USPTO Examiner TORRES JOSEPH D - Art Unit 2112

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19134442APPARATUS FOR CANCELING NOISE FROM BROADCAST SIGNAL FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLEMay 2025March 2026Allow910NoNo
18825077ARITHMETIC CIRCUIT, MEMORY SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING NONVOLATILE MEMORYSeptember 2024February 2026Allow1801NoNo
18817713COMMAND ADDRESS FAULT DETECTIONAugust 2024February 2026Allow1710NoNo
18841053SYMBOL JUDGEMENT APPARATUS, SYMBOL JUDGEMENT METHOD AND PROGRAMAugust 2024November 2025Allow1500NoNo
18785976LOW-DENSITY PARITY CHECK (LDPC) DECODERS USING PARTIAL SYNDROME EARLY TERMINATIONJuly 2024February 2026Allow1810YesNo
18784446METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SIMPLIFIED SUCCESSIVE CANCELLATION LIST DECODING OF POLARIZATION-ADJUSTED CONVOLUTIONAL (PAC) CODESJuly 2024February 2026Allow1810YesNo
18771859SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICESJuly 2024February 2025Allow700NoNo
18770877ADAPTING FORWARD ERROR CORRECTION (FEC) OR LINK PARAMETERS FOR IMPROVED POST-FEC PERFORMANCEJuly 2024December 2025Allow1710YesNo
18767906STORAGE SYSTEM HAVING A HOST THAT MANAGES PHYSICAL DATA LOCATIONS OF A STORAGE DEVICEJuly 2024April 2025Allow910NoNo
18763594METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LOW-DENSITY PARITY-CHECK (LDPC) CODINGJuly 2024January 2025Allow700NoNo
18763252STORAGE DEVICES CONFIGURED TO GENERATE PARITY BASED ON RELIABILITY, AND METHODS OF OPERATION OF THE SAMEJuly 2024August 2025Allow1400NoNo
18756281OPTICAL TUNING TEST SYSTEM USING PARALLEL OVEN PIPELINES WITH PARALLEL INSTRUMENT CHANNELS AND MACHINE LEARNING ASSISTANCEJune 2024December 2025Allow1701NoNo
18754901IN-PLACE REFRESH TECHNIQUES FOR NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICESJune 2024August 2025Allow1300NoNo
18749161CHIP HEAT TREATMENT SYSTEMJune 2024August 2025Allow1400NoNo
18721754COMMUNICATON DEVICE WITH LOW DENSITY PARITY CHECK ROTATOR, AND METHOD THEREFORJune 2024July 2025Allow1300NoNo
18745853STAIRCASE MATRIX CODE AND HIGHLY PARALLEL LOW-LATENCY ORDERED STATISTICS DECODING METHOD THEREOFJune 2024February 2026Abandon2010NoNo
18733912METHOD FOR DETERMINING A CODE WORDJune 2024February 2026Allow2010NoNo
18715590Secure Multi-Rail Control for Sparsely Encoded SignalsMay 2024October 2025Allow1710YesNo
18674278ACCELERATING LOW-DENSITY PARITY-CHECK DECODING VIA SCHEDULING, AND RELATED DEVICES, METHODS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMSMay 2024August 2024Allow300NoNo
18673228HARDWARE BASED STATUS COLLECTOR ACCELERATION ENGINE FOR MEMORY SUB-SYSTEM OPERATIONSMay 2024March 2025Allow1010NoNo
18670952MEMORY CONTROLLER WITH ERROR DETECTION AND RETRY MODES OF OPERATIONMay 2024December 2025Abandon1911NoNo
18712657METHOD, SENDER, PROCESSING DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR TRANSMITTING DATA IN SEMANTIC-BASED WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND METHOD, RECEIVER, AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR RECEIVING DATAMay 2024July 2025Allow1400NoNo
18668028LIST DECODING OF POLARIZATION-ADJUSTED CONVOLUTIONAL CODESMay 2024January 2025Allow800NoNo
18658754INTERLEAVED CODEWORD TRANSMISSION FOR A MEMORY DEVICEMay 2024May 2025Allow1210NoNo
18656339CONFIGURABLE DATA PATH FOR MEMORY MODULESMay 2024April 2025Allow1210NoNo
18652085SOFT INFORMATION GENERATION FOR CONCATENATED FORWARD ERROR CORRECTION IN DIGIRAL SIGNAL PROCESSINGMay 2024December 2025Allow1901NoNo
18704101TRANSMISSION DEVICE, TRANSMISSION METHOD, RECEPTION DEVICE, AND RECEPTION METHODApril 2024December 2025Abandon2010NoNo
18640394SAMPLE-LEVEL ERROR-CORRECTING CODEApril 2024November 2024Allow700NoNo
18625417DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR DETECTING AND MITIGATING SILENT DATA CORRUPTIONS VIA ADAPTIVE VOLTAGE-FREQUENCY SCALINGApril 2024February 2025Allow1110NoNo
18618654Erasure Code-Based Encoding Method and Related DeviceMarch 2024August 2025Allow1710NoNo
18617505CONCATENATED ERROR CORRECTING CODESMarch 2024February 2026Allow2330YesYes
18608652MEMORY SYSTEM FAILURE DETECTION AND SELF RECOVERY OF MEMORY DICEMarch 2024October 2024Allow700NoNo
18608627ITERATIVE DECODING TECHNIQUE FOR CORRECTING DRAM DEVICE FAILURESMarch 2024January 2025Allow1000NoNo
18691943CORRECTING ONE OR MORE ERRORS IN A RECEIVED WORDMarch 2024December 2025Abandon2110NoNo
18603709SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF EXCHANGING DATA USING A HIGH-SPEED COMMUNICATION LINKMarch 2024July 2025Allow1701NoNo
18602782VOLTAGE DOMAIN BASED ERROR MANAGEMENTMarch 2024October 2025Allow1900NoNo
18600191AUTO-NEGOTIATION METHOD AND APPARATUSMarch 2024October 2025Abandon2020YesNo
18590803SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR QUANTUM POST-SELECTION USING LOGICAL SYNDROME COMPRESSIONFebruary 2024January 2026Allow2220YesNo
18584838ENCODER AND ENCODING METHODFebruary 2024August 2025Allow1710YesNo
18440380SPUR DETECTION, ESTIMATION, AND MITIGATIONFebruary 2024May 2025Allow1501NoNo
18438380METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TESTING ERROR CORRECTING CODE (ECC) FUNCTION OF FPGA ON-CHIP BLOCK RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (BRAM)February 2024March 2025Allow1300NoNo
18433756SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ACTIVATING FEC PROCESSING PER APPLICATION PROBE CLASSFebruary 2024February 2025Allow1210NoNo
18429127BIT INTERLEAVER FOR LOW-DENSITY PARITY CHECK CODEWORD HAVING LENGTH OF 64800 AND CODE RATE OF 7/15 AND QUADRATURE PHASE SHIFT KEYING, AND BIT INTERLEAVING METHOD USING SAMEJanuary 2024May 2025Allow1510NoNo
18424623CONTROLLER, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DECODING CODEWORD BASED ON HISTORICAL INFORMATIONJanuary 2024March 2026Allow2620NoNo
18419393LOW DENSITY PARITY CHECK ENCODER HAVING LENGTH OF 64800 AND CODE RATE OF 7/15, AND LOW DENSITY PARITY CHECK ENCODING METHOD USING THE SAMEJanuary 2024June 2025Allow1710NoNo
18415439QUANTUM DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMJanuary 2024April 2025Allow1500NoNo
18410782COMPRESSING CHECK NODE UNIT PARAMETERS IN LOW-DENSITY PARITY-CHECK CODES IN NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICESJanuary 2024September 2025Allow2000NoNo
18407498APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DECODING QUANTUM LOW-DENSITY PARITY-CHECK CODEJanuary 2024May 2025Allow1601NoNo
18577217NON-LINEAR ENCODING AND DECODING FOR RELIABLE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONJanuary 2024May 2025Allow1601NoNo
18403050METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING BIT-ERROR RATE IN A DATA CHANNELJanuary 2024April 2025Allow1500NoNo
18398361Maintaining Availability of Critical Information in a Distributed Storage NetworkDecember 2023December 2025Allow2420NoNo
18396774LDPC ENCODING AND DECODING METHODDecember 2023December 2025Allow2310NoNo
18395820IDENTIFYING A DYNAMICAL DECOUPLING SEQUENCE FOR ERROR SUPPRESSION OF QUANTUM COMPUTATIONS USING A GENETIC ALGORITHMDecember 2023February 2026Allow2620YesNo
18396102FAST COMBINED CHASE AND GMD DECODING OF GENERALIZED REED-SOLOMON CODESDecember 2023June 2025Allow1810YesNo
18540595ERROR CORRECTION BASED ON ASYMMETRIC RATIODecember 2023May 2025Allow1710NoNo
18539044METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR QUANTUM-CLASSICAL RESOURCE BALANCING OPTIMIZATIONSDecember 2023January 2026Allow2620NoNo
18537459METHOD AND DEVICE FOR POLAR CODE ENCODING AND DECODINGDecember 2023November 2024Allow1110NoNo
18533745SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HEALTH ANALYSIS OF A MODELED SOFTWARE SYSTEMDecember 2023June 2025Allow1800NoNo
18527902YIELD IMPROVEMENTS FOR THREE-DIMENSIONALLY STACKED NEURAL NETWORK ACCELERATORSDecember 2023January 2025Allow1310YesNo
18512678PROBABALISTIC AMPLIFICATION AND ATTENUATION OF QUANTUM ERRORS USING A SINGLE DATASETNovember 2023June 2025Allow1910YesNo
18511690ACCELERATION OF S-POLAR ECC THROUGHPUT BY SCHEDULERNovember 2023October 2024Allow1111YesNo
18498832INTEGRATION OF COMPRESSION ALGORITHMS WITH ERROR CORRECTION CODESOctober 2023March 2025Allow1701NoNo
18497903ERROR CORRECTION ON QUANTUM DEVICESOctober 2023March 2026Abandon2820YesNo
18383813Partial Speed Changes To Improve In-Order TransferOctober 2023August 2024Allow901NoNo
18494386POWER SAVING USING PREDICTIONS RELATED TO LOW DENSITY PARITY CHECK DECODING SUCCESSOctober 2023September 2025Allow2220YesNo
18493579PMD-TO-TC-MAC INTERFACE WITH 2-STAGE FEC PROTECTIONOctober 2023January 2025Abandon1520NoNo
18482964ANALOG ERROR DETECTION AND CORRECTION IN ANALOG IN-MEMORY CROSSBARSOctober 2023June 2024Allow810NoNo
18286009STREAMING MEDIA COMMUNICATION WITH FORWARD ERROR CORRECTIONOctober 2023June 2024Allow800NoNo
18480261ENCODING AND DECODING APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING MULTI-MODE CODINGOctober 2023August 2024Allow1010YesNo
18476055SELECTING DECODER USED AT QUANTUM COMPUTING DEVICESeptember 2023September 2025Allow2310NoNo
18467959MEMORY DEVICE, MEMORY DEVICE TEST METHOD, AND TEST SYSTEMSeptember 2023January 2025Allow1600NoNo
18449118Memory Controller With Error Detection And Retry Modes Of OperationAugust 2023March 2024Allow700NoNo
18449647STORAGE SYSTEM HAVING A HOST THAT MANAGES PHYSICAL DATA LOCATIONS OF A STORAGE DEVICEAugust 2023April 2024Allow800NoNo
18449479Methods And Apparatus For Selectively Extracting And Loading Register StatesAugust 2023March 2025Allow1931YesNo
18364421MODULATOR AND MODULATION METHOD USING NON-UNIFORM 16-SYMBOL SIGNAL CONSTELLATION FOR LOW-DENSITY PARITY CHECK CODEWORD HAVING 4/15 CODE RATEAugust 2023May 2024Allow1010NoNo
18355332ENCODER AND DECODER OF FORWARD ERROR CORRECTION (FEC) CODECJuly 2023November 2024Allow1620NoNo
18218294ERROR CORRECTION CODE DECODER, STORAGE CONTROLLER AND STORAGE DEVICEJuly 2023December 2024Allow1700NoNo
18213907Interface circuit and memory controllerJune 2023February 2025Allow2010NoNo
18258782NEGATIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT TRANSMISSIONS DURING PHYSICAL LAYER ISSUESJune 2023October 2024Allow1610NoNo
18335804Diagnostic DeviceJune 2023September 2024Allow1501NoNo
18209909PREDICTIVE CONTEXT-BASED DECODER CORRECTIONJune 2023July 2025Allow2510NoNo
18209542METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING ACTIONS OF TESTBENCH COMPONENTS WITHIN A TEST ENVIRONMENTJune 2023August 2024Allow1401NoNo
18334078SEMICONDUCTOR TEST APPARATUS USING FPGA AND MEMORY CONTROL METHOD FOR SEMICONDUCTOR TESTJune 2023August 2025Allow2610NoNo
18208795METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR TRANSMITTING PACKETSJune 2023January 2024Allow700NoNo
18330669SYNDROME CALCULATION FOR ERROR DETECTION AND ERROR CORRECTIONJune 2023February 2024Allow800NoNo
18330955LOW DENSITY PARITY CHECK ENCODER HAVING LENGTH OF 16200 AND CODE RATE OF 3/15, AND LOW DENSITY PARITY CHECK ENCODING METHOD USING THE SAMEJune 2023April 2024Allow1110NoNo
18206161LOW-DENSITY PARITY-CHECK DECODER WITH SCALING TO REDUCE POWER CONSUMPTIONJune 2023September 2025Abandon2720NoNo
18330142Qualitative Communication Using Adaptive Network Coding with a Sliding WindowJune 2023August 2024Allow1510NoNo
18329377PARALLEL DECODING FOR QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTING CODESJune 2023August 2024Allow1400NoNo
18327765METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR COMPACTLY DESCRIBING LIFTED LOW-DENSITY PARITY-CHECK (LDPC) CODESJune 2023July 2024Allow1420YesNo
18323729Asynchronous Data Replication in a Storage NetworkMay 2023August 2024Allow1520NoNo
18254377READ-WRITE METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LEPS SOFT DECODING ESTIMATION, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEMay 2023June 2024Allow1200NoNo
18253147INTERLEAVER FOR CONSTELLATION SHAPINGMay 2023February 2025Allow2110NoNo
18316531NONVOLATILE SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICEMay 2023November 2023Allow600NoNo
18143343METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DECODING LOW-DENSITY PARITY-CHECK (LDPC) CODEMay 2023September 2024Allow1700NoNo
18143288SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SERIALIZED COMMUNICATIONMay 2023January 2025Allow2010NoNo
18309278BIT INTERLEAVER FOR LOW-DENSITY PARITY CHECK CODEWORD HAVING LENGTH OF 64800 AND CODE RATE OF 7/15 AND QUADRATURE PHASE SHIFT KEYING, AND BIT INTERLEAVING METHOD USING SAMEApril 2023November 2023Allow600NoNo
18134690DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR ENCODING AND DECODING CODEWORDSApril 2023January 2025Allow2121YesNo
18131203Multi-Layer Forward Error Correction (FEC) for Jamming ResiliencyApril 2023July 2025Allow2700NoNo
18126807SCALABLE PHOTONIC QUANTUM COMPUTING WITH HYBRID RESOURCE STATESMarch 2023March 2026Allow3601NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner TORRES, JOSEPH D.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
35
Examiner Affirmed
22
(62.9%)
Examiner Reversed
13
(37.1%)
Reversal Percentile
58.4%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 37.1% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
140
Allowed After Appeal Filing
44
(31.4%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
96
(68.6%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
48.1%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 31.4% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner TORRES, JOSEPH D - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner TORRES, JOSEPH D works in Art Unit 2112 and has examined 1,351 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 79.5%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 29 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner TORRES, JOSEPH D's allowance rate of 79.5% places them in the 49% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by TORRES, JOSEPH D receive 1.67 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 34% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by TORRES, JOSEPH D is 29 months. This places the examiner in the 63% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +6.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by TORRES, JOSEPH D. This interview benefit is in the 34% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 22.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 49% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 60.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 50% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 72.4% of appeals filed. This is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 44.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 44.2% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 6.1% of allowed cases (in the 88% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 18.2% of allowed cases (in the 93% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.