USPTO Examiner BRADEN GRACE VICTORIA - Art Unit 2112

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18592082COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUSFebruary 2024November 2025Allow2110NoNo
18584508MEMORY SYSTEMFebruary 2024March 2026Allow2520YesNo
18584879DUAL-ERROR CORRECTING CODE (ECC) FOR METADATA IN MEMORY SYSTEMFebruary 2024October 2025Allow2010YesNo
18433407DECODING METHOD, MEMORY STORAGE DEVICE AND MEMORY CONTROL CIRCUIT UNITFebruary 2024October 2025Allow2010NoNo
18404870HANDSHAKING METHOD AND DATA STORAGE SYSTEMJanuary 2024September 2025Allow2010NoNo
18400782FAULT-TOLERANT MEMORY APPLIANCEDecember 2023May 2025Allow1610NoNo
18398825DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING LANE-SPECIFIC ERROR DETECTION IN HIGH-SPEED DATA LINKSDecember 2023June 2025Allow1710NoNo
18534135SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND MEMORY SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAMEDecember 2023January 2026Allow2610YesNo
18525395APPARATUSES AND METHODS TO PERFORM DATA SWAPPING ON A HOSTNovember 2023January 2026Allow2520NoNo
18507945NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICENovember 2023September 2025Allow2220NoNo
18504342APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR SINGLE-PASS ACCESS OF ECC INFORMATION, METADATA INFORMATION OR COMBINATIONS THEREOFNovember 2023September 2025Allow2210NoNo
18490685PHASE-CHANGE MEMORY CONTROLLER CAPABLE OF REDUCING WRITE POWER AND PHASE-CHANGE MEMORY SYSTEM INCLUDING SAMEOctober 2023August 2025Allow2210NoNo
18489245ELECTRONIC DEVICE, ELECTRONIC SYSTEM, METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING AN ELECTRONIC SYSTEMOctober 2023September 2025Allow2320YesNo
18376637MEMORY CONTROLLER AND MEMORY SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAMEOctober 2023August 2025Allow2320YesNo
18283185METHOD OF OPERATING MEMORY FOR HAVING HIGH RELIABILITY AND MEMORY OF IMPLEMENTING THE SAMESeptember 2023July 2025Allow2210NoNo
18242981EFFICIENT ENCODING VALIDATIONSeptember 2023March 2025Allow1910YesNo
18447326MEMORY CONTROLLER AND MEMORY SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAMEAugust 2023June 2025Allow2210NoNo
18353571Uneven segmentation of data packets to reduce retransmission latencyJuly 2023February 2025Allow1910NoNo
18353626CYCLIC REDUNDANCY CHECK INTERLEAVER FOR CHANNEL ENCODING CHAIN FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONSJuly 2023May 2025Allow2210NoNo
18222044Data Storage Device and Method for Using Zones of Memory in a Read Scrub OperationJuly 2023November 2024Allow1610YesNo
18220464METHOD AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM AND APPARATUS FOR DECODING LOW-DENSITY PARITY-CHECK (LDPC) CODEJuly 2023January 2025Allow1810NoNo
18219087Data storage device and method for performing error recoveryJuly 2023January 2025Allow1810NoNo
18270633METHODS, APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS FOR REDUCED COMPLEXITY POLAR CODES BASED ON MODIFIED CYCLIC-REDUNDANCY-CHECK (CRC) PROCEDURESJune 2023May 2025Allow2320NoNo
18336900Low Complexity System and Method for Detection and Correction of Data with additional Metadata from CorruptionJune 2023February 2025Allow2010YesNo
18306510Package On Package Memory Interface and Configuration With Error Code CorrectionApril 2023January 2026Allow3310NoNo
17937585ERROR DIAGNOSIS CIRCUIT AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A DEVICEOctober 2022July 2025Allow3350YesNo
17402202DECODER AND DECODING METHOD SELECTING AN ERROR CONCEALMENT MODE, AND ENCODER AND ENCODING METHODAugust 2021June 2025Allow4610NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner BRADEN, GRACE VICTORIA - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BRADEN, GRACE VICTORIA works in Art Unit 2112 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 46 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BRADEN, GRACE VICTORIA's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BRADEN, GRACE VICTORIA receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BRADEN, GRACE VICTORIA is 46 months. This places the examiner in the 11% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 8% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 9% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.