Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19142130 | HOT SWAP ERROR REPORTING METHOD, PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURE, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM | June 2025 | March 2026 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18927482 | DEBUG AND RECOVERY OPERATIONS FOR NON-REMOVABLE MEMORY SUB-SYSTEMS | October 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18769156 | SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR ANOMALY DETECTION PIPELINE WITH FEW-SHOT LANGUAGE MODELS | July 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18677444 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING STORAGE MEDIUM FAILURE AND SOLID STATE DRIVE | May 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18639364 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING GEO-REDUNDANT CLOUD SERVERS IN COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS | April 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18633334 | Delayed Log Write of Input/Outputs Using Persistent Memory | April 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18695706 | REMEDIATION ACTION INITIATION RESPONSIVE TO STORAGE CONTROL FEATURE DISABLING | March 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18613031 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IN-SYSTEM DETECTION AND RECOVERY OF A BIT CORRUPTION EVENT | March 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18590755 | RESET TECHNIQUES FOR PROTOCOL LAYERS OF A MEMORY SYSTEM | February 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18388391 | FAULT INTERFACE ARCHITECTURE IN SAFETY-RELEVANT SYSTEMS | November 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18372227 | MANAGING SERVERS USING POWER TRANSMISSION CIRCUITS | September 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18342615 | HIGH PERFORMANCE TRACE OFFLOAD CIRCUIT ARCHITECTURE | June 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18249892 | Dynamic CPU Allocation on Failover | April 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17534386 | STORAGE NODE FAILURE DETECTION BASED ON REGISTER VALUES FOR AN ALL FLASH ARRAY SERVER | November 2021 | July 2023 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17469348 | METHOD, EQUIPMENT AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR DYNAMIC STORAGE RECOVERY RATE | September 2021 | June 2023 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17465722 | ANTI-ENTROPY-BASED METADATA RECOVERY IN A STRONGLY CONSISTENT DISTRIBUTED DATA STORAGE SYSTEM | September 2021 | May 2023 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17386653 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FAILURE IN MCU | July 2021 | August 2023 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17355851 | Method For Failure Detection And Role Selection In A Network Of Redundant Processes | June 2021 | May 2023 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17354401 | IN-APP FAILURE INTELLIGENT DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS | June 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17345276 | MEMORY MODULE AND OPERATING METHOD | June 2021 | January 2023 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17342098 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ON-DEMAND WARM STANDBY DISASTER RECOVERY | June 2021 | January 2022 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17306896 | MEMORY STORAGE APPARATUS WITH PROTECTION OF COMMAND DATA IN A HOST BUFFER IN RESPONSE TO A SYSTEM ABNORMALITY | May 2021 | January 2023 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17238831 | CONTROL DEVICE, NON-TRANSITORY STORAGE MEDIUM, AND SYSTEM | April 2021 | September 2022 | Abandon | 17 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17232210 | FAILOVER MANAGEMENT FOR BATCH JOBS | April 2021 | November 2022 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17230110 | METHOD OF COLLECTING ERROR LOGS | April 2021 | November 2021 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17228967 | MCU-INDEPENDENT PRIMARY-SECONDARY PMIC SEQUENCING AND CENTRALIZED FAULT MANAGEMENT | April 2021 | July 2022 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17219746 | RE-ALIGNING DATA REPLICATION CONFIGURATION OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY DATA SERVING ENTITIES OF A CROSS-SITE STORAGE SOLUTION AFTER A FAILOVER EVENT | March 2021 | May 2022 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17188073 | MITIGATING AND AUTOMATING BACKUP FAILURE RECOVERIES IN DATA PROTECTION POLICIES | March 2021 | March 2022 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17180512 | VIRTUAL MACHINE CONFIGURATION UPDATE TECHNIQUE IN A DISASTER RECOVERY ENVIRONMENT | February 2021 | December 2022 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17169067 | DETECTING AND REPORTING RANDOM RESET FAULTS FOR FUNCTIONAL SAFETY AND OTHER HIGH RELIABILITY APPLICATIONS | February 2021 | July 2021 | Allow | 5 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17158504 | DATABASE RECOVERY BASED ON WORKLOAD PRIORITIES | January 2021 | May 2022 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17156613 | ALL FLASH ARRAY SERVER AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | January 2021 | August 2021 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17150698 | SCSI COMMAND SET FOR ERROR HISTORY LOGGING IN A MEMORY SYSTEM AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF | January 2021 | February 2023 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17106004 | IDENTIFYING FAULT DOMAINS FOR DELTA COMPONENTS OF A DISTRIBUTED DATA OBJECT | November 2020 | April 2022 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17052986 | RECOVERY FROM CORRUPTION | November 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17035815 | Layer Control Unit Instruction Addressing Safety Mechanism In An Artificial Neural Network Processor | September 2020 | June 2021 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17042974 | FAILURE SHIELD | September 2020 | June 2022 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17019676 | TRANSACTION RECOVERY | September 2020 | May 2022 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16994373 | RECONFIGURING AN ADDRESSING MECHANISM FOR A SYSTEM ON CHIP TO BYPASS A DEFECTIVE BRANCH UNIT | August 2020 | August 2021 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16990770 | FALLBACK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM FOR REDUNDANCY DURING SYSTEM FAILOVER | August 2020 | September 2022 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16920005 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF RESYNCING DATA IN ERASURE-CODED OBJECTS WITH MULTIPLE FAILURES | July 2020 | July 2021 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16910694 | TRUE ZERO RTO: PLANNED FAILOVER | June 2020 | June 2023 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16872606 | Internal Watchdog Two Stage Extension | May 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15930326 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RAPIDLY TRANSFERRING AND RECOVERING LARGE DATA SETS | May 2020 | July 2022 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16855837 | NETWORK STORAGE FAILOVER SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS | April 2020 | June 2021 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16851279 | INTELLIGENT ACCESS TO A STORAGE DEVICE | April 2020 | October 2021 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16836556 | PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM WITH DIFFERENT HARDWARE ARCHITECTURE CONTROLLER BACKUP | March 2020 | April 2023 | Allow | 37 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16816756 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY UPDATING AN INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM UPON SYSTEM CRASH | March 2020 | April 2021 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16811500 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR A GEOGRAPHICAL HOT REDUNDANCY | March 2020 | August 2021 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16810947 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING A PROACTIVE COPY OPERATION FOR A SPARE PERSISTENT STORAGE | March 2020 | July 2021 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16805149 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING BACKUP SCHEDULES | February 2020 | December 2022 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16784926 | MEDIA MANAGEMENT LOGGER FOR A MEMORY SUB-SYSTEM | February 2020 | September 2021 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16750539 | REDUCING SERVICE DISRUPTIONS IN A MICRO-SERVICE ENVIRONMENT | January 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16743643 | DYNAMIC RECLAMATION OF STORAGE STRIPES | January 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 25 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16710825 | USER-BASED RECOVERY POINT OBJECTIVES FOR DISASTER RECOVERY | December 2019 | May 2021 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16694528 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ON-DEMAND WARM STANDBY DISASTER RECOVERY | November 2019 | March 2021 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16680556 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS | November 2019 | September 2021 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16607296 | RECONFIGURATION CONTROL DEVICE | October 2019 | May 2022 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16606765 | MEMORY DEVICES INCLUDING EXECUTION TRACE BUFFERS | October 2019 | May 2022 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16601690 | CONNECTIVITY-AWARE WITNESS FOR ACTIVE-ACTIVE STORAGE | October 2019 | August 2021 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16568105 | ADJUSTMENT OF SAFE DATA COMMIT SCAN BASED ON OPERATIONAL VERIFICATION OF NON-VOLATILE MEMORY | September 2019 | April 2022 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16513665 | UNIVERSAL SERIAL BUS DOCKING APPARATUS AND ERROR DETECTING METHOD THEREOF | July 2019 | September 2021 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16454694 | DIAGNOSTICS FOR HIGH-AVAILABILITY SYSTEMS AND DEVICES | June 2019 | January 2022 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16405465 | CLOUD TO CLOUD DISASTER RECOVERY | May 2019 | May 2022 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16402309 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CHECKPOINT AND RESTART FOR DISTRIBUTED BACKUP STORAGE DEVICES | May 2019 | March 2023 | Abandon | 46 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16402320 | CLUSTER OF PROCESSING ELEMENTS HAVING SPLIT MODE AND LOCK MODE | May 2019 | November 2021 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16399028 | DATA STORAGE SYSTEM WITH REPAIR OF MID-LEVEL MAPPING BLOCKS OF INTERNAL FILE SYSTEM | April 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16398250 | CONTEXT-BASED DISASTER RECOVERY | April 2019 | February 2022 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16395363 | Processor Repair | April 2019 | May 2021 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16394929 | Enhanced Serial Peripheral Interface (eSPI) Signaling for Crash Event Notification | April 2019 | June 2021 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16393701 | APPLICATION FAULT DETECTION AND FORECASTING | April 2019 | September 2021 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16393358 | RAID SCHEMA FOR PROVIDING METADATA PROTECTION IN A DATA STORAGE SYSTEM | April 2019 | March 2021 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16389949 | Method and Apparatus for Restoring Data after Power Failure for An Open-Channel Solid State Drive | April 2019 | June 2021 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner LI, ALBERT works in Art Unit 2113 and has examined 60 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 91.7%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 21 months.
Examiner LI, ALBERT's allowance rate of 91.7% places them in the 77% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by LI, ALBERT receive 1.22 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 15% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LI, ALBERT is 21 months. This places the examiner in the 90% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +22.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by LI, ALBERT. This interview benefit is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 38.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 62.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 87% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 8% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 9% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.