USPTO Examiner CULBERT ROBERTS P - Art Unit 1716

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18850990INTEGRATION OF DRY DEVELOPMENT AND ETCH PROCESSES FOR EUV PATTERNING IN A SINGLE PROCESS CHAMBERSeptember 2024April 2025Allow600NoNo
18826224PROCESSING AND RECYCLING METHOD AND PRODUCT OF ULTRATHIN LITHIUM FOILSeptember 2024November 2024Allow200NoNo
18805861SUBSTRATE STRUCTURING METHODAugust 2024October 2024Allow200NoNo
18673409CHEMICAL LIQUID AND CHEMICAL LIQUID STORAGE BODYMay 2024July 2025Allow1310NoNo
18671779SURFACE TREATMENT OF A SULFIDE GLASS SOLID ELECTROLYTE LAYERMay 2024April 2025Allow1110NoNo
18670879POLISHING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USING THE SAMEMay 2024February 2025Allow900NoNo
18670641ION BEAM ETCHING WITH SIDEWALL CLEANINGMay 2024January 2025Allow800NoNo
18626719SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING SYSTEMApril 2024February 2025Allow1000NoNo
18612807TWO-COLOR SELF-ALIGNED DOUBLE PATTERNING (SADP) TO YIELD STATIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (SRAM) AND DENSE LOGICMarch 2024February 2025Allow1100NoNo
18693438METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A MOULD FOR NANOPRINTING AND ASSOCIATED MOULDMarch 2024October 2024Allow701NoNo
18400180PROCESSING METHOD, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND RECORDING MEDIUMDecember 2023February 2025Allow1310NoNo
18392987Microneedle Fabrication and Device ImplantationDecember 2023September 2024Allow900NoNo
18529763POLISHING COMPOSITIONDecember 2023September 2024Allow920YesNo
18529465POLISHING METHOD AND POLISHING COMPOSITIONDecember 2023June 2024Allow610NoNo
18525473Semiconductor Device and MethodNovember 2023February 2025Allow1410NoNo
18505043ALTERNATING ETCH AND PASSIVATION PROCESSNovember 2023January 2025Allow1420NoNo
18447943Plasma-Assisted Etching Of Metal OxidesAugust 2023August 2024Allow1220NoNo
18275266POLISHING COMPOSITIONAugust 2023July 2024Abandon1110NoNo
18275285POLISHING METHOD AND POLISHING COMPOSITIONAugust 2023December 2024Abandon1710NoNo
18362463Method of Forming a Semiconductor DeviceJuly 2023March 2025Allow1910NoNo
18357856THERMAL ATOMIC LAYER ETCHING PROCESSESJuly 2023February 2025Allow1810NoNo
18349444THERMAL ATOMIC LAYER ETCHING PROCESSESJuly 2023October 2024Allow1511NoNo
18269616POLYCRYSTALLINE SiC COMPACT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMEJune 2023May 2025Allow2300NoNo
18258555POLISHING COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF POLISHING SILICON WAFERJune 2023May 2025Allow2300NoNo
18257751ETCHING METHOD WITH METAL HARD MASKJune 2023August 2024Allow1400NoNo
18206037METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING SUBSTRATES USING ONE OR MORE AMORPHOUS CARBON HARDMASK LAYERSJune 2023July 2024Allow1310NoNo
18328790METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEJune 2023August 2024Allow1511NoNo
18038252COMPOSITION FOR POST-POLISHING TO BE USED AFTER PRIMARY POLISHING OF SILICON WAFERSMay 2023October 2023Allow500NoNo
18201061TWO-COLOR SELF-ALIGNED DOUBLE PATTERNING (SADP) TO YIELD STATIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (SRAM) AND DENSE LOGICMay 2023February 2024Allow800YesNo
18143652ETCHING PROCESSES AND PROCESSING ASSEMBLIESMay 2023April 2025Allow2300NoNo
18305875SELECTIVE DEPOSITION OF SIOC THIN FILMSApril 2023April 2024Allow1210NoNo
18137131IDENTIFICATION CODES ON SEMICONDUCTOR CHIPSApril 2023April 2025Allow2400NoNo
18247669ETCHING METHOD AND ETCHING APPARATUSApril 2023April 2025Allow2400NoNo
18125936METHOD FOR FORMING PHOTORESIST PATTERN AND METHOD FOR FORMING PATTERN ON A SUBSTRATEMarch 2023April 2025Allow2500NoNo
18028262RECESS FILLING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUSMarch 2023April 2025Allow2500NoNo
18124593ETCHING METHOD AND PLASMA PROCESSING SYSTEMMarch 2023May 2025Allow2601NoNo
18188255ATOMIC LAYER ETCHING PROCESSESMarch 2023April 2024Allow1310NoNo
18026095ETCHING PROCESSING METHODMarch 2023June 2025Allow2810NoNo
18112302PLASMA PROCESSING METHOD AND PLASMA PROCESSING SYSTEMFebruary 2023April 2025Allow2601NoNo
18168448POLISHING COMPOSITION, POLISHING METHOD, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATEFebruary 2023June 2025Allow2801NoNo
18163522PLASMA ETCHING CHEMISTRIES OF HIGH ASPECT RATIO FEATURES IN DIELECTRICSFebruary 2023June 2024Allow1721YesNo
18101336ETCHING GAS MIXTURE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE USING THE SAMEJanuary 2023February 2025Allow2500NoNo
18156917IN-SITU FOCUS RING COATINGJanuary 2023March 2025Allow2500NoNo
18096032ETCHING METHOD AND PLASMA PROCESSING APPARATUSJanuary 2023May 2025Allow2801NoNo
18013675Etch Rate Modulation of FinFET Through High-Temperature Ion ImplantationDecember 2022April 2025Allow2810YesNo
18056468ALTERNATING ETCH AND PASSIVATION PROCESSNovember 2022August 2023Allow910NoNo
18045003COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR CONDUCTING A MATERIAL REMOVING OPERATIONOctober 2022August 2023Allow1010NoNo
17910587Methods for Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) Resist Patterning DevelopmentSeptember 2022September 2024Allow2420NoNo
17930472METHOD OF ENHANCING THE REMOVAL RATE OF POLYSILICONSeptember 2022April 2024Abandon1920NoYes
17895601METHOD OF PROCESSING SUBSTRATE HAVING SILICON NITRIDE LAYERAugust 2022February 2025Allow3000NoNo
17800611Method for Producing a Nanoscale Channel StructureAugust 2022January 2025Allow2910NoNo
17885228SUBSTRATE PROCESSING WITH SELECTIVE ETCHINGAugust 2022November 2024Allow2700NoNo
17880727POLISHING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USING SAMEAugust 2022March 2024Abandon1911NoNo
17880758POLISHING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFAugust 2022August 2023Allow1210NoNo
17878132SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHODAugust 2022May 2025Allow3301NoNo
17877151METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR FABRICATING A MEMS DEVICEJuly 2022September 2024Allow2501NoNo
17875524TEMPERATURE-CONTROLLED PLASMA GENERATION SYSTEMJuly 2022January 2025Allow3000NoNo
17874614Semiconductor Device and MethodJuly 2022August 2023Allow1310NoNo
17865052METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING VIBRATOR DEVICEJuly 2022November 2024Allow2800NoNo
17859700METHOD FOR INKJET PRINTING AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE USING THE SAMEJuly 2022June 2024Allow2300NoNo
17856376HARD MASK TRIMMING IN METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEJuly 2022September 2024Allow2700NoNo
17854112ATOMIC-SCALE PROCESSING METHOD BY COMBINING EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT AND PLASMAJune 2022January 2023Allow600NoNo
17846929POLISHING OF TRANSITION METALSJune 2022June 2025Allow3611NoNo
17807724MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE AND SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTUREJune 2022June 2023Allow1201NoNo
17807374WET ETCHING APPARATUSJune 2022May 2024Allow2300NoNo
17841443Method of Uniformity ControlJune 2022January 2025Allow3101NoNo
17839869ETCHING METHOD AND ETCHING APPARATUSJune 2022September 2024Allow2701NoNo
17785000CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING LIQUIDJune 2022November 2024Allow3010NoNo
17829884OMNIPHOBIC COMPOSITIONSJune 2022November 2024Allow3001NoNo
17724721TOOL FOR POLISHING GLASS, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING GLASS-POLISHING TOOL, AND METHOD FOR POLISHING GLASSApril 2022January 2025Abandon3301NoNo
17769841ETCHING METHOD, AIR-GAP DIELECTRIC LAYER, AND DYNAMIC RANDOM-ACCESS MEMORYApril 2022November 2023Allow1910NoNo
17712561Low-k Feature Formation Processes and Structures Formed TherebyApril 2022February 2023Allow1110NoNo
17760519PLASMA ETCHING METHODMarch 2022July 2024Allow2810NoNo
17694145SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEMarch 2022August 2024Allow2901NoNo
17693022METHOD OF PROCESSING SUBSTRATE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND RECORDING MEDIUMMarch 2022September 2023Allow1811NoNo
17689236SILICON NITRIDE CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING SLURRY WITH SILICON NITRIDE REMOVAL RATE ENHANCERS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFMarch 2022February 2024Allow2401NoNo
17685611MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICEMarch 2022September 2024Allow3000NoNo
17679415POLISHING COMPOSITION AND POLISHING METHODFebruary 2022October 2024Allow3111NoNo
17674158METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING ETCHANT COMPOSITION HAVING HIGH ETCHING SELECTIVITYFebruary 2022November 2024Allow3310NoNo
17673009POLISHING COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING CHARGED ABRASIVEFebruary 2022February 2023Allow1210NoNo
17670844ETCHING METHOD AND ETCHING APPARATUSFebruary 2022July 2024Allow2911NoNo
17666725METHOD OF RUNNING AN ETCH PROCESS IN HIGHER SELECTIVITY TO MASK AND POLYMER REGIME BY USING A CYCLIC ETCH PROCESSFebruary 2022October 2024Allow3210NoNo
17648840SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUSJanuary 2022February 2024Allow2501NoNo
17648836End Point Control in Etching ProcessesJanuary 2022August 2024Allow3011NoNo
17580936Dynamically Adjusted Purge Timing In Wet Atomic Layer EtchingJanuary 2022December 2023Allow2300NoNo
17647737METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING FABRICATION CHAMBERJanuary 2022September 2022Allow800NoNo
17646389THERMAL ATOMIC LAYER ETCHING PROCESSESDecember 2021April 2023Allow1510NoNo
17646274THERMAL ATOMIC LAYER ETCHING PROCESSESDecember 2021April 2023Allow1510NoNo
17562034SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFDecember 2021January 2025Abandon3721NoNo
17596921ALTERNATING ETCH AND PASSIVATION PROCESSDecember 2021May 2022Allow400NoNo
17645286TRANSISTORS WITH SOURCE-CONNECTED FIELD PLATESDecember 2021August 2024Allow3201NoNo
17620181CHEMICAL-MECHANICAL POLISHING COMPOSITION, RINSE COMPOSITION, CHEMICAL-MECHANICAL POLISHING METHOD, AND RINSING METHODDecember 2021July 2024Allow3100NoNo
17537328PLASMA UNIFORMITY CONTROL IN PULSED DC PLASMA CHAMBERNovember 2021July 2024Allow3200NoNo
17528196SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING SYSTEMNovember 2021January 2024Allow2611NoNo
17595397ETCHING METHOD AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR ELEMENTNovember 2021February 2025Allow3920NoNo
17595416ETCHING METHODNovember 2021June 2024Allow3100NoNo
17611074DEPOSITION OF SELF ASSEMBLED MONOLAYER FOR ENABLING SELECTIVE DEPOSITION AND ETCHNovember 2021June 2022Allow700NoNo
17522403CD DEPENDENT GAP FILL AND CONFORMAL FILMSNovember 2021August 2023Allow2110NoNo
17609572Method for producing a metal-ceramic substrate, and metal-ceramic substrate produced using such a methodNovember 2021April 2024Allow2900NoNo
17514233Non-Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) Method of Forming Sidewall Passivation Layer During High Aspect Ratio Carbon Layer EtchOctober 2021February 2023Allow1620NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CULBERT, ROBERTS P.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
10
Examiner Affirmed
7
(70.0%)
Examiner Reversed
3
(30.0%)
Reversal Percentile
45.3%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 30.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
26
Allowed After Appeal Filing
10
(38.5%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
16
(61.5%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
60.6%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 38.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner CULBERT, ROBERTS P - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CULBERT, ROBERTS P works in Art Unit 1716 and has examined 1,157 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 89.5%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 18 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CULBERT, ROBERTS P's allowance rate of 89.5% places them in the 69% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CULBERT, ROBERTS P receive 0.89 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CULBERT, ROBERTS P is 18 months. This places the examiner in the 94% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -13.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CULBERT, ROBERTS P. This interview benefit is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 45.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 63% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 20.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 25% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 56.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 23% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 30.8% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 41.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 42% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 2.8% of allowed cases (in the 81% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 4% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.