USPTO Examiner FELTON AILEEN BAKER - Art Unit 1734

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18841242SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLABLE SYNTHESIS OF ENERGETIC NANOCOMPOSITESAugust 2024January 2026Allow1700NoNo
18617674Hybrid Rocket Engine Fuel Grains with Radial Energy Compositional VariationsMarch 2024January 2026Allow2210NoNo
18688565METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE PENTAZOLATE ANION USING A HYPERVALENT IODINE OXIDANTMarch 2024December 2025Allow2200NoNo
18407661PROPELLANT APPLIED TO A THRUSTER AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEJanuary 2024March 2025Allow1511NoNo
18289145COMPOSITION FOR FORMING AN EXPLOSIVE COMPRISING AN EMULSION OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE AND AN OIL TYPE FUELNovember 2023January 2026Abandon2620YesYes
18289153SENSITIZING COMPOSITION FOR ENERGETIC HYDROGEN PEROXIDE EMULSIONSNovember 2023March 2026Allow2830YesYes
18367926THERMITE BLOCK FOR STORED-DATA DESTRUCTIONSeptember 2023February 2026Allow2901NoNo
18224755MULTI-PART MIXED ENERGETIC MATERIALS AND EPOXY BINDERSJuly 2023December 2025Allow2910YesNo
18354221LIQUID EXPLOSIVE FOR IN-SITU EXPLOSIVE FRACTURING IN LOW-PERMEABILITY OILFIELDS AND APPLICATION THEREOFJuly 2023December 2023Allow501NoNo
18109055METHODOLOGIES TO PRODUCE TEXTURED THREAT SIMULANTSFebruary 2023January 2026Abandon3541NoNo
18109007METHODOLOGIES TO PRODUCE SIMULANTS OF TEXTURED THREAT COMPOUNDSFebruary 2023August 2024Allow1821NoNo
18067202NON-DETONABLE SHAPED CHARGE AND ACTIVATIONDecember 2022June 2024Allow1810YesNo
18001644METHOD FOR EXTRACTING AMMONIUM PERCHLORATE FROM A SOLID COMPOSITE PROPELLANTDecember 2022June 2025Allow3000NoNo
17981636EXOTHERMIC EXPANDABLE COMPOSITIONSNovember 2022December 2024Abandon2512YesNo
17815776MECHANICALLY-GASSED EMULSION EXPLOSIVES AND METHODS RELATED THERETOJuly 2022October 2025Allow3901NoNo
17749144GAS GENERATORMay 2022February 2025Allow3300NoNo
17763372METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING A PREDETERMINED PYROTECHNIC ENERGY OUTPUTMarch 2022January 2026Abandon4501NoNo
17666837REMOVING DISSOLVED GASSES FROM PROPELLANT COMPOSITIONSFebruary 2022January 2026Allow4711NoNo
17583983FLEXURAL SHEET EXPLOSIVE SIMULANTSJanuary 2022November 2022Allow1020NoNo
17621507PYROTECHNIC GAS-GENERATING COMPOSITIONDecember 2021September 2025Abandon4501NoNo
17556848ENERGETIC MATERIALSDecember 2021September 2025Allow4530NoNo
17544263HYBRID ROCKET ENGINE FUEL GRAINS WITH RADIAL ENERGY COMPOSITIONAL VARIATIONSDecember 2021November 2023Allow2321NoNo
17616440Explosives Based on Hydrogen Peroxide With Improved Sleep TimeDecember 2021January 2026Abandon4911NoNo
17456915Synthesis of High Explosive Nanoparticles by Turbulent MixingNovember 2021May 2025Allow4210NoNo
17521116METHOD FOR MAKING PYROTECHNIC MATERIAL AND RELATED TECHNOLOGYNovember 2021September 2025Allow4730YesNo
17602829ENERGY-RELEASING COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAMEOctober 2021December 2025Allow5021NoNo
17478013GAS GENERANT COMPOSITION, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND USE THEREOFSeptember 2021May 2025Allow4411NoNo
17460717OPTO-THERMAL LASER DETONATORAugust 2021November 2022Allow1500NoNo
17394115Passivated FuelAugust 2021November 2024Allow3910NoNo
17390825Phase change separators for thermal gas generatorsJuly 2021November 2025Abandon5211NoNo
17389598PYROTECHNIC DELAY ELEMENT DEVICEJuly 2021November 2022Allow1600NoNo
17371091Plasticized, Adhesive Binary ExplosiveJuly 2021November 2024Abandon4110NoNo
17359765MATERIAL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE FOR ENGINEERED REACTIVE MATRIX COMPOSITIONSJune 2021February 2024Abandon3120NoNo
17354310APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PROPELLANTJune 2021August 2024Allow3800NoNo
17351371IGNITION POWDER, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND USE THEREOF, AND AIRBAG GAS GENERATORJune 2021September 2025Allow5121NoNo
17311940A WATER-BASED EXPLOSIVEJune 2021August 2022Allow1501NoNo
17318406METHOD OF PREPARING AND APPLYING A SLURRY MIXTURE TO A BRIDGE WIRE INITIATORMay 2021December 2022Allow1900NoNo
17289434DEPOSING INITIARY COMPOSITIONSApril 2021November 2025Abandon5521YesNo
17282038POLYMERISABLE BINDERApril 2021January 2026Abandon5721YesNo
17208467HIGH DENSITY HYBRID ROCKET MOTORMarch 2021June 2023Allow2700NoNo
17193370HIGH FIDELITY SHEET EXPLOSIVE SIMULANTSMarch 2021October 2021Allow711NoNo
17265890METHOD FOR PRODUCING ECOLOGICAL EXPLOSIVE FOR PRIMER COMPOSITIONS OF AMMUNITIONFebruary 2021September 2024Allow4301NoNo
17162412CAPSAICINOID SMOKEJanuary 2021August 2024Allow4311YesNo
17151557PBX COMPOSITIONJanuary 2021June 2023Allow2900NoNo
17151554PBX COMPOSITIONJanuary 2021July 2023Allow3000YesNo
17137940FLAMELESS SMOKE COMPOSITIONDecember 2020November 2025Abandon5921NoNo
17110659METAL HYDRIDE NANOPARTICLESDecember 2020February 2024Allow3820NoNo
17087227SYSTEMS FOR PRODUCING DEMN EUTECTICNovember 2020January 2026Abandon6021NoNo
17047717PROCEDURE AND INSTALLATION FOR LOADING BOREHOLES WITH BULK WATER-BASED SUSPENSION OR WATERGEL TYPE EXPLOSIVESOctober 2020January 2026Allow6031YesYes
17024949SPHERICAL COMPOSITE POWDERSeptember 2020December 2024Allow5111NoNo
17019569ACOUSTIC MIXING SYSTEM FOR CREATING PROPELLANT MIXTURESeptember 2020June 2024Allow4510NoNo
16975084FUNCTIONAL GROUP-PROTECTED DIAZIDOGLYOXIME, METHOD OF SYNTHESIZING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF SYNTHESIZING TKX-50 USING FUNCTIONAL GROUP-PROTECTED DIAZIDOGLYOXIMEAugust 2020September 2025Abandon6031YesNo
16960716USE OF A TETRAPHENYLPHOSPHONIUM HALOGENATED SALT AS SMOKE-PRODUCING AGENT AND SMOKE-PRODUCING PYROTECHNIC COMPOSITION INCORPORATING SUCH A MATERIALJuly 2020September 2025Abandon6031NoNo
16770763PROPELLANT CHARGEJune 2020December 2024Abandon5421NoNo
16754817ACOUSTIC MIXERSApril 2020September 2025Allow6021NoNo
16843291LOW-SMOKE PYROTECHNIC COMPOSITIONApril 2020June 2023Abandon3810NoNo
16828865MODIFIED BLASTING AGENTMarch 2020December 2021Allow2100NoNo
16810409BONDED THERMITE COMPOSITIONMarch 2020March 2024Abandon4911NoNo
16639621Co-Layered Propellant ChargeFebruary 2020December 2023Allow4611NoNo
16751731METHOD FOR REDUCING PROPELLANT CURING RESIDUAL STRESS BY HIGH-ENERGY ACOUSTIC BEAMJanuary 2020September 2023Allow4331NoNo
16741508THERMAL HYDROGEN GENERATOR USING A METAL HYDRIDE AND THERMITEJanuary 2020March 2022Allow2600NoNo
16730303METHOD FOR PROTECTION FROM EXPLOSION AND FIREDecember 2019December 2020Allow1121NoNo
16725744Enhanced Slag Formation For Copper-Containing Gas GenerantsDecember 2019March 2023Abandon3920YesNo
16715190EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITIONS WITH REDUCED FUMEDecember 2019September 2023Abandon4501NoNo
16618005EXPLOSIVES COMPOSITIONNovember 2019March 2025Abandon6021NoNo
16689795NON-LETHAL PAYLOADS AND METHODS OF PRODUCING SAMENovember 2019November 2024Abandon6031YesNo
16688258OBSCURANT EMISSION SYSTEMS AND METHODSNovember 2019December 2021Allow2400NoNo
16612954A METHOD FOR PRODUCING POTASSIUM 1,1 -DINITRAMINO-5,5-BISTETRAZOLATE AND EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING SAID SALTNovember 2019October 2023Abandon4701NoNo
16600905NON-DETONABLE SHAPED CHARGE AND ACTIVATIONOctober 2019March 2023Abandon4141NoNo
16604402IMPROVEMENTS IN OR RELATING TO ENERGETIC MATERIALSOctober 2019February 2025Allow6021NoNo
16500298PROCESS FOR MAKING AND FILLING A PBX COMPOSITIONOctober 2019August 2023Allow4711YesNo
16500296RESONANT ACOUSTIC MIXING (RAM) OF AN EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITIONOctober 2019September 2023Allow4711NoNo
16590242SHORT DURATION CHEMILUMINESCENT COMPOSITIONOctober 2019December 2023Allow5020YesNo
16582490Multi-Purpose PuttySeptember 2019February 2024Allow5321NoNo
16602212Flexible halocarbon pyrolantAugust 2019August 2023Allow4811NoNo
16555709COOL BURNING GAS GENERANT COMPOSITIONS WITH LIQUID COMBUSTION PRODUCTSAugust 2019March 2022Allow3111NoNo
16548522MINERAL PRECIPITATION METHODSAugust 2019July 2022Abandon3510NoNo
16530042IGNITION BOOSTER COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAMEAugust 2019December 2024Allow6040YesNo
16513211PYROPHORIC PELLETS THAT EMIT INFRARED RADIATIONJuly 2019September 2024Allow6021NoNo
16509673NON-METALLIC IGNITION DEVICESJuly 2019November 2023Abandon5221NoNo
16472297GAS-GENERATING PYROTECHNIC SOLID OBJECTSJune 2019March 2024Abandon5721NoNo
16469317EMULSION EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITION AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFORJune 2019February 2024Abandon5621NoNo
16469518EXOTHERMIC EXPANDABLE COMPOSITIONSJune 2019March 2024Abandon5721NoNo
16468613NANOENERGETIC MATERIAL COMPOSITE-BASED SOLID PROPELLANT, METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAME, AND PROJECTILE USING THE SAMEJune 2019March 2024Allow5721NoNo
16468137IMPROVED EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITIONJune 2019November 2023Abandon5311NoNo
16427663Solid Rocket Motor Propellant Manufacture and ConfigurationsMay 2019September 2025Abandon6041YesYes
16415804ENERGETIC LADEN FIBER FOR EXPLOSIVE CORD FILLMay 2019May 2023Allow4811YesNo
16410875BIODEGRADABLE REACTIVE SHOOTING TARGET AND METHOD OF MANUFACTUREMay 2019February 2024Allow5701NoNo
16389091ELECTRICALLY OPERATED PROPELLANTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USE THEREOFApril 2019June 2024Abandon6031NoNo
16369609COOL BURNING HYDRATE FUELS IN GAS GENERANT FORMULATIONS FOR AUTOMOTIVE AIRBAG APPLICATIONSMarch 2019March 2023Allow4720YesNo
16369591GAS GENERANT COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING A THERMALLY STABLE CRYSTALLINE HYDRATE COMPOUND FOR COOLING COMBUSTION FLAME TEMPERATURE AND IMPROVING BALLISTIC PERFORMANCEMarch 2019September 2022Allow4210YesNo
16369577GAS GENERANT COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING MELAMINE OXALATE FOR USE IN AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT DEVICESMarch 2019February 2026Allow6040NoYes
16353918EXTERNAL HOMOGENIZATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS RELATED THERETOMarch 2019December 2023Allow5721NoNo
16298502DETONATOR-SENSITIVE ASSEMBLED BOOSTER CHARGES FOR USE IN BLASTING ENGINEERING AND THE USE THEREOFMarch 2019August 2020Abandon1710NoNo
16290200THREE PART MIXING PROCESS FOR ENERGETIC MATERIALS AND EPOXY BINDERMarch 2019June 2023Allow5221NoNo
16273942EXTREMELY SLOW PYROTECHNIC STROBE COMPOSITION WITH REDUCED TOXICITYFebruary 2019July 2020Allow1710NoNo
16270016CRYOGENICALLY COMPATIBLE ROCKET PROPELLANTFebruary 2019September 2023Allow5510NoNo
16260157BISMUTH-BASED ENERGETIC MATERIALSJanuary 2019June 2023Allow5221NoNo
16258298MECHANICALLY-GASSED EMULSION EXPLOSIVES AND METHODS RELATED THERETOJanuary 2019May 2022Allow4001NoNo
16250317NON-AMMONIUM NITRATE BASED GENERANTSJanuary 2019March 2024Abandon6021NoYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner FELTON, AILEEN BAKER.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
15
Examiner Affirmed
9
(60.0%)
Examiner Reversed
6
(40.0%)
Reversal Percentile
61.1%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 40.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
46
Allowed After Appeal Filing
19
(41.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
27
(58.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
68.9%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 41.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner FELTON, AILEEN BAKER - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner FELTON, AILEEN BAKER works in Art Unit 1734 and has examined 310 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 61.6%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 46 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner FELTON, AILEEN BAKER's allowance rate of 61.6% places them in the 22% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by FELTON, AILEEN BAKER receive 2.12 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 57% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by FELTON, AILEEN BAKER is 46 months. This places the examiner in the 10% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +3.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by FELTON, AILEEN BAKER. This interview benefit is in the 27% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 11.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 37.5% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 35% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 65.1% of appeals filed. This is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 17.9% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 60.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.3% of allowed cases (in the 56% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 13.6% of allowed cases (in the 91% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.