USPTO Examiner HANEY AMANDA MARIE - Art Unit 1682

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18662886METHOD FOR EVALUATING TEA PLANT (+)-CATECHIN CONTENTMay 2024January 2025Allow810NoNo
18418913EPIGENETIC MARKERS AND RELATED METHODS AND MEANS FOR THE DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF CERTAIN CANCERSJanuary 2024June 2025Allow1721YesNo
18394729SEROTONIN TRANSPORTER GENE AND TREATMENT OF OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERSDecember 2023December 2024Allow1110NoNo
18535773MLH1 METHYLATION ASSAYDecember 2023July 2025Allow1920NoNo
18527076METHODS OF IDENTIFYING AND TREATING TUMORS WITH SIGMA1 INHIBITORSDecember 2023August 2025Abandon2111NoNo
18513107THERAPEUTIC AND DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR CANCERNovember 2023December 2024Abandon1310NoNo
18379355EXTRACT FROM A BODY FLUID COMPRISING A MICRO RNAOctober 2023June 2025Allow2031NoNo
18240789METHODS OF IDENTIFYING AND TREATING A PERSON HAVING A PREDISPOSITION TO OR AFFLICTED WITH A CARDIOMETABOLIC DISEASEAugust 2023August 2025Allow2330NoNo
18339400KIT, DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR DETECTING BLADDER CANCERJune 2023October 2024Allow1611YesNo
18332648BIOMARKER PANEL AND METHODS FOR DETECTING MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY IN CANCERSJune 2023August 2025Allow2721YesNo
18328070STRATIFICATION AND PROGNOSIS OF CANCERJune 2023November 2024Abandon1710NoNo
18311703DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF IMP CARBAPENEMASES USING REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION ASSAYMay 2023July 2024Allow1410NoNo
18308706Methods and Compositions for Sequentially Detecting TargetsApril 2023November 2024Allow1910NoNo
18306648METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR RISK PREDICTION, DIAGNOSIS, PROGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT OF PULMONARY DISORDERSApril 2023April 2025Allow2431YesNo
18249615METHODS OF ASSESSING RISK OF DEVELOPING A DISEASEApril 2023March 2026Abandon3501NoNo
18131204PKD MUTATIONS AND EVALUATION OF SAMEApril 2023March 2025Abandon2431NoNo
18182868CIRCULATING SERUM MICRORNA BIOMARKERS AND METHODS FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE DIAGNOSISMarch 2023May 2025Allow2611NoNo
18023933COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DIAGNOSING AND TREATING A DYSTONIAFebruary 2023March 2026Abandon3701NoNo
18162572COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USING RNA FRAGMENTSJanuary 2023September 2025Abandon3231YesNo
18003658EPIGENETIC BIOMARKER COMPOSITION FOR DIAGNOSING DOWN SYNDROME, AND USE THEREOFDecember 2022June 2025Allow3031YesNo
18055189MITOCHONDRIAL DNA PROSTATE CANCER MARKER AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODSNovember 2022January 2026Abandon3831NoNo
17967277GENE AND MUTATIONS THEREOF ASSOCIATED WITH SEIZURE AND MOVEMENT DISORDERSOctober 2022February 2025Allow2841NoNo
17945832METHODS AND KITS FOR EVALUATING THE RISK OF DISEASES OR CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH ATHEROSCLEROSISSeptember 2022February 2026Abandon4111YesNo
17910206METHOD FOR ASSESSING DIFFERENTIATION STATE OF CELLS, GELATIN NANOPARTICLES AND GELATIN NANOPARTICLE SETSeptember 2022January 2026Abandon4111NoNo
17888290BIOMARKERS OF ORAL, PHARYNGEAL AND LARYNGEAL CANCERSAugust 2022December 2025Abandon4010NoNo
17739731POINT-OF-CARE IMMUNOASSAY FOR QUANTITATIVE SMALL ANALYTE DETECTIONMay 2022November 2025Abandon4201NoNo
17699761Method Of Determining PIK3CA Mutational Status In A SampleMarch 2022April 2025Allow3700NoNo
17651793LONGITUDINAL MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS DETECT SOMATIC REVERSION MUTATIONSFebruary 2022January 2025Abandon3510NoNo
17651397DIAGNOSIS, PROGNOSIS AND TREATMENT FOR SCHIZOPHRENIA AND SCHIZOAFFECTIVE PSYCHOSISFebruary 2022November 2024Abandon3321NoNo
17579900Determining Antigen-Specific T-CellsJanuary 2022March 2025Allow3811NoNo
17596711METHODS FOR PREDICTING DRUG RESPONSIVENESS IN CANCER PATIENTSDecember 2021February 2026Abandon5011NoNo
17539023NOVEL FUSION MOLECULES AND USES THEREOFNovember 2021April 2025Allow4021YesNo
17594567METHOD OF DETERMINING ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY AND APPLICATION THEREOFOctober 2021September 2025Allow4721YesNo
17448662HIGHLY SENSITIVE IMMUNOCONJUGATE, PREPARING METHOD THEREOF, IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC REAGENT AND IN VITRO DIAGNOSTIC KIT INCLUDING THE SAMESeptember 2021September 2025Abandon4820NoNo
17437381CANCER DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSISSeptember 2021April 2025Abandon4301NoNo
17435766METHOD FOR DETERMINING SIDE EFFECTS OF TRASTUZUMAB AND KIT FOR SAMESeptember 2021February 2025Abandon4201NoNo
17434675DNA METHYLATION MARKER FOR PREDICTING RECURRENCE OF LIVER CANCER, AND USE THEREOFAugust 2021July 2025Allow4730NoNo
17432813PROCESS FOR CLASSIFICATION OF GLIOMAAugust 2021February 2026Abandon5421NoNo
17430877BIOMARKERSAugust 2021December 2024Abandon4001NoNo
17395769SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM MARKER FOR PRECOCIOUS PUBERTY DIAGNOSIS OR TREATMENT PROGNOSIS PREDICTION, AND USE THEREOFAugust 2021February 2025Allow4321NoNo
17372255ULTRA-HIGH-THROUGHPUT ASSAY FOR TELOMERASE REPEAT ADDITION PROCESSIVITYJuly 2021January 2025Allow4221NoNo
17368610Methods, Compositions and Systems for Detecting PNPLA3 Allelic VariantsJuly 2021July 2025Abandon5441NoNo
17418298METHOD FOR DETECTING POLYMERASE INCORPORATION OF NUCLEOTIDESJune 2021September 2025Abandon5111NoNo
17299885Methods for Detecting Cell Wall-Deficient Bacteria (CWDB) in Biological SamplesJune 2021September 2025Abandon5120NoNo
17299132DNA METHYLATION BIOMARKERS FOR EARLY DETECTION OF CERVICAL CANCERJune 2021July 2025Allow4931YesNo
17293869Compositions and Methods for DNA Modification DetectionMay 2021April 2025Allow4711NoNo
17179976METHODS OF PREDICTING AGE, AND IDENTIFYING AND TREATING CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH AGINGFebruary 2021August 2025Abandon5440YesNo
17171101CARRIER STATUS OF ANNEXIN A5 M2 HAPLOTYPE AND OBSTETRIC RISKSFebruary 2021August 2025Allow5420NoNo
17266492METHODS FOR MEASURING RIBOSOMAL METHYLATION AGEFebruary 2021October 2024Abandon4521NoNo
17146294Methods for Diagnosis of TuberculosisJanuary 2021June 2025Abandon5321NoNo
17257932COMPOSITIONS FOR THERAPEUTICS PRESCREENINGJanuary 2021October 2024Abandon4501NoNo
17138314ENZYMATIC CIRCUITS FOR MOLECULAR SENSORSDecember 2020April 2024Abandon3920YesNo
17256334HIGH THROUGHPUT ASSEMBLY OF NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULESDecember 2020July 2025Abandon5521NoNo
17250244METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS RELATING TO PERSONALIZED PAIN MANAGEMENTDecember 2020June 2025Abandon5421NoNo
17118322COMBINATIONS OF CELL FREE NUCLEIC ACIDSDecember 2020March 2025Allow5151YesNo
17114912METHODS AND PROBES FOR IDENTIFYING GENE ALLELESDecember 2020December 2024Abandon4841NoNo
16973407DEVICES AND METHOD FOR DETECTING AN AMPLIFICATION EVENTDecember 2020November 2025Allow5931YesNo
17056881CIRCULATORY BIOMARKERS FOR PLACENTAL OR FETAL HEALTHNovember 2020September 2025Allow5841YesNo
17053834GENOME-WIDE CLASSIFIERS FOR DETECTION OF SUBACUTE TRANSPLANT REJECTION AND OTHER TRANSPLANT CONDITIONSNovember 2020July 2024Allow4541YesNo
16980812Non-Invasive Classification of Benign and Malignant Melanocytic Lesions Using MicroRNA ProfilingSeptember 2020October 2024Abandon4911NoNo
16938847Methods for Detecting and Treating Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisJuly 2020November 2025Abandon6032NoNo
16963479PRECISION MEDICINE FOR PAIN: DIAGNOSTIC BIOMARKERS, PHARMACOGENOMICS, AND REPURPOSED DRUGSJuly 2020October 2025Abandon6041YesNo
16766366USE OF ADIPOQ GENE EXPRESSION LEVEL FOR CLASSIFICATION OF A SUBJECT IN RISK GROUPS IN THE PROGNOSIS OR DIAGNOSIS OF TYPE II DIABETES MELLITUSJune 2020October 2024Allow5331YesNo
16650258MOLECULAR SIGNATURES OF THREE SUB-POPULATIONS OF DERMAL FIBROBLASTS AND DERMAL EQUIVALENT COMPRISING ONE OF THESE SUB-POPULATIONSMarch 2020July 2025Allow6032YesNo
16636320USE OF IMMUNE CELL-SPECIFIC GENE EXPRESSION FOR PROGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER AND PREDICTION OF RESPONSIVENESS TO RADIATION THERAPYFebruary 2020August 2025Allow6042YesNo
16623725TRANSPLANT PATIENT MONITORING WITH CELL-FREE DNADecember 2019January 2023Abandon3760NoYes
16623719ASSESSING CONDITIONS IN TRANSPLANT SUBJECTS USING DONOR-SPECIFIC CELL-FREE DNADecember 2019December 2024Abandon6050NoYes
16685439METHOD OF IMPROVING PREDICTION OF RESPONSE FOR CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMMUNOTHERAPYNovember 2019September 2025Allow6091YesNo
16610001THERANOSTIC TOOLS FOR MANAGEMENT OF PANCREATIC CANCER AND ITS PRECURSORSOctober 2019September 2024Allow5961YesNo
16499290COMPANION DIAGNOSTICS FOR LEUKEMIA TREATMENTSeptember 2019November 2024Abandon6041NoNo
16323490DNA METHYLATION BASED PREDICTOR OF MORTALITYFebruary 2019December 2025Abandon6023NoYes
16320379PHASINGJanuary 2019December 2024Abandon6051NoNo
16249104CLONAL HEMATOPOIESIS AND CYTOKINE TARGETSJanuary 2019January 2026Abandon60131NoNo
15978332METHODS AND DEVICES FOR BONE INFECTION TREATMENT SELECTIONMay 2018December 2018Allow710YesNo
15735567DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS DISEASEDecember 2017January 2025Abandon6061NoNo
15821960GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS ASSOCIATED WITH MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION, METHODS OF DETECTION AND USES THEREOFNovember 2017September 2019Allow2211YesNo
15415476Methods and Systems for Predicting Whether a Subject Has a Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) Lesion from a Suspension Sample of Cervical CellsJanuary 2017September 2025Allow6081NoYes
15315808Method and Systems for Lung Cancer DiagnosisDecember 2016April 2020Allow4012YesNo
14676987USE OF GTF21 MUTATIONS IN THE PROGNOSIS OF THYMIC CANCERSApril 2015June 2016Allow1520YesNo
13997450METHOD FOR DIAGNOSING HEMATOLOGICAL DISORDERSJune 2013June 2016Allow3641YesNo
13682303ASSESSMENT AND REDUCTION OF RISK OF GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASENovember 2012March 2015Allow2821YesNo
13676382CELLULAR ARRAYS AND METHODS OF DETECTING AND USING GENETIC DISORDER MARKERSNovember 2012November 2015Allow3640YesNo
13516617DETECTION OF STREPTOCOCCUS PNEUMONIAE THROUGH MAGNETO-AMPEROMETRIC GENOSENSORS USING LYTA GENE-SPECIFIC PRIMERS AND PROBESNovember 2012November 2015Allow4131YesNo
13696196FOOD-POISONING BACTERIA DETECTION CARRIER, AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FOOD-POISONING BACTERIANovember 2012June 2015Allow3231YesNo
13522348SET OF PROBES FOR THE DETECTION AND TYPING OF 46 HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS MUCOSAL TYPESOctober 2012March 2015Allow3211NoNo
13351485Prognostic Signature for Colorectal Cancer RecurrenceJanuary 2012August 2015Allow4351YesNo
13245706MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR PREDICTING BRAIN METASTASIS OF BREAST CANCERSeptember 2011January 2017Allow6031YesNo
13150799GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING OF EGFR POSITIVE CANCERJune 2011November 2011Allow610NoNo
13103407POLARIZATION-ENHANCED DETECTOR WITH GOLD NANORODS FOR DETECTING NANOSCALE ROTATIONAL MOTION AND METHOD THEREFORMay 2011February 2012Allow1020NoNo
13103497POLARIZATION-ENHANCED DETECTOR WITH GOLD NANORODS FOR DETECTING NANOSCALE ROTATIONAL MOTION AND METHOD THEREFORMay 2011March 2012Allow1020YesNo
12994192NATURAL KILLER P30 (NKP30) DYSFUNCTION AND THE BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS THEREOFNovember 2010November 2016Allow6053YesNo
12912421SUSCEPTIBILITY GENE FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASEOctober 2010November 2011Allow1320YesNo
12524865MUTATIONS IN HUMAN UBIAD1April 2010August 2012Allow3721YesNo
12386146SPLICE VARIANTS OF HUMAN IL-23 RECEPTOR (IL-23R) MRNA AND USE OF A DELTA 9 ISOFORM IN PREDICTING INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASESApril 2009March 2012Allow3521YesNo
12392054GENETIC MARKERS OF THE RISK OF DEVELOPING RESTENOSISFebruary 2009April 2011Allow2511NoNo
12370543GENES INVOLVED IN INTESTINAL INFLAMMATORY DISEASES AND USE THEREOFFebruary 2009November 2011Allow3321NoNo
12287505GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS ASSOCIATED WITH MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION, METHODS OF DETECTION AND USES THEREOFOctober 2008February 2010Allow1710NoNo
12220761DETERMINING A PREDISPOSITION TO CANCERJuly 2008August 2010Allow2510NoNo
11913873USE OF A GIP PROMOTER POLYMORPHISMMay 2008June 2011Allow4311YesNo
12102281Method for Typing HLA AllelesApril 2008February 2013Allow5821YesYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HANEY, AMANDA MARIE.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
1
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
70.2%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
13
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(23.1%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
10
(76.9%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
30.8%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 23.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner HANEY, AMANDA MARIE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner HANEY, AMANDA MARIE works in Art Unit 1682 and has examined 103 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 72.8%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 47 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner HANEY, AMANDA MARIE's allowance rate of 72.8% places them in the 36% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by HANEY, AMANDA MARIE receive 2.96 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 86% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HANEY, AMANDA MARIE is 47 months. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +41.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HANEY, AMANDA MARIE. This interview benefit is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 26.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 80.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 71% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 75.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 62.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 67% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 27.2% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 8.0% of allowed cases (in the 86% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.