USPTO Examiner MISIR DAYWAYSHWAR D - Art Unit 2127

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19360280ATTENTION NEURAL NETWORKS WITH LINEAR UNITSOctober 2025December 2025Allow200YesNo
19253802METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR NEURAL NETWORK CONFIDENCE REGULATION VIA TEMPERING FACTORJune 2025November 2025Allow400YesNo
19241593DETECTION METHOD, SYSTEM, MEDIUM AND DEVICE BASED ON MULTI-SPECTRAL DATA FUSIONJune 2025August 2025Allow200YesNo
19237528AUTOMATED TECHNOLOGIES FOR ASSESSING AND CERTIFYING THE SAFETY OF AI-BASED PRODUCTS BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING ANALYSISJune 2025July 2025Allow200YesNo
19203278ANALOG AI COMPUTING ARCHITECTUREMay 2025July 2025Allow310NoNo
19175902TOPOLOGICAL ORDER DETERMINATION IN CAUSAL GRAPHSApril 2025June 2025Allow200YesNo
19085323ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL GENERATED USING AGENTIC WORKFLOW SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL ALIGNED WITH DOMAIN-SPECIFIC PRINCIPLESMarch 2025December 2025Allow910YesNo
19050755DETECTING AND REDUCING BIAS IN MACHINE LEARNING MODELSFebruary 2025August 2025Allow610YesNo
19046748SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTELLIGENT GENERATION AND ASSESSMENT OF CANDIDATE LESS DISCRIMINATORY ALTERNATIVE MACHINE LEARNING MODELSFebruary 2025April 2025Allow200YesNo
19033441AUTOMATED TECHNOLOGIES FOR ASSESSING AND CERTIFYING THE SAFETY OF AI-BASED PRODUCTS BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING ANALYSISJanuary 2025April 2025Allow300YesNo
19008444AGENTIC WORKFLOW SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING SYNTHETIC DATA FOR TRAINING OR POST TRAINING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODELS TO BE ALIGNED WITH DOMAIN-SPECIFIC PRINCIPLESJanuary 2025February 2025Allow200YesNo
18969830METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR USING AI MODELS TO OPTIMIZE A GOALDecember 2024May 2025Allow510YesNo
18947502TOPOLOGICAL ORDER DETERMINATION IN CAUSAL GRAPHSNovember 2024April 2025Allow510YesNo
18944178SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING CUSTOMIZED AI MODELSNovember 2024April 2025Allow610YesNo
18934779EXPERIMENTAL CONTENT GENERATION LEARNING MODEL FOR RAPID MACHINE LEARNING IN A DATA-CONSTRAINED ENVIRONMENTNovember 2024January 2025Allow200YesNo
18845615System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Reducing Dataset Biases in Natural Language Inference Tasks Using Unadversarial TrainingSeptember 2024February 2025Allow500YesNo
18824828SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OUTLIER DETECTION AND FEATURE TRANSFORMATION IN MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TRAININGSeptember 2024November 2024Allow200YesNo
18800900PROMPT ROUTING SYSTEM AND METHODAugust 2024March 2025Allow710YesNo
18741000SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTELLIGENT GENERATION AND ASSESSMENT OF CANDIDATE LESS DISCRIMINATORY ALTERNATIVE MACHINE LEARNING MODELSJune 2024December 2024Allow610YesNo
18672889SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING, DISTRIBUTING AND DEPLOYING A RECURSIVE DECISIONING SYSTEM BASED ON CONTINUOUSLY UPDATING MACHINE LEARNING MODELSMay 2024April 2025Allow1100YesNo
18665210EXPERIMENTAL CONTENT GENERATION LEARNING MODEL FOR RAPID MACHINE LEARNING IN A DATA-CONSTRAINED ENVIRONMENTMay 2024July 2024Allow200YesNo
18660605METHODS AND DEVICES IN PERFORMING A VISION TESTING PROCEDURE ON A PERSONMay 2024December 2025Allow1940YesNo
18661377GRADIENT ADVERSARIAL TRAINING OF NEURAL NETWORKSMay 2024May 2025Allow1200YesNo
18646104SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ALIGNING LARGE MULTIMODAL MODELS (LMMs) OR LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLMs) WITH DOMAIN-SPECIFIC PRINCIPLESApril 2024November 2024Allow610YesNo
18641245SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INTRACORTICAL BRAIN MACHINE INTERFACE DECODINGApril 2024April 2025Allow1200YesNo
18638585GUARDRAIL MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR AUTOMATED SOFTWAREApril 2024November 2024Allow710NoNo
18627258COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS CONFIGURED TO AUTOMATICALLY GENERATE A INTERACTION SESSION BASED ON AN INTERNAL IDENTIFICATION TOKEN AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFApril 2024July 2024Allow300YesNo
18600520APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A PROJECTED OCCURRENCEMarch 2024July 2024Allow510YesNo
18599955SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ALIGNING LARGE MULTIMODAL MODELS (LMMs) OR LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLMs) WITH DOMAIN-SPECIFIC PRINCIPLESMarch 2024September 2024Allow610YesNo
18686563Method, System, and Computer Program Product for Synthetic Oversampling for Boosting Supervised Anomaly DetectionFebruary 2024July 2024Allow400YesNo
18428299CREATING A MACHINE LEARNING POLICY BASED ON EXPRESS INDICATORSJanuary 2024September 2024Allow800YesNo
18404365QUANTUM STATISTIC MACHINEJanuary 2024September 2024Allow900YesNo
18393349Counterfactual Policy Evaluation of Model PerformanceDecember 2023January 2025Allow1310YesNo
18538536ANONYMOUS TRAINING OF A LEARNING MODELDecember 2023January 2026Abandon2510NoNo
18518412SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FAULT DETECTION OF COMPONENTS USING INFORMATION FUSION TECHNIQUENovember 2023October 2025Allow2210YesNo
18516405System, Apparatus and Method for Supporting Formal Verification of Informal Inference on a ComputerNovember 2023November 2025Abandon2410NoNo
18514202VERIFYING THE PROVENANCE OF A MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMNovember 2023April 2024Allow510YesNo
18511672METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN UNCERTAINTY LEVEL OF DEEP REINFORCEMENT LEARNING NETWORK AND DEVICE IMPLEMENTING SUCH METHODNovember 2023May 2024Allow610YesNo
18503108PREDICTING USER STATE USING MACHINE LEARNINGNovember 2023May 2025Allow1810NoNo
18386015TRAINING ENCODER MODEL AND/OR USING TRAINED ENCODER MODEL TO DETERMINE RESPONSIVE ACTION(S) FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE INPUTNovember 2023April 2025Allow1710YesNo
18494986DROP IMPACT PREDICTION METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR HEAVY EQUIPMENT AIRDROP BASED ON NEURAL NETWORKOctober 2023February 2024Allow410YesNo
18493524Detecting and Correcting Anomalies in Computer-Based Reasoning SystemsOctober 2023September 2024Allow1000YesNo
18483294CLUSTERING, EXPLAINABILITY, AND AUTOMATED DECISIONS IN COMPUTER-BASED REASONING SYSTEMSOctober 2023June 2024Allow800YesNo
18464473DETECTION AND VISUALIZATION OF NOVEL DATA INSTANCES FOR SELF-HEALING AI/ML MODEL-BASED SOLUTION DEPLOYMENTSeptember 2023November 2025Allow2620YesNo
18347408Explainable and Automated Decisions in Computer-Based Reasoning SystemsJuly 2023March 2024Allow900YesNo
18217290METROLOGY IN THE PRESENCE OF CMOS UNDER ARRAY (CUA) STRUCTURES UTILIZING MACHINE LEARNING AND PHYSICAL MODELINGJune 2023April 2025Allow2100YesNo
18196470ARCHITECTURES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS HAVING SEGREGATED SECURE AND PUBLIC FUNCTIONSMay 2023January 2024Allow810YesNo
18195876Reducing Parasitic Interactions in a Qubit GridMay 2023February 2026Allow3400YesNo
18311670HARDWARE-ASSISTED GRADIENT OPTIMIZATION USING STREAMED GRADIENTSMay 2023March 2025Allow2210YesNo
18307748NEURAL NETWORK FOR PROCESSING APTAMER DATAApril 2023February 2025Allow2110YesNo
18181529Detecting and Correcting Anomalies in Computer-Based Reasoning SystemsMarch 2023July 2023Allow400YesNo
18179132APPARATUS FOR CLASSIFYING DATA AND METHOD THEREOFMarch 2023February 2026Allow3500YesNo
18043155GENERATION METHOD, PROGRAM, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND TRAINED MODELFebruary 2023March 2024Allow1220YesNo
18174275SCHEDULING CONFIGURATION FOR DEEP LEARNING NETWORKSFebruary 2023March 2024Allow1210NoNo
18041857BIG DATA-BASED MODULAR AI ENGINE SERVER AND DRIVING METHOD OF THE SAMEFebruary 2023October 2025Allow3200YesNo
18102300SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROBABILISTIC DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY IN AUTONOMOUS CYBER OPERATIONSJanuary 2023October 2025Allow3300YesNo
18100290APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR QUANTUM COMPUTING AND MACHINE LEARNINGJanuary 2023February 2024Allow1310YesNo
18154674METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SYNTHESIZING PHENOMENON DATA USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEJanuary 2023September 2025Allow3300YesNo
18153010DETECTION AND VISUALIZATION OF NOVEL DATA INSTANCES FOR SELF-HEALING AI/ML MODEL-BASED SOLUTION DEPLOYMENTJanuary 2023May 2023Allow510YesNo
18084920MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM AND MACHINE LEARNING METHODDecember 2022February 2026Allow3810YesNo
18066270ENABLING CLASSICAL PLANNING IN INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENTS WITH INCOMPLETE MODELSDecember 2022February 2026Allow3810YesNo
17994672LEARNING DATA GENERATION SYSTEM, LEARNING DATA GENERATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMNovember 2022August 2025Allow3300YesNo
18058053MACHINE LEARNING PIPELINE AUTOMATIONNovember 2022January 2026Allow3710YesNo
18056379DISTRIBUTED MACHINE LEARNING COMPILER OPTIMIZATIONNovember 2022August 2025Allow3300YesNo
17975358VALIDATION OF ACCOUNT IDENTIFIEROctober 2022August 2023Allow1020YesNo
17963819FAILURE PREDICTOR DETECTION DEVICE, FAILURE PREDICTOR DETECTION METHOD, TRAINING DEVICE, AND TRAINED LEARNING MODEL GENERATION METHODOctober 2022November 2025Allow4710YesNo
17962820Clustering, Explainability, and Automated Decisions in Computer-Based Reasoning SystemsOctober 2022July 2023Allow900YesNo
17937745Multiplicative Recurrent Neural Network for Fast and Robust Intracortical Brain Machine Interface DecodersOctober 2022January 2024Allow1510YesNo
17936677CORRECTING A MACHINE LEARNING MODELSeptember 2022January 2026Allow3910YesNo
17935217Method and System for Analyzing Data in a DatabaseSeptember 2022February 2024Allow1710YesNo
17945335SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATING DETECTION OF REGIONS OF MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM UNDERPERFORMANCESeptember 2022October 2023Allow1320YesNo
17930511SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING, DISTRIBUTING AND DEPLOYING A RECURSIVE DECISIONING SYSTEM BASED ON CONTINUOUSLY UPDATING MACHINE LEARNING MODELSSeptember 2022March 2024Allow1810YesNo
17896281AUTOMATED PROCESSING OF MULTIPLE PREDICTION GENERATION INCLUDING MODEL TUNINGAugust 2022March 2024Allow1810YesNo
17888742DIGITAL RIGHTS MANAGEMENT OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELSAugust 2022January 2026Allow4110YesNo
17811350METHOD FOR INTELLIGENT DISASTER AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT INTERWORKING WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, AND SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING METHODJuly 2022March 2026Abandon4410NoNo
17858980DEVICE, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR MACHINE LEARNINGJuly 2022November 2025Allow4010YesNo
17857204INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODJuly 2022June 2025Abandon3500NoNo
17810198MACHINE LEARNING MAPPING FOR QUANTUM PROCESSING UNITSJune 2022January 2024Allow1910YesNo
17845291NEURAL NETWORK INSTRUCTION SET ARCHITECTUREJune 2022March 2024Allow2110YesNo
17748743SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HETEROGENEOUS MODEL COMPOSITIONMay 2022January 2024Allow2010YesNo
17773917GAP-AWARE MITIGATION OF GRADIENT STALENESSMay 2022January 2023Allow910YesNo
17720737CREATING A MACHINE LEARNING POLICY BASED ON EXPRESS INDICATORSApril 2022October 2023Allow1910YesNo
17702286PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS USING FIRST-PARTY DATA OF LONG-TERM CONVERSION ENTITIESMarch 2022October 2022Allow720YesNo
17696809PROBABILISTIC PROJECTION OF NETWORK PARAMETERSMarch 2022October 2025Allow4310YesNo
17696819ACCOUNTING FOR COMPUTE TIME IN TRAINING OF NETWORKMarch 2022November 2025Allow4410YesNo
17696812DECOMPOSITION OF WEIGHT TENSORS FOR STRUCTURAL SPARSITYMarch 2022November 2025Allow4410YesNo
17686072Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Model Decisioning and Rectification SystemMarch 2022September 2025Allow4210YesNo
17682200INDIVIDUAL TREATMENT EFFECT ESTIMATION UNDER HIGH-ORDER INTERFERENCE IN HYPERGRAPHSFebruary 2022March 2023Allow1301YesNo
17678897QUANTUM STATISTIC MACHINEFebruary 2022October 2023Allow1910YesNo
17668229AUGMENTATION OF SENSOR DATA UNDER VARIOUS WEATHER CONDITIONS TO TRAIN MACHINE-LEARNING SYSTEMSFebruary 2022March 2026Abandon4920YesNo
17666442SYSTEMS FOR CONSTRUCTING HIERARCHICAL TRAINING DATA SETS FOR USE WITH MACHINE-LEARNING AND RELATED METHODS THEREFORFebruary 2022October 2023Allow2010YesNo
17649852VIRTUAL NOSE USING QUANTUM MACHINE LEARNING AND QUANTUM SIMULATIONFebruary 2022June 2025Allow4110YesNo
17590181Systems and Methods for Managing, Distributing and Deploying a Recursive Decisioning System Based on Continuously Updating Machine Learning ModelsFebruary 2022August 2022Allow710YesNo
17587806AUTOMATED PROCESSING OF MULTIPLE PREDICTION GENERATION INCLUDING MODEL TUNINGJanuary 2022May 2022Allow410YesNo
17627835METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING ANOMALIES, CORRESPONDING COMPUTER PROGRAM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUMJanuary 2022September 2025Abandon4410NoNo
17570784NEURAL NETWORK ACCELERATOR TILE ARCHITECTURE WITH THREE-DIMENSIONAL STACKINGJanuary 2022January 2024Allow2510YesNo
17560816MACHINE LEARNING MAPPING FOR QUANTUM PROCESSING UNITSDecember 2021June 2022Allow610YesNo
17524161Explainable and Automated Decisions in Computer-Based Reasoning SystemsNovember 2021April 2023Allow1700YesNo
17498978TARGET DATA PARTY SELECTION METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DISTRIBUTED MODEL TRAININGOctober 2021May 2022Allow710YesNo
17497529ANONYMOUS TRAINING OF A LEARNING MODELOctober 2021May 2024Abandon3120NoYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MISIR, DAYWAYSHWAR D.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
4
Examiner Affirmed
2
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
71.5%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
9
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(33.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
6
(66.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
51.5%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner MISIR, DAYWAYSHWAR D - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MISIR, DAYWAYSHWAR D works in Art Unit 2127 and has examined 148 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 81.1%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MISIR, DAYWAYSHWAR D's allowance rate of 81.1% places them in the 52% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MISIR, DAYWAYSHWAR D receive 1.55 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 29% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MISIR, DAYWAYSHWAR D is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 21% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +51.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MISIR, DAYWAYSHWAR D. This interview benefit is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 27.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 5.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 50.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 38.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 27% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 9% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 5.0% of allowed cases (in the 80% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.