Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18761232 | In-Application User Interface Messaging | July 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18663378 | PROVIDING CONTEXTUAL ACTIONS IN COMMAND LINE INTERFACES | May 2024 | March 2025 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18390849 | INITIALIZING A CONVERSATION WITH AN AUTOMATED AGENT VIA SELECTABLE GRAPHICAL ELEMENT | December 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18542146 | CREATING DYNAMIC DATA-BOUND CONTAINER HOSTED VIEWS AND EDITABLE FORMS | December 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18534300 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR | December 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18377667 | Intellectual-Property Landscaping Platform with Interactive Graphical Element | October 2023 | November 2024 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18230803 | METHOD OF ADJUSTING VIRTUAL KEYBOARDS AND INTERFACES BASED ON USER HEIGHT | August 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 12 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18082750 | CREATING NEW WORKLOADS FOR LAUNCH WIZARDS | December 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17980020 | SECURE, COLLABORATIVE, DIGITAL CLIPBOARD | November 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 17943197 | MULTIMEDIA REDIRECTION IN COLLABORATIVE SESSIONS ON VIRTUAL DESKTOPS | September 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17820745 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING DEVICES USING MOTION GESTURES | August 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17885384 | TRANSFERABLE REAL-TIME CLOCK FOR ROBOTICS CONTROL | August 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17877568 | Dynamically Morphing Virtual Assistant Avatars for Assistant Systems | July 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 28 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17816072 | Method For Automatically Generating An Electronic Card Book From A Physical Card Book Having Scannable Code | July 2022 | October 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17869041 | LAUNDRY APPLIANCES WITH CUSTOMIZED FEATURES | July 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17742995 | MONITORING AND DETECTING ERRORS BY LOCATION AND COMMON DEPENDENCY WITHIN A COMPLEX DIGITAL ECOSYSTEM | May 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17774546 | OPERATION METHOD AND OPERATION SYSTEM FOR OPERATING PRODUCTION FACILITIES OF A SAME KIND | May 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17736549 | PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM INCLUDING PROCESS CONDITION DETERMINATION USING ATTRIBUTE-RELATIVE PROCESS CONDITION | May 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 32 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17660965 | FINGERSPELLING TEXT ENTRY | April 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17730007 | VERSATILE ANOMALY DETECTION SYSTEM FOR INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS | April 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17708480 | INTER-PLATFORM CONTROL INTERFACE | March 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17761867 | Device Capability Scheduling Method and Electronic Device | March 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17650701 | SHOE MAKING ASSISTANCE APPARATUS | February 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17627863 | METHOD AND CONTROL DEVICE FOR OPERATING A CONVERTER-BASED GRID UNIT | January 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17620374 | COMPUTER-ASSISTED CONFIGURATION OF A TECHNICAL SYSTEM INCLUDING A SEQUENCE OF SYSTEM COMPONENTS THAT IS ASSIGNABLE TO A SEQUENCE PATTERN | December 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17612434 | QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSTIC METHOD FOR QUALITY OF MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT | November 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17524762 | VARIABLE-STEP-DISTANCE MICRO-MILLING REPAIR CUTTER PATH GENERATING METHOD FOR DAMAGE POINTS ON SURFACE OF OPTICAL CRYSTAL | November 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17598786 | METHOD FOR PLANTATION TREATMENT OF A PLANTATION FIELD | September 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17481254 | ELECTRICAL DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR HUMAN-POWERED VEHICLE | September 2021 | December 2024 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17378205 | PHASOR IDENTIFICATION VIA SYNCHRONOUS MESSAGING | July 2021 | August 2024 | Allow | 37 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17265051 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING A ROBOTIC MANIPULATOR OR ASSOCIATED TOOL | February 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 48 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16952562 | OFFLINE STRUCTURED DATA NAVIGATION ON A MOBILE DEVICE | November 2020 | November 2024 | Allow | 48 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17067327 | Method, System and Apparatus for Contactless Clock-In and Clock-Out | October 2020 | November 2024 | Abandon | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16919388 | AGENT ENVIRONMENT CO-CREATION USING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING | July 2020 | November 2024 | Allow | 53 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16628546 | FORM AUTHORITY GRANTING METHOD BASED ON TIME PROPERTY FIELDS OF FORM | January 2020 | December 2024 | Allow | 59 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15267224 | USER INTERFACE FOR SEARCHING A LARGE DATA SET | September 2016 | September 2019 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner OKASHA, RAMI RAFAT.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner OKASHA, RAMI RAFAT works in Art Unit 2118 and has examined 34 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 88.2%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.
Examiner OKASHA, RAMI RAFAT's allowance rate of 88.2% places them in the 65% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by OKASHA, RAMI RAFAT receive 1.85 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 58% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by OKASHA, RAMI RAFAT is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 31% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +13.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by OKASHA, RAMI RAFAT. This interview benefit is in the 54% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 40.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 37.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 49% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 8% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 8% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.