USPTO Examiner SHIRALI RITU SHIVSHANKAR - Art Unit 1732

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18656578METHODS FOR PREVENTING CRYSTAL MALTITOL FROM CAKING IN STORAGEMay 2024September 2024Allow500NoNo
18542700METHODS FOR PRODUCING PHOTOCATALYSTDecember 2023February 2025Allow1410NoNo
18244136METHOD FOR SPRAY DRYING D-TAGATOSESeptember 2023September 2024Allow1210YesNo
18209840GROUP-III NITRIDE SUBSTRATEJune 2023March 2024Allow900NoNo
18080008ALUMINUM NITRIDE CRYSTALS HAVING LOW URBACH ENERGY AND HIGH TRANSPARENCY TO DEEP-ULTRAVIOLET WAVELENGTHSDecember 2022December 2024Allow2430YesNo
17965899METHOD FOR PRODUCING HYDROGEN AND CARBOXYLIC ACIDOctober 2022December 2023Allow1400NoNo
17948794BIMETALLIC PEROVSKITE LOADED GRAPHENE-LIKE CARBON NITRIDE VISIBLE-LIGHT PHOTOCATALYST AND ITS PREPARATION METHODSeptember 2022October 2024Allow2411NoNo
17690562POROUS TITANIA PHOTOCATALYST ON QUARTZ FIBERS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME FOR CHEMICAL-FREE UV-AOP IN WATER TREATMENTMarch 2022December 2024Abandon3321NoNo
17686436METHODS FOR PRODUCING PHOTOCATALYST, AND USES OF THE PHOTOCATALYST IN DEGRADING NOXMarch 2022November 2023Allow2010NoNo
17753252A CATALYST SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ITS PREPARATIONFebruary 2022December 2024Allow3411NoNo
17545179ALUMINUM NITRIDE SINGLE CRYSTALS HAVING CONTROLLABLE COLOR AND METHODS OF FORMING THEMDecember 2021July 2023Allow1900NoNo
17457329SURFACE TREATMENT AGENT, SURFACE TREATMENT METHOD, AND AREA-SELECTIVE FILM FORMING METHOD ON SUBSTRATE SURFACEDecember 2021February 2025Abandon3940NoNo
17539021SILVER-TITANIUM OXIDE COMPLEX PARTICLE AND METHOD OF PREPARING THE SAMENovember 2021November 2023Abandon2310NoNo
17535596MANUFACTURING METHOD OF TITANIUM DIOXIDE SOLUTION AND TITANIUM DIOXIDE FILMNovember 2021March 2023Allow1610NoNo
17529841DRYING OF ALLULOSE CRYSTALSNovember 2021June 2023Allow1911NoNo
17507783ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY WALL PAINT FOR BUILDING AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOFOctober 2021June 2023Allow1901NoNo
17480320FORMULATION AND METHOD FOR SPRAY-DRYING D-TAGATOSESeptember 2021August 2023Allow2221NoNo
17472795COMPOSITE, COMPACT, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING COMPACTSeptember 2021April 2024Abandon3121NoNo
17471311MYCELIUM-CONTAINING HYBRID MATERIALSSeptember 2021July 2024Allow3521YesNo
17470240METHOD FOR PREPARING MODIFIED CELLULOSE AEROGEL FOR GLYCOPROTEIN SEPARATIONSeptember 2021December 2022Allow1500NoNo
17411316Adhesive, a Production Method of a Wood Board Using the Adhesive and Product ThereofAugust 2021February 2024Allow3021NoNo
17407401MODIFIED SULFURIC ACID AND USES THEREOFAugust 2021December 2023Allow2821NoNo
17430138Method for Bleaching Sugar With Effluent RecyclingAugust 2021December 2024Abandon4010NoNo
17299025COATING COMPOSITIONJune 2021November 2024Allow4241YesYes
17241204FERROSILICATE SSZ-70 MOLECULAR SIEVE, ITS SYNTHESIS AND USEApril 2021February 2025Abandon4530NoYes
17284088Process of Treating Carbonaceous Material and Apparatus ThereforApril 2021December 2024Allow4411NoNo
17275271BI-REFORMING OF HYDROCARBONS TO PRODUCE SYNTHESIS GASMarch 2021January 2025Abandon4611NoNo
17271304COMPOSITE MATERIAL DERIVED FROM LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAMEFebruary 2021September 2024Abandon4341NoNo
17268621PROCESS OF MAKING SILICONE-IN-WATER EMULSIONSFebruary 2021August 2024Allow4250YesNo
17173170LARGE AREA GROUP III NITRIDE CRYSTALS AND SUBSTRATES, METHODS OF MAKING, AND METHODS OF USEFebruary 2021February 2024Allow3621YesNo
17173169LARGE AREA GROUP III NITRIDE CRYSTALS AND SUBSTRATES, METHODS OF MAKING, AND METHODS OF USEFebruary 2021March 2023Allow2511YesNo
17250508PROCESSING OF LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASSJanuary 2021December 2023Allow3530YesNo
17263970SEMI-CRYSTALLINE FRUCTOSE IN SOLID FORM AND PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMEJanuary 2021June 2023Allow2921NoNo
17122268COMPOSITION FOR A STAINLESS COATING, STAINLESS MEMBER INCLUDING THE STAINLESS COATING, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAMEDecember 2020May 2023Allow2911NoNo
17058207POWDER CONTAINING CARBOXYMETHYLATED CELLULOSE NANOFIBERSNovember 2020March 2024Allow4010NoNo
17054339MANNOSE EXTRACTION METHODNovember 2020November 2022Abandon2411NoNo
17048512CONTROLLED PH BIOMASS TREATMENTOctober 2020March 2023Allow2920YesNo
17047816PRODUCTION OF WHITE SUGARS AND HIGH-QUALITY LIQUID SUGARSOctober 2020May 2024Abandon4331NoNo
17047681FRUCTOSE PURIFICATION METHODOctober 2020January 2023Allow2720YesNo
17060770p-type TiO2/n-type WO3 HETEROJUNCTION CATALYST, ITS PREPARATION AND USE IN PHOTOCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS OF FUELSOctober 2020September 2022Allow2411NoNo
17043443CEMENT AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING SELF-PROTECTING CEMENTSeptember 2020January 2025Allow5221NoNo
17043491PHOTOCATALYST TRANSFER FILM AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOFSeptember 2020March 2022Allow1700NoNo
17040802PROCESSING METHANE FOR SYNGAS PRODUCTION WITH REDUCED CO2 EMISSIONSSeptember 2020July 2024Allow4521NoNo
17040150METHOD FOR PRODUCING TETRAHYDROBORATE AND TETRAHYDROBORATESeptember 2020February 2023Allow2911NoNo
16982818COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING LIGNIN AND METHODS FOR MAKING THE SAMESeptember 2020February 2024Abandon4101NoNo
17023720GROUP-III NITRIDE SUBSTRATESeptember 2020March 2023Allow3020YesNo
16980678GLYCOLIDE PRODUCTION METHODSeptember 2020June 2023Abandon3330NoNo
16977159METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A COMPOSITION COMPRISING MICROFIBRILLATED CELLULOSESeptember 2020December 2022Allow2811NoNo
16971765COMPOSITION FOR FORMATION OF ZINC OXIDE THIN FILM, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A ZINC OXIDE THIN FILMAugust 2020July 2024Allow4721YesNo
16970623METHOD OF PRODUCTION OF LIGNIN AND HEMICELLULOSE FROM A PLANT LIGNOCELLULOSIC MATERIALAugust 2020April 2024Allow4431NoNo
16966760Process for the Conversion of a Solid Material Containing Hemicellulose, Cellulose and LigninJuly 2020May 2022Allow2110NoNo
16966817Process for the Conversion of a Solid Material Containing Hemicellulose, Cellulose and LigninJuly 2020July 2022Abandon2310NoNo
16966791Process for the Conversion of a Solid Material Containing Hemicellulose, Cellulose and LigninJuly 2020May 2022Allow2210NoNo
16964703PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF SUGARS FROM BIOMASS DERIVED FROM GUAYULE PLANTSJuly 2020July 2022Allow2410NoNo
16933638OPTICAL MEMBER WITH HARD COAT LAYER-FORMING COMPOSITIONJuly 2020March 2023Abandon3210NoNo
16771791PROCESSES FOR ISOLATION AND RECOVERY OF C5 SUGARSJune 2020February 2024Allow4430NoNo
16896677Organic Composition for Treating RoadsJune 2020August 2023Abandon3820NoNo
16883191NANOCELLULOSE/SURFACTANT COMPOSITEMay 2020January 2023Abandon3221YesNo
16882219IMPROVED GROUP III NITRIDE SUBSTRATE, METHOD OF MAKING, AND METHOD OF USEMay 2020March 2023Allow3311NoNo
16875048Amylopectin-based Cyclic Glucan and Method for Processing the SameMay 2020June 2022Allow2521NoNo
16870744PROTECTIVE COATINGS FOR FERROUS SUBSTRATESMay 2020August 2023Allow3911NoNo
16870673PROTECTIVE COATINGS FOR GALVANIZED STEELMay 2020October 2023Allow4111NoNo
16870728PROTECTIVE COATINGS FOR CONCRETEMay 2020May 2024Allow4821NoNo
16850750FLUORINE-DOPED TIN OXIDE SUPPORT AND Pt CATALYST FOR FUEL CELL COMPRISING THE SAMEApril 2020December 2023Allow4431YesNo
16643064CELLULOSE FIBER-CONTAINING COMPOSITION AND PAINTFebruary 2020June 2022Abandon2710NoNo
16802206METHOD OF MANUFACTURING METAL SINGLE-ATOM CATALYSTSFebruary 2020May 2022Allow2710NoNo
16720518ATOMICALLY DISPERSED PRECURSOR FOR PREPARING A NON-PLATINUM GROUP METAL ELECTROCATALYSTDecember 2019March 2023Allow3931YesNo
16621350METHOD FOR PRODUCING SWEETENER ALLULOSEDecember 2019August 2023Allow4540YesNo
16693736AQUEOUS BONDING COMPOSITIONNovember 2019June 2022Allow3120NoNo
16682898FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTOR INCLUDING A METAL OXIDE COMPOSITE PROTECTIVE LAYER, AND DISPLAY ELEMENT, IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE, AND SYSTEM INCLUDING THE FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORNovember 2019September 2023Allow4631YesNo
16493659GROUP III NITRIDE SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATESeptember 2019February 2023Allow4120NoNo
16489917CELLULOSE FIBERS, CELLULOSE FIBER-CONTAINING COMPOSITION, CELLULOSE FIBER DISPERSION, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELLULOSE FIBERSAugust 2019October 2022Allow3811NoNo
16546877SURFACE TREATMENT AGENT AND SURFACE TREATMENT METHODAugust 2019January 2025Abandon6071NoNo
16480515CELLULOSE ACETATE, CELLULOSE ACETATE COMPOSITION, MOLDED ARTICLE, AND FILMJuly 2019July 2022Allow3521YesNo
16477041A PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC FILMSJuly 2019November 2021Allow2910NoNo
16472482METHOD OF PULPING COTTON-BASED RAW MATERIALJune 2019November 2023Allow5321YesNo
16444147ALUMINUM NITRIDE CRYSTALS HAVING LOW URBACH ENERGY AND HIGH TRANSPARENCY TO DEEP-ULTRAVIOLET WAVELENGTHSJune 2019September 2022Allow3910NoNo
16410667MULTIFUNCTIONAL SELF-CLEANING SURFACE LAYER AND METHODS OF FORMING THE SAMEMay 2019July 2023Allow5021YesNo
16346910THERMALLY STABLE CELLULOSE ESTER COMPOSITIONS AND ARTICLES MADE USING THESE COMPOSITIONSMay 2019January 2024Allow5630NoNo
16341952THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITEApril 2019August 2022Abandon4001NoNo
16225411BIOPOLYMERS HAVING COILED NANOSTRUCTURES AND PROCESSES INCORPORATING THE BIOPOLYMERSDecember 2018March 2022Abandon3901NoNo
16310460A METHOD OF PREPARING INORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR FLOCCULANT BY POLYMERIZING SILICATE AND ZIRCONIUM CHLORIDEDecember 2018July 2022Allow4300NoNo
16013211HARD-COAT-LAYER-FORMING COMPOSITION AND OPTICAL MEMBERJune 2018September 2022Allow5111NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SHIRALI, RITU SHIVSHANKAR.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
1.9%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
2
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(50.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(50.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
77.6%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner SHIRALI, RITU SHIVSHANKAR - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SHIRALI, RITU SHIVSHANKAR works in Art Unit 1732 and has examined 73 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 74.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 35 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SHIRALI, RITU SHIVSHANKAR's allowance rate of 74.0% places them in the 38% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SHIRALI, RITU SHIVSHANKAR receive 1.77 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 39% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SHIRALI, RITU SHIVSHANKAR is 35 months. This places the examiner in the 38% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +27.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SHIRALI, RITU SHIVSHANKAR. This interview benefit is in the 74% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 31.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 63% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 59.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 84% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 50.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 5% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 7.4% of allowed cases (in the 85% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.