USPTO Examiner CHERNYSHEV OLGA N - Art Unit 1649

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17113559p53 Peptides as Markers in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Alzheimer's DiseaseDecember 2020January 2023Allow2540YesNo
17104886METHODS FOR AIDING IN THE HYPERACUTE DIAGNOSIS AND DETERMINATION OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY IN A HUMAN SUBJECT USING EARLY BIOMARKERSNovember 2020May 2024Allow4120YesNo
17099668METHODS FOR AIDING IN THE DETERMINATION OF WHETHER TO PERFORM IMAGING ON A HUMAN SUBJECT WHO HAS SUSTAINED OR MAY HAVE SUSTAINED AN INJURY TO THE HEAD USING EARLY BIOMARKERSNovember 2020May 2024Allow4220YesNo
17095695METHODS FOR AIDING IN THE HYPERACUTE DIAGNOSIS AND DETERMINATION OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY USING EARLY BIOMARKERS ON AT LEAST TWO SAMPLES FROM THE SAME HUMAN SUBJECTNovember 2020May 2024Allow4220YesNo
17093251METHODS OF TREATING PRADER WILLI SYNDROME AND CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH LOW BASAL METABOLIC RATE OR HYPERPHAGIA USING A KATP CHANNEL OPENERNovember 2020October 2023Abandon3510NoNo
17084568METHODS FOR AIDING IN DIAGNOSING AND EVALUATING A MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY IN A HUMAN SUBJECT USING CARDIAC TROPONIN I AND EARLY BIOMARKERSOctober 2020November 2023Allow3610YesNo
17081013USE OF AKT PHOSPHORYLATION AS A BIOMARKER FOR PROGNOSING NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES AND TREATING SAMEOctober 2020August 2023Allow3320NoNo
17080180METHODS OF TREATING PRADER-WILLI SYNDROMEOctober 2020December 2023Allow3811NoNo
17078678IN VITRO DETECTION OF PRIONSOctober 2020January 2023Allow2741YesNo
17046116QUANTIFICATION OF BIOMARKERS PRESENT IN DRIED PHYSIOLOGICAL SAMPLESOctober 2020June 2024Allow4431YesNo
17046119QUANTIFICATION OF BIOMARKERS PRESENT IN PHYSIOLOGICAL SAMPLESOctober 2020June 2024Allow4431YesNo
16982494PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTING OR TREATING NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES COMPRISING COX2 ACETYLATING AGENT AS ACTIVE INGREDIENTSeptember 2020October 2023Allow3721NoNo
16979822DETECTION OF PHOSPHO-SERINE 129 ALPHA-SYNUCLEIN IN BLOOD CELLS AS A BIOMARKER FOR SYNUCLEINOPATHIESSeptember 2020May 2023Abandon3201NoNo
16978244DETECTION OF PATHOLOGICAL PROTEIN AGGREGATIONSeptember 2020August 2023Allow3521YesNo
17011374ALPHA-SYNUCLEIN DETECTION USING BEADSSeptember 2020April 2021Allow710NoNo
17005892NOVEL NERVOUS SYSTEM-SPECIFIC TRANSMEMBRANE PROTEASOME COMPLEX THAT MODULATES NEURONAL SIGNALING THROUGH EXTRACELLULAR SIGNALING VIA BRAIN ACTIVITY PEPTIDESAugust 2020December 2023Allow4011NoNo
16986904INNATE IMMUNE PROTEINS AS BIOMARKERS FOR CNS INJURYAugust 2020August 2023Abandon3611NoNo
16938736METHODS OF TREATING COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTJuly 2020November 2023Allow4030NoNo
16961995DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS BASED ON AMINE CONTAINING METABOTYPESJuly 2020March 2024Abandon4410NoNo
16959990SEPTAPEPTIDES ASSOCIATED WITH NEURODEGENERACYJuly 2020December 2023Abandon4221NoNo
16916809NT-proANP AND NT-proBNP FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF STROKEJune 2020March 2024Abandon4531YesNo
16913394Prognostic and Diagnostic Glycan-Based Biomarkers of Brain DamageJune 2020December 2022Abandon3011NoNo
16909881ANTI-HUMAN NGF ANTIBODIES AND METHODS USING SAMEJune 2020January 2023Allow3031NoNo
16904023DIAGNOSIS OF A NEUROAUTOIMMUNE DISEASEJune 2020February 2022Allow2000NoNo
16893266BIOMARKERS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF SEIZURES AND EPILEPSYJune 2020October 2022Allow2941YesNo
16889771METHODS OF ASSESSING FUTURE MEMORY LOSS BY MEASURING POLYUNSATURATED FATTY ACIDSJune 2020November 2022Abandon3020YesNo
16884768DELTA-2-TUBULIN AS A BIOMARKER AND THERAPEUTIC TARGET FOR PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHYMay 2020September 2023Allow3942NoYes
16885102SCREENING METHODS USING CANINE T2R RECEPTORS AND PET FOOD PRODUCTS AND COMPOSITIONS IDENTIFIED USING THE SAMEMay 2020May 2022Abandon2330NoNo
16881052Method For Detecting Bodily Adhesions By Identifying Markers In Circulating CellsMay 2020April 2024Abandon4731NoNo
16764431METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF LYSOSOMAL FUNCTION AND TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASEMay 2020May 2022Abandon2411NoNo
16762794METHODS FOR EVALUATING AND IMPROVING COGNITIVE FUNCTIONMay 2020April 2024Allow4731NoNo
16761350DENDRITIC CELL RECRUITMENT FROM BLOOD TO BRAIN IN NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASEMay 2020November 2023Abandon4220NoNo
16863429METHODS FOR TREATING INFLAMMATIONApril 2020October 2022Abandon2921NoNo
16861330COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT DURING NON-ACUTE PERIODS FOLLOWING CNS NEUROLOGICAL INJURYApril 2020October 2022Allow3020NoNo
16860713COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TREATMENT OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERApril 2020September 2021Abandon1721YesNo
16860239TREATMENT OF MOST BOTHERSOME SYMPTOM (MBS) ASSOCIATED WITH MIGRAINE USING ANTI-CGRP ANTIBODIESApril 2020April 2023Abandon3531NoNo
16852755INHIBITION OF AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER USING DECOY ANTIGENS TO MATERNAL BRAIN-REACTIVE ANTIBODIESApril 2020February 2022Allow2210YesNo
16755303METHOD OF SCREENING COMPOUNDS FOR TREATING CNS DISORDERSApril 2020March 2024Abandon4741NoNo
16846065GENE THERAPIES FOR LYSOSOMAL DISORDERSApril 2020January 2024Allow4521NoNo
16840664TREATMENT OF MOOD AND STRESS RELATED DISORDERSApril 2020October 2023Abandon4231YesNo
16753295USE OF ANTI-FAMILY WITH SEQUENCE SIMILARITY 19, MEMBER A5 ANTIBODIES FOR THE TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSIS OF MOOD DISORDERSApril 2020April 2024Allow4831YesNo
16651860METHOD OF TREATING ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMEMarch 2020April 2024Allow4841NoNo
16829917Serum Biomarker Screen for the Diagnosis of Clinical and Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseMarch 2020May 2022Abandon2510NoNo
16630045BIOMARKER FOR COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION DISEASE AND METHOD FOR DETECTING COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION DISEASE USING BIOMARKERMarch 2020September 2022Allow3241YesNo
16810319METHODS OF TREATING AL AMYLOIDOSISMarch 2020November 2022Abandon3231YesNo
16793208TREATMENT OF HEADACHE USING ANTI-CGRP ANTIBODIESFebruary 2020December 2022Allow3430NoNo
16787938OPTIMIZED MINI-DYSTROPHIN GENES AND EXPRESSION CASSETTES AND THEIR USEFebruary 2020March 2021Allow1310NoNo
16788123ANTI-NEURODEGENERATIVE THERAPEUTIC, METHOD OF MANUFACTURE, AND USEFebruary 2020July 2023Allow4141NoNo
16635752METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING RISK OF AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERJanuary 2020September 2024Abandon5551YesNo
16779229PREDICTING SUICIDALITY USING A COMBINED GENOMIC AND CLINICAL RISK ASSESSMENTJanuary 2020November 2021Abandon2201NoNo
16775811IPTG-FREE INDUCTION PROCESS FOR EXPRESSION OF BIOSIMILAR RHU RANIBIZUMAB ANTIBODY FRAGMENT USING E. COLIJanuary 2020October 2022Allow3230YesNo
16736937TREATMENT OF MEDICATION OVERUSE HEADACHE USING ANTI-CGRP OR ANTI-CGRP-R ANTIBODIESJanuary 2020February 2024Abandon4951YesNo
16736925ACUTE TREATMENT AND RAPID TREATMENT OF HEADACHE USING ANTI-CGRP ANTIBODIESJanuary 2020December 2022Allow3531YesNo
16733663GPR156 Variants And Uses ThereofJanuary 2020June 2021Allow1820NoYes
16726427COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS USING AN ENDOTHELIN-B RECEPTOR AGONISTDecember 2019November 2023Abandon4641NoNo
16716095ASTROCYTE TRAUMATOME AND NEUROTRAUMA BIOMARKERSDecember 2019October 2021Allow2220YesNo
16713425MULTI-PROTEIN BIOMARKER ASSAY FOR BRAIN INJURY DETECTION AND OUTCOMEDecember 2019August 2022Allow3331YesNo
16622287IL-10, S100B AND H-FABP MARKERS AND THEIR USE IN DETECTING TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURYDecember 2019May 2023Abandon4111NoNo
16700750COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR NEURALGENESISDecember 2019December 2022Allow3741YesNo
16618262BIOMARKER FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASENovember 2019August 2022Abandon3221YesNo
16698363MARKERS AND THEIR USE IN BRAIN INJURYNovember 2019April 2022Abandon2921YesNo
16695717METHODS FOR DIAGNOSING HUNTINGTON�S DISEASENovember 2019August 2023Abandon4450YesNo
16696941MEMORY IN SUBJECTS WITH MINI-MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION OF 24-26November 2019March 2022Allow2821NoNo
16693461MUTANT PROTEINS AND METHODS FOR THEIR PRODUCTIONNovember 2019October 2022Abandon3421NoNo
16615044COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING COGNITIONNovember 2019October 2023Abandon4750YesNo
16688650ANIMAL MODEL OF A MOOD DISORDER AND SCREENING METHODNovember 2019August 2022Abandon3321NoNo
16685041METHOD FOR PRODUCING REFOLDED RECOMBINANT HUMANIZED RANIBIZUMABNovember 2019August 2022Allow3330YesNo
16685149BIOMARKERS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF SEIZURES AND EPILEPSYNovember 2019February 2023Allow3941NoNo
16677414PRECISION MEDICINE FOR TREATING AND PREVENTING SUICIDALITYNovember 2019October 2022Allow3541YesNo
16610428BLOOD-BASED METHODS FOR DETERMINING A-BETA AMYLOIDOSISNovember 2019April 2024Allow5350YesNo
16609914METHOD FOR DIAGNOSIS OF UNSTABLE ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUESOctober 2019October 2022Abandon3601NoNo
16669629BIOMARKER FOR DIAGNOSING DEPRESSION AND USE OF BIOMARKEROctober 2019August 2020Abandon900NoNo
166696265-HYDROXYTRYPTAMINE 1B RECEPTOR-STIMULATING AGENT FOR USE AS A PROMOTER OF SATELLITE CELLS SELF-RENEWAL AND/OR DIFFERENTIATIONOctober 2019February 2022Allow2710NoNo
16661769METHODS FOR REDUCING POST-OPERATIVE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION (POCD)October 2019August 2021Allow2221YesNo
16658439SCREENING METHODOctober 2019November 2021Allow2420NoNo
16606727CD 14 ANTAGONIST ANTIBODIES FOR TREATING NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASESOctober 2019January 2022Abandon2721NoNo
16575248INHIBITION OF ALPHA5BETA1 INTEGRIN WITH ATN-161 AS A NOVEL THERAPY FOR VASCULAR DEMENTIASeptember 2019June 2023Abandon4551YesNo
16492115METHOD OF IDENTIFYING MALODOR MODULATING COMPOUNDSSeptember 2019May 2023Allow4541NoNo
16489426METHOD OF DIAGNOSIS OF DRUG INDUCED LIVER INJURYAugust 2019January 2024Allow5231YesNo
16489506A NOVEL NERVOUS SYSTEM-SPECIFIC TRANSMEMBRANE PROTEASOME COMPLEX THAT MODULATES NEURONAL SIGNALING THROUGH EXTRACELLULAR SIGNALING VIA BRAIN ACTIVITY PEPTIDESAugust 2019June 2023Abandon4521NoNo
16488011HEXOKINASE 2-SPECIFIC INHIBITORS FOR USE IN ACUTE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM INJURYAugust 2019October 2022Allow3831YesNo
16487332SEROLOGIC ASSAY FOR SILENT BRAIN ISCHEMIAAugust 2019September 2023Abandon4921YesNo
16544383DIAGNOSTIC DRUG AND DIAGNOSTIC METHOD FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASEAugust 2019March 2024Abandon5580YesNo
16486687METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING A BRAIN INJURYAugust 2019July 2021Abandon2311NoNo
16539829BIOMARKER FOR MENTAL DISORDERS INCLUDING COGNITIVE DISORDERS, AND METHOD USING SAID BIOMARKER TO DETECT MENTAL DISORDERS INCLUDING COGNITIVE DISORDERSAugust 2019March 2023Allow4351YesNo
16484272ASSAY FOR PHAGOCYTIC IMMUNE CELL DEFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH AUTISMAugust 2019May 2021Abandon2211NoNo
16534098METHODS, SYSTEMS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR WHOLE BRAIN PROTEOME-BASED TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI) AND ASSOCIATED NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE IMMUNE RESPONSE DIAGNOSTICSAugust 2019August 2022Abandon3630YesNo
16484073ERYTHROCYTE-DERIVED EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES AND PROTEINS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH VESICLES AS BIOMARKERS FOR PARKINSON'S DISEASEAugust 2019January 2023Allow4121NoNo
16483260METABOLIC BIOMARKERS FOR COGNITIVE ABILITYAugust 2019November 2021Allow2721NoNo
16481245NEUROTROPHIN MUTANTS FOR TREATING HEARING LOSS AND OTHER OTIC DISORDERSJuly 2019January 2023Abandon4221YesNo
16481312NEUROTROPHIN MUTANTS AND USE THEREOF FOR TREATING NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES AND DISORDERSJuly 2019April 2022Abandon3301NoNo
16477812COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DIAGNOSING AND TREATING PEROXISOMAL DISEASESJuly 2019January 2024Allow5421NoNo
16474814BIOSENSOR EXHIBITING SENSITIVITY TO TRINITROTOLUENEJune 2019October 2021Allow2821NoNo
16473256METHOD FOR MODIFYING THE THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF DRUGSJune 2019September 2023Abandon5060YesNo
16436867Compositions and Methods for Uncoupling TrkB Receptor from PLC Gamma 1 for the Treatment of Epilepsy and Anxiety-Like DisorderJune 2019May 2021Allow2321NoNo
16435483DIAGNOSTIC AUTOANTIBODY PROFILES FOR THE DETECTION AND DIAGNOSIS OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASESJune 2019July 2022Allow3741YesNo
16467783METHODS OF DIAGNOSING ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RISK OF PROGRESSION TO ALZHEIMER'S DISEASEJune 2019March 2023Allow4531NoNo
16433106CITRULLINATED BRAIN AND NEUROLOGICAL PROTEINS AS BIOMARKERS OF BRAIN INJURY OR NEURODEGENERATIONJune 2019February 2024Allow5680YesYes
16432483THERAPY OF IONIZING RADIATION-INDUCED DISORDERSJune 2019January 2023Abandon4441YesNo
16431559CIRCULATING ASTROCYTES AND MFSD2A AS BIOMARKERSJune 2019March 2021Allow2120YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
17
Examiner Affirmed
12
(70.6%)
Examiner Reversed
5
(29.4%)
Reversal Percentile
46.7%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 29.4% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
126
Allowed After Appeal Filing
21
(16.7%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
105
(83.3%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
20.5%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 16.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N works in Art Unit 1649 and has examined 955 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 35.4%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 34 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N's allowance rate of 35.4% places them in the 7% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N receive 2.30 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 61% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N is 34 months. This places the examiner in the 42% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +47.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CHERNYSHEV, OLGA N. This interview benefit is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 15.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 37.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 47.1% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 42% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 76.1% of appeals filed. This is in the 67% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 61.1% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 63.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 66% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 2.3% of allowed cases (in the 76% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 1.8% of allowed cases (in the 69% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.