Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17255132 | METHODS FOR SELECTING TRANSFORMED PLANTS | December 2020 | May 2023 | Abandon | 28 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 17251652 | INCREASING PLANT GROWTH AND YIELD BY USING A RING/U-BOX SUPERFAMILY PROTEIN | December 2020 | May 2023 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17115410 | POLYNUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES AND PROTEINS ENCODED THEREBY USEFUL FOR MODIFYING PLANT CHARACTERISTICS | December 2020 | March 2024 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 15734859 | METHODS OF IDENTIFYING, SELECTING, AND PRODUCING SOUTHERN CORN RUST RESISTANT CROPS | December 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17090334 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR RNA-ENCODED DNA-REPLACEMENT OF ALLELES | November 2020 | December 2023 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17086577 | Corn Plant Event MON87460 and Compositions and Methods for Detection Thereof | November 2020 | July 2024 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 16958098 | BARLEY WITH INCREASED HYDROLYTIC ENZYME ACTIVITY | June 2020 | April 2025 | Allow | 57 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner SHARMA, SANTOSH works in Art Unit 1663 and has examined 7 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 71.4%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 38 months.
Examiner SHARMA, SANTOSH's allowance rate of 71.4% places them in the 36% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by SHARMA, SANTOSH receive 1.43 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 20% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SHARMA, SANTOSH is 38 months. This places the examiner in the 28% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +66.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SHARMA, SANTOSH. This interview benefit is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 2% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 3% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.