Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18442460 | Devices, Methods, and Graphical User Interfaces for Navigating, Displaying, and Editing Media Items with Multiple Display Modes | February 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18438880 | OPTIMIZING DISPLAY ENGAGEMENT IN ACTION AUTOMATION | February 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18509766 | SMART ASSIST FOR REPEATED ACTIONS | November 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18500955 | Tree Frog Computer Navigation System for the Hierarchical Visualization of Data | November 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18230106 | SMART TABLE SYSTEM FOR DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT | August 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18328667 | AUTOMATED DESCRIPTION GENERATION FOR JOB POSTING | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18037384 | OPERATION SUPPORT DEVICE, OPERATION SUPPORT METHOD, AND OPERATION SUPPORT PROGRAM | May 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18300813 | CONTEXT-AWARE EDIT MANAGEMENT OF WEBPAGE-BASED APPLICATIONS | April 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18115140 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR STIMULATING NEURAL ACTIVITY | February 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18007434 | FPGA-BASED FAST PROTOCOL DECODING METHOD, APPARATUS, AND DEVICE | January 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18006301 | Method for Displaying Plurality of Windows and Electronic Device | January 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 57 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18082781 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING SUPPLEMENTAL CONTENT FOR MEDIA CONTENT | December 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17944754 | DOCUMENT ARCHITECTURE WITH SMART RENDERING | September 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17891595 | INTELLIGENT DETECTION OF DOCUMENT READINESS | August 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17889427 | DOCUMENT PROCESSING DEVICE AND DOCUMENT PROCESSING METHOD | August 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17717827 | METHOD FOR ANNOTATIONS IN A CONTENT MODEL OF A CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | April 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 31 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17717835 | SYSTEM FOR ANNOTATIONS IN A CONTENT MODEL OF A CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | April 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 31 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17766533 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFIGURING AND IMPLEMENTING INTERFACE CONNECTORS ON A SERVER | April 2022 | November 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17639653 | MODEL TRAINING METHOD, SHORT MESSAGE AUDITING MODEL TRAINING METHOD, SHORT MESSAGE AUDITING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17598177 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING OBJECTS FROM LABELED IMAGES OF SAID OBJECTS | September 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 48 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17395651 | USER INTERFACE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK | August 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 51 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17336958 | HIDING PORTIONS OF DISPLAY CONTENT | June 2021 | February 2026 | Abandon | 56 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17302989 | GENERATING OR UPDATING CROSS-COMMUNITY STREAMS | May 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17315528 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | May 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 47 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17201681 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING IMAGE, DEVICE AND MEDIUM | March 2021 | November 2024 | Abandon | 44 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17147879 | Method for Identifying a Valid Energy State | January 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 56 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17120059 | MEMORY-EFFICIENT SYSTEM FOR DECISION TREE MACHINE LEARNING | December 2020 | June 2025 | Abandon | 54 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17035598 | Machine-Learned Natural Language Document Processing System | September 2020 | August 2024 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16912245 | RECOMMENDATIONS USING SESSION RELEVANCE AND INCREMENTAL LEARNING | June 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 51 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16509174 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FUZZING WITH FEEDBACK | July 2019 | January 2026 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16231199 | MODULAR AUTOTUNE FOR AUTOMATED FEED MODEL TRAINING | December 2018 | April 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15085129 | AUTO GROUPING BROWSER TABS | March 2016 | October 2016 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14867638 | Systems and Methods for Displaying Web Content | September 2015 | November 2018 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14699038 | USER EXPERIENCE FOR MULTIPLE UPLOADS OF DOCUMENTS BASED ON SIMILAR SOURCE MATERIAL | April 2015 | November 2018 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 13305282 | Conditional Logic for Delivering Computer-Executable Program Instructions and Content | November 2011 | December 2015 | Allow | 49 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12698457 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SPECIALTY IMAGING EFFECT GENERATION USING MULTIPLE LAYERS IN DOCUMENTS | February 2010 | August 2014 | Allow | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 12649711 | Method and Apparatus for Defining Screen Reader Functions within Online Electronic Documents | December 2009 | June 2017 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 12581772 | AUTOMATED APPLICATION COMPATIBILITY TESTING | October 2009 | October 2014 | Allow | 59 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 12070722 | Web application code decoupling and user interaction performance | February 2008 | June 2014 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 11868197 | USER-TAILORABLE ROMANIZED CHINESE TEXT INPUT SYSTEMS AND METHODS | October 2007 | October 2011 | Allow | 48 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11832768 | COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM FOR CONTROLLING ARCHIVING OF ELECTRONIC DOUCUMENT, DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND COMPUTER DATA SIGNAL | August 2007 | December 2010 | Allow | 41 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 11753631 | Technique for Changing the Display of Web Pages as Time Passes | May 2007 | May 2013 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11684748 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR CONSOLIDATING WEB PAGES DISPLAYED IN MULTIPLE BROWSERS | March 2007 | April 2017 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11608796 | NON-SYMBOLIC DATA SYSTEM FOR THE AUTOMATED COMPLETION OF FORMS | December 2006 | March 2014 | Allow | 60 | 9 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11533811 | CONTENT MANAGEMENT VIA CONFIGURATION SET RELATIONSHIPS IN A CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | September 2006 | January 2011 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11484389 | GROUPING OF INFORMATION ITEMS ON A PAGE | July 2006 | September 2010 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11482388 | PROGRAMMATICALLY HIDING AND DISPLAYING WIKI PAGE LAYOUT SECTIONS | July 2006 | May 2011 | Allow | 59 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 11482628 | RELEVANT TERM EXTRACTION AND CLASSIFICATION FOR WIKI CONTENT | July 2006 | September 2011 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 11365331 | Methods and apparatus for management of unconsciously captured documents | February 2006 | July 2016 | Allow | 60 | 10 | 0 | No | No |
| 11363733 | AUTOMATIC REPUBLICATION OF DATA | February 2006 | December 2009 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11287896 | SITE REDIRECTION | November 2005 | September 2011 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 11257441 | Producing input to a transformation engine | October 2005 | March 2011 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HASTY, NICHOLAS.
With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 37.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner HASTY, NICHOLAS works in Art Unit 2141 and has examined 34 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 70.6%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 54 months.
Examiner HASTY, NICHOLAS's allowance rate of 70.6% places them in the 33% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by HASTY, NICHOLAS receive 3.32 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 92% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HASTY, NICHOLAS is 54 months. This places the examiner in the 2% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HASTY, NICHOLAS. This interview benefit is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 17.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 32.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 77.8% of appeals filed. This is in the 69% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 2.9% of allowed cases (in the 79% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.