USPTO Examiner SPEED DEQUANTARIUS JAVON - Art Unit 1663

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17904632GLYCOSYLTRANSFERASES, POLYNUCLEOTIDES ENCODING THESE AND METHODS OF USEMay 2024February 2026Abandon4201NoNo
18582845GENE BHLH35 FOR PROMOTING ANTHOCYANIN ACCUMULATION OF PLANTS AND APPLICATION THEREOFFebruary 2024February 2026Allow2320YesNo
18486766METHOD FOR TERRESTRIAL CARBON SEQUESTRATIONOctober 2023June 2025Abandon2001NoNo
18282642AGENT FOR INCREASING EXPRESSION OF GENE AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS ACTIVATING AGENTSeptember 2023November 2025Abandon2601NoNo
18458027USE OF MULTIGENE STACKING METHOD IN SYNTHESIS OF NERVONIC ACID IN BRASSICA NAPUSAugust 2023November 2025Abandon2720NoNo
18309979USE OF RNA TO TREAT XYLELLA FASTIDIOSA INFECTION IN PLANTSMay 2023June 2025Abandon2511NoNo
18309482TEA PLANT CsFAAH6 GENE AND USE THEREOFApril 2023December 2024Allow2010YesNo
18032129ENGINEERING INCREASED SUBERIN LEVELS BY ALTERING GENE EXPRESSION PATTERNS IN A CELL-TYPE SPECIFIC MANNERApril 2023March 2026Allow3511YesNo
18174103GENE-EDITING IN CANNABIS PLANTFebruary 2023March 2026Abandon3711NoNo
18108996Plastid-transgene-encoded nuclear gene silencingFebruary 2023February 2026Abandon3611NoNo
18154861METHOD AND BIOLOGICAL AGENT FOR CATALYZING ESTERIFICATION OF PLANT FREE CAROTENOIDS AND TRANSGENIC PLANTJanuary 2023June 2025Allow2911YesNo
18004243SPOTTED WILT DISEASE RESISTANCE GENE RTSW FROM TOBACCO AND USE THEREOFJanuary 2023May 2025Allow2810YesNo
18010819Powdery Mildew Resistant Grapevine PlantDecember 2022January 2026Allow3721YesNo
18009795GENE ENCODING CYTOCHROME P450 AND USE THEREOFDecember 2022January 2026Allow3711YesNo
17907040GENOME EDITING IN SUNFLOWERSeptember 2022May 2025Abandon3102NoNo
17905591NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULES, POLYPEPTIDES HAVING EPOXY GROUP-REMOVING CATALYTIC ACTIVITY AND USE THEREOFSeptember 2022January 2026Allow4121YesNo
17896596Method For Organically Planting DendrobiumAugust 2022April 2025Allow3110YesNo
17774705Cinnamomum Burmannii Monoterpene Synthase CBTPS1, Related Biomaterial Thereof And Application ThereofMay 2022March 2026Allow4631YesNo
17634694ALTERATION OF FLAVOR TRAITS IN CONSUMER CROPS VIA DISABLEMENT OF THE MYROSINASE/GLUCOSINOLATE SYSTEMFebruary 2022July 2025Allow4122YesNo
17609723SELF-COMPATIBILITY IN CULTIVATED POTATONovember 2021February 2026Allow5122YesNo
16967390METHOD OF PRODUCING TRANSFORMED PLANT CELLS, CONTAINING RECOMBINANT HUMAN ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE, AND THE USE OF SAID TRANSFORMED PLANT CELLS, CONTAINING RECOMBINANT HUMAN ALKALINE PHOSPHATASEAugust 2020December 2025Abandon6021NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner SPEED, DEQUANTARIUS JAVON - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SPEED, DEQUANTARIUS JAVON works in Art Unit 1663 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 50.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 10000 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SPEED, DEQUANTARIUS JAVON's allowance rate of 50.0% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SPEED, DEQUANTARIUS JAVON receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 50% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SPEED, DEQUANTARIUS JAVON is 10000 months. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +100.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SPEED, DEQUANTARIUS JAVON. This interview benefit is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 74% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 2% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 3% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.