Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18759740 | SERVICE MANAGEMENT USING DYNAMICALLY CALCULATED REQUESTS PER SECOND THRESHOLDS | June 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18645327 | USING A DURABLE FUTURE TO RESUME EXECUTION OF AN OPERATION AFTER A PROCESS THAT INCLUDES THE OPERATION CRASHES | April 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18601248 | AUTONOMOUS SYSTEM TO DETECT AND ADDRESS FILE SYSTEM UNAVAILABILITY OR CORRUPTION | March 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18438574 | METHOD TO MONITOR A DDR5 POWER MANAGEMENT INTEGRATED CIRCUIT TO ENSURE OVER-CURRENT PROTECTION | February 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18434195 | METHOD AND SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY AND RECOVER FROM FAULTS IN NON-SAFETY TARGETS AND SAFETY TARGETS | February 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18403198 | REDUNDANCY AND SWAPPING SCHEME FOR MEMORY REPAIR | January 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18401710 | Method and apparatus for monitoring - with contention mitigation - avionics application(s) running on a platform with multi-core processor, related electronic avionics system and computer program | January 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18397323 | HIERARCHICALLY DECISIONED FAILOVER SYSTEM | December 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18495883 | STORAGE UNIT ACCESS METHOD, STORAGE UNIT REPAIR METHOD, DIE, AND MEMORY CHIP | October 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18495696 | OPERATION METHOD OF MEMORY, MEMORY AND MEMORY SYSTEM | October 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18226286 | AUTOMATED MIGRATION FROM A VIRTUAL MACHINE ENVIRONMENT TO A CLOUD NATIVE ENVIRONMENT | July 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18359288 | TRIGGER POINT DETECTION FOR ONLINE ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS AND SYSTEM FAULT DIAGNOSIS | July 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18354894 | AVOIDING FAILED TRANSACTIONS WITH ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE BASED MONITORING | July 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18354582 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREDICTING AND MITIGATING OUT OF MEMORY KILLS | July 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18223465 | MEMORY WITH FAIL INDICATORS, INCLUDING MEMORY WITH LED FAIL INDICATORS, AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS | July 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18352548 | DISASTER RECOVERY USING INCREMENTAL DATABASE RECOVERY | July 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18352123 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING TEST INPUTS FOR FAULT DIAGNOSIS | July 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18320072 | DATA CENTER NETWORK DEVICE SENSING | May 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17479267 | FAILOVER FOR POOLED MEMORY | September 2021 | April 2025 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17311387 | EQUIPMENT ANOMALY DETECTION METHOD, COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, CHIP, AND DEVICE | June 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 48 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner HUANG, BRYAN PAI SONG works in Art Unit 2114 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.
Examiner HUANG, BRYAN PAI SONG's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by HUANG, BRYAN PAI SONG receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HUANG, BRYAN PAI SONG is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 7% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 8% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 9% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.