USPTO Examiner BONAPARTE AMY C - Art Unit 1692

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18896739DEVICE AND PROCESS FOR PREPARING SEBACIC ACID THROUGH ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION HEATING COUPLED WITH DRY CONSTANT-TEMPERATURE ALKALINE HYDROLYSISSeptember 2024January 2025Allow410NoNo
18716802LOW BIURET UREA PRODUCTIONJune 2024February 2025Allow810NoNo
18650059GluN2C/D Subunit Selective Antagonists of the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate ReceptorApril 2024April 2025Allow1210YesNo
18378221CATHEPSIN INHIBITORSOctober 2023March 2025Allow1710YesNo
18454685CHEMICAL DERIVATIVES AND METHODS FOR SYNTHESIZING AND COMPOUNDING CHEMICAL DERIVATIVES RELATED TO CAPSAICIN PALMITATE AND CAPSAICIN PRODRUGSAugust 2023March 2025Allow1910YesNo
18349727CHEMOSELECTIVE THIOL-CONJUGATION WITH ALKENE OR ALKYNE-PHOSPHONAMIDATESJuly 2023August 2024Allow1310NoNo
18212456NOVEL PHOTOCLEAVABLE MASS-TAGS FOR MULTIPLEXED MASS SPECTROMETRIC IMAGING OF TISSUES USING BIOMOLECULAR PROBESJune 2023September 2024Allow1500YesNo
18317768GENERATION OF PEROXYFORMIC ACID THROUGH POLYHYDRIC ALCOHOL FORMATEMay 2023June 2025Allow2540YesNo
18141994UREA SYNTHESIS FROM GREENHOUSE GAS AND NITROGEN VIA TRANSITION METAL-FREE CATALYSIS OVER GRAPHITIC CARBON NITRIDEMay 2023June 2025Abandon2650NoNo
18299605Method for Preparing L-GlufosinateApril 2023October 2024Abandon1810NoNo
18245317PROCESS FOR ACID HYDROLYSIS OF PURE POLYLAUROLACTAMMarch 2023May 2025Allow2600NoNo
18043268METHOD FOR PREPARING GUANIDINO ACETIC ACIDFebruary 2023May 2025Allow2610YesNo
18106305Inhibitors of Dihydroceramide Desaturase For Treating DiseaseFebruary 2023October 2024Allow2111NoNo
18106073OXYSTEROLS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFFebruary 2023August 2024Allow1810NoNo
18067293CONTINUOUS-FLOW SYNTHESIS METHOD OF 13C-UREADecember 2022May 2025Abandon2940NoNo
17784533METHOD FOR THE INDUSTRIAL PREPARATION OF THE DISODIUM SALT OF ((2S)-3-([1,1'-BIPHENYL]-4-YL)-2-((HYDROXY((1R)-1-(((1-(ISOBUTYRYLOXY)ETHOXY)CARBONYL)AMINO)ETHYL)PHOSPHORYL) METHYL)PROPANOYL)-L-ALANINEJune 2022March 2025Allow3400NoNo
17825689PROCESS FOR THE SYNTHESIS OF CALEBIN-A AND ITS INTERMEDIATESMay 2022October 2024Allow2910NoNo
17433700METHOD FOR PROCESSING BENZENE POLYCARBOXYLIC ACID ESTERS AND USE OF SAME TO PRODUCE CYCLOHEXANE POLYCARBOXYLIC ACID ESTERSApril 2022June 2025Allow4510YesNo
17724969ANTI-FUNGALS TARGETING THE SYNTHESIS OF FUNGAL SHINGOLIPIDSApril 2022October 2024Abandon3021NoNo
17693620INHIBITOR OF EIF2alpha DEPHOSPHORYLATIONMarch 2022June 2025Allow3910NoNo
17639122AN N,N-DIHYDROCARBONYLAMIDE CARBOXYLIC ACID, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND USE THEREOFMarch 2022May 2025Allow3801YesNo
17627626METHOD FOR PRODUCING ALPHA-ACYLOXYCARBOXYLIC ACID ESTERJanuary 2022April 2025Allow3910NoNo
17623723NEW STABLE FORMULATIONS OF 1-Z-BROMOALK-1-ENE COMPOUNDS AND USE THEREOF IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PHEROMONESDecember 2021December 2024Allow3600NoNo
17622834METHOD FOR RACEMIC PREPARATION OF CHIRAL B-AMINO ACIDS AND DERIVATIVES THEREOFDecember 2021April 2025Abandon3940NoNo
17596381PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DIACYL PEROXIDESDecember 2021September 2024Allow3300YesNo
17526759METHOD FOR PRODUCING SOLID UREA BY GRANULATIONNovember 2021May 2025Allow4231NoNo
17438915PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR UREA PRODUCTIONSeptember 2021December 2024Allow3901YesNo
17438091METHODS FOR FUNCTIONALIZATION HYDROCARBONSSeptember 2021May 2025Allow4421YesNo
17435831LIGANDS FOR PRODUCTION OF 1-OCTENE IN CHROMIUM ASSISTED ETHYLENE OLIGOMERIZATION PROCESSSeptember 2021June 2025Allow4521YesNo
17435731Process for preparing {6-[(diethylamino)methyl]naphthalen-2-yl}methyl [4-(hydroxycarbamoyl)phenyl]carbamate having high puritySeptember 2021August 2024Allow3521YesNo
17182413PHENOXY CARBOXYLIC ACID COMPOUNDS AND MEDICAL USES THEREOFAugust 2021March 2025Allow4911YesNo
17423273AGENT FOR INITIATING A RADICAL ADDITION REACTION AND PROCESS USING ITJuly 2021May 2025Allow4630NoNo
17420886SALT-FREE PRODUCTION OF METHIONINE FROM METHIONINE NITRILEJuly 2021August 2024Allow3710YesNo
17357061METHOD FOR PRODUCING FLUOROALKOXIDEJune 2021March 2025Allow4551YesNo
17417599COMPOSITION FOR PRODUCING N-VINYL CARBOXYLIC ACID AMIDEJune 2021October 2024Allow4020YesNo
17416489A process for preparation of amides and esters of 2-((2-hydroxypropanoyl)oxy)propanoic acidJune 2021May 2025Allow4640NoNo
17414995OXIDATIVE PREPARATION OF MALEIC ACIDJune 2021July 2024Allow3720NoNo
17415271PREPARATION OF A LYSINATE COMPOUND FROM AN AQUEOUS LYSINE SOLUTIONJune 2021June 2025Allow4831NoNo
17413540METHOD FOR PRODUCING METHIONINEJune 2021August 2024Allow3820YesNo
17298477FLUORESCENT PROBE FOR DETECTING CARBOXYPEPTIDASE ACTIVITYMay 2021September 2024Allow3910YesNo
17291908NEGATIVELY CHARGED PEG-LIPID CONJUGATESMay 2021April 2025Allow4711YesNo
17208092Biocidal CompoundMarch 2021January 2025Abandon4631YesNo
17113343Calcium-based Catalyst and Method for Catalytically Synthesizing Alkanolamide Surfactant thereofDecember 2020September 2024Allow4521YesNo
17046432UREA MANUFACTURING METHODOctober 2020April 2025Abandon5430NoNo
16760684SPIRO COMPOUNDS AS MALODOR COUNTERACTING INGREDIENTSApril 2020November 2024Allow5421YesNo
16204413METHOD FOR PREPARING N-[4-(2-{[2-(4-METHANE SULFONAMIDOPHENOXY) ETHYL](METHYL)AMINO}ETHYL)PHENYL]METHANESULFONAMIDE (DOFETILIDE)November 2018June 2019Allow600NoNo
16113624PROCESS FOR PREPARING BIPHENYLAMINES FROM ANILIDES BY RUTHENIUM CATALYSISAugust 2018October 2018Allow200YesNo
16076486AN IMPROVED PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF LACOSAMIDEAugust 2018June 2019Allow1010YesNo
16070111FLUORINE ATOM-CONTAINING COMPOUND AND USE THEREOFJuly 2018February 2019Allow700YesNo
15740245METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION OF ALKYLSALICYLALDEHYDE AND ALKYLSALICYLALDOXIME, AND USE THEREOFDecember 2017October 2018Allow1010YesNo
15547772MANUFACTURE OF A CHARGE DIRECTORJuly 2017July 2018Allow1210YesNo
15506611RECOVERY PROCESS FOR FUNCTIONALIZED COMPOUND REACTION PRODUCTFebruary 2017January 2020Allow3431YesNo
15305865PROCESS FOR PREPARING BIPHENYLAMINES FROM ANILIDES BY RUTHENIUM CATALYSISOctober 2016April 2018Allow1811YesNo
15126526AN IMPROVED PROCESS FOR THE SYNTHESIS OF DIMETHYL FUMARATESeptember 2016January 2020Allow4040YesNo
14423963SULFAMOYL-ARYLAMIDES AND THE USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HEPATITIS BFebruary 2015September 2016Allow1830YesNo
13094657Process for Removing Water From Alcohol MixturesApril 2011February 2014Allow3410NoNo
123770002, 2', 6, 6'- TETRASUBSTITUTED AMINOPHOSPHINE LIGAND AND ITS SYNTHESIS METHODJune 2009January 2014Allow5901YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner BONAPARTE, AMY C - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BONAPARTE, AMY C works in Art Unit 1692 and has examined 54 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 87.0%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 36 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BONAPARTE, AMY C's allowance rate of 87.0% places them in the 61% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BONAPARTE, AMY C receive 1.65 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 45% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BONAPARTE, AMY C is 36 months. This places the examiner in the 16% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +24.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BONAPARTE, AMY C. This interview benefit is in the 74% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 31.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 38.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 52% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 83% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 3% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 8.5% of allowed cases (in the 86% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.