Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19246918 | MACHINE LEARNING MODEL RESOURCE UTILIZATION OPTIMIZATION | June 2025 | January 2026 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 19194308 | METHODS, DEVICES, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR LOCATING ANOMALY ROOT CAUSES | April 2025 | October 2025 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 19067141 | MONITORING EMERGING FAULTS | February 2025 | November 2025 | Allow | 8 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 19057067 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS USING TREE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS | February 2025 | October 2025 | Allow | 8 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18995732 | MEMORY MANAGEMENT METHOD AND MODULE, CHIP, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | January 2025 | March 2026 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 19015167 | PRIORITY DETERMINATION SYSTEM AND PRIORITY DETERMINATION METHOD | January 2025 | January 2026 | Abandon | 13 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18878020 | FAULT RECOVERY METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR BASEBOARD MANAGEMENT CONTROLLER FIRMWARE, AND DEVICE AND MEDIUM | December 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18958861 | SEMICONDUCTOR SYSTEM | November 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18945561 | CONTROL CIRCUIT, CONTROL METHOD, AND SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY | November 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18882369 | ERROR ROBUST QUANTUM COMPILER | September 2024 | November 2025 | Abandon | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18805699 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND STORAGE MEDIA FOR INTELLIGENT DIAGNOSIS OF DEVICE FAILURES BASED ON INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS (IIOT) | August 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 6 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18783172 | AUTOMATIC RECOVERY OF NODE RESOURCE MEMORY DEVICES | July 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18759829 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE VERIFICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | June 2024 | January 2026 | Abandon | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18733162 | TECHNIQUES TO ENHANCE FAILURE TOLERANCE DURING FILE SYNCHRONIZATION | June 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18714851 | Controlling Concurrent Execution of Perception Algorithms | May 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18676780 | AUTOMATED SYSTEM CRASH ANALYSIS AND REMEDIATION | May 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18617725 | AUTOMATED ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS OF ANOMALIES | March 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18444056 | METHOD, PROGRAM, SYSTEM, AND DEVICE FOR ESTIMATING CAUSE OF PROBLEM | February 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18441015 | KUBERNETES ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS SYSTEM | February 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18435684 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE PROVIDING WARNING MESSAGE THROUGH COMMUNICATION INTERFACE, AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME | February 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18429582 | DETECTING ANOMALIES IN EMBEDDED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | February 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18428840 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AI BASED INCIDENT IMPACT AND ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS | January 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18408867 | CONFIGURABLE CIRCULAR BUFFER FOR STREAMING MULTIVARIATE ML ESTIMATION | January 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18402876 | LANGUAGE MODEL-ASSISTED SYSTEM INSTALLATION, DIAGNOSTICS, AND DEBUGGING | January 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18536571 | UNIFIED BOT FOR ADAPTIVE WORKLOAD MANAGEMENT AND RAPID RESTORATION | December 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18532070 | POLICY CONTROLLER FOR DISTRIBUTED VIRTUALIZATION INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT MONITORING | December 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18561703 | SERVICE MONITORING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FLIGHT QUERY SYSTEM, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18508449 | SYSTEM FOR REAL-TIME OVERLOAD DETECTION USING IMAGE PROCESSING ANALYSIS | November 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18387941 | DEVICE CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | November 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18384516 | DIGITIZER ERROR DETECTION AND RECOVERY | October 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18488784 | BATCH MONITORING TOOL | October 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18486248 | CONCURRENT RECOVERY OF EXPORTED PHYSICAL TAPE DATA | October 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18379331 | DATA LOSS PROTECTION FOR MEMORY SYSTEMS AND DEVICES | October 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18378779 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AN ENHANCED ERROR MESSAGE | October 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 24 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18484375 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING ALERT CONTEXT DASHBOARD | October 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18481768 | IMPROVING A SYSTEM BY DETECTING FAULTY COMPONENTS | October 2023 | August 2025 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18481848 | METHOD FOR FACILITATING FRAME ERROR HANDLING AND AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE | October 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18479036 | TECHNIQUES FOR MITIGATING ERRORS TIED TO SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | September 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18473108 | APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR MEMORY FAULT DETECTION WITHIN DIE ARCHITECTURES | September 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18472868 | SMART SURVEILLANCE SERVICE IN PRE-BOOT FOR QUICK REMEDIATIONS | September 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18469023 | Abnormality Detection Method and Apparatus | September 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18466210 | SYSTEM BASED ON IOMT AND OPERATING METHOD OF THE SAME | September 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18466392 | TIME SERIES ANOMALY DETECTION WITH RARE EVENT FAILURE PREDICTION | September 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18367114 | ANOMALY DETECTION DURING CLOUD APPLICATION INSTALLATION | September 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18465721 | AUTOMATIC COLLECTION OF RELEVANT LOGS ASSOCIATED WITH A SERVICE DISRUPTION | September 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18367165 | METHOD OF PROCESSING EXCEPTION EVENTS AND STORAGE DEVICE FOR PROCESSING EXCEPTION EVENTS | September 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18465771 | POWER SUPPLY WITH SYSTEM MONITORING | September 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18550136 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | September 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18465242 | Cellular-to-USB and Cellular-to-DisplayPort SW mitigation | September 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18465074 | ANOMALY DETECTION USING LOGS | September 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18242793 | OPTIMIZED ERRATIC PROGRAM DETECTION PROCESS | September 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18228849 | RAID DISTRIBUTED PARITY GENERATION SYSTEM | August 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18363089 | AVAILABILITY ZONE FAULT INJECTOR FOR CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS | August 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18363570 | ESTIMATING ORIGINAL CAUSE OF SYSTEM REBOOT | August 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18228108 | Parallelized Exception Handling for Large Datasets | July 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18227877 | MACHINE LEARNING AIDED DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS OF LARGE SCALE DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS | July 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18360047 | Determining an Implementation of a Quantum Program that has a Minimized Overall Error Rate | July 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18114963 | OUT-OF-BOUNDS RECOVERY CIRCUIT | February 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18154166 | DATA DRIVEN SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO ISOLATE NETWORK FAULTS | January 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18088265 | AUTOMATIC QUBIT CALIBRATION | December 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18052043 | ADAPTIVE LOG DATA LEVEL IN A COMPUTING SYSTEM | November 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17844233 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE OF A PROCESS | June 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17397745 | ADAPTIVE DATA INTEGRITY SCAN FREQUENCY | August 2021 | June 2022 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17200229 | ADAPTIVE LOG DATA LEVEL IN A COMPUTING SYSTEM | March 2021 | July 2022 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17197950 | STREAMING SERVER STATISTICS AND PREDICTIVE MITIGATION | March 2021 | March 2022 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17172369 | Machine Defect Prediction Based on a Signature | February 2021 | March 2022 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16952063 | COMPUTER-CONTROLLED METRICS AND TASK LISTS MANAGEMENT | November 2020 | July 2022 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17081631 | MISSION-CRITICAL COMMUNICATION LINKS FOR INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS | October 2020 | March 2022 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17073720 | FAULT CLUSTERING FOR REMEDIAL ACTION ANALYSIS | October 2020 | March 2022 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17047532 | HARDWARE REPLACEMENT PREDICTIONS VERIFIED BY LOCAL DIAGNOSTICS | October 2020 | March 2022 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17066288 | PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEM RUNTIME STATE RELOAD | October 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17065492 | TECHNIQUES FOR REPAIRING AN INOPERABLE AUXILIARY DEVICE USING ANOTHER DEVICE | October 2020 | May 2022 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17065165 | DETECTION AND REMEDIATION OF MEMORY LEAKS | October 2020 | May 2022 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17035838 | STREAMING SERVER STATISTICS AND PREDICTIVE MITIGATION | September 2020 | January 2021 | Allow | 4 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17028253 | OUT-OF-BOUNDS RECOVERY CIRCUIT | September 2020 | January 2021 | Allow | 4 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17016852 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS CONFIGURED TO PERFROM DEBUG ANALYSIS BASED ON A DISTRIBUTED REPRESENTATION VECTOR FOR LINES OF A DEBUG LOG, METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUM | September 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17007030 | STORAGE APPARATUS, DUMP DATA MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND DUMP DATA MANAGEMENT PROGRAM | August 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17002333 | METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR ANALYZING LOG FILE | August 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 17 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16998557 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATING FAULT DETECTION IN MULTI-TENANT ENVIRONMENTS | August 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16968170 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR A TRACE PROCESS | August 2020 | June 2021 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16945954 | COMPUTING SYSTEM EVENT ERROR CORRECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION | August 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 18 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16927241 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A PERFORMANCE INDICATOR VALUE FOR PREDICTING ANOMALIES IN A COMPUTING INFRASTRUCTURE FROM VALUES OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS | July 2020 | March 2022 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16923134 | SYSTEM KERNEL ERROR IDENTIFICATION AND REPORTING | July 2020 | August 2021 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16921148 | MAZE-DRIVEN SELF-DIAGNOSTICS USING REINFORCEMENT LEARNING | July 2020 | May 2022 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16918095 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR BACKUP MANAGEMENT | July 2020 | October 2021 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16908983 | DEVICE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND DEVICE MANAGEMENT APPARATUS | June 2020 | April 2021 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16908494 | PREDICTING AND REDUCING HARDWARE RELATED OUTAGES | June 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16769752 | ANOMALY DETERMINATION APPARATUS, ANOMALY DETERMINATION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM STORING PROGRAM | June 2020 | March 2022 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16882430 | DIAGNOSING ANOMALIES DETECTED BY BLACK-BOX MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | May 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16874415 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY MONITORING AND DIAGNOSING USER EXPERIENCE PROBLEMS | May 2020 | March 2022 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16861931 | COMPUTER ERROR PREVENTION AND REDUCTION | April 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16859944 | FILE SERVICE AUTO-REMEDIATION IN STORAGE SYSTEMS | April 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16853226 | MANAGING DATA DISTURBANCE IN A MEMORY WITH ASYMMETRIC DISTURBANCE EFFECTS | April 2020 | April 2021 | Allow | 12 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16836684 | VALIDATION OF A SUBSET OF A PLURALITY OF RESPONSES DURING PROTOCOL TESTING | March 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16835157 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MONITORING FUNCTIONAL SAFFETY IN INTEGRATED CIRCUITS (ICS) | March 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16832090 | MODEL INTERPRETABILITY USING PROXY FEATURES | March 2020 | July 2022 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16826450 | TEST CASE FAILURE WITH ROOT CAUSE ISOLATION | March 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16822868 | INCIDENT ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS USING GALOIS CONNECTIONS | March 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16819939 | SEQUENCE MINING IN MEDICAL IOT DATA | March 2020 | December 2021 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16820615 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR AMALGAMATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) AND MACHINE LEARNING (ML) IN TEST CREATION, EXECUTION, AND PREDICTION | March 2020 | September 2021 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner GIBSON, JONATHAN D.
With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 54.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner GIBSON, JONATHAN D works in Art Unit 2113 and has examined 315 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 88.3%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 25 months.
Examiner GIBSON, JONATHAN D's allowance rate of 88.3% places them in the 69% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by GIBSON, JONATHAN D receive 1.72 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 36% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by GIBSON, JONATHAN D is 25 months. This places the examiner in the 78% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +9.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by GIBSON, JONATHAN D. This interview benefit is in the 42% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 69% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 40.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 36% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 60.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 33.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 8% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 9% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.