Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19197004 | DOCUMENT GENERATION PLATFORM FOR GENERATIVE AI ASSISTED DOCUMENT GENERATION | May 2025 | November 2025 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18795796 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTENT GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT FOR ELECTRONIC RESUME GENERATION | August 2024 | February 2026 | Abandon | 19 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18736189 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRANSLATION COMMENTS FLOWBACK | June 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18668376 | RECOMMENDATION PLATFORM FOR SKILL DEVELOPMENT | May 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 19 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18635916 | FILLING FIELD ON USER INTERFACE BASED ON CONTENT OF MESSAGE | April 2024 | October 2025 | Abandon | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18589404 | Robot Utility and Interface Device | February 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 19 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18586080 | GENERATING AND DISPLAYING CUSTOMIZED AVATARS IN MEDIA OVERLAYS | February 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18544625 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTEGRATING USER FEEDBACK INTO WEBSITE BUILDING SYSTEM SERVICES | December 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18541901 | NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DOCUMENTS | December 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18487756 | RECOMMENDATION PLATFORM FOR SKILL DEVELOPMENT | October 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18377796 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING AND MANAGING SMART HYPERLINKS | October 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18476679 | CLASSIFYING TYPES OF SENSITIVE EVENTS FOR DATA LOSS PREVENTION | September 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18475125 | DOCUMENT PARSER AND GENERATOR | September 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18451153 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR STRUCTURE AND HEADER EXTRACTION | August 2023 | October 2024 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18206050 | ENABLING SECURE AUTO-FILLING OF INFORMATION | June 2023 | September 2024 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18320507 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESENTING WEB APPLICATION CONTENT | May 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18194759 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ASSET GENERATION | April 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18124779 | Method for Grouping and Managing Web Pages or Browser and Non-Browser Tabs in Two-Dimensional Manner | March 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18151180 | SYSTEM, METHOD, AND APPARATUS FOR IDENTIFYING AND PREVIEWING RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS ACROSS DIFFERENT QUESTIONNAIRES | January 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18077506 | FONT LIBRARY GENERATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2022 | May 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18050664 | Method of managing information security program maturity | October 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 35 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17786209 | DATA GENERATION DEVICE, DATA GENERATION METHOD, AND PROGRAM RECORDING MEDIUM | June 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17718285 | METHOD, APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR TEXT CLASSIFICATION | April 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17715543 | Infinite Canvas | April 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 42 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17713376 | MANAGING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING AGENTS USING MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP CONSENSUS IN A LOCALIZED MICROGRID CLUSTER | April 2022 | January 2026 | Abandon | 46 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17642526 | INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO ENHANCE A USER EXPERIENCE AND METHODS THEREOF | March 2022 | June 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17640236 | METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY CREATING USER-CUSTOMIZED DOCUMENT, AND DEVICE AND SERVER FOR SAME | March 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 32 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17675987 | KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY BASED ON USER-POSED QUERIES | February 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17555339 | SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR GENERATING SYMBOL SEQUENCES AND FAMILIES OF SYMBOL SEQUENCES | December 2021 | January 2026 | Abandon | 49 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17643451 | METHOD, DEVICE, AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYZING UNSTRUCTURED DOCUMENT | December 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17538539 | SPIKE NEURAL NETWORK CIRCUIT INCLUDING SELF-CORRECTING CONTROL CIRCUIT AND METHOD OF OPERATION THEREOF | November 2021 | November 2025 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17453221 | IDENTIFYING THERAPEUTIC BIOMARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPLEX DISEASES | November 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17497438 | DYNAMIC PROJECT VIEWS OF A VIRTUAL WORKSPACE TO FACILITATE ACTIVE READING | October 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17489474 | CONTEXT-AWARE FONT RECOMMENDATION FROM TEXT | September 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17368434 | AUTOMATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | July 2021 | February 2026 | Abandon | 55 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17419472 | DISPLAYING GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES BASED ON AUDIO SESSION STATES | June 2021 | February 2026 | Abandon | 56 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17331855 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LATENCY REDUCTION IN SERIALIZED MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS | May 2021 | November 2025 | Allow | 54 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17317435 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEEP LEARNING ENHANCED GARBAGE COLLECTION | May 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 56 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17288512 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING CROWDSOURCED INPUT INFORMATION | April 2021 | December 2024 | Abandon | 44 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17288143 | ANSWER INTEGRATING DEVICE, ANSWER INTEGRATING METHOD, AND ANSWER INTEGRATING PROGRAM | April 2021 | July 2025 | Abandon | 51 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17287476 | Entity Semantic Relation Classification | April 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 55 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17287413 | Distributed Processing System and Distributed Processing Method | April 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 53 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17301455 | Processing Device, Processing Method, Computer Program, And Processing System | April 2021 | November 2025 | Abandon | 55 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 17204007 | MATERIAL PROPERTY PREDICTION METHOD AND MATERIAL PROPERTY PREDICTION DEVICE | March 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17203921 | USER ACCEPTANCE TEST SYSTEM FOR MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS | March 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 54 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17173691 | DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM AND DATA PROCESSING METHOD | February 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17172519 | EXECUTION BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TEXT-BASED ENSEMBLE MALWARE DETECTOR | February 2021 | November 2025 | Allow | 57 | 2 | 1 | Yes | Yes |
| 17265857 | PRODUCTION PROCESS DETERMINATION DEVICE FOR SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, SUBSTRATE PROCESSING SYSTEM, PRODUCTION PROCESS DETERMINATION METHOD FOR SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, LEARNING MODEL GROUP, GENERATION METHOD OF LEARNING MODEL GROUP, AND PROGRAM | February 2021 | February 2026 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17258303 | OBSERVED EVENT DETERMINATION APPARATUS, OBSERVED EVENT DETERMINATION METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM | January 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 50 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17126091 | PROVIDING EXPLAINABLE MACHINE LEARNING MODEL RESULTS USING DISTRIBUTED LEDGERS | December 2020 | November 2025 | Allow | 59 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17251437 | Control Device and Control Method | December 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 45 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16973087 | HARDWARE CIRCUIT FOR ACCELERATING NEURAL NETWORK COMPUTATIONS | December 2020 | February 2026 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17112824 | TREE-BASED TRANSFER LEARNING OF TUNABLE PARAMETERS | December 2020 | December 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15734209 | LEARNING DEVICE, FORECASTING DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | December 2020 | July 2025 | Abandon | 55 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16951088 | Data Processing System and Data Processing Method | November 2020 | December 2024 | Abandon | 49 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16951714 | MACHINE LEARNING BASED DATABASE SEARCH AND KNOWLEDGE MINING | November 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 46 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16950534 | IDENTIFICATION OF COMPARTMENTS IN GAS RESERVOIRS | November 2020 | September 2025 | Abandon | 58 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17072485 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DIFFERENTIAL ARCHITECTURE SEARCH FOR NEURAL NETWORKS | October 2020 | October 2025 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17039063 | OUTLIER DETECTION IN A DEEP NEURAL NETWORK USING T-WAY FEATURE COMBINATIONS | September 2020 | September 2025 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17003229 | RELATIONAL PRESENTATION OF COMMUNICATIONS AND APPLICATION FOR TRANSACTION ANALYSIS | August 2020 | October 2024 | Allow | 50 | 9 | 0 | No | No |
| 16823317 | LINKING AND COMPOSING WORKSHEETS | March 2020 | April 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16731259 | DEEP LEARNING ENGINE AND METHODS FOR CONTENT AND CONTEXT AWARE DATA CLASSIFICATION | December 2019 | July 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16121281 | GENERATING DIVERSE PLANS | September 2018 | September 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15723321 | COMBINING AND DISPLAYING MULTIPLE DOCUMENT AREAS | October 2017 | October 2018 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15286648 | MANAGING PRODUCT CONFIGURATION | October 2016 | March 2017 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15152633 | MANAGING PRODUCT CONFIGURATION | May 2016 | September 2016 | Allow | 4 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15147468 | IDENTIFICATION OF CONTENT IN AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT | May 2016 | February 2019 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15018680 | ENCODING A SPREADSHEET PROGRAM FOR STREAM PROCESSING | February 2016 | November 2018 | Allow | 33 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14986601 | MARKUP LANGUAGE SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT | December 2015 | July 2018 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 14976039 | MANAGING PRODUCT CONFIGURATION | December 2015 | March 2016 | Allow | 3 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14859092 | DELIVERING PARSED CONTENT ITEMS | September 2015 | January 2019 | Allow | 40 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14824035 | OPTIMIZING RENDERING OF DATA TABLES | August 2015 | August 2018 | Allow | 36 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14821603 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING CITATIONS WITHIN A DOCUMENT | August 2015 | June 2019 | Allow | 46 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14707111 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RELATION EXTRACTION FOR CHINESE CLINICAL DOCUMENTS | May 2015 | February 2019 | Allow | 45 | 5 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14707121 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF OPTIMIZING A WEB PAGE FOR SEARCH ENGINES | May 2015 | December 2016 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14704604 | Electronic Book Building System and Method | May 2015 | April 2017 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14592524 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MANIPULATING AN INPUTTED CHARACTER STRING TO A DIACRITIC-MODIFIED CHARACTER STRING USING A SINGLE LAYOUT FOR A CHARACTER ENTRY DEVICE | January 2015 | May 2017 | Allow | 28 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14534157 | CREATING ACCESSIBLE, TRANSLATABLE MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATIONS | November 2014 | February 2019 | Allow | 52 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14341706 | CURATING CHAT TRANSCRIPTS INTO WEBPAGES | July 2014 | January 2016 | Allow | 18 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14308583 | MODELING AND MEASURING BROWSER PERFORMANCE USING REFERENCE PAGES | June 2014 | February 2019 | Allow | 56 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14295464 | COMPARING WEBPAGE ELEMENTS HAVING ASYNCHRONOUS FUNCTIONALITY | June 2014 | October 2016 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14196213 | MANAGING PRODUCT CONFIGURATION | March 2014 | August 2016 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14195485 | OPTIMIZED READ/WRITE ACCESS TO A DOCUMENT OBJECT MODEL | March 2014 | July 2017 | Allow | 40 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14193514 | DOCUMENT ORDER MANAGEMENT VIA BINARY TREE PROJECTION | February 2014 | April 2016 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14099160 | DYNAMIC CONTEXT-BASED CONTENT GENERATION | December 2013 | November 2016 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 14096871 | METHOD FOR GENERATING SIMPLE OBJECT ACCESS PROTOCOL MESSAGES AND PROCESS ENGINE | December 2013 | August 2016 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13962411 | Methods and Apparatus for In-line Editing of Web Page Content with Reduced Disruption of Logical and Presentational Structure of Content | August 2013 | January 2017 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13772512 | OPTIMIZING RENDERING OF DATA TABLES | February 2013 | April 2016 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13743843 | INFORMATION PROCESSING TERMINAL DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | January 2013 | August 2015 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13734620 | EDITING WEB PAGES | January 2013 | September 2015 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13733165 | DYNAMIC WEBPAGE CHANGE ANIMATION | January 2013 | December 2015 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13663070 | IDENTIFICATION OF CONTENT IN AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT | October 2012 | February 2016 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13605057 | LINKING SOURCES TO COPIED TEXT | September 2012 | September 2015 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13534591 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ABBREVIATING INFORMATION SENT TO A VIEWING DEVICE | June 2012 | April 2015 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13460399 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DECLARATIVE UPDATING OF SELF-DESCRIBING, STRUCTURED DOCUMENTS | April 2012 | March 2015 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13453751 | DYNAMIC PREVIEW OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE APPEARANCE | April 2012 | February 2015 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13449240 | Object Recognition and Describing Structure of Graphical Objects | April 2012 | December 2014 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13396060 | DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT APPARATUS AND DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | February 2012 | January 2016 | Allow | 47 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13302660 | ELECTRONIC BOOK BUILDING SYSTEM AND METHOD | November 2011 | January 2015 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13259492 | Using Display Monitor User Controls To Adjust An Accessory | September 2011 | April 2015 | Allow | 42 | 3 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner STORK, KYLE R.
With a 37.5% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner STORK, KYLE R works in Art Unit 2128 and has examined 100 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 78.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.
Examiner STORK, KYLE R's allowance rate of 78.0% places them in the 45% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by STORK, KYLE R receive 3.31 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 92% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by STORK, KYLE R is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +9.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by STORK, KYLE R. This interview benefit is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 24.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 133.3% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 65.2% of appeals filed. This is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 40.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 38.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 3.0% of allowed cases (in the 79% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.