USPTO Examiner KAPUSHOC STEPHEN THOMAS - Art Unit 1683

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18606093COLORECTAL CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODMarch 2024February 2026Allow2300NoNo
18604659PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODMarch 2024July 2025Allow1600NoNo
18416797ANALYTE SEQUENCING WITH NANOPORESJanuary 2024August 2025Allow1921NoNo
18577460DEVICES, KITS, AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING INCREASED SUSCEPTIBILITY TO AND TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF PERIODONTITIS, ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE, AND OTHER CONDITIONSJanuary 2024November 2025Abandon2221NoNo
18405371LUNG CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODJanuary 2024April 2025Allow1600NoNo
18538488NON-INVASIVE DETECTION OF FETAL GENETIC TRAITSDecember 2023April 2025Abandon1620NoNo
18514603BREAST CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODNovember 2023April 2025Allow1700NoNo
18509767STOMACH CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODNovember 2023March 2025Allow1600NoNo
18502378BIOMARKER FOR PREDICTING AGE IN DAYS OF PIGS, AND PREDICTION METHODNovember 2023April 2025Abandon1821NoNo
18491272LIVER CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODOctober 2023August 2024Allow1000YesNo
18473061DNA Damage Repair Inhibitors for Treatment of CancerSeptember 2023March 2025Abandon1801NoNo
18455537METHODS OF MONITORING IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPIES IN A TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTAugust 2023September 2025Abandon2521NoNo
18455517METHODS OF MONITORING IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPIES IN A TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTAugust 2023September 2025Abandon2521NoNo
18455499METHODS OF MONITORING IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPIES IN A TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTAugust 2023September 2025Abandon2521NoNo
18455488METHODS OF MONITORING IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPIES IN A TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTAugust 2023May 2025Abandon2021NoNo
18455480METHODS OF MONITORING IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPIES IN A TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTAugust 2023September 2025Abandon2521NoNo
18455462METHODS OF MONITORING IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPIES IN A TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTAugust 2023September 2025Abandon2521NoNo
18455527METHODS OF MONITORING IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPIES IN A TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTAugust 2023June 2025Abandon2231NoNo
18455456METHODS OF MONITORING IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPIES IN A TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTAugust 2023June 2025Abandon2231NoNo
18361440BILIARY TRACT CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODJuly 2023July 2024Allow1200NoNo
18215608SMALL RNA PREDICTORS FOR HUNTINGTON'S DISEASEJune 2023February 2025Abandon2001NoNo
18170241ASSOCIATION OF GENETIC VARIATIONS TO DIAGNOSE AND TREAT ATTENTION-DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER (ADHD)February 2023July 2024Allow1711YesNo
18167807DIAGNOSTIC ASSAY FOR TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION STATUSFebruary 2023March 2026Allow3721YesNo
18160918SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING MULTI-MOLECULE BIOMARKERSJanuary 2023September 2024Allow1921YesNo
18091186CIRCULATING RNA SIGNATURES SPECIFIC TO PREECLAMPSIADecember 2022August 2024Allow2021YesNo
17977723METHYLATED MARKERS FOR COLORECTAL CANCEROctober 2022July 2025Allow3231NoNo
17945243COLORECTAL CANCER DETECTION KIT OR DEVICE, AND DETECTION METHODSeptember 2022October 2024Abandon2520NoNo
17930488BIOMARKERS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF FIBROTIC LUNG DISEASESeptember 2022July 2025Allow3421NoNo
17905899METHODS OF DETERMINING WHETHER A SUBJECT HAS OR IS AT RISK OF HAVING A CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHYSeptember 2022November 2025Allow3810YesNo
17905511COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE EFFICACY OF INHIBITORS OF NEUROTRANSMITTER TRANSPORTERSSeptember 2022February 2026Allow4221YesNo
17908618microRNAS MARKERS OF THROMBOSIS CONDITIONSSeptember 2022January 2026Abandon4110NoNo
17798427METHOD FOR EVALUATING AND PREDICTING PLACENTA-DERIVED DISEASES AND KITAugust 2022January 2026Abandon4101NoNo
17797253METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MULTIPLEX ALLELE DETECTIONAugust 2022January 2026Abandon4101NoNo
17816210METHODS AND KITS COMPRISING GENE SIGNATURES FOR STRATIFYING BREAST CANCER PATIENTSJuly 2022July 2024Allow2311YesNo
17796603DETERMINATION OF FETAL GENOTYPE USING MATERNAL BIOLOGICAL SAMPLEJuly 2022January 2026Abandon4201NoNo
17759833METHOD FOR SELECTING SPERMATOZOA, IN PARTICULAR FOR MEDICALLY ASSISTED PROCREATION (MAP)July 2022November 2025Allow4010YesNo
17807774CHIMERIC TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR VARIANTS WITH AUGMENTED SENSITIVITY TO DRUG LIGAND INDUCTION OF TRANSGENE EXPRESSION IN MAMMALIAN CELLSJune 2022January 2026Abandon4301NoNo
17787035Genome-Wide Detection of DNA Repeats Expanded in DiseaseJune 2022December 2025Abandon4201NoNo
17778729METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DIAGNOSING AND TREATING CHRONIC MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CMML)May 2022December 2025Abandon4301NoNo
17777467METHODS AND BIOMARKERS FOR DIAGNOSTICS, DISEASE MONITORING, PERSONALIZED DRUG DISCOVERY AND TARGETED THERAPY OF MALIGNANT AND NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE CONDITIONSMay 2022December 2025Abandon4301NoNo
17777497METHODS AND BIOMARKERS FOR DIAGNOSTICS, DISEASE MONITORING, PERSONALIZED DRUG DISCOVERY AND TARGETED THERAPY OF AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE CONDITIONSMay 2022December 2025Abandon4301NoNo
17726809Processes and Compositions for Methylation-Based Enrichment of Fetal Nucleic Acid From a Maternal Sample Useful for Non-Invasive Prenatal DiagnosesApril 2022February 2025Abandon3421NoNo
17768181A MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM FOR PREDICTING CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND IDENTIFYING DRUG TARGETS IN ISCHEMIC STROKEApril 2022August 2025Allow4011YesNo
17672343AMPLIFICATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDSFebruary 2022November 2025Abandon4501NoNo
17669081METHODS FOR PROFILING AND QUANTITATING CELL-FREE RNAFebruary 2022March 2025Allow3731YesYes
17579041Genomics-Assisted Prediction Method for Apple Fruit Quality Traits and Disease Resistance and Use ThereofJanuary 2022December 2025Abandon4731NoNo
17544354METHODS USING CHARACTERISTICS OF URINARY AND OTHER DNADecember 2021December 2025Allow4831YesNo
17497270Biomarkers of CancerOctober 2021December 2025Abandon5032NoNo
17475584COMPOSITIONS FOR DETECTING EPIGENETIC MODIFICATIONSSeptember 2021September 2024Allow3621YesNo
17329847THROMBOEMBOLIC DISEASEMay 2021December 2025Abandon5441NoNo
17317240NON-INVASIVE DETECTION OF FETAL GENETIC TRAITSMay 2021January 2025Abandon4431YesNo
17307152METHODS FOR DETECTING MUTATIONAL SIGNATURES USING TARGETED PANELSMay 2021November 2025Abandon5441NoNo
17227157Biomarkers for the Identification of Prostate Cancer and Methods of UseApril 2021July 2025Abandon5231NoNo
17222810DETERMINING RISK OF PROSTATE TUMOR AGGRESSIVENESSApril 2021February 2026Abandon5931NoYes
17276043SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF DELIRIUM RISK USING EPIGENETIC MARKERSMarch 2021September 2025Abandon5512NoNo
17198897DETECTION OF EXPRESSION OF MARKERS USEFUL FOR PREDICTING RISK OF CATASTROPHIC INJURIES IN ATHLETIC ANIMALSMarch 2021August 2024Allow4141YesNo
17265102ELIMINATION PROBE-BASED METHOD FOR DETECTING NUMERICAL CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES, AND NUCLEIC ACID COMPOSITION FOR DETECTING NUMERICAL CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIESFebruary 2021January 2025Abandon4821NoNo
17263757Methods of Detecting Inherited Myopathies in HorsesJanuary 2021March 2025Allow5021YesNo
17122946Particles with RNA Cleaving Nucleobase Polymers and Uses for Managing Inflammatory DisordersDecember 2020October 2025Abandon5821NoNo
17079196METHODS FOR DETECTION OF MACRO-HETEROPLASMY AND MICRO-HETEROPLASMY IN MITOCHONDRIAL DNAOctober 2020June 2024Allow4421YesYes
17028377Computational Design of Self-Assembling Cyclic Protein Homo-oligomersSeptember 2020September 2024Allow4711NoNo
16979615METHODS OF IDENTIFYING, SELECTING, AND PRODUCING DISEASE RESISTANT CROPSSeptember 2020July 2024Allow4621NoNo
17001144METHOD OF DETECTING CANCER THROUGH GENERALIZED LOSS OF STABILITY OF EPIGENETIC DOMAINS AND COMPOSITIONS THEREOFAugust 2020July 2025Allow5942NoNo
16969923CLASSIFIER FOR IDENTIFICATION OF ROBUST SEPSIS SUBTYPESAugust 2020November 2025Allow6021YesYes
16969304METHODS FOR SUBTYPING OF BLADDER CANCERAugust 2020September 2024Allow4911YesNo
16959431REFERENCE MATERIAL FOR NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFJune 2020September 2022Abandon2611NoNo
16956204PREDICTING CHRONIC ALLOGRAFT INJURY THROUGH ISCHEMIA-INDUCED DNA METHYLATIONJune 2020November 2024Abandon6041YesNo
16900275GENETICALLY ENCODED FLUORESCENT-IRON FERRITIN NANOPARTICLE PROBES FOR DETECTING AN INTRACELLULAR TARGET BY FLUORESCENT AND ELECTRON MICROSCOPYJune 2020February 2026Allow6021YesNo
16771733INFECTION-RELATED PRETERM BIRTH DIAGNOSTIC METHODJune 2020April 2025Abandon5841NoNo
16757505SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS AND FEEDING EFFICIENCY IN CATTLEApril 2020September 2024Allow5331YesNo
16838653GENE CLASSIFIERS FOR USE IN MONITORING UV DAMAGEApril 2020March 2025Abandon6031NoNo
16836498METHODS FOR PROFILING AND QUANTITATING CELL-FREE RNAMarch 2020October 2025Allow6032YesNo
16708543PREDICTION METHOD FOR RISK OF ISCHEMIC STROKE ONSETDecember 2019November 2024Abandon5941YesNo
16698411GENES AND POLYMORPHISMS ASSOCIATED WITH AGE RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION (AMD)November 2019January 2025Abandon6011NoNo
16692276EVALUATING GENETIC DISORDERSNovember 2019October 2025Abandon6021NoNo
16358825THERAPEUTIC TREATMENT OF SELECT DIFFUSE LARGE B CELL LYMPHOMAS EXHIBITING DISTINCT PATHOGENIC MECHANISMS AND OUTCOMESMarch 2019November 2025Allow6051YesNo
15999597EPIGENOMIC PROFILING REVEALS THE SOMATIC PROMOTER LANDSCAPE OF PRIMARY GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMAAugust 2018April 2025Allow6050YesNo
15501761METHOD FOR DETERMINING STATE OF DIFFERENTIATION OF STEM CELLS, AND NOVEL DIFFERENTIATION MARKER USED THEREFORFebruary 2017May 2020Allow3931NoNo
15368073Genomic Regions with Epigenetic Variation That Contribute to Phenotypic Differences in LivestockDecember 2016February 2020Allow3931YesNo
14822873METHOD OF USING FOXO3A POLYMORPHISMS AND HAPLOTYPES TO PREDICT AND PROMOTE HEALTHY AGING AND LONGEVITYAugust 2015January 2020Allow5351YesNo
14796590MEANS AND METHODS FOR HAPLOTYPING MHC-DRB LOCI IN MAMMALS AND USES THEREOFJuly 2015October 2017Allow2721YesNo
14600419Composition for Diagnosing Recurring Glioblastoma Multiforme and Method for Diagnosing SameJanuary 2015December 2018Allow4642YesNo
14584788DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR DETERMINING PROGNOSIS OF NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCERDecember 2014January 2018Allow3631YesNo
14253592MARKERS OF TUMOR CELL RESPONSE TO ANTI-CANCER THERAPYApril 2014March 2018Allow4731YesNo
13790309COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DIAGNOSING AUTISMMarch 2013April 2017Allow5041YesNo
13565105Haplotype AnalysisAugust 2012April 2013Allow910NoNo
13357416SCHIZOPHRENIA-RELATED ISOFORM OF KCNH2 AND DEVELOPMENT OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGSJanuary 2012June 2014Allow2921NoNo
13255871GENOTYPING TOOL FOR IMPROVING THE PROGNOSTIC AND CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF MS PATIENTSNovember 2011May 2014Allow3321YesYes
13279947DETECTION OF HIGH GRADE DYSPLASIA IN CERVICAL CELLSOctober 2011March 2019Allow60101YesNo
13203810METHOD FOR DETERMINING SENSITIVITY TO IRINOTECAN AND USE THEREOFAugust 2011May 2015Allow4431YesNo
13211373METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ELITE EVENT RF-BN1 IN BRASSICA PLANT MATERIALAugust 2011July 2012Allow1111NoNo
13155555METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERJune 2011June 2018Allow6081YesNo
13155199RGS2 GENOTYPES ASSOCIATED WITH EXTRAPYRAMIDAL SYMPTOMS INDUCED BY ANTIPSYCHOTIC MEDICATIONJune 2011December 2014Allow4241YesNo
13094729CANCER BIOMARKERS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFApril 2011June 2024Allow60161YesNo
13026173MARKERS FOR DETERMINATION OF PATIENT RESPONSIVENESSFebruary 2011April 2014Allow3921YesYes
13019906DIAGNOSTIC METHODS INVOLVING DETERMINING GENE COPY NUMBERS AND SNPS IN THE FC-GAMMA-RII/ FC-GAMMA-RIII GENE CLUSTER, AND PROBES FOR USE IN SUCH METHODS TO DETECT SUSCEPTIBILITY TO AND TREATMENT EFFICACY IN AUTOIMMUNE DISEASESFebruary 2011February 2014Allow3741YesYes
12981529METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR GENETICALLY DETECTING IMPROVED MILK PRODUCTION TRAITS IN CATTLEDecember 2010February 2016Allow6021YesYes
12935098PROCESS AND METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING ALZHEIMER'S DISEASEDecember 2010March 2013Allow2921YesNo
12969744NOVEL POLYMORPHISM IN BOVINE PRION PROTEIN GENE SEQUENCEDecember 2010September 2013Allow3321NoNo
12948722PROBE, PROBE SET, PROBE CARRIER, AND TESTING METHODNovember 2010January 2012Allow1411NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
91.6%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
11
Allowed After Appeal Filing
6
(54.5%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
5
(45.5%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
86.1%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 54.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS works in Art Unit 1683 and has examined 107 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 85.0%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS's allowance rate of 85.0% places them in the 61% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS receive 2.86 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 83% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 7% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +28.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by KAPUSHOC, STEPHEN THOMAS. This interview benefit is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 25.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 43.9% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 67% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 90.9% of appeals filed. This is in the 83% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 60.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 70.6% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 19.6% of allowed cases (in the 98% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.2% of allowed cases (in the 69% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.