USPTO Examiner FELTON AILEEN BAKER - Art Unit 1734

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17110659METAL HYDRIDE NANOPARTICLESDecember 2020February 2024Allow3820NoNo
17024949SPHERICAL COMPOSITE POWDERSeptember 2020December 2024Allow5111NoNo
17019569ACOUSTIC MIXING SYSTEM FOR CREATING PROPELLANT MIXTURESeptember 2020June 2024Allow4510NoNo
16770763PROPELLANT CHARGEJune 2020December 2024Abandon5421NoNo
16843291LOW-SMOKE PYROTECHNIC COMPOSITIONApril 2020June 2023Abandon3810NoNo
16828865MODIFIED BLASTING AGENTMarch 2020December 2021Allow2100NoNo
16810409BONDED THERMITE COMPOSITIONMarch 2020March 2024Abandon4911NoNo
16639621Co-Layered Propellant ChargeFebruary 2020December 2023Allow4611NoNo
16751731METHOD FOR REDUCING PROPELLANT CURING RESIDUAL STRESS BY HIGH-ENERGY ACOUSTIC BEAMJanuary 2020September 2023Allow4331NoNo
16741508THERMAL HYDROGEN GENERATOR USING A METAL HYDRIDE AND THERMITEJanuary 2020March 2022Allow2600NoNo
16730303METHOD FOR PROTECTION FROM EXPLOSION AND FIREDecember 2019December 2020Allow1121NoNo
16725744Enhanced Slag Formation For Copper-Containing Gas GenerantsDecember 2019March 2023Abandon3920YesNo
16715190EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITIONS WITH REDUCED FUMEDecember 2019September 2023Abandon4501NoNo
16618005EXPLOSIVES COMPOSITIONNovember 2019March 2025Abandon6021NoNo
16689795NON-LETHAL PAYLOADS AND METHODS OF PRODUCING SAMENovember 2019November 2024Abandon6031YesNo
16688258OBSCURANT EMISSION SYSTEMS AND METHODSNovember 2019December 2021Allow2400NoNo
16612954A METHOD FOR PRODUCING POTASSIUM 1,1 -DINITRAMINO-5,5-BISTETRAZOLATE AND EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SAID SALTNovember 2019October 2023Abandon4701NoNo
16600905NON-DETONABLE SHAPED CHARGE AND ACTIVATIONOctober 2019March 2023Abandon4141NoNo
16604402IMPROVEMENTS IN OR RELATING TO ENERGETIC MATERIALSOctober 2019February 2025Allow6021NoNo
16500298PROCESS FOR MAKING AND FILLING A PBX COMPOSITIONOctober 2019August 2023Allow4711YesNo
16500296RESONANT ACOUSTIC MIXING (RAM) OF AN EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITIONOctober 2019September 2023Allow4711NoNo
16590242SHORT DURATION CHEMILUMINESCENT COMPOSITIONOctober 2019December 2023Allow5020YesNo
16582490Multi-Purpose PuttySeptember 2019February 2024Allow5321NoNo
16555709COOL BURNING GAS GENERANT COMPOSITIONS WITH LIQUID COMBUSTION PRODUCTSAugust 2019March 2022Allow3111NoNo
16602212Flexible halocarbon pyrolantAugust 2019August 2023Allow4811NoNo
16548522MINERAL PRECIPITATION METHODSAugust 2019July 2022Abandon3510NoNo
16530042IGNITION BOOSTER COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAMEAugust 2019December 2024Allow6040YesNo
16513211PYROPHORIC PELLETS THAT EMIT INFRARED RADIATIONJuly 2019September 2024Allow6021NoNo
16509673NON-METALLIC IGNITION DEVICESJuly 2019November 2023Abandon5221NoNo
16472297GAS-GENERATING PYROTECHNIC SOLID OBJECTSJune 2019March 2024Abandon5721NoNo
16469317EMULSION EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITION AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFORJune 2019February 2024Abandon5621NoNo
16469518EXOTHERMIC EXPANDABLE COMPOSITIONSJune 2019March 2024Abandon5721NoNo
16468613NANOENERGETIC MATERIAL COMPOSITE-BASED SOLID PROPELLANT, METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME, AND PROJECTILE USING THE SAMEJune 2019March 2024Allow5721NoNo
16468137IMPROVED EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITIONJune 2019November 2023Abandon5311NoNo
16415804ENERGETIC LADEN FIBER FOR EXPLOSIVE CORD FILLMay 2019May 2023Allow4811YesNo
16410875BIODEGRADABLE REACTIVE SHOOTING TARGET AND METHOD OF MANUFACTUREMay 2019February 2024Allow5701NoNo
16389091ELECTRICALLY OPERATED PROPELLANTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USE THEREOFApril 2019June 2024Abandon6031NoNo
16369609COOL BURNING HYDRATE FUELS IN GAS GENERANT FORMULATIONS FOR AUTOMOTIVE AIRBAG APPLICATIONSMarch 2019March 2023Allow4720YesNo
16369591GAS GENERANT COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING A THERMALLY STABLE CRYSTALLINE HYDRATE COMPOUND FOR COOLING COMBUSTION FLAME TEMPERATURE AND IMPROVING BALLISTIC PERFORMANCEMarch 2019September 2022Allow4210YesNo
16353918EXTERNAL HOMOGENIZATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS RELATED THERETOMarch 2019December 2023Allow5721NoNo
16298502DETONATOR-SENSITIVE ASSEMBLED BOOSTER CHARGES FOR USE IN BLASTING ENGINEERING AND THE USE THEREOFMarch 2019August 2020Abandon1710NoNo
16290200THREE PART MIXING PROCESS FOR ENERGETIC MATERIALS AND EPOXY BINDERMarch 2019June 2023Allow5221NoNo
16273942EXTREMELY SLOW PYROTECHNIC STROBE COMPOSITION WITH REDUCED TOXICITYFebruary 2019July 2020Allow1710NoNo
16270016CRYOGENICALLY COMPATIBLE ROCKET PROPELLANTFebruary 2019September 2023Allow5510NoNo
16260157BISMUTH-BASED ENERGETIC MATERIALSJanuary 2019June 2023Allow5221NoNo
16258298MECHANICALLY-GASSED EMULSION EXPLOSIVES AND METHODS RELATED THERETOJanuary 2019May 2022Allow4001NoNo
16250317NON-AMMONIUM NITRATE BASED GENERANTSJanuary 2019March 2024Abandon6021NoYes
16248961Non-Conductive Pyrotechnic MixtureJanuary 2019September 2023Allow5631YesNo
16243177PYROTECHNIC DELAY COMPOSITIONJanuary 2019March 2023Abandon5020YesNo
16313493LEAD-FREE INITIATING AGENTS OR INITIATING AGENT MIXTURESDecember 2018August 2022Allow4411NoNo
16230308METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING TEXTURE IN SIMULANTSDecember 2018June 2023Abandon5321NoNo
16197373METHOD FOR PREPARATION OF INSENSITIVE HIGH EXPLOSIVENovember 2018September 2021Allow3400NoNo
16192977PROPELLANT STABILIZERNovember 2018March 2025Abandon6041NoYes
16095928Chemical Heat Sources for use in Down-Hole OperationsOctober 2018June 2024Allow6041NoNo
16093609Water Resistance Additive for Particulate Ammonium Nitrate-Fuel Oil (Anfo) ExplosivesOctober 2018March 2024Allow6041NoNo
16091371EFFICIENT SMOKE COMPOSITION IN VISIBLE AND INFRARED RANGESOctober 2018May 2022Allow4421NoNo
16062856VEHICLE ADAPTED FOR MAKING MIXTURES OF WASTE LUBRICATING OIL/FUEL OIL FOR THE IN SITU PRODUCTION OF BULK PRODUCTS, AND ASSOCIATED PROCESSSeptember 2018August 2022Allow5001NoNo
16087692GAS PROPELLED MUNITIONS ANTI-FOULING SYSTEMSeptember 2018September 2021Abandon3601NoNo
16087440ENERGETIC MATERIALSSeptember 2018October 2023Abandon6041NoNo
16137934Material and Method of Manufacture for Engineered Reactive Matrix CompositiesSeptember 2018August 2022Allow4721NoNo
16125871ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED COMBUSTIBLE ELEMENT WITH FUEL AND OXIDIZERSeptember 2018January 2020Allow1600NoNo
15940209INCENDIARY CAPSULEMarch 2018December 2023Allow6031NoNo
15762761SOLID ROCKET MOTOR HAVING HYDORXYL -TERMINATED BINDER WEIGHT DIOLMarch 2018June 2024Allow6021NoYes
15762745SOLID ROCKET PROPELLANT WITH LOW GLASS TRANSITIONMarch 2018March 2022Allow4831NoNo
15762181SOLID ROCKET PROPELLANT WITH BLENDED TRIAZOLE PLASTICZERMarch 2018February 2025Abandon6041NoYes
15925735ENERGETIC THERMOPLASTIC FILAMENTS FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING AND METHODS FOR THEIR FABRICATIONMarch 2018June 2021Abandon3911NoNo
15920521HYPERGOLIC HYDROCARBON FUELMarch 2018July 2021Allow4021NoNo
15921193METHOD OF PREPARING AND APPLYING A SLURRY MIXTURE TO A BRIDGE WIRE INITIATORMarch 2018March 2021Allow3611NoNo
15758808PROPELLANT CHARGEMarch 2018September 2023Allow6030NoNo
15756636BLASTING AGENTMarch 2018August 2021Allow4121NoNo
15751501GAS-PRODUCING MATERIALFebruary 2018April 2022Allow5021NoNo
15891557PYROTECHNIC DELAY ELEMENT DEVICEFebruary 2018June 2021Allow4011YesNo
15882172OPTO-THERMAL LASER DETONATORJanuary 2018June 2021Allow4011NoNo
15746980PBX COMPOSITIONJanuary 2018October 2021Allow4421YesYes
15870395Gaseous Oxygen Propulsion System With Chemical Oxygen GenerationJanuary 2018May 2021Allow4011NoNo
15742432CAST EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITIONJanuary 2018December 2020Allow3511YesNo
15740371COATED PARTICLESDecember 2017December 2020Abandon3601NoNo
15852886CO2 DESORPTION CATALYSTDecember 2017September 2020Allow3311NoNo
15849935GUNPOWDER PREPARATION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAMEDecember 2017October 2020Allow3401NoNo
15849281High Temperature Energetic FormulationsDecember 2017December 2020Abandon3611NoNo
15832744RADIATION CURABLE ENERGETIC MATERIAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USEDecember 2017May 2021Abandon4221NoNo
15525757THERMAL PRE-IGNITION AGENTDecember 2017March 2020Abandon3511NoNo
15817746AMORPHOUS ENERGETICSNovember 2017March 2020Allow2810YesNo
15810756Catalyst Component for High Activity and high Stereoselectivity in Olefin PolymerizationNovember 2017November 2020Allow3601NoNo
15782290Synthesis of energetic material particles with controlled morphologyOctober 2017March 2020Allow2911NoNo
15726731PRECURSOR COMPOSITIONS FOR AN INSULATION, INSULATED ROCKET MOTORS, AND RELATED METHODSOctober 2017December 2024Abandon6051NoYes
15724086Propellant CompositionOctober 2017December 2021Abandon5031NoNo
15713600PYROTECHNIC COMPOSITIONSSeptember 2017September 2021Abandon4821NoYes
15690515High Density Hybrid Rocket MotorAugust 2017June 2021Allow4521NoNo
15545570REACTIVE MATERIALSJuly 2017October 2022Abandon6041YesYes
15649105PRECURSOR FORMULATIONS OF A SOLID PROPELLANT, SOLID PROPELLANTS INCLUDING A REACTION PRODUCT OF THE PRECURSOR FORMULATION, ROCKET MOTORS INCLUDING THE SOLID PROPELLANT, AND RELATED METHODSJuly 2017June 2021Allow4721NoNo
15539635TUNGSTEN OXIDE PRIMER COMPOSITIONSJune 2017September 2021Abandon5121NoNo
15604716HIGH FIDELITY SHEET EXPLOSIVE SIMULANTSMay 2017November 2020Allow4122NoNo
15591173BEAD MILLED SPRAY DRIED NANO-EXPLOSIVEMay 2017May 2021Allow4822NoNo
15582954SYSTEMS FOR PRODUCING DEMN EUTECTIC, AND RELATED METHODS OF FORMING AN ENERGETIC COMPOSITIONMay 2017July 2020Allow3812NoNo
15521959EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF DELIVERYApril 2017September 2020Allow4121YesNo
15731136Stability of gas atomized reactive powders through multiple step in-situ passivationApril 2017December 2019Allow3211NoNo
15491433Copolymerized Bis-(Ethylene Oxy) Methane Polysulfide Polymer and Hydroxyl Terminated Poly Butadiene as a Solid Fueled Ramjet FuelApril 2017December 2019Allow3221NoNo
15518701AN EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITIONApril 2017September 2020Abandon4221NoNo
15731053Stability of gas atomized reactive powders through multiple step in-situ passivationApril 2017May 2020Allow3720NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner FELTON, AILEEN BAKER.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
14
Examiner Affirmed
9
(64.3%)
Examiner Reversed
5
(35.7%)
Reversal Percentile
57.4%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 35.7% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
43
Allowed After Appeal Filing
17
(39.5%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
26
(60.5%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
65.1%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 39.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner FELTON, AILEEN BAKER - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner FELTON, AILEEN BAKER works in Art Unit 1734 and has examined 276 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 61.2%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 46 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner FELTON, AILEEN BAKER's allowance rate of 61.2% places them in the 23% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by FELTON, AILEEN BAKER receive 2.20 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 56% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by FELTON, AILEEN BAKER is 46 months. This places the examiner in the 12% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +7.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by FELTON, AILEEN BAKER. This interview benefit is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 12.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 40.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 65.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 19.2% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 67.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.4% of allowed cases (in the 56% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 14.2% of allowed cases (in the 92% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.