USPTO Examiner HOWARD ZACHARY C - Art Unit 1646

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17125903RECOMBINANT ROBO2 PROTEINS, COMPOSITIONS, METHODS AND USES THEREOFDecember 2020September 2023Allow3330NoNo
17253207ANTI-IL-23p19 ANTIBODY AND USE THEREOF IN TREATING DISEASESDecember 2020May 2024Allow4111YesNo
17122243Treatment of Headache, Migraine and/or Photophobia Conditions Using Humanized Anti-PACAP AntibodiesDecember 2020November 2023Allow3511YesNo
17058537METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF PSORIASIS WITH AN ANTI-APO B100 ANTIBODYNovember 2020February 2024Allow3911YesNo
17058508METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND ACCELERATED ATHEROSCLEROSIS WITH AN ANTI-APO B100 ANTIBODYNovember 2020February 2023Allow2711YesNo
16953443A Screening Method for Identifying Anti-PACAP Antibodies or Antibody Fragments Suitable for Use in Treating or Preventing PACAP-Associated Photophobia or Light AversionNovember 2020January 2024Allow3821YesNo
16951650METHODS OF INHIBITING INTEGRIN ALPHA9BETA1 ACTIVITYNovember 2020June 2023Allow3121NoNo
16951458FLT3L-FC FUSION PROTEINSNovember 2020May 2021Allow610NoNo
17083917METHODS FOR ALTERING BODY COMPOSITION BY ADMINISTERING ANTI-PRO/LATENT MYOSTATIN ANTIBODIESOctober 2020January 2024Allow3931NoNo
17051678USE OF EPITHELIAL MEMBRANE PROTEIN 2 [EMP2] TARGETING AGENTS IN TREATING LUNG DISORDERSOctober 2020September 2023Allow3521YesNo
17080626ANTAGONISTIC CD40 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND USES IN TREATING IMMUNE RESPONSESOctober 2020October 2021Allow1121NoNo
17050261TREATMENT OF SKIN DISEASES OR DISORDERS BY DELIVERY OF ANTI-OSMRBeta ANTIBODYOctober 2020April 2023Abandon3011NoNo
17049739SELECTING PATIENTS FOR THERAPY WITH ADENOSINE SIGNALING INHIBITORSOctober 2020May 2024Abandon4301NoNo
17071931ANTIBODY THAT BINDS XENOPUS WISE PROTEINOctober 2020March 2023Abandon2920NoNo
17045398SPNS2 NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODYOctober 2020January 2023Allow2811YesNo
17031965METHODS FOR TREATING LATE-ONSET ASTHMA USING BENRALIZUMABSeptember 2020June 2024Abandon4411NoNo
17040468ANTI-BAG3 ANTIBODIES AS THERAPEUTIC REAGENT IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASESeptember 2020August 2022Abandon2310NoNo
17019722ETANERCEPT FORMULATIONS STABILIZED WITH XYLITOLSeptember 2020November 2022Abandon2611NoNo
16957328MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES THAT BIND TRBV9 AND METHODS FOR USING SAME FOR INHIBITING THE T CELL RECEPTOR FOR TREATMENTSeptember 2020October 2022Allow2811YesNo
16978807FHUD2 FUSION PROTEINS FOR THE OUTER MEMBRANE VESICLE (OMV) DELIVERY OF HETEROLOGOUS POLYPETIDES AND IMMUNOGENIC COMPOSITIONS THEREOFSeptember 2020March 2024Allow4311YesNo
16996623METHODS OF LOWERING TRIGLYCERIDE LEVELS WITH AN ANGPTL8-BINDING ANTIBODY OR ANTIGEN-BINDING FRAGMENT THEREOFAugust 2020October 2022Allow2611NoNo
16988257BIOPHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING NUCLEIC ACIDS ENCODING IL-5 BINDING PROTEINSAugust 2020December 2023Allow4120YesNo
16968528IMMUNOMODULATING AND IMMUNOSTIMULATING ECOTIN POLYPEPTIDES FROM SALMONELLA FOR DRUG-DELIVERYAugust 2020May 2022Allow2211YesNo
16985708METHODS FOR TREATING ATOPIC DERMATITIS BY ADMINISTERING AN IL-4R ANTAGONIST ANTIBODYAugust 2020May 2024Allow4511NoNo
16943289METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY WITH FOLLISTATIN POLYPEPTIDESJuly 2020July 2022Allow2310NoNo
16965687ANTI-TIGIT ANTIBODY AND USE THEREOFJuly 2020March 2022Allow2010NoNo
16919124METHODS FOR TREATING PSORIASIS WITH ANTAGONISTIC ANTI-LEPTIN RECEPTOR ANTIBODIESJuly 2020December 2023Abandon4140NoNo
16946483Methods for Using Anti-Myostatin AntibodiesJune 2020April 2022Allow2210NoNo
16909361COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING AND TREATING PATHOLOGICAL FIBROBLAST CELLSJune 2020March 2023Abandon3201NoNo
16954763FGF21 and GLP1 DOUBLE GENE-MODIFIED MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL AND USE IN TREATING A METABOLIC DISEASEJune 2020April 2023Allow3411YesNo
16772917TREATMENT OF MONOGENIC DISEASES WITH AN ANTI-CD45RC ANTIBODYJune 2020February 2023Abandon3211NoNo
16772150ASTROTACTIN1-BASED COMPOSITIONS AND PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONSJune 2020March 2022Allow2111NoNo
16897935NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE RECEPTOR 1 ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USEJune 2020March 2021Allow911YesNo
16891344USING NUCLEIC ACIDS ENCODING NAP-2 POLYPEPTIDES TO IMPROVE CARDIAC FUNCTIONJune 2020April 2022Allow2210NoNo
16888249ANGIOPOIETIN-LIKE PROTEIN 8 POLYPEPTIDE FRAGMENTS AND COMPOSITIONS THEREOFMay 2020May 2022Abandon2301NoNo
16882707METHODS OF INCREASING SATELLITE CELL PROLIFERATION WITH VORINOSTAT OR BOSUTINIBMay 2020April 2022Allow2310NoNo
16760457IMMUNOTHERAPEUTIC METHOD FOR TREATING LUNG CANCER BY ADMINISTERING A POLYPEPTIDE COMPRISING AN EPITOPE OF hZP3April 2020July 2023Allow3921NoNo
16861897NUCLEIC ACIDS ENCODING ANTI-HcTNT-N69 ANTIBODIESApril 2020February 2022Allow2211YesNo
16759331INHIBITION OF OXIDATION-SPECIFIC EPITOPES TO TREAT ISCHEMIC REPERFUSION INJURYApril 2020September 2023Allow4141YesNo
16858154METHODS FOR CARDIAC TISSUE REPAIR WITH COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING CTGFApril 2020October 2022Allow2911YesNo
16851287METHODS FOR TREATING PULMONARY HYPERTENSION WITH A LIGAND BINDING DOMAIN OF A TGF-BETA TYPE II RECEPTORApril 2020July 2023Allow3921NoNo
16755268Compositions and Methods Using a Single-Domain Antibody Binding Transferrin and Protein A for Increasing Protein Half-life in SerumApril 2020August 2022Allow2811YesNo
16838711USE OF SOLUBLE UROKINASE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR RECEPTOR LEVELS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASEApril 2020March 2022Abandon2411NoNo
16829283SYNTHETIC TRUNCATED NORRIN PROTEINMarch 2020September 2021Allow1710YesNo
16648130ANTI-FOLATE RECEPTOR ALPHA ANTIBODY CONJUGATED WITH HEMIASTERLINSMarch 2020April 2024Allow4912YesNo
16818149METHOD FOR TREATING CANCER WITH C-KIT ANTIBODIESMarch 2020February 2022Allow2411NoNo
16646994MELANIN ANTIBODIES AND USES THEREOFMarch 2020May 2023Allow3811YesNo
16816097NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULES ENCODING CLOSTRIDIUM HISTOLYTICUM COLLAGENASE I AND METHODS OF PRODUCING THE SAMEMarch 2020March 2024Allow4811NoNo
16641889USE OF CANAKINUMABFebruary 2020April 2023Abandon3701NoNo
16641897USE OF CANAKINUMABFebruary 2020May 2023Abandon3801NoNo
16798953COMPOSITION FOR TREATING CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE COMPRISING A cDNA ENCODING BMI-1February 2020March 2024Abandon4931NoNo
16798269INTERLEUKIN 15 FUSION PROTEIN FOR TUMOR TARGETING THERAPYFebruary 2020September 2021Allow1921YesNo
16793643ANTIBODIES AGAINST CD38 FOR TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE MYELOMAFebruary 2020September 2023Abandon4311NoNo
16639424Methods Of Treating Cancer By Inhibiting SETD2February 2020December 2023Allow4621NoNo
16787313HUMANIZED ANTI-PACAP ANTIBODIESFebruary 2020December 2020Allow1011NoNo
16787260HUMANIZED ANTI-PACAP ANTIBODIESFebruary 2020October 2020Allow911YesNo
16787294ANTI-PACAP ANTIBODIESFebruary 2020December 2020Allow1021NoNo
16787250HUMANIZED ANTI-PACAP ANTIBODIESFebruary 2020November 2020Allow911NoNo
16637383METHOD FOR PREVENTING OR TREATING ATHEROSCLEROSISFebruary 2020June 2021Abandon1611NoNo
16782015KIT FOR DETECTING CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE COMPRISING AN MAA PROTEIN ADDUCT AND REAGENTS THAT BIND TO ANTIBODIESFebruary 2020September 2022Allow3111YesNo
16635687EXOSOMES DERIVED FROM CORTICAL BONE STEM CELLS CAN AUGMENT HEART FUNCTION AFTER CARDIAC INJURYJanuary 2020March 2024Abandon4921NoNo
16635526ANTI-CD39 ANTIBODIESJanuary 2020January 2022Allow2411YesNo
16748057LONG-ACTING G-CSF FOR PREVENTING NEUTROPENIA OR REDUCING DURATION OF NEUTROPENIAJanuary 2020August 2023Allow4231YesNo
16631756METHOD FOR PREDICTION OF RESPONSE TO CARDIOVASCULAR REGENERATION BASED ON DETECTING THE AMOUNT OF BIOMARKERSJanuary 2020March 2023Allow3821YesNo
16630572BLOCKING GARP CLEAVAGE AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFJanuary 2020May 2022Abandon2801NoNo
16627075PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING PCSK-9 ANTIBODY AND USE THEREOFDecember 2019September 2022Allow3321NoNo
16626071Inhibition of Vascular Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 to Treat Ischemic InjuryDecember 2019January 2022Allow2521NoNo
16723782Chimeric Immunoreceptor Useful in Treating Human CancersDecember 2019November 2021Allow2311NoNo
16714292ANTI-APOC3 ANTIBODIESDecember 2019September 2021Allow2211NoNo
16714294POLYNUCLEOTIDES ENCODING ANTI-APOC3 ANTIBODIESDecember 2019September 2021Allow2211NoNo
16707492METHODS FOR TREATING PATIENTS WITH HETEROZYGOUS FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA (heFH) WITH AN ANTI-PCSK9 ANTIBODYDecember 2019December 2021Allow2421NoNo
16616435CMV Vaccine and Method of Making and Using the SameNovember 2019May 2023Abandon4211NoNo
16616318ANTIBODY-IL2 ENGRAFTED PROTEINS AND METHODS OF USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCERNovember 2019September 2023Allow4631YesNo
16687272A METHOD FOR THE TREATMENT OR PREVENTION OF A DISEASE RELATED TO VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL LIPASE BY ADMINISTERING A HUMANIZED MONOCLONAL ANTIBODYNovember 2019July 2021Allow2011NoNo
16686596ANTAGONISTIC CD40 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND USES THEREOFNovember 2019July 2021Allow2001YesNo
16612958EX VIVO METHOD OF GENERATING SUPER REGULATORY T CELLS FOR THE PREVENTION OF AUTOIMMUNE DISEASENovember 2019February 2023Allow3921YesNo
16611203RESOLVIN MIMETIC ANTIBODIES AND USES THEREOFNovember 2019March 2022Allow2811YesNo
16608519CELLS EXPRESSING A BCMA-TARGETING CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR, AND COMBINATION THERAPY WITH A GAMMA SECRETASE INHIBITOROctober 2019January 2022Abandon2601NoNo
15777666HIV antibody derivatives with dual antiviral and immunomodulatory activities from CD4 and GP41October 2019August 2023Allow6031NoNo
16607066ONCOLYTIC VIROTHERAPY WITH HELPER-DEPENDENT ADENOVIRAL-BASED VECTORS EXPRESSING IMMUNOMODULATORY MOLECULESOctober 2019October 2023Allow4721YesNo
16658965ANTI-APOC3 ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFOctober 2019September 2021Allow2301YesNo
16657287METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING ULCERSOctober 2019July 2021Allow2101NoNo
16657000ANTI-NPR1 ANTIBODIES AND USES THEREOFOctober 2019December 2021Allow2611YesNo
16604378USE OF LAMBDA INTERFERONS IN THE TREATMENT OF OBESITY-RELATED DISORDERS AND RELATED DISEASESOctober 2019June 2024Allow5641YesYes
16592656IL-12 HETERODIMERIC FC-FUSION PROTEINSOctober 2019March 2022Allow3021YesNo
16498586ENGINEERED T-CELL MODULATING MOLECULES AND METHODS OF USING SAMESeptember 2019December 2022Abandon3911NoNo
16498276NEW UNIVERSAL CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR T CELLS SPECIFIC FOR CD22September 2019February 2023Allow4011NoNo
16580603METHODS FOR TREATING INFLAMMATION USING ANTIBODIES TO KALLIDIN AND DES-ARG10-KALLIDINSeptember 2019February 2023Abandon4151NoNo
16580483Anti-CD30 Antibodies and Methods for Treating CD30+ CancerSeptember 2019October 2022Allow3731YesYes
16580625CD30 Bispecific Antibodies and Method of Immunotherapy of CD30+ MalignanciesSeptember 2019January 2023Allow4041NoNo
16496129METHODS OF TREATING CANCER USING ANTI-LRP1 POLYCLONAL ANTIBODIESSeptember 2019May 2022Allow3221YesNo
16496252LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN RECEPTOR RELATED PROTEIN 5 INHIBITION SUPPRESSES TUMOR FORMATIONSeptember 2019September 2022Abandon3621NoNo
16575903METHODS OF TREATMENT OF EOSINOPHILIC BRONCHITIS WITH AN ANTI-IL-5 ANTIBODYSeptember 2019January 2022Allow2821NoNo
16495633ANTI-TMEFF1 ANTIBODIES AND ANTIBODY DRUG CONJUGATESSeptember 2019January 2022Allow2811NoNo
16493888METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR ENHANCING CARDIOMYOCYTE MATURATION AND ENGRAFTMENTSeptember 2019April 2023Allow4311YesNo
16488238IMMUNOGENIC FRAGMENT PEPTIDE OF EN2 PROTEIN OR ANTIBODY COMPOSITION SPECIFICALLY RECOGNIZING SAMEAugust 2019August 2022Allow3521YesNo
16488082ACVR2A-Specific Antibody and Method of Treatment of Muscle AtrophyAugust 2019April 2021Allow2021YesNo
16487051ANTIFIBROTIC ACTIVITY OF CD47 BLOCKADEAugust 2019November 2021Allow2711NoNo
16544356PIP2 AS A MARKER FOR HDL FUNCTION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE RISKAugust 2019March 2021Abandon1911NoNo
16538886ANTIBODIES RECOGNIZING GENETIC VARIANTS OF NT-proBNPAugust 2019February 2022Allow3021YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HOWARD, ZACHARY C.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
4
Examiner Affirmed
2
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
70.0%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
76
Allowed After Appeal Filing
10
(13.2%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
66
(86.8%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
16.7%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 13.2% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner HOWARD, ZACHARY C - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner HOWARD, ZACHARY C works in Art Unit 1646 and has examined 900 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 48.3%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 29 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner HOWARD, ZACHARY C's allowance rate of 48.3% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by HOWARD, ZACHARY C receive 1.68 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 31% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HOWARD, ZACHARY C is 29 months. This places the examiner in the 62% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +51.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HOWARD, ZACHARY C. This interview benefit is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 77% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 1% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 87.9% of appeals filed. This is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 79.3% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 82.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 2.4% of allowed cases (in the 77% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.3% of allowed cases (in the 72% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.