18360867CONTROLLED SCREEN SHARINGJuly 2023April 2025Allow2000YesNo
18222569SIMPLIFIED SHARING OF CONTENT AMONG COMPUTING DEVICESJuly 2023July 2024Allow1210YesNo
18352015Presenting Output To Indicate A Communication Attempt During A Communication SessionJuly 2023July 2024Allow1310YesNo
18219473GENERATING MEMES AND ENHANCED CONTENT IN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONJuly 2023April 2025Allow2100YesNo
18200241DISPLAY APPARATUS, USER TERMINAL, CONTROL METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUMMay 2023March 2025Allow2210YesNo
18139708METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING AN ENERGY MAPApril 2023February 2025Allow2210NoNo
18123072ESTABLISHED PERSPECTIVE USER INTERFACE AND USER EXPERIENCE FOR VIDEO MEETINGSMarch 2023June 2025Allow2750YesNo
18173011IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND INPUT DEVICEFebruary 2023March 2025Allow2510NoNo
18106215PROMPTED TEXT-TO-IMAGE GENERATIONFebruary 2023July 2024Allow1820YesNo
18096441Monitoring and Management of Wearable DevicesJanuary 2023November 2024Allow2200NoNo
17964041ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING FLEXIBLE DISPLAY AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING INPUT AREA FOR EXPANSION AND REDUCTION OF DISPLAY IN THE ELECTRONIC DEVICEOctober 2022May 2025Allow3100NoNo
17811252CLASSICAL-QUANTUM DATA CONFIDENCE FABRICJuly 2022May 2025Allow3400YesNo
17838347NON-LINEAR DATA DEPENDENCY DETECTION IN MACHINE LEARNING USING HYBRID QUANTUM COMPUTINGJune 2022June 2025Allow3600YesNo
17751519Devices, Methods, and Graphical User Interfaces for Providing Haptic FeedbackMay 2022December 2024Abandon3020YesNo
17564706CLINICAL TRIAL MATCHING SYSTEM USING INFERRED BIOMARKER STATUSDecember 2021October 2024Allow3400YesNo
17595794Method for Determining State Information Relating to a Belt Grinder by Means of a Machine Learning SystemNovember 2021May 2025Allow4100YesNo
17522920BASE MUTATION DETECTION METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON SEQUENCING DATA, AND STORAGE MEDIUMNovember 2021February 2025Allow3900NoNo
17606050METHOD FOR SIMULATING STOCHASTIC OSCILLATION IN INDIVIDUAL-GRANULARITY LONG-DISTANCE EXPRESSWAY TRAFFIC FLOW USING QUANTUM HARMONIC OSCILLATOROctober 2021March 2025Allow4100YesNo
17508544Quantifying User ExperienceOctober 2021February 2025Allow4000YesNo
17451270CROSS-TEMPORAL ENCODING MACHINE LEARNING MODELSOctober 2021January 2025Allow3900YesNo
17500645METHOD OF TRAINING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK AND METHOD OF EVALUATING PRONUNCIATION USING THE METHODOctober 2021November 2024Allow3700YesNo
17494055NEURO-SYMBOLIC REINFORCEMENT LEARNING WITH FIRST-ORDER LOGICOctober 2021January 2025Allow3900NoNo
17489458SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USING A CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK TO DETECT CONTAMINATIONSeptember 2021January 2025Allow3900NoNo
17477771SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LABEL GENERATION FOR TIMESERIES CLASSIFICATIONSeptember 2021December 2024Allow3900YesNo
17466156ADAPTIVE MODEL FOR VEHICLE PROCESSING OF IMAGESSeptember 2021November 2024Allow3800YesNo
17402803METHOD, DEVICE, AND PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR PROCESSING SAMPLE DATA IN INTERNET OF THINGS ENVIRONMENTAugust 2021November 2024Allow3900YesNo
17397653SPARSITY-AWARE COMPUTE-IN-MEMORYAugust 2021December 2024Allow4100YesNo
17373896INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAMJuly 2021March 2025Abandon4410NoNo
17369209NEURAL NETWORK ACCELERATIONJuly 2021May 2025Allow4610NoNo
17359862MACHINE LEARNING MODEL SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING SYSTEMJune 2021October 2024Allow3900YesNo
17304577METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRAINING MODEL TO PERFORM LINK PREDICTION IN KNOWLEDGE HYPERGRAPHJune 2021September 2024Allow3900NoNo
17345730Learning Mahalanobis Distance Metrics from DataJune 2021March 2025Allow4510NoNo
17322550INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMMay 2021April 2025Abandon4620NoNo
17233600DETERMINING COMPONENT CONTRIBUTIONS OF TIME-SERIES MODELApril 2021July 2024Allow3900YesNo
17180720ARITHMETIC PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND ARITHMETIC PROCESSING METHODFebruary 2021March 2025Abandon4910NoNo
17155896BRANCHING OPERATION FOR NEURAL PROCESSOR CIRCUITJanuary 2021September 2024Allow4410YesNo
17143769PIPELINED MACHINE LEARNING FRAMEWORKSJanuary 2021February 2025Allow4920YesNo
17139800APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR BOUNDARY LEARNING OPTIMIZATIONDecember 2020July 2024Allow4310NoNo
17105204COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR CANCER DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION USING NEURAL NETWORKSNovember 2020December 2024Abandon4810NoNo
16949958CONVERTING QUASI-AFFINE EXPRESSIONS TO MATRIX OPERATIONSNovember 2020August 2024Allow4520YesNo
17076329USER INTERFACE CUSTOMIZATION PER APPLICATIONOctober 2020December 2022Allow2640NoYes
17039447META-Q LEARNINGSeptember 2020September 2024Allow4830YesNo
16501983Mechanical button that activates a computer touch screen without causing damage to the touch screenJuly 2019June 2020Allow1100YesNo
16325395CONTROLLING A DEVICE USING A RADIAL GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACEFebruary 2019April 2020Allow1400YesNo
16242435PROVIDING DATA VISUALIZATIONJanuary 2019April 2020Allow1500YesNo
16021271VISUALIZATION OF CYCLICAL PATTERNS IN METRIC DATAJune 2018November 2019Allow1600YesNo
15780107INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAMMay 2018August 2019Allow1520YesNo
15979448SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COOPERATIVE SHARING OF RESOURCES OF AN ENVIRONMENTMay 2018December 2019Allow1900YesNo
15484089Overloading App Icon Touchscreen Interaction to Provide Action AccessibilityApril 2017May 2019Allow2600YesNo
15387980IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR, AND STORAGE MEDIUMDecember 2016January 2020Allow3720YesNo
15272958RECORDING GUI DATASeptember 2016May 2018Allow2000YesNo
15236917Method and apparatus for producing full synchronization of a digital file with a live eventAugust 2016December 2018Allow2800YesNo
15196729VISUALIZATION OF RUNTIME RESOURCE POLICY ATTACHMENTS AND APPLIED POLICY DETAILSJune 2016October 2018Allow2800YesNo
15089580SELECTABLE FLATTENING HIERARCHICAL OBJECT BROWSERApril 2016April 2018Allow2500NoNo
15075662INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND METHODMarch 2016September 2018Allow3000YesNo
15018046GRAPHIC-BASED ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHODFebruary 2016August 2018Allow3001YesNo
14895938Method for Controlling Voice Emoticon in Portable TerminalDecember 2015June 2018Allow3000YesNo
14959306FEEDBACK TOOLDecember 2015May 2018Allow3000YesNo
14931907VISUALIZATION OF CYCLICAL PATTERNS IN METRIC DATANovember 2015March 2018Allow2900YesNo
14706393CLOUD-BASED TRASH CANMay 2015January 2018Allow3310NoNo
14704931METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR TREATING KERATOCONUSMay 2015November 2017Allow3001YesNo
14660455SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CROWD SOURCINGMarch 2015November 2016Allow2020YesNo
14629349CREATION, SHARING AND EMBEDDING OF INTERACTIVE CHARTSFebruary 2015July 2017Allow2900YesNo
14385413USER TERMINAL, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFSeptember 2014October 2016Allow2500YesNo
14465175IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR, AND STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2014September 2016Allow2500YesNo
14451669Relocation Between Virtual Environments Based Upon Promotional and Alert ConditionsAugust 2014September 2017Allow3720NoNo
14308634Method and Apparatus for Producing Full Synchronization of a Digital File with a Live EventJune 2014May 2016Allow2300NoNo
14279897SYMBOLIC REFERENTIAL THIRD-PARTY NOTIFICATIONMay 2014July 2016Allow2600NoNo
14266548MODULAR SEARCH OBJECT FRAMEWORKApril 2014February 2017Allow3401YesNo
14224508VISUALIZATION OF RUNTIME RESOURCE POLICY ATTACHMENTS AND APPLIED POLICY DETAILSMarch 2014August 2016Allow2910YesNo
14216276Rules Based User Interface ArchitectureMarch 2014April 2016Allow2500YesNo
14184933SELECTABLE FLATTENING HIERARCHICAL FILE BROWSERFebruary 2014December 2015Allow2200YesNo
14164515GRAPHIC-BASED ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHODJanuary 2014November 2015Allow2100YesNo
14106318USER INTERACTION WITH CONTENT MARKERSDecember 2013April 2016Allow2810NoNo
14105872THREE-DIMENSIONAL NAVIGATION USING A TWO-DIMENSIONAL SURFACEDecember 2013September 2015Allow2100YesNo
14096839EMOTICON INPUT METHOD FOR MOBILE TERMINALDecember 2013February 2016Allow2700YesNo
14040784SMART CALENDARSeptember 2013August 2015Allow2200YesNo
14034630INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR CHANGING EXECUTION PRIORITYSeptember 2013March 2016Allow2910YesNo
13962236CREATION, SHARING AND EMBEDDING OF INTERACTIVE CHARTSAugust 2013August 2015Allow2500YesNo
13982192UI CREATION SUPPORT SYSTEM, UI CREATION SUPPORT METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUMJuly 2013May 2015Allow2100YesNo
13995115CONTENT SHARING DEVICE MANAGEMENTJune 2013March 2015Allow2100YesNo
13879014SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED AVAILABILITY AND/OR OUTAGE MANAGEMENTMay 2013October 2014Allow1810YesNo
13892008MOOD-BASED ORGANIZATION AND DISPLAY OF CO-USER LISTSMay 2013June 2015Allow2500YesNo
13842369RICH PROFILE COMMUNICATION WITH NOTIFICATIONSMarch 2013March 2016Allow3630YesNo
13765178VISUALIZATION OF RUNTIME RESOURCE POLICY ATTACHMENTS AND APPLIED POLICY DETAILSFebruary 2013May 2016Allow3920YesYes
13765257System and method for creating and displaying data_tiesFebruary 2013May 2015Allow2710YesNo
13813333CLOUD-BASED TRASH-CANJanuary 2013January 2015Allow2300YesNo
13754250USER INTERFACES AND SYSTEMS FOR ORAL HYGIENEJanuary 2013October 2014Allow2100YesNo
13742445FAST AND SMOOTH SCROLLING OF USER INTERFACES OPERATING ON THIN CLIENTSJanuary 2013March 2016Allow3820NoNo
13367247Systems And Methods For The Use Of Virtual EmblemsFebruary 2012December 2014Allow3410YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner NABI, REZA U.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
4
Examiner Affirmed
2
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
71.0%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
10
Allowed After Appeal Filing
6
(60.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
4
(40.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
87.6%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 60.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner NABI, REZA U - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner NABI, REZA U works in Art Unit 2142 and has examined 125 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 96.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner NABI, REZA U's allowance rate of 96.0% places them in the 88% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by NABI, REZA U receive 1.13 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 17% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by NABI, REZA U is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 23% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +7.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by NABI, REZA U. This interview benefit is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 39.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 20.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 133.3% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 69.2% of appeals filed. This is in the 50% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 22.2% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 50.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 9% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.