USPTO Examiner DUTT ADITI - Art Unit 1675

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18686041RECOMBINANT PROTEIN OF NERVE GROWTH FACTOR MUTANT AND USE THEREOFFebruary 2024January 2026Abandon2221NoNo
18540403Methods of Treating a Spastic Disorder in a Subject Having Underlying Condition(s)December 2023February 2025Abandon1421NoNo
18525736NOVEL ANTI-A2AP ANTIBODIES AND USES THEREOFNovember 2023September 2024Allow1011NoNo
18521777Methods of Treating an Optic Disease in a SubjectNovember 2023November 2025Abandon2421NoYes
18455179Methods of Treating Cervical Dystonia in a Subject Having Underlying Condition(s)August 2023December 2025Abandon2831NoNo
18359633Methods of Treating or Preventing Migraine or Repetitive Occurrence of Common Migraine Headaches in a Subject Having Underlying Condition(s)July 2023January 2025Abandon1831NoNo
17853108ANTI-SECRETOGRANIN III (SCG3) ANTIBODIES AND USES THEREOFJune 2022March 2026Abandon4501NoNo
17850383CGRP ANTAGONISTS AND CLOSTRIDIAL DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEUROPSYCHIATRIC AND NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERSJune 2022January 2026Abandon4201NoNo
17686734INCREASING ATOH1 LIFE TO DRIVE SENSORINEURAL HAIR CELL DIFFERENTIANTIONMarch 2022January 2026Allow4610NoNo
17613310NOROVIRUS-BINDING PEPTIDENovember 2021September 2025Allow4601YesNo
17481528Method of Treating Peripheral Nerve DisordersSeptember 2021April 2025Abandon4301NoNo
17391990COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING CORONAVIRUS NEUTRALIZATION TITERSAugust 2021March 2025Abandon4301NoNo
17384408SINGLE CHAIN INTRABODIES THAT ALTER HUNTINGTIN MUTANT DEGRADATIONJuly 2021January 2026Allow5411YesNo
17242780ANTIBODY BASED REAGENTS THAT SPECIFICALLY RECOGNIZE NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE RELATED FORMS OF THE PROTEIN TDP-43April 2021January 2025Allow4510YesNo
17126351METHOD OF EFFECTING NEUROPROTECTION USING SOLUBLE NEUREGULIN ISOFORMSDecember 2020December 2025Abandon6021NoNo
17051635ANTI-CARBONIC ANHYDRASE IX ANTIBODYOctober 2020April 2025Allow5411YesNo
17051413TREATMENT OF MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASIS BY INHIBITION OF AMYLOID PRECURSOR PROTEIN CLEAVAGEOctober 2020November 2024Abandon4821NoNo
17041050METHOD FOR DIFFERENTIATING MOTOR NEURONS FROM TONSIL-DERIVED MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLSSeptember 2020September 2025Abandon6031NoNo
17013974METHODS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION, ASSESSMENT, PREVENTION, AND TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND DISEASESSeptember 2020June 2025Abandon5721NoNo
17012159METHOD OF EFFECTING NEUROPROTECTION USING SOLUBLE NEUREGULIN ISOFORMSSeptember 2020January 2025Allow5211NoNo
16769743ANTIBODIES, COMPOSITIONS FOR USE IN DETECTING OR CAPTURING A POLYPEPTIDE IN A SAMPLE, AND METHODS FOR DETECTING OR CAPTURING A POLYPEPTIDE IN A SAMPLEJune 2020May 2025Allow6031NoNo
16768187BODY FLUID ANTIBODY BIOMARKER FOR HIGHLY SENSITIVE DETECTION OF RISK OF ONSET OF CEREBRAL INFARCTIONMay 2020August 2025Allow6041YesNo
16755312SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING RETINAL PROGENITORSApril 2020October 2024Allow5421NoNo
16782094CLADRIBINE REGIMEN FOR TREATING MULTIPLE SCLEROSISFebruary 2020February 2023Allow3611NoNo
16634869PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTING OR TREATING NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE, CONTAINING, AS ACTIVE INGREDIENTS, CYCLODEXTRIN AND STEM CELLS IN WHICH VEGF IS OVEREXPRESSEDJanuary 2020September 2025Abandon6051YesNo
16612141GUT MICROBIOME FUNCTION PREDICTS RESPONSE TO ANTI-INTEGRIN BIOLOGIC THERAPY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASESNovember 2019June 2025Abandon6031YesNo
16512278STEM CELL MODEL OF APOE GENOTYPE AND Abeta42-DEPENDENT NEURODEGENERATION AND METHODS OF USING THE SAMEJuly 2019November 2024Abandon6031NoNo
16457267MONOVALENT BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER SHUTTLE MODULESJune 2019July 2021Allow2411YesNo
16447106RE-USE OF ENZYMES IN IN VITRO GLYCOENGINEERING OF ANTIBODIESJune 2019December 2024Allow6031YesNo
16329659METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR SPINAL CORD CELLSFebruary 2019December 2025Abandon6071NoNo
16119656CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE 5 (CDK5) INHIBITORY PEPTIDESAugust 2018April 2025Allow6041YesNo
15781681COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INTERNALIZING ENZYMESJune 2018June 2025Abandon6071YesNo
15772572METHOD FOR VACCINATION AGAINST A SELF-ANTIGEN IN A HUMAN PATIENTMay 2018March 2025Allow6051YesYes
15768736MICROFLUIDIC MODEL OF THE BLOOD BRAIN BARRIERApril 2018May 2025Abandon6070NoNo
15352289DEVELOPMENT OF SPINAL CORD ON A MICROFLUIDIC CHIPNovember 2016February 2024Allow6070YesNo
15352249MODULATING THE PRODUCTION OF NEURONS AND/OR OLIGODENDROCYTES FROM WHITE MATTER PROGENITOR CELLSNovember 2016June 2019Allow3121YesNo
15034766VH4 ANTIBODIES AGAINST GRAY MATTER NEURON AND ASTROCYTEMay 2016September 2018Abandon2831NoNo
15012141SCREENING METHODS FOR COGNITIVE ENHANCERSFebruary 2016August 2017Allow1910YesNo
14863541CELLULAR TRANSPLANT SITESeptember 2015June 2019Allow4431YesNo
14505845IN VITRO MODEL FOR NEURONAL DEATHOctober 2014August 2016Allow2211YesNo
14122116VEGF-D/VEGFR2/3-Mediated Regulation of DendritesNovember 2013June 2016Allow3021YesNo
13975414PEPTIDES AND METHODS USING SAME FOR DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF AMYLOID-ASSOCIATED DISEASEAugust 2013November 2014Allow1511YesNo
13841351Sp35 Antibodies and Uses ThereofMarch 2013March 2015Allow2421YesNo
13718788TREATING NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERSDecember 2012June 2017Allow5431YesYes
13595130USE OF ENDOGENOUS ANTIOXIDANT PROTEINS IN THE TREATMENT OF STROKEAugust 2012September 2017Allow6041YesNo
13400244CYTOKINE ANTAGONISTS FOR NEUROLOGICAL AND NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISORDERSFebruary 2012October 2012Allow700YesNo
13364504SCREENING METHODS FOR COGNITIVE ENHANCERSFebruary 2012February 2014Allow2511YesNo
13128004DENDRITIC CELL MODULATION IN POST-ISCHEMIC WOUNDSNovember 2011September 2015Allow5321YesNo
13181387COMPOSITION COMPRISING VARIOUS PROTEORHODOPSINS AND/OR BACTERIORHODOPSINS AND USE THEREOFJuly 2011October 2012Allow1511YesNo
13018300HUMAN G-PROTEIN CHEMOKINE RECEPTOR HSATU68January 2011September 2014Allow4321YesNo
12223197Method for the Treatment and/or Prophylaxis of Multiple Sclerosis, and Use of Erythropoietin for the Manufacture of a Medicament for the Intermittent Treatment and/or Intermittent Prophylaxis of Multiple SclerosisJanuary 2011September 2015Allow6031YesNo
12601803APROTININ-LIKE POLYPEPTIDES FOR DELIVERING AGENTS CONJUGATED THERETO TO TISSUESAugust 2010February 2016Allow6031YesNo
12450515ISOLATED POPULATION OF CELLS AND METHODS OF GENERATING AND USING SAMEMay 2010March 2015Allow6021NoNo
12767164REGENERATION AND NEOGENESIS OF RETINAL PHOTORECEPTOR CELL USING OTX2 GENEApril 2010January 2012Allow2111NoNo
12730587Biomarkers for Assessing Peripheral Neuropathy Response to Cancer TreatmentMarch 2010November 2016Allow6051NoNo
12714068USE OF SCF AND G-CSF IN THE TREATMENT OF CEREBRAL ISCHEMIA AND NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERSFebruary 2010April 2013Allow3810NoNo
12688287NEUREGULINS FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DAMAGE FROM ACUTE ASSAULT ON VASCULAR AND NEURONAL TISSUE AND AS REGULATORS OF NEURONAL STEM CELL MIGRATIONJanuary 2010July 2011Allow1820YesNo
12688351NEUREGULINS FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DAMAGE FROM ACUTE ASSAULT ON VASCULAR AND NEURONAL TISSUE AND AS REGULATORS OF NEURONAL STEM CELL MIGRATIONJanuary 2010May 2011Allow1610YesNo
12590989PROTEIN MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH BONE MARROW STEM CELL DIFFERENTIATION INTO EARLY PROGENITOR DENDRITIC CELLSNovember 2009September 2012Allow3421NoNo
12568661METHODS TO FACILITATE TRANSMISSION OF LARGE MOLECULES ACROSS THE BLOOD-BRAIN, BLOOD-EYE, AND BLOOD-NERVE BARRIERSOctober 2009March 2012Allow3011YesNo
12305088IN VITRO MULTIPARAMETER DETERMINATION METHOD FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISORDERSSeptember 2009August 2014Allow6031YesYes
12458163PEPTIDES DIRECTED FOR DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF AMYLOID-ASSOCIATED DISEASESJuly 2009December 2010Allow1710NoNo
12474229DISC-1 PATHWAY ACTIVATORS IN THE CONTROL OF NEUROGENESISMay 2009December 2011Allow3102YesNo
12437167EYE-DROP VACCINE CONTAINING COPOLYMER 1 FOR THERAPEUTIC IMMUNIZATIONMay 2009July 2014Allow6021YesYes
12406925HUMAN BRAIN CARBOXYPEPTIDASE BMarch 2009February 2011Allow2311YesNo
12368838MODULATING THE PRODUCTION OF NEURONS AND/OR OLIGODENDROCYTES FROM WHITE MATTER PROGENITOR CELLSFebruary 2009September 2014Allow6041YesNo
12359851NEUREGULINS FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DAMAGE FROM ACUTE ASSAULT ON VASCULAR AND NEURONAL TISSUE AND AS REGULATORS OF NEURONAL STEM CELL MIGRATIONJanuary 2009September 2014Allow6031YesNo
12359773NEUREGULINS FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DAMAGE FROM ACUTE ASSAULT ON VASCULAR AND NEURONAL TISSUE AND AS REGULATORS OF NEURONAL STEM CELL MIGRATIONJanuary 2009June 2014Allow6051YesNo
12353196METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING SUBSTANCES FOR THE TREATMENT OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASEJanuary 2009September 2010Allow2020YesNo
12263939METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIANovember 2008September 2011Allow3511YesNo
12253428STIMULATING NEURITE OUTGROWTH USING TCTEX-1-RELATED POLYPEPTIDESOctober 2008January 2012Allow3901YesNo
11814906METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIASeptember 2008August 2011Allow4921YesNo
12177100ASSAY FOR PARKINSON'S DISEASE THERAPEUTICSJuly 2008May 2011Allow3421NoNo
12143202CELLS AND METHODS FOR ESTIMATION OF EFFECTS ON NEUROLOGICAL DYSFUNCTIONJune 2008September 2009Allow1500NoNo
12136509USE OF EPO RECEPTOR ACTIVATION OR STIMULATION FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE EDSS SCORE IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSISJune 2008June 2015Allow6061YesNo
12080212STEM CELL FACTOR-LIKE PROTEINS AND USES THEREOFApril 2008October 2009Allow1800NoNo
12042165DIRS1 POLYPEPTIDESMarch 2008December 2009Allow2101NoNo
12065523Method for Quantifying a Cholinergic Neurotoxin in a SampleMarch 2008July 2015Allow6031YesNo
11569862COMPOSITION COMPRISING VARIOUS PROTEORHODOPSINS AND/OR BACTERIORHODOPSINS AND USE THEREOFDecember 2007March 2011Allow5121YesNo
11892036SP35 ANTIBODIES AND USES THEREOFAugust 2007June 2013Allow6051YesNo
11891335METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR NEURAL MAINTENANCE AND REGENERATIONAugust 2007September 2012Allow6020NoNo
11571479OPTIMIZED INTERFERON-BETA GENEJune 2007August 2009Allow3221NoNo
11687302DOSING REGIMENS FOR NEURAL STEM CELL PROLIFERATING AGENTS AND DIFFERENTIATING AGENTS FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERSMarch 2007November 2011Allow5661YesNo
11601799METHODS TO FACILITATE TRANSMISSION OF LARGE MOLECULES ACROSS THE BLOOD-BRAIN, BLOOD-EYE, AND BLOOD-NERVE BARRIERSNovember 2006August 2009Allow3311YesNo
11514352NEUREGULINS FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF DAMAGE FROM ACUTE ASSAULT ON VASCULAR AND NEURONAL TISSUE AND AS REGULATORS OF NEURONAL STEM CELL MIGRATIONSeptember 2006June 2010Allow4542YesNo
11484719METHODS AND KITS FOR DIAGNOSING AND TREATING MENTAL RETARDATIONJuly 2006August 2009Allow3731NoNo
11428122TCTEX-1-RELATED POLYPEPTIDESJune 2006May 2008Allow2311NoNo
11479173DUAL BENEFICIAL EFFECT OF DOPAMINE ENHANCING AND NEUROPROTECTIVE ACTIONS OF PKC DELTA INHIBITORS FOR TREATMENT OF PARKINSON'S DISEASEJune 2006September 2013Allow6021YesNo
11473196PREVENTION OF DEFICITS IN NEUROGENESIS WITH ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTSJune 2006March 2011Allow5742NoYes
11446875ANTI-TRKB MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND USES THEREOFJune 2006November 2009Allow4211NoNo
11442314CELLS AND METHODS FOR ESTIMATION OF EFFECTS ON NEUROLOGICAL DYSFUNCTIONMay 2006April 2008Allow2221NoNo
11359489METHOD OF DETECTING OR DIAGNOSING OF A NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE OR CONDITIONFebruary 2006March 2010Allow4941YesNo
11336237PRESERVING HYPOXIC TISSUEJanuary 2006June 2010Allow5321NoYes
11334081STEM CELL FACTOR-LIKE PROTEINS AND USES THEREOFJanuary 2006January 2008Allow2411NoNo
10559784Method for producing retinal neurocyte from neural stem cell derived from iris tissueDecember 2005August 2013Allow6041NoNo
10559783Method for producing tissue cells from pluripotent stem cells derived from iris pigment epithelial cells of animal and tissue cell obtained by methodDecember 2005April 2014Allow6081YesNo
11290293METHOD OF DIMINISHING THE SYMPTOMS OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASENovember 2005August 2009Allow4541YesNo
11283005ANTIBODIES TO PROTEIN MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH BONE MARROW STEM CELL DIFFERENTIATION INTO EARLY PROGENITOR DENDRITIC CELLSNovember 2005August 2009Allow4531NoNo
11262528CYTOKINE ANTAGONISTS FOR NEUROLOGICAL AND NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISORDERSOctober 2005December 2011Allow6042YesNo
10549707MONOCYTE-ORIGIN MULTIPOTENT CELL MOMCOctober 2005May 2010Allow5661YesYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner DUTT, ADITI.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
3
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
3
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
91.5%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
13
Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(23.1%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
10
(76.9%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
30.8%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 23.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner DUTT, ADITI - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner DUTT, ADITI works in Art Unit 1675 and has examined 106 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 87.7%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 51 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner DUTT, ADITI's allowance rate of 87.7% places them in the 67% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by DUTT, ADITI receive 2.64 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 77% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DUTT, ADITI is 51 months. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +20.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by DUTT, ADITI. This interview benefit is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 26.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 40.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 133.3% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 81.2% of appeals filed. This is in the 74% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 61.5% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 64.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 69% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 12.3% of allowed cases (in the 95% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 4.3% of allowed cases (in the 78% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.