Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17126136 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COLLABORATIVE EDITING AN ELECTRONIC RESOURCE USING CLIENT DEVICE DESIGNATIONS | December 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 51 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16203585 | APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING IMMUNIZATION DATA TO GENERATE AN EFFICIENT COMPUTER INTERFACE | November 2018 | December 2024 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15615014 | VISUALLY GENERATED CONSUMER PRODUCT PRESENTATION | June 2017 | March 2019 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15421976 | METHOD FOR DISPLAYING INFORMATION, AND TERMINAL EQUIPMENT | February 2017 | January 2018 | Allow | 12 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15418215 | METHOD FOR DISPLAYING INFORMATION, AND TERMINAL EQUIPMENT | January 2017 | February 2018 | Allow | 12 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15342187 | IMAGE DATA GENERATION APPARATUS AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM | November 2016 | January 2019 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15266716 | VISUALLY GENERATED CONSUMER PRODUCT PRESENTATION | September 2016 | May 2017 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15168410 | SOCIAL SHARING PATH USER INTERFACE INSIGHTS | May 2016 | June 2019 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14854520 | Access-Control-Discontinuous Hyperlink Handling System and Methods | September 2015 | June 2017 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14831749 | METHOD OF TEXT INPUT FOR WEARABLE DEVICES | August 2015 | November 2018 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14327546 | SUMMARIZING PORTLET USAGE IN A PORTAL PAGE | July 2014 | June 2016 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 14159254 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATICALLY SWITCHING BETWEEN MODES BASED ON A POSITION OF AN INPUTTED DRAG OPERATION | January 2014 | August 2017 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14153645 | Topic Categorized Instant Message Communication | January 2014 | June 2018 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14127661 | VEHICLE OPERATION DEVICE AND VEHICLE OPERATION METHOD | December 2013 | April 2019 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14052606 | ARRANGEMENT OF CONTENT ON A LARGE FORMAT DISPLAY | October 2013 | October 2017 | Allow | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13926544 | VISUALLY GENERATED CONSUMER PRODUCT PRESENTATION | June 2013 | June 2016 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner PAN, YONGJIA.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner PAN, YONGJIA works in Art Unit 2118 and has examined 16 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 36 months.
Examiner PAN, YONGJIA's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 93% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by PAN, YONGJIA receive 3.19 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 87% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PAN, YONGJIA is 36 months. This places the examiner in the 35% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by PAN, YONGJIA. This interview benefit is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 34% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 18.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 8% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 9% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.