USPTO Examiner SCHELL JOSEPH O - Art Unit 2114

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18829593Flexible Bit Quantities for Error Correction Code (ECC) Values in a Memory EnvironmentSeptember 2024January 2026Allow1710YesNo
18809965Recovering Missing Data in a Storage Network via Locally Decodable Redundancy DataAugust 2024August 2025Allow1200NoNo
18794144FRAMEWORK FOR FAILURE DETECTION, FORECASTING AND REMEDIATION COMBINING DOMAIN-SPECIFIC TELEMETRY AND CUSTOMIZED MACHINE LEARNING MODELSAugust 2024December 2025Allow1610NoNo
18749944REDUNDANT DATA STORAGE USING INCREMENTAL ERROR DETECTION WITH NON-ZERO SEEDSJune 2024March 2026Allow2110YesNo
18747957COMPLEX DEVICE FAULT DIAGNOSIS METHOD AND SYSTEM BASED ON MULTI-DIMENSIONAL FEATURESJune 2024March 2025Allow920NoNo
18747234DATA PROTECTION WITH TIME-VARYING IN-SITU DATA REFRESHJune 2024November 2025Allow1700NoNo
18678285DATA TRANSACTION ANOMALY DETECTION ENHANCEMENTMay 2024January 2026Allow2010YesNo
18670636INJECTION FOR FAULT INSERTION AND INTEGRATION TESTINGMay 2024August 2025Allow1500NoNo
18653719CIRCUIT ELEMENT LINK TRAINING IN A MEMORY DEVICEMay 2024March 2026Allow2220YesNo
18706136DATA STORAGE METHOD AND APPARATUS BASED ON ADDITIONAL CHECK CODES AND CHECK CODES CORRESPONDING TO ORIGINAL ENCODING METHOD, DEVICE, AND NON-TRANSITORY READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMApril 2024December 2025Allow2020YesNo
18647357SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTACT CENTER FAULT DIAGNOSTICSApril 2024January 2025Allow910NoNo
18635073MEMORY CONTROLLER FOR PERFORMING EFFICIENT ERROR CORRECTION CODE (ECC) DECODING BASED ON HARD DECISION DATA AND SOFT DECISION DATA AND STORAGE DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAMEApril 2024March 2026Allow2310NoNo
18627181Caching Snapshot Information For Snapshot Image Processing and Optimization Based on Aggregating Read RequestsApril 2024June 2025Allow1520YesNo
18626382DIAGNOSTIC BOOT CYCLES IN A HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING PLATFORMApril 2024March 2026Allow2320NoNo
18696394DATA ENCODING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND MEDIUMMarch 2024March 2025Abandon1120NoNo
18696124ISOLATED DIAGNOSIS OF SOURCE OF ERROR USING CONTROL PANEL CIRCUITRYMarch 2024October 2025Allow1910YesNo
18696115Information Processing Apparatus Determining Risk Grade Based on Header InformationMarch 2024September 2025Allow1810YesNo
18694892Burn-In Apparatus For Testing Multi-Media Products Based on a Test File Generated by Matching a Signature and LogMarch 2024December 2025Allow2110NoNo
18581946HYBRID ERROR CORRECTION SYSTEM DESIGN FOR MULTIMODE SOLID-STATE DRIVESFebruary 2024December 2025Allow2210NoNo
18444523Data Protection Supplemental to Data RecoveryFebruary 2024November 2025Allow2110YesNo
18433705Detection of Anomalies in Behavior of a Device Under Test Subjected to Disturbances Using AI Algorithm Trained on Observations From When the DUT is Not Subjected to DisturbancesFebruary 2024March 2026Allow2520NoNo
18415627INTERLEAVED REED-SOLOMON (IRS) WITH COLLABORATIVE DECODINGJanuary 2024June 2025Allow1600NoNo
18408936METHOD FOR MONITORING A CLOCK GENERATOR MODULE OF AN ELECTRONIC CIRCUITJanuary 2024October 2025Allow2110NoNo
18542254PREDICTION METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FAULTY GPU, BASED ON PREDICTION MODEL ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUMDecember 2023September 2024Allow920NoNo
18569911Component Firmware Replacements via NetworksDecember 2023September 2025Allow2110YesNo
18537076UNIFIED TEST AND DEBUG CHIPLET ARCHITECTUREDecember 2023November 2025Allow2310YesNo
18528220Error Monitoring and Prevention in Computing Systems Based on Future Fault Prediction and Historical Values of a Network CharacteristicDecember 2023December 2024Allow1210NoNo
18513953Electronic Device, Server Testing System and Method with Environment DetectionNovember 2023April 2025Allow1710NoNo
18513380SELF-CONTAINED AND CONFIGURABLE DEBUGGING MECHANISM FOR STREAM-BASED HARDWARE ACCELERATORSNovember 2023December 2025Allow2520YesNo
18506825Systems and Methods to Reprogram Mobile Devices Based on Identity Information Queried Using a Low-Functionality DriverNovember 2023March 2025Allow1620NoNo
18506172SYSTEM LEVEL TESTING USING A CENTRAL TEST MANAGERNovember 2023February 2026Allow2820YesNo
18489496RAID Protection Updates Based on Storage System ReliabilityOctober 2023May 2024Allow700YesNo
18553876INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS THAT SYNCHRONIZES A STANDBY SYSTEM DATABASE WITH AN ACTIVE SYSTEM DATABASEOctober 2023August 2025Allow2310NoNo
18368753METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY CONFIGURING DATA SWITCH TO ENABLE RATE ADAPTION BETWEEN COMMUNICATION DEVICES, DATA SWITCH AND STORAGE MEDIUMSeptember 2023July 2025Allow2210NoNo
18464913TURNING ON SWITCHES BASED ON APPARATUS CONNECTION SETTING A HARDWARE-IN-LOOP TEST SYSTEMSeptember 2023June 2025Allow2200NoNo
18233344FRAMEWORK FOR SCHEDULING ACCELERATOR-ENABLED WORKLOADSAugust 2023September 2025Allow2520NoNo
18446303Providing Application-Side Infrastructure To Control Cross-Region Replicated Object StoresAugust 2023May 2025Allow2110NoNo
18446226High Availability And Disaster Recovery For Replicated Object StoresAugust 2023October 2025Allow2710YesNo
18446319Controlling The Direction Of Replication Between Cross-Region Replicated Object StoresAugust 2023August 2025Allow2410YesNo
18364764ERROR CORRECTION CODEAugust 2023December 2024Allow1700YesNo
18359926PRIORITIZATION DATA RESTORE BASED ON RECOVERY TIME OBJECTIVESJuly 2023June 2025Allow2310YesNo
18273215Method And System For Orchestrating Remote Block Device Connection Between ServersJuly 2023August 2025Allow2520YesNo
18223627INTELLIGENT SCORE BASED OOM TEST BASELINE MECHANISMJuly 2023June 2025Allow2310YesNo
18346753FAULT-TOLERANT SYSTEM WITH MULTI-CORE CPUS CAPABLE OF BEING DYNAMICALLY CONFIGUREDJuly 2023May 2025Allow2320YesNo
18338316FACILITATING ERROR CORRECTIONS DURING TESTING OF PROPOSED CODEJune 2023April 2025Allow2210YesNo
18337922LEVERAGING HEALTH STATUSES OF DEPENDENCY INSTANCES TO ANALYZE OUTAGE ROOT CAUSEJune 2023October 2025Allow2820YesNo
18332475END-TO-END RESTARTABILITY OF CROSS-REGION REPLICATION USING A COMMON SNAPSHOTJune 2023January 2026Allow3120YesNo
18330230GRAPHIC USER INTERFACE HEATMAP OF MOST USED SYSTEM TRANSACTION WITH TEST AUTOMATION DETAILSJune 2023July 2025Allow2520YesNo
18324264Data replication across data servers for failover processingMay 2023August 2025Allow2720YesNo
18202297METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING DATA ACCESS MANAGEMENT OF MEMORY DEVICE IN PREDETERMINED COMMUNICATIONS ARCHITECTURE TO ENHANCE SUDDEN POWER OFF RECOVERY OF PAGE-GROUP-BASED REDUNDANT ARRAY OF INDEPENDENT DISKS PROTECTION WITH AID OF SUSPENDIBLE SERIAL NUMBERMay 2023January 2025Allow1910NoNo
18199328SELECTING A WITNESS SERVICE WHEN IMPLEMENTING A RECOVERY PLANMay 2023November 2024Allow1810NoNo
18318592IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS THAT FORMS IMAGE BASED ON INFORMATION FROM WIRELESS TAGMay 2023July 2024Allow1410NoNo
18142018KEYPAD HEALTH AND DIAGNOSTICS SYSTEM AND PROCESSESMay 2023September 2025Allow2820NoNo
18140982Automated Application Programming Interface (API) Route Testing SystemApril 2023June 2024Allow1430NoNo
18307716SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTACT CENTER FAULT DIAGNOSTICSApril 2023February 2024Allow900NoNo
18139148METHOD FOR MODIFYING OR VERIFYING A CIRCUIT BY INSERTING A SABOTEUR CIRCUITApril 2023September 2024Allow1710NoNo
18306058Managing the Migration of Virtual Machines in the Presence of Uncorrectable Memory ErrorsApril 2023December 2023Allow800NoNo
18304223OFFLOADING A TASK FROM AN EDGE SERVER THAT IS INTEGRATED WITH A MOVING VEHICLEApril 2023April 2025Allow2410YesNo
18136395EFFICIENT TABLE-BASED ARCHIVING OF DATA ITEMS FROM SOURCE STORAGE SYSTEM TO TARGET STORAGE SYSTEMApril 2023March 2025Allow2310NoNo
18299185SYSTEM-ON-CHIP AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING A DIAGNOSIS DURING RUNTIMEApril 2023March 2025Allow2330NoNo
18129381MANAGEMENT OF HOT ADD IN A TESTING ENVIRONMENT FOR DUTs THAT ARE CXL PROTOCOL ENABLEDMarch 2023March 2025Allow2320YesNo
18245593METHOD FOR TRANSITIONING A VEHICLE BETWEEN DIFFERENT MODES ACCORDING TO AGREEMENT AND DEVIATIONS BETWEEN TIME SIGNALS OF DIFFERENT TIME SOURCESMarch 2023July 2025Allow2820NoNo
18184331METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REMOTE VERIFICATION OF THE INTEGRITY OF A COMPUTER PROGRAM IN A COMPUTING UNIT TO BE CHECKEDMarch 2023April 2025Allow2510NoNo
18175143Rebuilding Missing Data in a Storage Network via Locally Decodable Redundancy DataFebruary 2023May 2024Allow1420NoNo
18174759AGENT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT FOR BACKUP AND RESTORE APPLICATIONSFebruary 2023August 2024Allow1800NoNo
18175091LEADER ELECTION IN A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM BASED ON NODE WEIGHT AND LEADERSHIP PRIORITY BASED ON NETWORK PERFORMANCEFebruary 2023March 2024Allow1210NoNo
18110281SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSOR DEBUG USING LOW-BANDWIDTH INTERFACE WITH CONFIGURABLE LIST OF SKIP AND LOOP INSTRUCTIONSFebruary 2023October 2024Allow2010NoNo
18103966Automated Determination of Tuned Parameters for Analyzing Observable MetricsJanuary 2023November 2024Allow2210YesNo
18103891Early Abnormality Detection Based on Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency Vectors Created Using Event LogsJanuary 2023October 2024Allow2010YesNo
18159593CLOUD RESTART FOR VM FAILOVER AND CAPACITY MANAGEMENTJanuary 2023September 2024Abandon2010NoNo
18096420OPERATION VERIFYING APPARATUS, OPERATION VERIFYING METHOD AND OPERATION VERIFYING SYSTEMJanuary 2023October 2024Abandon2210NoNo
18096102PROGRAMMABLE INITIAL PACKETS REJECTION IN A DISPLAY SYSTEM INTERFACEJanuary 2023June 2024Allow1700NoNo
18152148Establishing A Guarantee For Maintaining A Replication Relationship Between Object Stores During A Communications OutageJanuary 2023February 2025Allow2510YesNo
18083846RECOVERY OF A SOFTWARE-DEFINED DATA CENTERDecember 2022April 2024Abandon1610NoNo
18064318Data Error Identification Prior to Role Reversal on a Remote Data Replication FacilityDecember 2022August 2024Allow2010YesNo
18062664APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUSLY CLEARING AND INSTALLING DATA ON A PLURALITY OF COMPUTING DEVICESDecember 2022March 2025Allow2830NoNo
18061620PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEM RUNTIME STATE RELOADDecember 2022August 2024Allow2010NoNo
18059633SYSTEM LEVEL TESTING OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PRIMITIVESNovember 2022July 2024Allow2010NoNo
18059061UNIFORM PROCESS FOR GENERATING MULTIPLE OUTPUTS WITH COMMON SECTION IN PSEUDO-RANDOM SOFTWARE SYSTEMNovember 2022September 2024Allow2110NoNo
17999780REMAPPING AT LEAST ONE OF A GUARD TAG AND AN ADDRESS TAG ASSOCIATED WITH A TARGET ADDRESS TO GENERATE A REMAPPED TAG FOR USE IN TAG CHECKINGNovember 2022September 2024Allow2210NoNo
17989853SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS FOR STATE CONVERGENCE ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH AVAILABILITY APPLICATION MIGRATION IN A VIRTUALIZED ENVIRONMENTNovember 2022January 2026Allow3800NoNo
18057160SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO REPROGRAM MOBILE DEVICES INCLUDING A CROSS-MATRIX CONTROLLER TO PORT CONNECTIONNovember 2022July 2023Allow710NoNo
17977017FENCE RANDOMIZATION WITH INTER-CHIP FENCING CONSTRAINTSOctober 2022September 2024Allow2210YesNo
17975545SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTACT CENTER FAULT DIAGNOSTICSOctober 2022February 2023Allow400NoNo
17970013IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS THAT FORMS IMAGE BASED ON INFORMATION FROM WIRELESS TAGOctober 2022August 2023Allow1010NoNo
17965846DYNAMICALLY CAPTURING DEBUG LOGS DURING RUNTIMEOctober 2022September 2024Abandon2310NoNo
17918786CONTROLLER FOR TESTING EXECUTABLE PROGRAM ELEMENT OF A VEHICLE FUNCTION, AND MOTOR VEHICLE COMPRISING A CONTROLLEROctober 2022September 2024Allow2310NoNo
17960408ERROR CORRECTION DYNAMIC METHOD TO DETECT AND TROUBLESHOOT SYSTEM BOOT FAILURESOctober 2022May 2025Allow3140YesNo
17936790CONTROLLER AND OPERATING METHOD OF THE CONTROLLER FOR DETERMINING RELIABILITY DATA BASED ON SYNDROME WEIGHTSeptember 2022August 2024Allow2310NoNo
17935176SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ERROR RECOVERY IN REBOOTLESS FIRMWARE UPDATESSeptember 2022January 2025Allow2820NoNo
17933563Recovering Missing Data in a Storage Network via Locally Decodable Redundancy DataSeptember 2022November 2022Allow200NoNo
17903925TRACE BUFFER DATA MANAGEMENT FOR EMULATION SYSTEMSSeptember 2022February 2025Allow2920YesNo
17902720Flexible RAID Layouts In A Storage SystemSeptember 2022June 2023Allow1010YesNo
17880181PROVIDING DEBUG INFORMATION ON PRODUCTION CONTAINERS USING DEBUG CONTAINERSAugust 2022June 2023Allow1110YesNo
17879720Optimizing Snapshot Image Processing Utilizing First and Second Levels of Snapshot Information and First and Second Levels of Cached Snapshot InformationAugust 2022December 2023Allow1720YesNo
17867885Safeguarding a system against false positivesJuly 2022June 2024Allow2310NoNo
17866845SAFEGUARDING A SYSTEM AGAINST FALSE NEGATIVESJuly 2022August 2024Allow2510NoNo
17792511DATA SYNCHRONIZATION METHOD FOR HOST MACHINE AND BACKUP MACHINE OF STATION APPLICATION SERVERJuly 2022January 2025Allow3020YesNo
17850145Utilizing Locally Decodable Redundancy Data in a Vast Storage NetworkJune 2022August 2022Allow200NoNo
17844991ISOLATED STORAGE DEVICE SECONDARY TESTINGJune 2022October 2024Abandon2820NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SCHELL, JOSEPH O.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
12
Examiner Affirmed
10
(83.3%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(16.7%)
Reversal Percentile
27.9%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 16.7% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
46
Allowed After Appeal Filing
13
(28.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
33
(71.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
41.6%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 28.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner SCHELL, JOSEPH O - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SCHELL, JOSEPH O works in Art Unit 2114 and has examined 794 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 87.3%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 31 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SCHELL, JOSEPH O's allowance rate of 87.3% places them in the 66% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SCHELL, JOSEPH O receive 1.89 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 46% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SCHELL, JOSEPH O is 31 months. This places the examiner in the 54% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +6.8% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SCHELL, JOSEPH O. This interview benefit is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 42.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 38.1% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 36% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 70.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 44.8% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 46.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 8.6% of allowed cases (in the 92% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 4.9% of allowed cases (in the 80% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.